We are virtual freelance legal assistants. We have over 180 documents posted online at www.scribd.com/nootkabearmcdonald
We enjoy being together, and sharing our lives with our two Kugsha. They are very large, and love to make us laugh, loads of fun!
(Natural News) A group of Canadian doctors has painstakingly demonstrated how Pfizer committed monumental fraud in conducting rapid clinical trials of its COVID-19 vaccine as they present evidence refuting nearly all claims that the jab is safer and that getting one reduces the incidence and seriousness of the coronavirus.
The organization called the Canadian COVID Care Alliance, representing more than 500 independent Canadian doctors, scientists and health care practitioners, presented a 40-minute video and accompanying slide presentation explaining exactly how Pfizer fudged numbers and testing in order to get its shot approved quickly under a program launched by former President Donald Trump, who very likely had no idea what the big pharma giant had done when his administration green-lighted Pfizer’s mRNA vaccinefor emergency authorization.
In short, according to The COVID World, “The full 40-minute video presentation by the group includes PDF slides that show evidence that Pfizer misrepresented data to hide the fact that their COVID injections came with an increased risk of illness and death when compared to the placebo group in their trial.”
The presentation “explains how Pfizer failed to follow established, high-quality safety and efficacy protocols for vaccine development as everything was done in under a year and animal testing was skipped,” the website adds.
The organization also highlights how Pfizer allegedly minimized vaccine injury to Maddie de Garay, a teen who was paralyzed from the waist down after she took part in a clinical trial for 12-to-15-year-olds in December 2020, noting that she still requires a wheelchair in order to get around and that she needs a feeding tube more than a year after the trial ended.
The presentation begins by noting that the best empirical evidence when conducting vaccine and other medicinal trials is “Level 1 evidence,” which is the “gold standard” and the only way that something can actually be proven true. As such, when making public health policy, only Level 1 evidence should be utilized.
But that wasn’t the case when it came to Pfizer’s vaccine, at least. The company said in its original trial report dated Dec. 31, 2020, after just two months’ worth of randomized testing — the appropriate way to test medication efficacy — that its vaccine had an efficacy rate of 95 percent seven days after the second dose, but further examination found that to be a gross exaggeration.
In reality, the 95-percent rate reflects “relative risk reduction,” but the “absolute risk reduction,” the more important metric, showed that the vaccine only carried a .84 percent efficacy rate.
Here is a short video that explains the difference:
In addition, the Canadian organization also broke down Pfizer’s short clinical trial to explain how the pharmaceutical maker fudged the process in order to come up with its inaccurate success rate.
The group noted that the clinical trial that began in late July 2020 should have featured two evenly divided groups of inoculated and non-vaccinated participants in a blind study — that is, no one in either group was supposed to know who got the vaccine and go was given a placebo. But instead, as the above slide shows, a “crossover” occurred in early 2021 and the placebo group was given “the opportunity to take the inoculation,” with the majority having agreed to do so. At that point, the Canadian group notes, “it’s no longer a randomized control trial,” as the “control group is gone.”
By 2023, the long-term safety data “that was supposed to be assessed at this point is no longer possible to ascertain as the placebo group crossed over two years previously,” so whatever efficacy data Pfizer claims to have discovered by now is essentially worthless.
To that point, the company’s most recent report claims an efficacy rate of 91.3 for its vaccine. But there, too, the group found that, when compared to the initial placebo group, there has also been an “increase in illness and death” despite the vaccine, thus, “there is no benefit to a reduction in cases if it comes at the cost of increased sickness and death.”
And mind you, all of the Canadian group’s findings come straight from Pfizer‘s own reporting; they are not random conclusions based on hunches or suspicions.
There’s more.
The group found that Pfizer did not follow established research protocols when conducting its clinical trial. Specifically:
— Animal testing was not performed.
— Phases II and III were combined.
— Emergency use was authorized after only two months’ worth of Phase II/III trials.
— The trials were unblinded.
— Phase III trials are continuing into 2023.
Also, Pfizer used misleading demographics and the wrong target population.
“When designing a trial for the efficacy and safety of a potential treatment, the focus should be on the target population who could most benefit from that treatment,” the group noted. “Instead Pfizer chose participants from younger demographic that would be a) less likely to need a vaccine, b) less likely to suffer an adverse event during a trial, c) more likely to respond well to a vaccine, as the elderly have comparatively poor immune responses.”
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers and experts have known that the virus afflicts younger, healthier people far less severely than older people and those with preexisting conditions.
But while roughly 95 percent of those who have died from COVID-19 had at least one co-morbidity listed as a cause of death — and the average is four co-morbidities — just one-in-five clinical trial participants, or around 21 percent, had a co-existing condition, according to the group.
In addition, the group found that Pfizer:
— Used inadequate control groups
— Failed to track biomarkers
— Used wrong clinical endpoints; did not focus on the question “Do people who take the vaccines have less illness and death than those who don’t?”
— “The Pfizer trials DID NOT test all participants for COVID-19,” meaning, “Asymptomatic infection would be missed entirely.”
— The adolescent trial was extremely small and therefore nearly worthless; “Pfizer claimed these were great results, but since adolescents are at statistically 0% risk of death from COVID-19, and very low risk of severe illness, the inoculation is of little benefit to them. Instead, it presents a very real risk of adverse events.”
— The vaccines appear to greatly increase cases of, or risk of, myocarditis.
BlackRock and Vanguard are taking over centralized food production technologies and will have near-total control over the future food supply in America
(Natural News) Many people are still blissfully unaware of what has happened, but the global food supply has been largely taken over by the oligarchs, including financial giants BlackRock and Vanguard.
It turns out that BlackRock and Vanguard have been gradually gobbling up ownership of the means of production, and now intend to lord it over the masses by centralizing all food production technologies in the United States and enslaving everyone under their control.
The top three shareholders of CD Industries Holdings, the world’s largest fertilizer company, include both BlackRock and Vanguard. BlackRock and Vanguard are also the top shareholders in Union Pacific, the railroad giant that moves fertilizer and other agriculture inputs all across the country.
The world’s top 10 food companies are also largely owned by both BlackRock and Vanguard. These include Nestlé, PepsiCo, General Mills, Kellogg’s, Associated British Foods, Mondel?z, Mars, Danone, Unilever, and Coca-Cola.
“What happens when they control all of the seeds, produce, and meat too?” asks Corey’s Digs.
“What happens when produce and meat are all grown inside secured facilities after a gene splice or inside a petri dish, and farmland becomes dormant due to overreaching regulations, lack of supplies, and manufactured inflation?”
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink says “it’s time to force people’s behavior to change”
BlackRock and Vanguard’s influence over CF Industries Holdings and T. Rowe Price Associates is having a major and direct impact on farming in the Midwest. It is also important to note that Union Pacific recently began mandating railroad shipping reductions of 20 percent, further impacting American agriculture.
“This will directly impact key agricultural areas such as Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, and California,” Corey’s Digs adds. “This will ultimately affect food supply and pricing. CF Industries is only one of 30 companies dealing with these restrictions.”
Another major transporter of agricultural goods, the Canadian National Railway (CN), is reportedly trying to help the fertilizer market grow. But its largest owner is none other than billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates, whom we reported is buying up as much American farmland as he can get his grubby little demonic hands on.
Back to BlackRock and Vanguard, the finance giants are also top shareholders in AppHarvest, a Kentucky-based agriculture company that boasts one of the biggest greenhouses in the world at 2.76 million square feet on 60 acres. The facility grows only tomatoes, which are sold at Kroger, Meijer, and Walmart.
Then there is Hydrofarm Holdings, based in Pennsylvania. This company also grows crops in a controlled environment with vertical farming technology. BlackRock and Vanguard are top shareholders in this company as well.
BlackRock currently boasts more than $20 trillion in investments, all of which follow the ESG and “socially responsible” guidelines required by its CEO Larry Fink. Fink infamously stated that “it’s time to force people’s behavior to change,” and he is apparently doing that by seizing control of American agriculture.
“Despite the LED lighting, robotics, computer data analysis, and ventilation systems required to power vertical growing facilities of this magnitude, since water is being saved and less of Bill Gates’ landmass is being used, investments are flowing into these alleged sustainable and environmentally friendly facilities, as well as massive greenhouses,” Corey’s Digs further explains.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) is capturing medicine and health care by moving swiftly to pass a new “pandemic treaty” that will give the United Nations total control over public health. This one-two punch of seizing both food and medicine spells a grim future of totalitarian fascism in the entire world.
More related news coverage about the engineered implosion of the global food supply can be found at Collapse.news.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on April 28, 2022 This is getting seriously out of hand. On top of the $14 billion already appropriated for Ukraine assistance, Joe Biden is now asking for a supplemental budget allocation of an additional $33 billion for Ukraine. Good grief, that’s almost $50 billion in aid, plus […]
Elon Musk responded to Joe Biden’s establishment of a far-left disinformation board with one word – discomforting. We reported on this new entity that will be under the biggest liar in the Biden gang, the DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who is responsible for millions of illegals crossing his wide-open Southern Border. Biden Regime Announces Creation […]
Principia Scientifica Written by apnews.com The coronavirus pandemic ushered in what may be the most rapid rise in homeschooling the U.S. has ever seen. Two years later, even after schools reopened and vaccines became widely available, many parents have chosen to continue directing their children’s educations themselves. Homeschooling numbers this year dipped from […]
The power of language is magical to behold. Through the mere pronouncement of words, people can be persuaded to do what they would never have thought to do, left to their own devices. The playbook with the most success in this regard is that of war. When people are “informed” that they and their families are in mortal danger, they can and often will acquiesce to any and all policies which government authorities claim to be necessary in order to protect them.
Young people can be coaxed into killing complete strangers who never did anything personally to them. Citizens can be brainwashed to believe that suitably labeled persons can and indeed must be denied any and all human rights. When the stakes are claimed to be life and death, even apparently intelligent people can be goaded to accept that the mere possession of a divergent opinion is evil, and the expression of dissent a crime. The use of military weapons to execute obviously innocent, entirely innocuous civilians, including children, suddenly becomes permissible, so long as the victims have been labeled collateral damage. All any of this takes is to identify “the enemy” as evil.
In centuries past, “the laws of war” were said to require the humane treatment of enemy soldiers. They were diagnosed as suffering from “invincible ignorance,” misled and mistaken about the dispute said to necessitate recourse to war, but still acknowledged as persons capable of being courageous combatants who found themselves through historical fortuity on the wrong side. An enemy soldier was to be provided with the opportunity to lay down his weapon and surrender in order to save his own life. Disarmed or incapacitated soldiers were not to be executed by their captors, for they had already been neutralized and posed no more danger than unarmed civilians. Prisoners of war were to be treated as human beings, and when they were tortured or summarily executed, this constituted a war crime. Such “laws of war,” which form the basis of international agreements, including the Geneva Conventions, have needless to say often been flouted, but, in theory, they were to be upheld by civilized people.
After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, political leaders and government officials proclaimed that “everything changed.” The Bush administration legal team deployed linguistic innovation to issue in an entirely new era of warfare, wherein the “laws of war” would still be said to obtain, but they would be inapplicable to entire classes of human beings. Jihadist soldiers for radical Islamist causes were labeled unlawful enemy combatants, whose “unlawful” status was said to imply that they were protected by neither international norms such as the Geneva Conventions nor the laws of civil society.
Under this pretext, terrorist suspects were tortured while held captive at prisons in Guantánamo Bay, Abu Ghraib and Baghram, in addition to many black sites around the world. Ever keen to cover their tracks, the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) also flatly denied that they ever tortured anyone, by redefining as enhanced interrogation techniques the abusive practices inflicted on hundreds, if not thousands, of men in an effort to extract from them actionable intelligence. And just in case any of this “logic” was called into question by pesky human rights advocates, Bush administration officials also derided the Geneva Conventions as “quaint.”
