‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home, By: Matt Agorist October 10, 2019

chicago-raids-660x330
(Image credit: CBS 2 Chicago screen capture)

Cops in Chicago are raiding innocent families and terrorizing them — by mistake — and are going through great lengths to cover it up.
chicago

‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home

‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home
Matt Agorist October 10, 2019

Chicago, IL — Because of their gross negligence and incompetence, the city of Chicago is facing a slew of lawsuits for raiding the homes of innocent people — allegedly by mistake. TFTP has reported on several of these lawsuits in which cops raided a four-year-old’s birthday party and held other children at gunpoint. One of these families has even been raided — mistakenly — three times. One family’s recent mistaken raid, however, is exposing a blue wall of silence and showing how far the Chicago police department is willing to go to cover up their crimes.

Over the past few years, the residents of Chicago have been subject to a militarized police state occupation. Innocent family after innocent family each waking up in the middle of the night as heavily armed storm troopers throw flash bangs into their homes, haul them outside in the cold, point guns at their heads, and even handcuff small children. These families are being terrorized in their own homes, many of them left with PTSD, and no one is being held accountable—because the state is the one behind the terror.

And because they are the state, they are refusing to hold themselves accountable and going through great lengths to keep their terror campaign secret.

Some of the latest victims in this state-sponsored police terror campaign are Domonique Wilson and her children. Wilson’s raid has just exposed a troubling problem within the department as well.

Wilson’s home was raided in March by a SWAT team who was acting on the wrong information. Her tiny children had guns pointed at their heads and were placed in handcuffs. They were marched outside like slaves and forced to stand in the freezing wet rain for hours.

“They made me stand up straight and my hands just behind my back, and they had them tight,” said Wilson’s 8-year-old son, Royal Smart.

Wilson said police used excessive force on her children who were clearly afraid for their lives.

“I was worried about my sister most, because she’s only 6 years old,” Royal said. “My legs were shaking.”

After they were wrongly raided and terrorized by police, Wilson said she went to the department to get the body camera footage which she says shows how terribly the cops treated her family. But police refused to turn it over.

CBS 2 News also went to the Chicago police department with a Freedom of Information Act request to get the body camera video, but they refused to honor it.

“What do you believe that body camera footage will show when it comes to your 8-year-old son?” CBS 2’s Dave Savini asked Wilson.

“It’s going to show them placing my 8-year-old son in handcuffs; how scared he was – traumatized.”

“Do you think they’re hiding something?” he asked.

“Yes. They’re hiding that they put rifles to me and my children’s heads,” said Wilson.
When CBS 2 asked police Supt. Eddie Johnson if the department was tracking wrong raids and knew how many times officers got it wrong, he told them that they do track it and they have those numbers. But that was a lie.

As CBS 2 reports:

But it turns out that Johnson and his staff do not have that information. After nearly a year of repeatedly asking for numbers, Chicago Police have admitted to CBS 2 they don’t even keep track of all the times police raid the wrong homes.

Meanwhile, Supt. Eddie Johnson has also refused more than a dozen requests for a one-on-one interview.

His chief communications officer, Anthony Guglielmi, said the superintendent does not have the time, and CBS 2’s ratings are not high enough, for him to do an interview on this topic.

Thus, he refuses to talk about our yearlong investigation and all those impacted by bad traumatizing raid – a refusal while new wrong raids cases keep rolling in.

https://cbsloc.al/2AKgchP?anvt=8

Al Hofeld Jr., whose law office represents multiple families who’ve been wrongfully raided by incompetent Chicago police, held a press conference in July to address this very serious problem.

“There is a silent epidemic of trauma being perpetrated upon the children and families of the South and West sides of our city by Chicago police barreling into the wrong homes, holding guns on children, handcuffing children … ,” Hofeld said.

“Chicago police officers behave as if our children of color and their trauma is collateral damage in Chicago,” said Holfield.

And he’s right. As TFTP reported earlier this year, when Samari Broswell, 7, was celebrating her younger brother, TJ Broswell’s 4th birthday earlier this year, she never expected to see 17 heavily armed cops come smashing through her door. However, thanks to a severe case of police incompetence, that is exactly what happened.

Now, just like Wilson’s family, this family is left traumatized while people who claim to ‘protect’ them instead ignore them and continue the same practice. In the Broswell’s case, police claim video from officer-worn body cameras showing the horrifying raid simply went “missing.”

But that is not all.

Also, just last August, two little boys who used to look up to police were traumatized and their view of police tarnished after a SWAT team burst into their home at night and held the entire family at gunpoint, including the children. The family was innocent and just like the above cases, the raid was on the wrong home.

Those two children now suffer from PTSD and have to attend counseling.

It’s not just children either, Chicago cops have raided the wrong homes of elderly women too.

Elizabeth Harrison, 82, used to tell kids to “respect the law.” Then on March 17, 2016, a gang of Chicago cops raided her home, busting down the door and holding her at gunpoint. Because of this trauma, Harrison had to be rushed to the hospital.

The great-grandmother said police must have had the wrong house, but they insisted it was the correct address based on their “intelligence.” No one believed her when she said she was a widow and lived alone. Harrison was made to sit in a chair, overwhelmed with anxiety, while they searched her home for non-existent drugs. The stress was so overwhelming, Harrison was hospitalized.

Despite this history of dangerous terrorism from raiding wrong homes, it appears Chicago cops aren’t trying to get any better at their jobs and remain entirely unapologetic.

Advertisements

Corrupt kids: A generational stench seeps from the swamp | WND — Truth2Freedom’s Blog

A popular 1930s radio program began with a distinctive voice asking, “Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men.” The answer then followed with an ominous laugh. Referencing the program’s crime-fighting vigilante, the answer came, “The Shadow knows.” For almost two decades, audiences gathered around their radios to listen to The Shadow’s latest […]

via Corrupt kids: A generational stench seeps from the swamp | WND — Truth2Freedom’s Blog

The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Isabelle Z.

AR-15-Rifle-Magazines-1
(Image: The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws)

The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws
Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Isabelle Z.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-ex-cop-testifies-will-not-comply-gun-confiscation.html

(Natural News) A former police officer expressed the sentiment of many Americans when she testified before Congress recently that she won’t comply with gun confiscation laws.

Dianna Muller, who won the ladies title in the 2015 NRA World Shooting Championship, is a 22-year veteran of the Tulsa Police Department. Speaking before the House Judiciary Committee recently, she stated that she would not be participating in an assault weapons ban should one be put in place.

She told the committee: “Please don’t legislate the 150 million people just like me into being criminals.”

She also spoke out on the ban on the bump stocks that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like automatic ones, saying she was forced to decide between complying with the ban or becoming a felon. Should she face a similar question about assault weapons, she said in no uncertain terms that she would not comply.

As a law enforcement officer during the previous assault weapon ban from 1994 to 2004, she said she did not see any impact on safety from the measure, adding that it wouldn’t have been allowed to sunset if it had been effective.

Muller is also the founder of the gun advocacy group The DC Project. Appearing on Fox & Friends shortly after her testimony, she warned that the Second Amendment is at stake and said that gun owners should “get involved and engaged.”

She said that many people in law enforcement agree with her stance and that those in favor of such a ban are throwing around terms such as “weapons of war” simply to stir up emotions.

Muller and other people at the hearing also raised questions about the practicality of such a ban. They said that the differences between the AR-15 and weapons like it, and a standard semi-automatic hunting rifle are merely cosmetic.

Another witness, Heritage Foundation Senior Legal Policy Analyst Amy Swearer, disputed the notion that law-abiding citizens don’t need weapons like AR-15s. She pointed out that her mother, who is a gun novice, struggled to fire a handgun at the range but was far more accurate when she tried an AR-15. Its greater stability makes it easy to handle and fire accurately in tense situations, but it can also be argued that simply brandishing one is often enough to deter would-be criminals from doing harm.

A question of self-defense
Many people who have obtained these weapons legally have done so for self-defense purposes, and several recent cases illustrate how valuable they can be in a life-or-death situation.