Imminent vs. Immediate in the Global War on Terror
The “peace candidate” Barack Obama was elected in 2008 on the promise to rein in the excesses of the Bush administration, including what Obama characterized as the “dumb” war on Iraq. The new president publicly denounced “enhanced interrogation techniques” as torture but then proceeded to take linguistic neologism to an entirely new level by not only redefining assassination as targeted killing but also labeling any suspect eliminated through the use of lethal drones as an Enemy Killed in Action (EKIA).
The slaughtered “soldiers” were assumed to be guilty of possible complicity in future possible crimes, a preposterous position never fully grasped by Obama’s devotees, who somehow failed to recognize that the specific implement used to kill does not distinguish various types of homicide from one another, morally speaking. The extrajudicial execution of individual human beings in civil society is illegal, but the Obama administration effectively maintained that the targeting of suspicious persons and their associates in lands far away was perfectly permissible, so long as the victims were killed by missiles launched from drones, thereby rendering them “acts of war.”
The entire drone program, whether within or far from areas of active hostilities (i.e., war zones), was portrayed by Obama and his administration as just another facet of “just war.” Blinded to the moral atrocity of this new lethal-centric approach to dealing with suspected enemies, whereby they would be executed rather than taken prisoner, Obama’s loyal supporters blithely embraced the propaganda according to which he was a smart warrior. After demonstrating his death creds to the satisfaction of hawks, by killing not only Osama bin Laden, but also U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki, suspected of complicity in factional terrorism, Obama was reelected for a second term in 2012, despite having summarily executed thousands of men—mostly brown-skinned, unnamed, and unarmed—located in their own civil societies, far from any U.S. citizen, and in clear violation of the Geneva Conventions.
The deft deployment of two simple words, immediate and imminent, played a key role in allowing Obama to get away with murder, even of U.S. citizens such as Anwar al-Awlaki and his sixteen-year-old son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. Guided by drone-killing czar John Brennan, Obama’s lawyers calmly explained in public addresses and official documents that suspects who posed imminent threats to the United States could be targeted by lethal drones because an imminent threat did not imply immediacy. In other words, they could be killed even when they were currently unarmed and living in their own civil society, surrounded by family members and friends, and even when the future crime of which they were vaguely suspected was merely hypothetical and therefore had no specific date.
When targets were “nominated” for execution, the administration operated under the assumption that they were guilty unless specific information was brought forth to demonstrate their innocence. The victims themselves obviously could not do this, initially, because they were not informed that they were being targeted and, later, because they were dead. Meanwhile, local residents and journalists on the ground who knew these people’s names and dared to assert that the victims were not terrorists were either denounced as propagandists or cast as misguided persons hoodwinked by the rhetoric of jihadists.
As the death toll mounted, outspoken critics in the vicinity of the missile strikes became progressively more terrified of being themselves eliminated for seeming to support terrorist groups. Their concerns were not unfounded, for they risked being affixed with the lethal label associate and added to hit lists for execution if they dared to question the drone warriors’ narrative. This oppressive climate needless to say served actively to suppress dissent from the U.S. government’s official story of what they had done, even among locals who witnessed the grisly scenes where entirely innocent community members were incinerated by missiles launched from drones.
Imminent vs. Immediate in the Opioid Crisis
Improbably enough, the very same two words, imminent and immediate, used by the Obama legal team to invert the presumption of innocence to a presumption of guilt in the case of terrorist suspects located abroad, proved to be deadly in an entirely different context during the twenty-first century as well.
The causes of the sudden and shocking increase in the number of narcotics addicts and overdose deaths all over the United States are manifold, but a tidal wave of diversion was made possible by drug-dealer doctors and the notorious “pain clinics” where they plied their trade. Manufacturers produced and pharmacies dispensed billions of pills as demand multiplied in tandem with the creation of more and more new addicts, who could no longer function without narcotics.
Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family are widely regarded as the prime movers of the opioid crisis, having undertaken a highly successful campaign to coax doctors into believing that their patented time-release prescription narcotic Oxycontin was nonaddictive and could be safely provided to patients even for moderate pain. This marketing feat was achieved by influencing key players at the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), who not only approved the medication but permitted it to be sold along with a package insert falsely suggesting that it was less prone to abuse than other narcotics.
In its quest to sell as many pills as possible, the pharmaceutical industry repeatedly pivoted to neologize in lethal ways over the two decades following the launch of Oxycontin in 1996. When it emerged that the pills sometimes wore off before the twelve-hour time release period, marketers and sales representatives claimed that those patients were suffering from breakthrough pain, the remedy for which was (surprise!) to double their dose. The narcotics marketers indulged in flat-out sophistry when they insisted that patients who appeared to be addicted to their painkillers were in fact suffering from pseudoaddiction, the remedy for which was (surprise!) even higher doses of their drugs. As farcical as these arguments may seem in retrospect, with the benefit of hindsight and in the light of the overdose epidemic now running rampant, many doctors appear to have been persuaded to believe that their patients’ miserable condition was not indicative of addiction but a manifestation of their ongoing and unbearable pain, the solution to which was to ply them with yet more powerful narcotics.
Pharma-coopted lawmakers were notified of the proliferating addiction problem early on but refused to stop the runaway train by demanding that the FDA cease playing along with Purdue’s insane pro-narcotics marketing campaign. Other companies needless to say contributed as well, through promulgating the “pain epidemic” propaganda so as to expand the market niche of such products, which had previously been reserved for terminally ill patients. Johnson & Johnson played a causal role in what became the opioid crisis by growing tons of poppies (in Tasmania) to meet the enormous increased industry need for raw opium, without which the billions of pills prescribed could not and would never have been produced.
As the opioid crisis began to become recognized for what it was, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) sought to issue “Immediate Suspension Orders” (ISOs) against the three major drug wholesale distributors to pharmacies, Cardinal Health, McKesson, and Amerisource Bergen. Through issuing such orders, Joe Rannazzisi, the deputy director of the Office of Diversion Control, hoped to halt the ongoing mass shipments of opioids to retailers such as CVS in cases where the sheer volume of prescriptions could not be explained by ordinary medical practice and so was a clear indication that widespread diversion of narcotics was underway.
Rannazzisi ended up being hobbled by a team of corporate lawyers and lobbyists who managed to cobble together a new law in 2014 which, despite its beneficent-sounding name, “The Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act” (HR4709), served to protect, above all, drug manufacturers and distributors. The Act rewrote the law already on the books through redefining the imminent danger required to issue an ISO to mean “a substantial likelihood of an immediate threat.” One of the new Act’s enthusiastic promoters, Linden Barber (a former DEA officer and lawyer who had left his government position to represent the drug distributors), persuasively explained on the floor of Congress that “having a clear legal standard is always better.” The measure passed unanimously, without a roll call vote, for the simple reason that it sounded like a policy to which no decent person could object. But rather than stemming the tide of the opioid crisis, the Act severely hampered the DEA’s ability to issue ISOs, for it was prohibitively difficult for officials to meet the newly stipulated legal standard of imminence as requiring immediacy.
President Obama signed the Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2014 into law, and the marketing campaign used to promote the use of highly addictive time-release narcotics barreled ahead. The DEA’s sudden inability to call a halt to the shipment of tons of narcotics to retailers effectively guaranteed that the number of dependent persons would multiply, as potent prescription pills continued to be diverted for recreational uses and thereby create more addicts. But more addicts meant more overdoses, not only from the potent pills themselves, but also because the street supplies of heroin to which many users eventually turned were often cut with extremely dangerous fentanyl.
Unfazed by the death tolls, which had already soared to many thousands by 2014, the pharmaceutical giants insisted that the sorry situation of addicts was no argument against helping patients genuinely in pain, who would in fact be wronged if their access to narcotics were curbed. The addicts dropping like flies were painted as solely responsible for their plight, despite ample evidence that many of the overdose victims began as legitimate pain patients, who became aware of their dependency only upon reaching the bottom of their amber vials.
The Role of Obamacare in Propelling and Augmenting the Opioid Crisis
“Everything changed” in the twenty-first century, not only with the war on terror, the rebranding of torture, and the normalization of assassination, but also in the pharma-friendly approach to healthcare ushered in by President Barack Obama. By pushing through his signature legislation, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, which leftists were led to believe would create a system of socialized medicine (referred to by many as Obamacare), the president notoriously bowed to drug makers and the insurance industry, extending to those sectors the very form of crony corporate welfare already enjoyed by companies in the military industry.
Obama’s collaboration with pharmaceutical and insurance company executives in crafting the ACA allowed them to secure advantageous pricing arrangements to ensure the maximization of their profits, while at the same time massively increasing the sheer volume of sales. The pharmaceutical industry was greatly enriched through the provision of virtually limitless free psychiatric medications to low-income patients through government programs such as Medicaid and Medicare, and to veterans through the VA (Veterans Administration). Mental health-based disability claims soared, and the sales of SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), anti-anxiety, atypical anti-psychotic medications and other psychotropes, including narcotics, increased accordingly. The millions of new prescription medications dispensed to formerly uninsured Americans ended up being paid for by the middle class, who were mandated by law to sign up for Obamacare or else face a hefty tax penalty, should they decline to comply.
Despite what may have been Obama’s initial good intention, to make healthcare available to uninsured persons, Obamacare ultimately made medical treatment in the United States prohibitively expensive for many middle class families, whose copays, premiums and deductibles increased dramatically. The new mandatory healthcare program skyrocketed the salaries of health industry executives while pricing drugs and procedures out of reach for many persons who had previously been able to afford them. Millions of people in the United States have filed medical bankruptcy in recent years. In cases where prescription narcotics addicts became uninsured because they lost their jobs, they turned to the streets for their needed drugs, given the impossibility of paying out of pocket for extraordinarily expensive prescription pills.
Given the story of Obamacare, perhaps no one should be surprised that when the Obama administration finally took action to address the opioid epidemic, most of the allocated $1.1 billion was for the alternative medication of already existing addicts. The pharma-friendly approach prevailed once again, encouraging the sale of more and more drugs (such as Suboxone) to help addicts to wean themselves off their narcotics. Obama’s dilatory and pro-pill approach to the opioid crisis ultimately generated even more people who, in order to kick their narcotics habit, would need to avail themselves of further pharmaceutical means, effectively trading one drug for another. In other words, both the problem of opioid overprescription, facilitated through Obamacare by providing easy access to narcotics to formerly uninsured persons, and the measures implemented by the Obama administration in response to the overdose epidemic, served to increase pharmaceutical industry profits.
The Death Connection
Whether or not one wishes to connect any further dots in the cases of drone assassination and the opioid epidemic, it does seem worth pointing out that Obama’s own attorney general, Eric Holder (2009-2015), was a former legal counselor to Purdue Pharma, who in fact defended the company in a 2004 lawsuit alleging deceptive marketing of Oxycontin. This is noteworthy because it was none other than Eric Holder who, in an infamous White Paper and various public addresses, so adamantly defended the creative interpretation of imminence as not implying immediacy, the crucial linguistic maneuver used to defend and promote Obama’s drone killing spree.
The normalization of assassination achieved by the Obama administration expanded the domain of what was said to be legitimate state killing by inverting the burden of proof on suspects while simultaneously claiming (illogically enough) that “areas outside active hostilities” were in fact war zones. Together, all of these linguistic tricks generated a veritable killing machine, opening up vast new market niches and dramatically increasing the profit potential for companies in the shockingly lucrative business of state-inflicted homicide. Not only weapons manufacturers but also logistics and analytics companies were able to reap hefty profits through eliminating as many people pegged as “terrorist suspects” as possible.