For example, a college student was able to scare off two armed burglars simply by holding up an unloaded AR-15 in 2013. That same year, a 15-year-old boy saved his own life and that of his 12-year-old sister when he fended off a pair of home invaders using his father’s AR-15.

When an Illinois man with an AR-15 intervened as a neighbor was attacking a pregnant woman with a knife in Oswego, Illinois, last year, the “intimidation factor” of the rifle was cited as the reason the attacker ultimately dropped his knife.

Muller likely spoke for a lot of gun owners when she said she didn’t plan to comply with laws that amount to gun confiscation, and such a move could well spark an uprising. Most owners of AR-15s and similar weapons hope they never have to use them on another person, but the peace of mind of knowing they can defend themselves and their families from those who want to harm them is something many people are willing to protect at all costs.

Sources for this article include:

TheTruthAboutGuns.com

FoxNews.com

DailySignal.com

Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Ethan Huff

aoc-4
(Image: Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along)

Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along
Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Ethan Huff
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-woman-at-aoc-townhall-demands-everyone-eat-the-babies.html

(Natural News) During a recent town hall event in Corona, New York, her home district, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) responded to questions about her infamous Green New Deal, including from one woman who told AOC that we now need to “eat the babies” in order to save the planet from climate change.

Contending that AOC’s Green New Deal doesn’t go far in enough in addressing global warming, the woman stood up and began ranting about how “we only have a few months left,” and that AOC’s next campaign slogan should be, “We have to start eating babies!”

The woman then proceeded to remove her jacket, revealing a t-shirt that stated on the front of it, “Save the Planet. Eat the Children.”

“We don’t have enough time,” the irate woman continued to tell AOC, who nodded affirmatively in response. “Even if we would bomb Russia, we still have too many people, too much pollution, so we have to get rid of the babies. Just stopping having babies is not enough, we need to eat the babies.”

For more related news, be sure to check out Libtards.news.

Tucker Carlson mocks AOC’s stupidity in failing to denounce the suggestion that we all need to eat human babies to save the planet

AOC’s eventual response to the woman was that, “luckily, we have more than a few months.” AOC continued on to suggest that there are many “positive” solutions to the climate crisis that she hopes to tackle while in office.

The woman’s rantings were quickly picked up by the media, including by Tucker Carlson from Fox News. Carlson broadcast a clip of the incident during a segment of his show, laughing at the sheer lunacy of what the woman was suggesting.

Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: Lab-verified Nascent Iodine solution is a dietary supplement that provides your body with supplemental iodine to help protect your thyroid during radiation exposure. Nuclear accidents such as Fukushima (or nuclear war) can expose your body to radioactive iodine-131, a dangerous radioisotope. Pre-loading your system with stable iodine occupies the iodine receptor sites on your organs, causing your body to naturally expel radioactive iodine you may have been exposed to through air, food, water or milk products. This defensive strategy is recommended by nearly all health authorities, worldwide, including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Discover more at this link.

“Is that real?” Carlson asked with a chuckle. “We don’t know. Was it a swiftian parody? Was it clever trolling of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? Maybe it was. Maybe that’s just someone who believes the rhetoric of the Left.”

Even if it was a joke, what’s not was AOC’s lack of an appropriate response to the woman. Rather than decry her suggestion that we all start eating infant flesh to stop global warming, AOC appeared to be in agreement with it when she gently nodded her head in the affirmative.

“Either way, what didn’t you hear?” Carlson also asked about this anomaly. “That was the most interesting part. If someone said to you, ‘we need to eat the babies,’ wouldn’t your first response be, ‘what?! No, of course not! Eat the babies?!’ That’s the one thing that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez didn’t say. Huh, pretty revealing!”

blob:https://www.brighteon.com/2a966f79-71dc-4a73-af47-bf712e4e8bed

AOC’s Green New Deal would seem to imply that some people need to be killed off to solve “overpopulation”

Perhaps the reason why AOC didn’t have a more appropriate response to the woman from her district who suggested that we all “eat the babies” is the fact that AOC’s Green New Deal does contain provisions that, in order to come about, would require a massive reduction in the world’s population.