The imminent vs. immediate dichotomy was inverted and redeployed, but in the opposite direction, by pharmaceutical company legal teams and collaborating lawmakers in 2014 to permit the promiscuous sale of narcotics to continue on despite the opioid overdose epidemic on display throughout the United States. The Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2014 ironically “ensured” only profits for drug companies, as millions of new addicts would be created during the second decade of the twenty-first century, accelerating and multiplying the domino effect of diversion and overdoses already ravaging communities all across the United States. It matters not that pharmaceutical company executives sought not to kill people but to sell pills. They aggressively pushed narcotics without regard for the likely future consequences of their drive for profit. Indeed, they persisted in pushing narcotics even as drug overdose deaths reached record levels.
Under Obama, more than two thousand suspects outside areas of active hostilities were premeditatedly and intentionally incinerated by missiles launched from drones. The tally of overdose deaths in the United States exceeded 100K for the single year ending in April 2021. The long-range effects of the normalization of assassination, however, are likely to be more deadly than the opioid crisis, given that many other governments have followed suit in acquiring lethal drones for their own use, having been persuaded by the precedent set by the U.S. government that this form of state-inflicted homicide is perfectly permissible. In contrast, the promiscuous opioid prescription practices of doctors in the United States has been curtailed and was not emulated in the UK or in Europe, although the pharmaceutical giants do appear to have continued their morally dubious marketing practices in other countries abroad, especially in less-developed lands.
As both the drone program and the opioid prescription debacle illustrate, when government agencies such as the Pentagon and the FDA have been captured by industry forces focused above all on maximizing profits, they will simply look the other way as the corpses pile up, denying responsibility for any and all “collateral damage.” This tendency of bureaucrats and corporate leaders to shirk responsibility for the negative consequences of their policies helps to explain the ease with which lawmakers are coopted by lobbyists from not only the military but also the pharmaceutical industry. The recent deployment of imminent and immediate by lethal legal “experts” serves to underscore why the censorship of language by government officials themselves is inherently dangerous, given that their policies in recent years have multiplied, not prevented, the deaths of human beings.
In a representative democracy, the lawmakers promote the interests of the voters who elected them. What kind of government sacrifices the lives of human beings in order to maximize the profits of corporate leaders?9,969
John Michael Crichton (23 October 1942 – 4 November 2008) was an American author and filmmaker. His books have sold over 200 million copies worldwide, and over a dozen have been adapted into films.
Sooner Or Later The Endless Spectacle Is Over. Then We Will Take Revenge; Mercilessly.”
“If you don’t know history, then you don’t know anything. You are a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree.”John Michael Crichton (23 October 1942 – 4 November 2008) was an American author and filmmaker. His books have sold over 200 million copies worldwide, and over a dozen have been adapted into films.
Standing opposed to the Western powers seeking to take command of the “Heartland” so they could control the world was Russian linguist and historian Nikolai Trubetzkoy (16 April 1890 – 25 June 1938), who founded the Eurasianism political movement in Russia that posits that Russian civilization does not belong in the “European” or “Asian”—and, in 1938, died from a heart attack attributed to Nazi persecution after he had published an article that was highly critical of Nazi German leader Adolph Hitler’s theories of Western “white master race” supremacy over all other peoples.
It is the space of Midnight. And there the final point of the Fall is reached. The moment at hand is one of a change of poles.
The West turns into the East. Putin and Trump are in two opposite corners of the planet.
In the 20th century, these two extremes were embodied by the most radical forms of Modernity – capitalism and communism.
Two apocalyptical monsters – Leviathan and Behemoth. Now they have turned into two eschatological promises: Putin’s Greater Russia and America liberating itself under Trump.
The 21st century has finally begun.
For over a century now, the Western powers trying to take command of the “Heartland” so they can control the world have left in their wake tens-of-millions of Russian lives—and Russia will never allow this happen, which means that if they are pressed too far, they will obliterate the West with their largest in the world nuclear arsenal, then rise from the ashes to start over again, which they’ve been planning to do for as long as this threat has hung over them.
What’s most critically important for each of you realize at this moment, and like I told you exactly a month ago, this a war about Christianity, not Ukraine—and when you know this fact, and as history has long proved, this war won’t end until one side is decisively defeated—which means that it won’t be over in days, weeks or months, but rather in years, if not decades.
As a direct participant in this war, and maybe soon an actual combatant as it draws ever nearer to your front door, the most critical decision you have to make right now is who you receive your information from—and whose choice you have are those who’ve continued to lie to you, or those like us who keep telling you the truth.
I don’t have to tell you about the ferocious attacks we’re now under because we keep telling you the truth, because you know this fact well—but I can honestly tell you that without your immediate support we’ll no longer be able to sustain against these attacks—and to keep from happening, all you have to do is open your generous hearts and intelligent minds and give today whatever you can so we can survive.
And, as always, I’ll leave you with the words I’ve left you with before, and are as true right now as they always will be: In the coming months, the dimensions of this looming war are going to shift in radical and unforeseen ways—which is why we believe it is your right to know the full truth about what is happening—a truth the demonic enemies of humanity and our God are doing everything in their power to suppress—which is why our Dear Lord ordered us to band together in such times as these to protect one another—a protection we urgently need at this very moment to keep the truth flowing to you—and in aiding us, our Dear Lord has promised you: “Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”
With God,
Sister Ciara
Dublin, Ireland
23 March 2022https://www.youtube.com/embed/9VnJ9l4xZ6Q
Our needs today are dire indeed, but, if every one of you reading this gave just $20.00 today, our budget for the entire year would be met! So, before you click away, ask yourself this simple question….if your knowing the truth about what is happening now, and what will be happening in the future isn’t worth 5 US pennies a day what is?
(Natural News) Analyzing the current dynamics of the pre-planned world war crisis now unfolding in Ukraine, it looks like cyber war is going to be the globalists’ next move against humanity.
With the covid narrative having collapsed — and with vaccines now widely rejected by the informed public — the next phase of the globalist war is escalating to a planned “lights out” scenario. This will involve deep state-run cyber attacks on financial institutions, telecommunications and the power grid, all to be blamed on Russia.
These attacks are designed to achieve what the vaccines were originally hoped to achieve: Large-scale depopulation of western nations and the collapse of the United States of America as a sovereign entity.
The contrived war with Russia was a necessary step in the narrative to blame Russia for the deep state cyber attacks on America, of course.
This means the cyber attacks are probably very close. It also means that we all need to be especially prepared for cyber-related takedowns in the context of our own preparedness.
Audit your reliance on internet services and the power grid
In today’s Situation Update podcast (below), I urge people to audit their own reliance on cloud computing services and internet systems as well as the power grid. Far too many people require the internet to function in order to be able to:
Enter their own homes (“smart” home door locks, which are an incredibly stupid idea)
Operate their electric vehicles (Tesla)
Engage in financial transactions (they have no cash) to buy anything
In addition, the power grid is obviously necessary for all these things and much more:
Run heating or air conditioning systems that make your home livable
Municipal water supply
Cell tower operations
Cooking food
The winning strategy in dealing with all this is to create off-grid redundant systems for each of the key areas for survival such as food, water, shelter, self-defense, emergency communications, emergency medicine and so on.
This means going super low-tech, which is why I have been strongly advocating the use of low-tech, non-electric systems. Start thinking like the Amish, in other words. The Amish had it right the whole time.
How will you cook food, flush the toilet, filter water or contact loved ones when the grid is down and the banks don’t work?
Those who wish to survive what’s coming need to think seriously about how they’re going to cover the basic necessities without a functioning power grid or banking system. While outages won’t be everywhere or permanent, we should all expect intermittent or regional outages of unknown duration. In a worst-case scenario, some systems could stay down for months.
If you conduct an honest evaluation of the risks and the solutions to all this, you quickly realize that cities are death traps. They are simply not survivable in a cyber war takedown scenario. Thus, getting out of the cities is critical for survival. (The social order in America’s cities will collapse within hours of a grid-down scenario.)
Even then, surviving in rural areas requires planning and practice so that you are familiar with how to run the off-grid systems you need to operate in order to survive. Did you know you can build a rocket stove out of cinder blocks? You only need 4 blocks. See this video:
Think about low-tech or alternative tech solutions for survival. Satellite phones work even when the local cell towers don’t function, for example. Solar generators allow you to gather enough power to charge flashlights, mobile phones and even laptop computers.
A collapse of the prescription medicine supply chain means it’s smart to reduce your reliance on prescription medications because they may simply not be available. You can actually grow your own medicines via sprouting or hydroponic grow systems.
Growing food can be done rather easily using off-grid, non-electric, non-circulating hydroponic systems. I’ve filmed a video on my own “grow bin” systems (using the Kratky method) that you can see here:
Search Brighteon.com for “kratky” or “hydroponics” to see a lot more videos on this subject.
Today’s Situation Update podcast focuses on low-tech, off-grid solutions for food, shelter, communications, security, financial interactions and much more. Listen here and learn how to survive the cyber war takedown of America:
(Natural News) Analyzing the current dynamics of the pre-planned world war crisis now unfolding in Ukraine, it looks like cyber war is going to be the globalists’ next move against humanity.
With the covid narrative having collapsed — and with vaccines now widely rejected by the informed public — the next phase of the globalist war is escalating to a planned “lights out” scenario. This will involve deep state-run cyber attacks on financial institutions, telecommunications and the power grid, all to be blamed on Russia.
These attacks are designed to achieve what the vaccines were originally hoped to achieve: Large-scale depopulation of western nations and the collapse of the United States of America as a sovereign entity.
The contrived war with Russia was a necessary step in the narrative to blame Russia for the deep state cyber attacks on America, of course.
This means the cyber attacks are probably very close. It also means that we all need to be especially prepared for cyber-related takedowns in the context of our own preparedness.
Audit your reliance on internet services and the power grid
In today’s Situation Update podcast (below), I urge people to audit their own reliance on cloud computing services and internet systems as well as the power grid. Far too many people require the internet to function in order to be able to:
Enter their own homes (“smart” home door locks, which are an incredibly stupid idea)
Operate their electric vehicles (Tesla)
Engage in financial transactions (they have no cash) to buy anything
In addition, the power grid is obviously necessary for all these things and much more:
Run heating or air conditioning systems that make your home livable
Municipal water supply
Cell tower operations
Cooking food
The winning strategy in dealing with all this is to create off-grid redundant systems for each of the key areas for survival such as food, water, shelter, self-defense, emergency communications, emergency medicine and so on.
This means going super low-tech, which is why I have been strongly advocating the use of low-tech, non-electric systems. Start thinking like the Amish, in other words. The Amish had it right the whole time.
How will you cook food, flush the toilet, filter water or contact loved ones when the grid is down and the banks don’t work?
Those who wish to survive what’s coming need to think seriously about how they’re going to cover the basic necessities without a functioning power grid or banking system. While outages won’t be everywhere or permanent, we should all expect intermittent or regional outages of unknown duration. In a worst-case scenario, some systems could stay down for months.
If you conduct an honest evaluation of the risks and the solutions to all this, you quickly realize that cities are death traps. They are simply not survivable in a cyber war takedown scenario. Thus, getting out of the cities is critical for survival. (The social order in America’s cities will collapse within hours of a grid-down scenario.)
Even then, surviving in rural areas requires planning and practice so that you are familiar with how to run the off-grid systems you need to operate in order to survive. Did you know you can build a rocket stove out of cinder blocks? You only need 4 blocks. See this video:
Think about low-tech or alternative tech solutions for survival. Satellite phones work even when the local cell towers don’t function, for example. Solar generators allow you to gather enough power to charge flashlights, mobile phones and even laptop computers.
A collapse of the prescription medicine supply chain means it’s smart to reduce your reliance on prescription medications because they may simply not be available. You can actually grow your own medicines via sprouting or hydroponic grow systems.
Growing food can be done rather easily using off-grid, non-electric, non-circulating hydroponic systems. I’ve filmed a video on my own “grow bin” systems (using the Kratky method) that you can see here:
Search Brighteon.com for “kratky” or “hydroponics” to see a lot more videos on this subject.