Because entitlement spending would go through the roof under AOC’s plan, millions of people would end up suffering in order to accommodate it, leading to what Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore once described as “the end of civilization” as we currently know it.

“The Green New Deal will be the end of civilization if 85% of the world’s and 85% of the US coal, oil and natural gas were phased out over the next few years, like the next ten years,” Carlson stated during an earlier segment of his show about AOC’s plan.

“We do not have anything to replace them with … Half of the population will die in a very short period of time. And as I also pointed out, there wouldn’t be a tree left on this planet … because that would be all there was to heat and cook.”

Sources for this article include:

TheGatewayPundit.com

NaturalNews.com

Once, Twice, or Thrice, It Was Not Enough for Japan to continue poisoning us ever since Fukashima triple melt down in 2011. Fukushima: Storage tanks are full, radioactive waste to be dumped straight into the ocean; Tuesday, October 01, 2019 by: Tracey Watson

Fukushima-Japan-Nuclear-Radiation-Disaster

Fukushima: Storage tanks are full, radioactive waste to be dumped straight into the ocean; Tuesday, October 01, 2019 by: Tracey Watson

(Natural News) Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was commissioned back in 1971 and was one of the world’s largest power stations until double natural disasters in March 2011 caused the second worst nuclear accident in history.

The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), has tried everything to contain the resulting buildup of contaminated groundwater, but recent reports indicate that they have effectively lost the war.

The go-to solution has been to store 1 million tons of the toxic water in 1,000 tanks at the site, but the company has now warned that it will have run out of tank storage by mid-2022. The proposed solution? After going to such great lengths to contain the water because of its toxicity, Tepco is now insisting that it can safely be diluted by being drained into the sea.

What triggered the Fukushima nuclear disaster?
As explained by Encyclopedia Britannica, first the Fukushima area was battered by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake. Then, two days later, a massive, 50-foot tsunami made landfall, damaging the power plant’s backup generators. The three reactors operating at the time were successfully shut down, but the loss of power caused by the generator failure meant the reactors’ cooling systems failed within days. The resulting high temperatures caused the fuel rods to overheat and start to melt, releasing radiation in the process.

Workers pumped cool seawater and boric acid into the units to try to cool them, but it was later discovered that some of the melted material had caused large holes at the bottom of the vessels, partially exposing nuclear material.

Natural News previously reported:

Even though the nuclear disaster in Fukushima took place over seven years ago, radioactive waste has continued to build up as ground water flows through the destroyed reactor buildings and becomes contaminated. This creates a staggering 160 tons of contaminated water each day.

While the purification devices used by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) do remove most of the radioactive materials, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen known as tritium cannot be removed, and tritium-contaminated water continues to cause big problems.

Why the government claims dumping the water in the ocean is a good idea
Officials from both Tepco and the Japanese government now insist that since tritium exists in nature, dumping this water in the ocean is a perfectly safe solution to the problem.

“The only option will be to drain it into the sea and dilute it,” Yoshiaki Harada, a Japanese politician, told a news briefing held in Tokyo recently. “The whole of the government will discuss this, but I would like to offer my simple opinion.”

According to the Guardian, recent studies have found that it would take around 17 years to get contamination levels low enough to meet the plant’s safety standards.

Local fishermen have expressed anger at the idea of toxic water being dumped into the ocean, and South Korea has voiced concerns about the potential impact on the reputation of its own fishing industry.

Meanwhile, there is evidence that Fukushima radiation is already causing harm to animals and marine life as far away as the west coast of the United States:

*Many different types of animals have been found with open wounds and fur loss;

*Large numbers of sea lions have inexplicably died;

*Populations of sockeye salmon are at an all-time low in both Canada and Alaska;

*Fish have been found along the coastline bleeding from the gills, eyes and bellies, for no apparent reason;

*Scientists have detected unusually high levels of cesium-137 in plankton in the Pacific;

*Bluefin tuna have been found to be contaminated with radiation; and

*Scientists in Canada have discovered extremely high levels of nuclear radiation in samples taken from a variety of fish.

Imagine the dire consequences if Tepco starts actively dumping contaminated water directly into the ocean!

Related: Learn more about this threat to the environment at Environ.news.

Sources include:

CounterPunch.org

TheGuardian.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Chaos Continues In Hong Kong; Undercover Cops Pull Guns Amid ‘Aggressive Clearance Operation’


(Photo via Alejandro Alvarez)

Chaos Continues In Hong Kong; Undercover Cops Pull Guns Amid ‘Aggressive Clearance Operation’

by Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/29/2019 – 15:30
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/chaos-continues-hong-kong-undercover-cops-pull-guns-amid-aggressive-clearance

Violence continued in Hong Kong as anti-government demonstrations entered their 17th week. The police response was described by the Washington Post as “among the most aggressive” since the movement began over a now-withdrawn extradition bill which would have allowed China to forcibly move suspects to the mainland for face trial in communist courts.

Protesters destroyed signs and flags raised in advance of the 70th anniversary celebrations of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, some of which were burned. According to WaPo, “At times, riot police appeared outnumbered. Shoppers at a luxury mall in central Hong Kong looked on as police and protesters engaged in a pitched battle. Protesters crouched, created a phalanx of umbrellas and tossed bricks and bottles toward the officers. Police fired round after round of tear gas.”

The protesters inched forward as rubber bullets shredded their umbrellas. When it appeared the police might be outflanked, officers made a hasty retreat. Protesters seized the moment, rushing toward officers piling into police vans. 

Demonstrators, cheered by onlookers and fellow marchers, hit the vans with poles and bottles as the vehicles sped away. The road was littered with glass and spent tear-gas canisters clinked across the asphalt as the protesters continued their march. 

At nightfall in the nearby neighborhood of Wan Chai, residents left their homes and workplaces to jeer at police and pelt their vehicles with bricks and bottles. -Washington Post

barricade
At one point, an undercover cop who was exposed pulled a gun on protesters.
undercover

Several people were seriously injured, including an Indonesian journalist based in Hong Kong who was hit in the eye by a projectile while live-streaming the event for her publication.

...

Street battles broke between protesters and police who struggled to keep the demonstrators at bay with rubber bullets and tear gas. 

Residents and tourists were caught in the crossfire, clutching their faces and running in fear in several areas, including the neon-lit luxury shopping district of Causeway Bay. -Washington Post

In addition to tear gas, authorities deployed water cannons again – spraying protesters with blue die containing an irritant.
smile
Hong Kong police officer sprays reporter

At approximately 5pm, riot police launched an aggressive clearance operation against protesters along Harcourt Road – a frequent location for clashes.

Police pushed young demonstrators to the asphalt road and dragged them away, leaving pools of blood. Hong Kong’s hospital authority said 13 people were admitted to hospitals by 7:30 p.m., including one in serious condition. -Washington Post

standoff-HK

Riot police officers fire tear gas to disperse anti-government protesters after a march in Hong Kong. (Athit Perawongmetha/Reuters)

Arrested protesters were lined up against a wall outside a government building before being frisked and taken away.

station-fire
After one clash, police regrouped and then charged protesters. “Go, go, go,” a commanding officer shouted as dozens of tactical and riot officers sprinted down the street. Officers tackled demonstrators, pinning them to the ground and blocking journalists’ cameras as they made arrests. -Washington Post

Some Red Flags About ‘Red Flag’ Laws

Red-Flag-Laws-Beth-PP-Featured-9-24-19

Some Red Flags About ‘Red Flag’ Laws
Beth Alcazar – 09/24/2019

Some Red Flags About ‘Red Flag’ Laws

A terrible tragedy occurred in my home state of Alabama last month. As reported by the local news, a father and his son were involved in an argument that led to the 70-year-old father shooting his 45-year-old son in the chest in what he claims was self-defense.