Today’s Situation Update podcast focuses on low-tech, off-grid solutions for food, shelter, communications, security, financial interactions and much more. Listen here and learn how to survive the cyber war takedown of America:
The Georgia Supreme Court has given new life to a lawsuit challenging DeKalb County commissioners’ vote giving themselves a hefty pay raise.
In an opinion published Friday, the state’s high court found that a DeKalb Superior Court judge erred in dismissing some of the claims that local gadfly Ed Williams made in his lawsuit over the controversial 2018 vote.
While the Supreme Court did not rule on the merit of any alleged violations themselves, it found that Williams should have been permitted to pursue civil penalties against individual commissioners for allegedly violating the state’s Open Meetings Act. It also found that Williams’ request for an injunction to stop DeKalb CEO Michael Thurmond from paying the new salaries was dismissed prematurely.
The case was sent back to DeKalb Superior Court Judge Gregory A. Adams to hash things out.
“I’m elated by the decision that the court made,” Williams said Monday. “I kind of expected that result, but it made me happy when it was actually rendered. It gave me some relief that two years of working on the case was not lost and wasted.”
County officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the Supreme Court’s findings.
The salary saga started in February 2018, when commissioners voted to give themselves a nearly 60% raise that increased their pay to $64,637 per year. The proposal was quickly introduced during a meeting without being listed on the agenda and without going through the commission’s normal committee review process.
Other commissioners said at the time that they deserved more compensation for the hours they devote to what are supposed to be part-time jobs.
The way the vote was handled outraged some DeKalb County residents, two of whom eventually filed complaints with the state Attorney General’s Office. Attorney General Chris Carr determined that the vote violated the state’s open meetings law, but declined to take action because the 90-day period to formally contest the vote had passed.
In August 2018, Williams filed a lawsuit alleging that the commission’s vote violated open meeting laws and that the salary ordinance was unconstitutional. Adams dismissed the suit but Williams appealed all the way to Georgia’s Supreme Court.
The opinion issued last week was a victory for Williams, but there’s still a long way to go.
While the Supreme Court ruled that individual commissioners don’t enjoy immunity from penalties under the Open Meetings Act, it will still be up to Judge Adams to determine if those violations occurred.
Adams also will determine if Williams has the legal standing to sue Thurmond, the DeKalb CEO. If Williams does have standing, Adams would then have to determine if Thurmond even has the power enact what Williams is seeking: a stoppage on payments of the commission’s higher salaries.
The timeline in which Adams will re-consider the case is murky. Courts across Georgia are closed for the foreseeable future due to concerns about the spread of coronavirus.
Williams said he’s confident he’ll get more good news, whenever a decision comes.
“The law is on my side,” he said. “The law has always been on my side.”
A new judge will be assigned to handle the lawsuit challenging DeKalb County commissioners’ controversial 2018 vote to give themselves a pay raise.
DeKalb Superior Court Judge Gregory A. Adams voluntarily recused himself from the case late last week, more than three months after the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling sending it back to the trial court.
Adams’ recusal follows a motion brought by local activist Ed Williams, who filed the original lawsuit against several DeKalb commissioners and county CEO Michael Thurmond. Williams had requested Adams remove himself due to his previous rulings in the case and what Williams called the judge’s “long congenial relationship with some of the commissioners.”
Williams also raised questions about Adams’ appointment as chair of DeKalb’s charter review commission, a body tasked with evaluating the organization of the county’s government and how powers are delegated. Williams argued that the matters under examination by the review commission could include the very issue he raised in his lawsuit.
In his June 26 recusal latter, Adams did not specify a reason for removing himself from the case.
As of Wednesday, a new judge had not been assigned.
Williams filed his lawsuit without the aid of an attorney in August 2018, several months after DeKalb commissioners voted to give themselves a nearly 60% raise. The pay hike was quickly introduced during a meeting without being listed on the agenda and without going through the commission’s normal committee review process.
Williams’ suit argues that the commission’s vote violated open meeting laws and the salary ordinance was unconstitutional.
Adams dismissed the suit originally but Williams appealed all the way to the state’s Supreme Court, where law students at the University of Georgia’s appellate litigation clinic helped argue the case late last year.
The Supreme Court issued its opinion in March.
While the high court did not rule on the merit of any allegations themselves, it found that Williams should have been permitted to pursue civil penalties against individual commissioners for allegedly violating the state’s Open Meetings Act. It also found that Williams’ request for an injunction to stop CEO Thurmond from paying the increased salaries was dismissed prematurely.
(Natural News) This is the most important Daily News note that I have ever written. Read on and you will understand why I wrote this to go out with the LifeSite Daily News email to subscribers last night.
Monday was a wild, roller coaster day for Canadians and the Convoy 2022 movement that has attracted immense international attention and support. One nation after another has seen the rise of a trucker movement imitating the incredibly successful Canadian one. Each one verifies similar citizen disgust and desperation over covid mandates in their respective nations.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced end to vaccine passports mandate
The day started out with an astonishing press conference from COVID tyrant and Ontario premier Doug Ford. Ontario is Canada’s most populated and wealthy province. Ford announced a completely unexpected, supposed end to the province’s vaccine passports mandate. I use “supposed” because he is also going to allow businesses to continue to demand proof of vaccination if they so wish. That is a contradictory policy of giving with one hand while taking away with the other.
He also vaguely indicated that masks will stay in place until “a later date” and threatened Truckers with “serious consequences” for “lawless activity,” ignoring his own constantly failed, massively lawless COVID policies that have been catastrophic and resulted in thousands of otherwise preventable deaths and severe injuries that are ongoing.
Trudeau/federal government invocation of Emergency Measures Act
Then there was the carefully staged Justin Trudeau and various aids’ press conference, where for the first time in Canadian history the extreme Emergency Measures Act (EMA) was invoked. It gives this chronically lying prime minister frightening dictatorial powers to crush terrorists or similar threats to the nation.
Trudeau has never been known to be consistent on his beliefs and policies which back in 2020 would have strongly supported today’s truckers’ actions – even if they lasted a year. See the following excerpt from the New York Times editorial board noted in an illuminating Hot Air column today:
“Entertaining the use of force to disperse or contain legal protests is wrong. As Mr. Trudeau said in November 2020, in expressing his support of a yearlong protest by farmers in India that blocked major highways to New Delhi, “Canada will always be there to defend the right of peaceful protest.”’
The Hot Air author logically concludes, “Trudeau’s sudden grasp of emergency powers to shut down peaceful protest is not just a clear case of hypocrisy, but also a warning sign for authoritarianism.”
LifeSite’s Kennedy Hall writes that what Trudeau has actually done was to give himself new powers to “squash a freedom movement that is engaging in civil disobedience peacefully.” And that civil disobedience has been a sacred, traditional right in Canada.
Trudeau political clone Doug Ford also expressed complete support for the PM’s extreme reaction to the peaceful, patriotic protesters. They have been gaining support from millions of Canadians desperately seeking relief from the COVID mandates that have devastated Canada’s economy and society.
Ford seems to have a political death wish which the provincial Liberals will take full advantage of in the upcoming provincial election.
Tucker Carlson was quick to respond last night to Trudeau as having declared Canada to be a dictatorship, which, as he explains, is not an unreasonable charge.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has thankfully announced last night that Trudeau has gone too far. They added, “the federal government has not met the threshold necessary to invoke the Emergencies Act. This law creates a high and clear standard for good reason: the Act allows the government to bypass ordinary democratic processes. This standard has not been met.”
They are correct. There is no justifiable, honest reason for its invocation. This is major fraud involving massive exaggerations and lies about the truckers and supporters.
At an earlier truckers’ press conference, Canadian Senator Brian Peckford, the last remaining drafter of Canada’s Charter of Rights, and a great Canadian expressed dismay over the expected invocation of the EMA. Both Peckford and a trucker organizer stated that Convoy 2022 “will hold the line” and the protests will continue to try to free Canadians from the destructive mandates.
Canada’s federal police, the Mounties, have engaged in overnight, Mafia-like violent sabotage of three huge excavators on private property in a field near the Coutts, Alberta truckers’ blockade which they only “suspected” would be used in the blockade. They also claim to have arrested persons connected to the blockade who allegedly had a large number of guns and planned violence against the Mounties when they moved to dismantle the blockade.
At the truckers’ press conference a journalist asked a question about the arrests and guns. There was an immediate outcry from the truckers shouting “lies, lies, lies.” Almost everyone related to the truckers has long been expecting a false flag setup of this type by the Mounties in order to turn the public against them and to justify extreme actions.
The Conservative parliamentary motion to end the COVID restrictions was unfortunately defeated Monday 185 to 151, with only all the Conservatives supporting the motion.
Dr. Robert Malone warns Canadians to defend their nation from Globalists
This is the big one: Dr. Robert Malone posted an article on his blog supporting the Canadian truckers and warning that Canadians must defend their nation if they “wish to keep it, or the Globalists will take it from you.” The article is a MUST-READ for all Canadians and citizens of all other nations.
Malone explains what the catastrophic COVID policies are really all about – imposing the Great Reset on every nation in the world. That also explains the real purpose of Monday’s Canadian federal government press conference. In reality, it had NOTHING to do with “terrorists” or other serious threats to the security of Canada. Justin Trudeau is a protégé of Great Reset creator Klaus Schwab and has a number of times publicly expressed his support for the evil Great Reset scheme.
The truckers are very patriotic Canadians giving their whole heart and soul to defend Canada from those who are destroying it. Every truck and all those cheering them on in Ottawa and on every bridge and stop along the way to Ottawa from the different parts of Canada displayed a sea of Canadian flags.
During rallies, there has been frequent singing of the national anthem. In Ottawa, contrary to Liberal and media lies, truckers cleaned and protected the monuments in front of Parliament. They are no “terrorists” nor any threat to the nation among them compared to the threat that the federal and provincial governments have been with their two years of COVID tyranny and destruction.
Check out my February 11 article that now includes five moving, short videos revealing the true heart and soul of Convoy 2022 and the millions of Canadians supporting them. Forward that article and videos to others so they can use them to convince skeptics and critics of the truckers that they are actually very different from what they have been told every day by the bought and controlled media.
Convoy 2022 has become an unexpected, international, and very serious threat to Great Reset global plans as well as a convenient opportunity to exploit for the purpose of rapidly advancing Great Reset policies in Canada sooner than planned.
Deputy PM Freeland’s shocking financial control measures
The especially big give-away yesterday was the lengthy explanation by Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland of radical new financial policies announcing the government will seize truckers’ assets at will.
Watch Freeland to the left of Trudeau at the beginning of the video of the press conference yesterday when all of this was announced. She was obviously extremely anxious about what she was about to say and the government’s huge risk in trying to get away with its extreme measures.
I have never seen a Deputy PM so obviously near what seems to be a panic attack before speaking. She had every reason to be that anxious as Justin Trudeau also seemed to be very uncomfortable as he announced his unsupportable invoking of the Emergency Measures Act against a huge, popular movement of peaceful Canadian patriots.
She stated, “We are broadening the scope of Canada’s anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules so that they cover Crowd Funding Platforms and the payment service providers they use.” That is an unprecedented, revolutionary and frightening change to Canada’s financial system and protections for citizens.
There was much more, including authorizing banks to unilaterally suspend any account for any reason on the basis of suspicion alone, no court order required, with legal immunity.
She also announced the government is even planning to seize crypto-currency funds which the truckers have begun using to protect their money from tyrannical government measures. Freeland’s announcements were the most frightening of all the government actions to date.
What Freeland announced strongly appeared to be the next stage of later, full government control of everyone’s financial assets, not just the truckers, and a suspension of all financial privacy rights, with arbitrary and often changing bank and government conditions required of citizens to earn, move and use money.