Soon afterward, the Alabama chapter of Moms Demand Action shared the news — along with a comment — on social media. They posted:

’Investigators said James Adams and his son, Alfred Dewayne Adams, were involved in an argument Sunday night. They further stated they believe James told Alfred he was going to bed. Alfred then walked into the bedroom and James shot him in the chest. Some of the neighbors and some other family members can tell us about stuff that was happening through [sic] the years.’ This life could have been spared by utilizing a red flag law.

Some Questions

“This life could have been spared by utilizing a red flag law?” That’s quite a statement. And I wanted to post a few questions to Moms Demand Action. First of all, I wanted to ask: If the father truly used a weapon in self-defense, would a “red flag” law have disarmed him … and then spared the life of his violent son? Would the father be dead, then, in this particular situation? Beyond that, do “red flag” laws cover all weapons in the home? What if the suspect had decided to use a knife? Or what about prescription drugs or poisons? Does it cover a person’s bare hands and/or body? Could we confiscate those weapons, as well, whenever we feel there’s “some stuff that was happening through the years?”

Some Examples

And what about the terrible case in which a son killed his father and wounded his mother with a knife? Two months ago, in Arizona, the Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office reported that when the older couple returned home, “they noticed their 33-year-old son had consumed a large amount of beer. The parents argued with him over their drinking concern. He threw his phone at them and then went into the kitchen and grabbed two large knives. When he tried to stab his mother, his father intervened and attempted to restrain him while he was still in the kitchen. The son began attacking his dad. As the struggle moved from the kitchen into the living room, the son was able to stab his dad in the chest. The father collapsed to the floor.”

Or there’s this recent horror story from Illinois: A man in a Chicago suburb was arrested by local police after killing his own mother by stabbing her repeatedly with a samurai sword in the chest. Park Ridge Police had removed the murderer’s firearms two times, with the last time being in July 2019. So the suspect didn’t have a gun … but he still had evil intent. And he used whatever weapon he could find.

There’s also the atrocity from Nevada a few weeks ago in which a 36-year-old man bludgeoned a woman to death with a sledgehammer in what Las Vegas police said was a random attack at a laundromat.

I could go on. But I won’t. Perhaps you see the point.

Some Red Flags

Beyond the fear of just anyone pointing out someone else with a gun for no good reason or people wrongly having their firearms taken from them because of mistaken identity or possibly just being in the wrong place at the wrong time, there are so many red flags about “red flag” laws. Undoubtedly, we’d love to be able to stop crimes and keep bad people from harming or killing others. But this is not the movie Minority Report, in which police can employ some sort of psychic technology to arrest and convict murderers before they commit their crimes. Ultimately, we have to ask: Will “red flag” laws actually target violent people … or just people with guns? Because as the above examples (and countless others) show, the problem isn’t the firearms.

About Beth Alcazar

Author of Women’s Handgun & Self-Defense Fundamentals, associate editor of Concealed Carry Magazine and creator of the Pacifiers & Peacemakers column, Beth Alcazar has enjoyed nearly two decades of teaching and working in the firearms industry. She holds degrees in language arts, education and communication management and uses her experience and enthusiasm to share safe and responsible firearms ownership and usage with others. Beth is certified through the NRA as a Training Counselor, Chief Range Safety Officer and Certified Instructor for multiple disciplines. She is also a Certified Instructor through SIG Sauer Academy, ALICE Institute, DRAW School, TWAW and I.C.E. Training and is a USCCA Certified Instructor and Senior Training Counselor.


How many times have we heard about someone running over a bunch of people too. Even the car or truck can be a deadly weapon. If someone is dead set that they are going to kill, for whatever reason, they will find the tool to kill others with!

These gun grabbers want any possible way to take our protection from us. And these same gun grabbers are socialists/communists.

Impeachment can go more ways than one. These politicians that want to do away with the Second Amendment, work for us. When they were sworn in, they swore to honor and uphold the Constitution. Trying to do away with any of the Amendments to the Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights, is not honoring and upholding the Constitution. Violating one’s Oath of Office is usually grounds for them to be removed.

I say let’s remove their asses!
(Please note, I usually don’t comment on my own posts).