Chrystia Freeland
That total control of personal finances is right out of the Great Reset book and all too similar to Communist China’s social credit system. This is even worse than if Trudeau sent in the army to remove the protesters. What Freeland and Trudeau have begun, unless there is an immediate, great uproar among all Canadians to stop this planned financial slavery, is a grave threat to every Canadian.
Trudeau, Freeland, and the others who spoke during the press conference indicated that these drastic new measures, other than the crowdfunding controls, were temporary and would last only for an unspecified period of time. Trudeau also stated that they are not intended to be applied to all Canadians.
More warnings about the duration and dangers of emergency measures
I need to remind everyone that Trudeau, Ford, and many others promised back in 2020 that they only needed “two weeks to flatten the curve.” How did that turn out? There has been an ongoing string of broken promises and policy reverses for the past two years on almost everything related to Covid. There is good reason to not believe any of the assurances given yesterday afternoon.
Watch the Trucker press conference this morning during which Ontario MPP Randy Hillier and the renowned Dr. Paul Alexander provide sobering responses to yesterday’s developments. Both are very blunt about what Canadians are now facing. There will surely be many more such warnings that Canada has now gone down a very dangerous, unnecessary path.
The entire Ottawa press conference was pure political theatre. It was carefully scripted to further unjustly demonize the Convoy 2022 and provoke Canadians to turn against each other. That is, nothing in it was honest and all Canadians and others watching were considered to be subjects for psychological conditioning to believe that the truckers are violent terrorists threatening national security and economic stability. That is preposterous and unconscionable!
Canadians were assured that the suspension of civil rights and severe actions were targeted only against anyone even suspected of supporting this patriotic movement. That would likely include even millions of Canadians. But it won’t stop there, I can guarantee you.
All Canadians, whether they support or oppose the truckers should be alarmed about this development. It portends the end of democracy in Canada. That would threaten every one of whatever views who are not among the globalist elites.
See the full, one-hour-long press conference here.It is important to endure watching and viewing it from the perspective that has been presented in this article.
I urge all LifeSite readers, no matter what country you are in, to pray for the continued success of Canada’s Convoy 2022 because what happens in Canada over the next few months will have an impact on the rest of the world.
RESIST and NEVER COMPLY with unjust laws and policies.
Originally posted on MCViewPoint: Diverting domestic issue attention while protecting America…McDonnell Douglas. https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/biden-orders-3000-troops-deployed-nato-eastern-flank-countries by Tyler Durden The White House has pulled the trigger on a fresh troop deployment which marks the first amid the still ratcheting Russia-Ukraine crisis, days after President Biden announced he would bolster US forces in East European allied countries. Senior defense…
(Everyone must see this video. These are not normal blood clots, and people that have been vaccinated, have strange white fiberous clots like have never been seen before. This video will be banned in 40 hours!)
Funeral director Richard Hirschman tells Dr. Jane Ruby that he’s seeing startling anomalies in the veins of deceased persons he’s attended in the last year.
The victims reportedly died of heart attacks and strokes, he says, and he started finding “strange clots” in them about a year ago, in the middle of 2021. With photos he brought with him for the interview, Hirschman says he’s finding “fibrous-looking” clots.
In one photo a white, fibrous clot is almost the length of a person’s leg. He also reported that the number of blockages like this has gone from about 50% of bodies he’s embalmed to 80%.
By Megan Redshaw Hundreds of truckers and thousands of citizens protesting Canada’s vaccine mandates for truckers remain in Ottawa, vowing to stay until the mandates are lifted. Thousands of truckers and others protesting Canada’s COVID vaccine mandates remained in Ottawa today, vowing to stay put until the mandates for truckers are lifted. Ottawa’s police chief, […]
Please note that the following came from an email I received. You can tell whenever someone does not like what you post because it looks like shit after you copy it in. of course, thats what happens when wordpress changes their formatting to make it easier…
Hi Janet Join the demand for compensation from judges who have broken the law by hearing cases in which they have a financial interest and who abuse their power NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email. You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g., click “Reply All” and send. To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to http://www.Judicial- Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New. The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. After The Wall Street Journal published its article on 28 Sep 21 “131 Federal Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest”, scores of judges have recused themselves and opened the door for retrials Outline of the webinar and consulting services on holding those judges, the peers who covered for them, and their supervisor, i.e., the Federal Judiciary, liable for the cost of retrials and the disentanglement of contracts and actions based on void and voidable decisions; judges’ failure to read the overwhelming majority of briefs; and their interception of people’s mail and emails to detect and suppress those of their critics; and exposing their coordinated abuse of power and financial criminality at unprecedented citizens hearings http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/ DrRCordero-join_demand_for_compensation_from_judges.pdf By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris Judicial Discipline Reform New York City http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net , DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org , CorderoRic@yahoo.comA. Top media outlets & a VIP have exposed law-breaking unaccountable judges 1. The Wall Street Journal, published on November 2, 2021, “Hidden Interests – Federal Judge Files Recusal Notices in 138 Cases After WSJ Queries. Rodney Gilstrap initially argued he didn’t violate financial-conflicts law”; James.Grimaldi@wsj.com, Joe.Palazzolo@wsj.com, Coulter.Jones@wsj.com. (See the articles referred to in this section here and at Appendix:6§C.22.) 2. Thomson Reuters, with 2,500+ journalists and 600+ photojournalists, published on June 30, 2020, the first of its three-part report “The Teflon Robe”, John.Shiffman @ thomsonreuters.com and Michael.Berens@ thomsonreuters.com, on its massive investigation of state judges. It found that “ hardwired judicial corruption” intertwines state judges and the state commissions on judicial performance that are duty-bound to supervise and discipline them. Reuters asked readers to send it their stories of abuse by judges…and it was “inundated” with them because those with stories want to tell them. 3. The Boston Globe published on September 30, 2018, its investigative report “Inside our secret courts”, Jenn Abelson, Nicole Dungca and “Todd Wallack” <twallack @ gmail .com>, patricia.wen@globe. comrs.com, spotlight@globe.com, in whose “private criminal hearings, who you are –and who you know– may be just as important as right and wrong”. 4. Senator Elizabeth Warren, in her “I have a plan for the Federal Judiciary too”, dare denounce judges’ unaccountability and their abuse of it by refusing to recuse themselves from cases in which they own stock in one of the parties before them in order to steer the cases so as to protect and/or increase the value of their stock. Sen. Warren refers to their grabbing as ‘abusive self-enrichment’. 5. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), in Washington, D.C., published on October 3, 2021, the Pandora Papers, that is, close to 12 million financial documents leaked to it. “More Than 600 Reporters Around The Globe Work With ICIJ On The Most Expansive Leak Of Tax Haven Files In History”. The expertise that ICIJ has gained in applying document scanning software and money tracking techniques can be applied to exposing judges’ illegal flow of money. 6. See also my three-volume study of judges and their judiciaries based on professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking. The study is titled and downloadable thus: Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting*†♣ i. Open the downloaded files using Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available for free. 7. Many of the study articles have been posted to the website of Judicial Discipline Reform. They have attracted so many webvisitors and elicited in them such a positive reaction that 41,071+ have become subscribers as of 27Dec21(Appendix 3). You too can subscribe to the articles: go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New. B. What the law and their Code of Conduct require from judges and their disregard of them 8. The federal law that imposes on federal judges the legal duty to recuse themselves from cases in which they or their relatives have a financial interest is found in Title 28 of the U.S. Code (of federal law only) section 455. Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge(28 USC §455). See also 28 USC §144. Bias or prejudice of judge. 9. Title18 USC contains the federal Criminal Code. It unambiguously imposes on everybody in general, and judges in particular, the duty to report crimes under federal law: a. 18 USC §4. Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. b. Under §3057, federal law imposes a reporting duty on any judge “having reasonable grounds for believing [which is a standard lower than “probable cause to believe” –a cause that makes the belief more likely than not– and much lower than “evidence”] that any violation under chapter 9 [on bankruptcy, the classification of over 70% of all cases filed in the Federal Judiciary] of this title [18] or other laws of the United States relating to insolvent debtors, receiverships or reorganization plans has been committed, or that an investigation should be had in connection therewith [which lowers the “reasonable grounds for believing” standard. 10. Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges imposes on judges an even broader ethical duty by requiring that “Judges avoid impropriety and even the appearance of impropriety”. 11. Judges protect themselves by abusing the self-disciplining authority granted them by Congress in the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980(28 USC §§351-364): They dismiss 100% of complaints filed against them and deny 100% of petitions to review their dismissals. This is shown by their official statistics, which by law(28 USC §603(h)(2)) they must file with Congress as a public document in the Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts(§604(a)(3) and (4)), who is appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court(§601). C. Causes of action arising from judges’ abuse of power and financialcriminality 12. The demand for compensation will be supported by, among others, the following causes of action. They are part of the outline that I can elaborate on if lawyers, their clients, or pro ses retain me to present my webinar, consult, write a statement or a brief, or commission an article for publication. (See a list of articles already written and downloadable for review; Appendix 6§A.) a. conflict of interests resolved in self-interest b. fraud by misleading the parties into thinking that the judges would conduct a fair and impartial process, resulting in harm to the parties; c. concealment of assets; d. tax evasion; e. money laundering f. embezzlement of public power for personal gain g. breach of the oath of office to uphold the law, harming the parties h. intentional disruption of business relations (contracts foreseeably based on biased, void or voidable decisions) i. intentional waste and misuse of public resources j. filing misleading and false mandatory annual financial disclosure reports under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978(Appendix to 5 USC) k. dereliction of the duty requiring the judges on the all-judge-Committee on Financial Disclosures –appointed by the Chief Justice– of the Judicial Conference of the U.S.(28 USC§331) –presided over by the Chief– to review with due diligence reports that all judges must file annually with the Committee l. implicit or explicit conspiracy between her, a judge, to cover his crime, that of another judge -the principal offender- by not reporting him, whereby she became an accessory after the fact, and facilitated his commission of another crime by instilling in him the expectation that she would not report him, whereby she became accessory before the fact and a party to the complicit mutual protection agreement that either would cover for the other if need be. 13. Tort liability can be predicated on the duty of a chief judge, the circuit judicial council, and the Judicial Conference to supervise and control the conduct of other judges; their abuse or criminality; and the resulting harm to the victim(28 USC §§331-332; 351-364). a. This applies the respondeat superior principle in a principal-agent relationship; and negligent/reckless hiring, supervision, and retention; e.g., the Chief Justice appoints the members of the all-judge disciplinary committee(§331); and each court of appeals vets, appoints, and removes the bankruptcy judges in its circuit(§152). b. Such application is justified on the grounds that judges themselves have developed to hold the Catholic Church liable for their pedophilic priests and its cover-up(91 Am. Jur. Trials 151; 101 A.L.R. 5th 1; Doe v. Apostolic Assembly of Faith in Christ Jesus, 452 F. Supp. 3d 503 (W.D. Tex. 2020). 14. A familiar principle can be adapted: ‘[financial criminality] Too big [for the Judiciary] to fail to know’. That allows the application of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO; 18 USC §1961 et seq.) to the judges’ running the Judiciary as a racketeering enterprise. The coordination between judges and the judges on the Judicial Conference Committee on Financial Disclosure that rubberstamp their reports can be charged as a racketeering activity. D. IN-COURT filings that in addition discuss causes of action for compensation 15. An individual’s demand for compensation from judges and their Judiciary is summarily dismissed by judges relying on the Supreme Court in Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), (judges’ “immunity applies even when the judge is accused of acting maliciously and corruptly”; and Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), (“A judge will not be deprived of immunity because the action he took was in error, was done maliciously, or was in excess of his authority”.) Such assurance by the Court has fostered judges’ impunity mindset: ‘Once on the bench, forever here no matter what.’ Yet, the Constitution contradicts the judicial immunity doctrine that judges have abusively concocted as a means of anticipatory self-exoneration. 16. A class action, e.g., under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or its state counterparts, is very expensive; the lawyer bringing it may not be appointed class counsel; the proposed settlement may not be approved; and even if won, an appellate court may decertify the class by declaring that ‘the interests of the plaintiffs are not common enough to permit their formation of a class’. 1. Joining with other similarly situated parties; and with journalists 17. However, lawyers, their clients, and pro ses can join forces to collectively demand compensation from federal judges and their Judiciary. By applying a method, they can find those who have appeared before the same judge or in the same court. If they are disciplined enough to focus only on the single issue of compensation, they can form a local chapter of demanders. Progressively, the chapters can coalesce into a national movement. Its precedent is the Tea Party – Taxed Enough Already–, which went from local chapters advocating the single issue of no new taxes to a national party. a. Federal judges and their Judiciary are the model of their respective state counterparts; their jurisdiction is national, so they make decisions that affect everybody in our country. Concentrating to begin with on exposing their unaccountability and consequent abuse of power and financial criminality will outrage the national public and create the momentum to expose state judges and their judiciaries. 18. Judges process complaints against judges secretly. Initially, they may also dismiss collective demands for compensation. But they will have to do so publicly, just as they dismiss any other demand in a case. Thereby they will expose the prerogative that they have arrogated to themselves: ‘Judges Can Do No Wrong, hence, we need not compensate anybody’. Making this known to a national public with no tolerance for political and socio-economic inequalities will cause outrage. 19. To give publicity to their demand for compensation, the demanders can hire WSJ, Thomson Reuters, and Boston Globe journalists, those of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, and others of similar high reputation as investigators of judges in one or many cases and in the same court; and as expert witnesses in judicial abuse and criminality. A new parties-journalists relation can develop. 20. Motions can be filed to void judges’ self-interested decisions and disentangle contractual relations based on them. They can petition the recusal of judges in whom trust has been lost for breaking the law even in other cases, for ‘He who can break the law once can break it more easily twice’. A new niche practice for lawyers can develop. 21. The demanders can claim standing based on their acting in the public interest to attain the common good of an honest judiciary. They can demand that judges disgorge any benefits received from breaking the law, invoking to that end Son of Sam principles and the successful forcing of former Vice President Spiro Agnew to give up the bribes that he had grabbed as Governor of Virginia. 2. Discussion based on the Constitution’s “equal treatment” clause 22. Defendants, parties, and abusees can invoke the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to demand “equal treatment” under law: a. Defendants can demand to be treated equally to the 131 judges who broke the law by hearing cases where they had a financial interest, none of whom has been investigated. None will be prosecuted(jur:81§C.1), lest judges individually and as a class devastatingly retaliate against the prosecutor and her office(Lsch:17§C). Far from it, once a judge resigns, all in-vestigation by their Judiciary ends and he collects his full pension. Yet, under Const., Art. III, §1, judges hold office and have a salary guarantee only “during good Behaviour”: 1) Former 9th Cir. Chief Judge Alex Kozinski resigned on December 18, 2017, to end a sexual harassment investigation that Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., had directed the 2nd Circuit to conduct. He is even practising as a lawyer. 2) Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, the sister of President Donald Trump, resigned on February 11, 2019, upon being informed that she was under investigation for participating in her father’s distribution of assets to his children through an inheritance tax-evading fraud scheme. 3) No investigation, never mind prosecution, of fellow judges will be authorized by Attorney General Merrick Garland, the former chief judge of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and as such their peer, colleague, principal and/or accessory, and thus accomplice. Defendants can object to A.G. Judge Garland’s and DoJ’s selective prosecution that gives the class of judges protection from the law. b. Parties can claim a privilege to equally evade the disclosure and discovery duties and sanctions of Rules 26-37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as would do judges if sued for compensation by claiming that the judicial immunity doctrine concocted in self-interest protects them with a privilege against disclosure and discovery. 1) Judges claim would show their disregard for “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”; cf. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), which provide, among other things, for trials to be a process for producing not only “the truth”, but also “the whole truth” as a requisite for applying the law in a just and fair way. 2) The fact is that Chief Justice Roberts, who presided over the impeachment trial in the Senate of President Trump, condoned the defending party’s refusal on a claim of privilege to produce a single piece of evidence requested by the prosecuting party. Heset a precedent. 3) Such claim by judges upheld by fellow judges would provide the precedent for parties to claim an established privilege, e.g., attorney-client privilege, or even make one up, e.g., ‘private corporation executive officer privilege’, and pretend that it justifies the denial of any disclosure and discovery whatsoever…or even dispense with the need for a privilege and simply self- servingly characterize the suit as “a hoax”, “a witch hunt”, or “abuse of process”. 4) If ] the precedent is recognized, allowing all parties greater scope to deny disclosure and discovery will gravely disrupt the system of justice. If it is not recognized so that only judges are unequally protected from disclosure and discovery, the outrage will stir up the public to demand transformative reform of the system of justice to ensure that judges are held equally liable to the compensatory sanctions of Rule 37 as well as all other kinds of damages. c. Abusees can claim an equal right to claim against judges as the right given abusees to sue pedophilic priests and the church that covered for them by the lookback laws adopted in the several states. The lookback either extends the number of years from a key event that the statute of limitations allows for suing the defendant or suspends the statute completely and allows suing during a certain future period of time. E. OUT-OF-COURT strategy to inform and outrage the national public 23. A more promising course of action for lawyers, their clients, and pro ses to demand compensation from judges and their Judiciary is by implementing the out-of-court inform and outrage strategy. They can inform the national public of, and outrage it at, judges’ abuse, criminality, and cover-up so as to stir the public up to compel politicians, lest they be voted out of, or not into, office, to investigate judges officially, and hold them accountable and liable to compensate the victims of their misconduct. 1. Informing the public through politicians and abusees’ stories24. The compensation demanders can seek out allies of result: Principled and opportunistic politicians running in the primaries for the 2022 mid-term elections who may be convinced that they can benefit electorally if at every rally, townhall meeting, and interview they vow and call on all politicians and journalists to: a. investigate judges for advancing their financial interests by failing to recuse and for other abuses that cause many more victims: 1) their failure to read the majority of briefs, each of which costs $1Ks and even $10Ks to produce and generates compensable waste; and 2) their interception of people’s emails and mail to detect and suppress those of their critics; b. petition President Biden to release the FBI’s secret vetting reports on judicial candidates; c. ask everybody who ever filed a complaint against a judge or has a story of abuse by judges that they have suffered or witnessed to email a copy to the journalists and members of the Biden Commission for the reform of the Supreme Court below. Let every storyteller apply the two-phase method for writing in up to 500 words their story. 1) In sharing their complaints and stories about judges, the storytellers will be exercising We the People‘s most cherished rights, namely, those guaranteed under the 1st Amendment to the Constitution to “freedom of speech, of the press, the right of the people peaceably to assemble [through the Internet and on social media too], and to petition the Government [of which judges are the third branch] for a redress of grievances [including through the payment of compensation]”. 2) They can copy and paste the following blocs of email addresses in the To: and cc: boxes, respectively, of the email containing their complaint or story. To: [the members of the Biden Commission] cristina.rodriguez@yale.edu, robert.bauer@nyu.edu, kandrias@law.columbia.edu, jack.balkin@yale.edu, baude@uchicago.edu, madams@yu.edu, charles@law.duke. 0edu, acrespo@law.harvard.edu, wdellinger@omm.com, ecb95@law.rutgers.edu, justin.driver@yale.edu, rfallon@law.harvard.edu, heather.k.gerken@yale.edu, ngertner@harvard.edu, jgoldsmith@law.harvard.edu, tgriffith@law.harvard.edu, tgrove@law.ua.edu, bhuang@law.columbia.edu, mkang@northwestern.edu, ojohns@law.columbia.edu, lacroix@uchicago.edu, lemos@law.duke.edu, levi@law.duke.edu, staff@pcscotus.gov, trevor.morrison@nyu.edu, cnelson@law.virginia.edu, rick.pildes@nyu.edu, mramsey@SanDiego.edu, krooseve@law.upenn.edu, bross@law.virginia.edu, d-strauss@uchicago.edu, tribe@law.harvard.edu, awhite36@gmu.edu, kewhitt@princeton.edu, michael.waldman@nyu.edu, caroline.fredrickson@georgetown.edu, development@naacpldf.org, Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, cc: [journalists, students, and professors] James.Grimaldi@wsj.com, Coulter.Jones@wsj.com, Joe.Palazzolo@wsj.com, contact @icij.org, fshiel@icij.org, investigations@icij.org, newstip@globe.com, insiders@icij.org, tips@thomsonreuters.com, john.shiffman@thomsonreuters.com, contact@go.reuters.com, tips@publicintegrity.org, michael.berens@thomsonreuters.com, blake.morrison@thomsonreuters.com, gryle@icij.org, ginger.thompson@propublica.org, andrea@americanthinker.com, marketresearch.thomsonreuters@thomsonreuters.com, drew@americanthinker.com, help@washpost.com, patricia.wen@globe.comrs.com, <brian.mcgrory@globe.com>, spotlight@globe.com, charles.ornstein@propublica. org, tracy.weber@propublica.org, Thehill@email.thehill.com, newsletters@above thelaw.com, tips@propublica.org, mderienzo@publicintegrity.org, watchdog@nootkabearnootkabearnootkabearnootkabearpublicintegrity.com, emily.holden@theguardian.com, tips@latimes.com, ryan.grim@theintercept.com, info@AP.org, corderoric@yahoo.com, mcnulaj@nytimes.com, MCoyle@alm.com, communication@lexisnexis.com, inytletters@nytimes.com, info@mail.huffpost.com, aturturro@alm.com, support@washposthelp.zendesk.com, Opencourt@cnn.com, letters@nytimes.com, Matt.Rocheleau@globe.com, oped@nytimes.com, Jackie.Botts@thomsonreuters.com, wpmagazine@washpost.com, hello@propublica.org, Jaimi.Dowdell@thomsonreuters.com, letters@washpost.com, Evan.Allen@globe.com, Vernal.Coleman@globe.com, Brendan.McCarthy@globe.com, national@washpost.com, colorofmoney@washpost.com, email@washingtonpost.com, oped@washpost.com, d. cause media outlets and students and their professors to join forces to hold the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings. At media stations and auditoriums of journalism, law, business, Information Technology, and social sciences schools, and via video conference they can hold hearings to give people the opportunity to tell the national public their story of judges’ abuse of power and financial criminality that they have suffered or witnessed. 2. An investigation to gain information from “little people” and confidential informants; and pioneering its reporting 25. Through a mutually reinforcing process the information provided through politicians and the stories will strengthen journalists’ commercial and reputational interest in investigating judges’ abuse and criminality: “Scandal sells” and reporting it can win Pulitzer Prizes. 26. Journalists can: a. conduct a focused and cost-effective investigation by starting off from the abundance of leads already gathered(OL:194§E); b. interview ‘little people’, such as waiters, waitresses, maids, bartenders, bellboys, drivers, and receptionists at conference centers, hotels, yachts, and private/country clubs, whom the judges deemed too dumb to understand their bragging in the presence of other judges and VIPs about their latest or most daring way of grabbing gain and convenience by disregarding due process requirements and taking advantage of confidential information discussed in chambers by the parties; ex-parte; submitted under seal; and revealed for a bribe; c. search for Deep Throat(jur:106§c) in Court: former and current court and law clerks, judges, and lawyers, who driven by idealism signed on to be Workers of Justice only to be disgusted by becoming ‘Three Monkey’ enforcers of abuse and can now redeem themselves by becoming confidential informants. 27. Disseminating the information obtained can lead to Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting. It can open the way to the investigation and publication of an Annual Report on Judicial Unaccountability and Consequent Abuse of Power. F. Developing this outline at a webinar or by consultation; and other services 28. If you would like to have me either via video conference or in person develop the above outline at a webinar with slides for you and your colleagues and guests or by consulting with me, you can let me know by using my contact information below. 29. To ascertain my capacity to make a presentation you may want to view my video and follow it on its slides. 30. You can also let me know if you wish to: a. retain me to write a brief or a statement for you; b. publish one or a series of my already written and downloadable articles (Appendix 6§A) judicial abuse of power and financial criminality exposure, compensation of abusees, and reform through transformative change(¶77); etc.(¶48); c. commission an article; d. hold together with journalists, students and professors, media outlets, and specialized schools the proposed multidisciplinary unprecedented citizens hearings. There the testimony of those who have suffered or witnessed judges’ abuse and criminality will be taken in person and inexpensively wherever they are via video conference, and broadcast multimedia nationally; 1) promote the citizens hearings by sponsoring a tour of presentations at schools and other venues(OL:197§G); and 2) organize the first-ever conference on judges’ abuse in connivance with politicians, who fear their devastating power of retaliation(Lsch:17§C). There the citizens hearings report will be presented interactively to a national and international audience. This can launch a global MeToo!, BLM-like movement where people shout the rallying cry so expressive of their self-assertive mood: Enough is enough! We won’t take any abuse from anybody anymore. e. join the investigation into judges, to be focused and cost-effective by starting off from the abundance of leads already gathered(OL:194§E); f. invest capital or expertise in the development of the website at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org to monetize its public appeal, proven by its 41,071+ subscribers, and make the site the center of a multidisciplinary academic and business venture, as described in its business plan, which is guided by the motto “Making Money While Doing Justice”. The investment can turn the site from an informational platform into: 1) a clearinghouse for complaints against judges that anybody can upload; 2) a research center for fee-paying clients auditing judges’ decisions and searching many other writings from many sources that through computer-assisted statistical, linguistic, and literary analysis can reveal the most persuasive type of evidence: judges’ patterns, trends, and schemes of abuse of power; and 3) the showroom and shopping portal of a multidisciplinary academic and business venture(jur:119§§1-4). It can evolve into the Institute of Judicial Unaccountability Reporting and Reform Advocacy, to be attached to a university or a news network. g. help form a national, single issue, apolitical, civic movement for We the People, the Masters of all public servants, to hold judicial public servants accountable for the exercise of the public power entrusted to them for the good of the People and liable to the victims of their abuse. 31. With their informing and reporting recognized as work in the public interest, demanders of collective compensation and journalists investigating judges can become acclaimed as the People‘sChampions of Justice. So can you. G. Every meaningful cause needs resource for its advancement; none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money 32. Lip service advances nothing; but it continues to enable the abusers. Put your money where your outrage at abuse and passion for justice are. 33. Support the professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking of: Judicial Discipline ReformDONATE by making a deposit or an online transfer through the Bill Pay feature of your online account or Zelle, to Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089; or TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673. Dare trigger history!…and you may enter it. Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Judicial Discipline Reform 2165 Bruckner Blvd Bronx, New York City 10472-6506 tel. +1(718)827-9521 Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, CorderoRic@yahoo.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq- 0508ba4bNOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at *>ggl:1 et seq. and †>OL2:1114§G, when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses. *************************
111 W Washington Street Chicago Illinois 60602 USA
News out of Vermont paints a bleak picture of just how harmful the collective psychosis of COVID hysteria is, a phenomenon that seems isolated to heavily Democrat areas.
For years, fear-mongering from the government and national media has pushed people to detach themselves from reality when it comes to assessing risk profiles regarding the coronavirus. That’s now playing out in the form of completely asymptomatic individuals rushing to jam up emergency rooms in Vermont. Though, as we’ll see, this is hardly limited to the Green Mountain State.
My thoughts, everyone should read the article,,,
The article shows that there is mental illness within the population, and it is growing. I hope that the democrats and other fear mongering monsters are happy with themselves. I also hopes that it comes back to bite them in their big ugly asses. They will be proud of themselves. Not only are they killing millions of people with their jabs, but they are scaring them to death before they die.
Strengthen my faith, Lord. Forgive my sins, so that I may be clean in your righteousness.
Make me brave, so I can stand and fight the spiritual battles in my life and in our world. Give me your wisdom and discernment so I won’t be caught off guard.
Together, Lord, we’ll win, because in truth, you already have. While evil still roams, the power of Your name and Your blood rises up to defeat and bring us victory against every evil planned against us. While malicious actions may disturb us, we use the armor of God You have given us to stand firm.
You will bring justice in due time for all the harm and needless violence aimed at Your children. Until then, we remain in Your presence, aligned with Your purposes, and we look to You as our Supreme Commander and Protector.
Help us to avoid temptation, and deliver us from evil, Lord. You are the Mighty One, the One Who will ultimately bring all evil to light. With You, Jesus, we are safe. Amen.
Watch Queensland Senator Pauline Hanson I’m Not Putting That Shit in My Body Video
This entry was posted by aviator on December 13, 2021 at 6:13 pm
🇦🇺 Queensland Senator Pauline Hanson: “I Haven’t Had the Jab, I Don’t Intend to Have the Jab, I’m Not Putting That Shit in My Body.”👇 pic.twitter.com/LUE6hCEOXB
All for a disease that’s so terrible and deadly, people have to be tested to see if they even have it; and for a vaccine that’s so wonderful, people have to be threatened and coerced to take it. This appears to many people to be literal insanity.
Another government official comes out. she knows the potential fate so she wants to be on the right side. But after 2 years, don’t think so. Too late
Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
One can only wonder if the court will do what it should do. When they first began allowing abortions, they never suspected that people would be aborting born babies (killing them at birth). They never suspected that they would be keeping aborted fetuses alive, and harvesting their body parts while they are still living.
It must be overturned, there are sick people out there doing horrendous crimes, and must not go unchecked.
Why in the hell isn’t she in jail for threatening the court? If it were us, we would have the FBI banging down the door by now. But demonrats are above the law.
By Politics.co.uk staff Sajid Javid confirms booster jabs for all adults amid Omicron case rise The health secretary Sajid Javid has confirmed Covid booster jabs will be offered to all adults in the UK to help stem the emergence of the new Omicron variant. The health secretary also confirmed the JCVI had approved cutting the […]
We need you more than ever. Please share this! It turns out that most people don’t know the facts, and I can’t blame them. Where are you supposed to find this kind of information when anything and everything that’s not in alignment with the current narrative is canceled or censored? You know your social environment is not safe anymore when you can’t ask questions and are punished for simply having a different opinion. That’s why we’ve made it possible for you to get full access to this revealing information, but we can’t spread the word fast enough. We can’t do this without YOU. Giving this information to your friends and family will be a game-changer for them as much as it is for you. That’s why we set up a very easy 1-click way to share. Just CLICK HERE and below the video of Patrick, you’ll see a “widget” to help you share. With just one click you can post an invite on Facebook, Messenger, Twitter, and a pre-written email will even pop up. YOU make a difference. THANK YOU! The C0VlD Revealed Revealed Support TeamP.S. Oh yeah, and remember to MARK YOUR CALENDAR! It all starts on: TUESDAY, November 30th @ 9 pm EST / 6 pm PST. And… THANK YOU for joining us in the mission! P.P.S. Every share that registers to watch C0VlD Revealed for free under your unique share link, gives you 1 point per head. Every point counts since we will be giving you access to exclusive bonus content based on how many people you share this with that register to watch with you. FOR EXAMPLE:1 Point – (1 Person) Gives you access to C0VlD Charts CNN Forgot 3 Points – (3 People) Unlocks access to Dr. Malone Speaks Out5 Points – (5 People) Gives you Who Decides Your Child is Next? 10 Points – (10 People) Get access to critical study results with To V@cc!nate or Not to V@cc!nate: 1200 Studies. 15 Points – (15 People) And last, but not least, the complete guide to C0VlD: Essential Guide to C0VlD Each eGuide gives you the information you need to make informed decisions based on facts, not fear. Read them, share them, and be informed! ______________________ If you happen to purchase anything Revealed Films recommends, in this or any of our communications, it’s likely we will receive some kind of affiliate compensation. Still, we only recommend stuff that we truly believe in and share with our friends and family. If you ever have an issue with anything we recommend please let us know. We want to make sure we are always serving you at the highest level. FTC DISCLOSURE: Any health claims shared by viewers, students, friends, subscribers, or clients are understood to be true and accurate, but are not verified in any way. Any products, programs, or personal recommendations made in this or any email communication from Revealed Films for 3rd parties will likely result in some form of compensation from said 3rd party. Always do your own due diligence and use your own judgment when making buying decisions and investments. Always consult a physician before making any health-related decisions. For more information click here for our terms of service. *Results may not be typical and may vary from person to person. Revealed Films 870 E. North Union Ave, Midvale, UT 84047 Tel: (833) 738-3456 Facebook
Originally posted on STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC: This is medical barbarism. From Mary Beth Pfeiffer at rescue.substack.com: A Chicago-area judge saved a grandfather’s life with the single question that exposes hospitals blocking doctors from using a safe, FDA-approved drug: Why? Sun Ng at Edward Hospital in Napierville, Illinois, where officials refused, until ordered by a court,…
Lucifer Unleashed Against President Trump As Last Stand For America Begins
“The essence of the devil is the lie, and he defines himself as: ‘I am who am not’—Lucifer has very little trouble with those who do not believe in him; they are already on his side.”
During the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s work in overturning the US Constitution’s standard for impeaching a President—to include denying a President the ability to defend themselves–was obfuscated by competing claims over if she had been fired by the Watergate Committee—with Jerry Zeifman, General Counsel to the Watergate Committee during the Watergate hearings, in his book Hillary’s Pursuit of Power, and during multiple interviews, accusing her of being a “liar”, “unethical” and “conspiring to violate the Constitution” during the impeachment inquiry into Watergate, and was the reason he fired her—but was a claim countered by the Clinton supporting liberal media who said this wasn’t true.
As in all cases where the truth between competing claims have to be decided, they are put through what is known as a Process of Investigation—which is a progression of activities or steps moving from evidence gathering tasks, to information analysis, to theory development and validation, to forming a reasonable ground to believe—and as it pertains to if, or if not, Hillary Rodham-Clinton was fired for being a “liar”, “unethical” and “conspiring to violate the Constitution”, can only use past and present evidence existing at the time she was fired—thus ruling out anything that happened afterwards, even if it appears to be relevant.
The evidence proving beyond the highest standard of reasonable doubt that Hillary Rodham-Clinton did, in fact, “conspire to violate the Constitution” can be seen in her creation of the “Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment” document against President Nixon—specially because it violates the Sixth Amendment that guarantees the right of all American citizens to retain or have appointed counsel represent them against any kind of charge and/or offense leveled against them, but that she sought to deny to Nixon—and explains why he resigned when faced with the prospect of not being able to have an attorney defend him.
The information analysis of the evidence proving beyond the highest standard of reasonable doubt that Hillary Rodham-Clinton was an “unethical liar conspiring to violate the Constitution”, overwhelmingly leads to the conclusion that she was fired as Watergate General Counsel Jeffrey Zeifman claims she was—which then starts the theory development phase of this Process of Investigation to hypothesize that her actions were based on her intention to overthrow the existing government of the United States for the purpose of making it a socialist-communist state—but in the validation phase of this investigation, must be supported by further evidence proving that she actually intended to do so—and if true, would see Rodham-Clinton, and the forces supporting her, attempting to force upon America the radical communist revolutionary agenda outlined by her mentor Saul Alinsky—and whose 8-Steps to accomplish are:
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Over the coming days, weeks, months, and even years if need be, my Dear Sisters will keep arming you with the true information and facts you need to battle against the Forces of Lucifer trying to destroy President Trump and the American people—such as Trump now being viciously attacked for asking the President of Ukraine questions about corruption in his country that may have been committed by former Vice President Joe Biden and his drug addicted son Hunter—questions that Trump actually had no choice but to ask, as the Constitution he swore an oath to uphold makes him the top law enforcer in the United States—and if failing to ask, would see him breaking this oath.
These facts and truths, though, can’t keep coming to you unless you first realize the grave danger you’re in—and when realizing—start supporting those few of us left still doing so—otherwise, all you’ll be left with are lies told to you by Lucifer and his followers—all of whose names and mainstream media organizations you already know without me having to tell you.
Our Lord, of course, knows all about what’s going on—and is why He gave you guidance to follow in this matter—“A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed.”—and makes my heartfelt prayer for all of you that you’ll follow to see how gloriously true these words really are!
With God,
Sister Ciara
Dublin, Ireland
26 September 2019
Our needs today are dire indeed, but, if every one of you reading this gave just $20.00 today, our budget for the entire year would be met! So, before you click away, ask yourself this simple question….if your knowing the truth about what is happening now, and what will be happening in the future isn’t worth 5 US pennies a day what is?
Lucifer Unleashed Against President Trump As Last Stand For America Begins
“The essence of the devil is the lie, and he defines himself as: ‘I am who am not’—Lucifer has very little trouble with those who do not believe in him; they are already on his side.”
During the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s work in overturning the US Constitution’s standard for impeaching a President—to include denying a President the ability to defend themselves–was obfuscated by competing claims over if she had been fired by the Watergate Committee—with Jerry Zeifman, General Counsel to the Watergate Committee during the Watergate hearings, in his book Hillary’s Pursuit of Power, and during multiple interviews, accusing her of being a “liar”, “unethical” and “conspiring to violate the Constitution” during the impeachment inquiry into Watergate, and was the reason he fired her—but was a claim countered by the Clinton supporting liberal media who said this wasn’t true.
As in all cases where the truth between competing claims have to be decided, they are put through what is known as a Process of Investigation—which is a progression of activities or steps moving from evidence gathering tasks, to information analysis, to theory development and validation, to forming a reasonable ground to believe—and as it pertains to if, or if not, Hillary Rodham-Clinton was fired for being a “liar”, “unethical” and “conspiring to violate the Constitution”, can only use past and present evidence existing at the time she was fired—thus ruling out anything that happened afterwards, even if it appears to be relevant.
The evidence proving beyond the highest standard of reasonable doubt that Hillary Rodham-Clinton did, in fact, “conspire to violate the Constitution” can be seen in her creation of the “Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment” document against President Nixon—specially because it violates the Sixth Amendment that guarantees the right of all American citizens to retain or have appointed counsel represent them against any kind of charge and/or offense leveled against them, but that she sought to deny to Nixon—and explains why he resigned when faced with the prospect of not being able to have an attorney defend him.
The information analysis of the evidence proving beyond the highest standard of reasonable doubt that Hillary Rodham-Clinton was an “unethical liar conspiring to violate the Constitution”, overwhelmingly leads to the conclusion that she was fired as Watergate General Counsel Jeffrey Zeifman claims she was—which then starts the theory development phase of this Process of Investigation to hypothesize that her actions were based on her intention to overthrow the existing government of the United States for the purpose of making it a socialist-communist state—but in the validation phase of this investigation, must be supported by further evidence proving that she actually intended to do so—and if true, would see Rodham-Clinton, and the forces supporting her, attempting to force upon America the radical communist revolutionary agenda outlined by her mentor Saul Alinsky—and whose 8-Steps to accomplish are:
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Over the coming days, weeks, months, and even years if need be, my Dear Sisters will keep arming you with the true information and facts you need to battle against the Forces of Lucifer trying to destroy President Trump and the American people—such as Trump now being viciously attacked for asking the President of Ukraine questions about corruption in his country that may have been committed by former Vice President Joe Biden and his drug addicted son Hunter—questions that Trump actually had no choice but to ask, as the Constitution he swore an oath to uphold makes him the top law enforcer in the United States—and if failing to ask, would see him breaking this oath.
These facts and truths, though, can’t keep coming to you unless you first realize the grave danger you’re in—and when realizing—start supporting those few of us left still doing so—otherwise, all you’ll be left with are lies told to you by Lucifer and his followers—all of whose names and mainstream media organizations you already know without me having to tell you.
Our Lord, of course, knows all about what’s going on—and is why He gave you guidance to follow in this matter—“A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed.”—and makes my heartfelt prayer for all of you that you’ll follow to see how gloriously true these words really are!
With God,
Sister Ciara
Dublin, Ireland
26 September 2019
Our needs today are dire indeed, but, if every one of you reading this gave just $20.00 today, our budget for the entire year would be met! So, before you click away, ask yourself this simple question….if your knowing the truth about what is happening now, and what will be happening in the future isn’t worth 5 US pennies a day what is?
Lucifer Unleashed Against President Trump As Last Stand For America Begins
“The essence of the devil is the lie, and he defines himself as: ‘I am who am not’—Lucifer has very little trouble with those who do not believe in him; they are already on his side.”
During the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s work in overturning the US Constitution’s standard for impeaching a President—to include denying a President the ability to defend themselves–was obfuscated by competing claims over if she had been fired by the Watergate Committee—with Jerry Zeifman, General Counsel to the Watergate Committee during the Watergate hearings, in his book Hillary’s Pursuit of Power, and during multiple interviews, accusing her of being a “liar”, “unethical” and “conspiring to violate the Constitution” during the impeachment inquiry into Watergate, and was the reason he fired her—but was a claim countered by the Clinton supporting liberal media who said this wasn’t true.
As in all cases where the truth between competing claims have to be decided, they are put through what is known as a Process of Investigation—which is a progression of activities or steps moving from evidence gathering tasks, to information analysis, to theory development and validation, to forming a reasonable ground to believe—and as it pertains to if, or if not, Hillary Rodham-Clinton was fired for being a “liar”, “unethical” and “conspiring to violate the Constitution”, can only use past and present evidence existing at the time she was fired—thus ruling out anything that happened afterwards, even if it appears to be relevant.
The evidence proving beyond the highest standard of reasonable doubt that Hillary Rodham-Clinton did, in fact, “conspire to violate the Constitution” can be seen in her creation of the “Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment” document against President Nixon—specially because it violates the Sixth Amendment that guarantees the right of all American citizens to retain or have appointed counsel represent them against any kind of charge and/or offense leveled against them, but that she sought to deny to Nixon—and explains why he resigned when faced with the prospect of not being able to have an attorney defend him.
The information analysis of the evidence proving beyond the highest standard of reasonable doubt that Hillary Rodham-Clinton was an “unethical liar conspiring to violate the Constitution”, overwhelmingly leads to the conclusion that she was fired as Watergate General Counsel Jeffrey Zeifman claims she was—which then starts the theory development phase of this Process of Investigation to hypothesize that her actions were based on her intention to overthrow the existing government of the United States for the purpose of making it a socialist-communist state—but in the validation phase of this investigation, must be supported by further evidence proving that she actually intended to do so—and if true, would see Rodham-Clinton, and the forces supporting her, attempting to force upon America the radical communist revolutionary agenda outlined by her mentor Saul Alinsky—and whose 8-Steps to accomplish are:
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Over the coming days, weeks, months, and even years if need be, my Dear Sisters will keep arming you with the true information and facts you need to battle against the Forces of Lucifer trying to destroy President Trump and the American people—such as Trump now being viciously attacked for asking the President of Ukraine questions about corruption in his country that may have been committed by former Vice President Joe Biden and his drug addicted son Hunter—questions that Trump actually had no choice but to ask, as the Constitution he swore an oath to uphold makes him the top law enforcer in the United States—and if failing to ask, would see him breaking this oath.
These facts and truths, though, can’t keep coming to you unless you first realize the grave danger you’re in—and when realizing—start supporting those few of us left still doing so—otherwise, all you’ll be left with are lies told to you by Lucifer and his followers—all of whose names and mainstream media organizations you already know without me having to tell you.
Our Lord, of course, knows all about what’s going on—and is why He gave you guidance to follow in this matter—“A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed.”—and makes my heartfelt prayer for all of you that you’ll follow to see how gloriously true these words really are!
With God,
Sister Ciara
Dublin, Ireland
26 September 2019
Our needs today are dire indeed, but, if every one of you reading this gave just $20.00 today, our budget for the entire year would be met! So, before you click away, ask yourself this simple question….if your knowing the truth about what is happening now, and what will be happening in the future isn’t worth 5 US pennies a day what is?
Lucifer Unleashed Against President Trump As Last Stand For America Begins
“The essence of the devil is the lie, and he defines himself as: ‘I am who am not’—Lucifer has very little trouble with those who do not believe in him; they are already on his side.”
During the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s work in overturning the US Constitution’s standard for impeaching a President—to include denying a President the ability to defend themselves–was obfuscated by competing claims over if she had been fired by the Watergate Committee—with Jerry Zeifman, General Counsel to the Watergate Committee during the Watergate hearings, in his book Hillary’s Pursuit of Power, and during multiple interviews, accusing her of being a “liar”, “unethical” and “conspiring to violate the Constitution” during the impeachment inquiry into Watergate, and was the reason he fired her—but was a claim countered by the Clinton supporting liberal media who said this wasn’t true.
As in all cases where the truth between competing claims have to be decided, they are put through what is known as a Process of Investigation—which is a progression of activities or steps moving from evidence gathering tasks, to information analysis, to theory development and validation, to forming a reasonable ground to believe—and as it pertains to if, or if not, Hillary Rodham-Clinton was fired for being a “liar”, “unethical” and “conspiring to violate the Constitution”, can only use past and present evidence existing at the time she was fired—thus ruling out anything that happened afterwards, even if it appears to be relevant.
The evidence proving beyond the highest standard of reasonable doubt that Hillary Rodham-Clinton did, in fact, “conspire to violate the Constitution” can be seen in her creation of the “Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment” document against President Nixon—specially because it violates the Sixth Amendment that guarantees the right of all American citizens to retain or have appointed counsel represent them against any kind of charge and/or offense leveled against them, but that she sought to deny to Nixon—and explains why he resigned when faced with the prospect of not being able to have an attorney defend him.
The information analysis of the evidence proving beyond the highest standard of reasonable doubt that Hillary Rodham-Clinton was an “unethical liar conspiring to violate the Constitution”, overwhelmingly leads to the conclusion that she was fired as Watergate General Counsel Jeffrey Zeifman claims she was—which then starts the theory development phase of this Process of Investigation to hypothesize that her actions were based on her intention to overthrow the existing government of the United States for the purpose of making it a socialist-communist state—but in the validation phase of this investigation, must be supported by further evidence proving that she actually intended to do so—and if true, would see Rodham-Clinton, and the forces supporting her, attempting to force upon America the radical communist revolutionary agenda outlined by her mentor Saul Alinsky—and whose 8-Steps to accomplish are:
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Over the coming days, weeks, months, and even years if need be, my Dear Sisters will keep arming you with the true information and facts you need to battle against the Forces of Lucifer trying to destroy President Trump and the American people—such as Trump now being viciously attacked for asking the President of Ukraine questions about corruption in his country that may have been committed by former Vice President Joe Biden and his drug addicted son Hunter—questions that Trump actually had no choice but to ask, as the Constitution he swore an oath to uphold makes him the top law enforcer in the United States—and if failing to ask, would see him breaking this oath.
These facts and truths, though, can’t keep coming to you unless you first realize the grave danger you’re in—and when realizing—start supporting those few of us left still doing so—otherwise, all you’ll be left with are lies told to you by Lucifer and his followers—all of whose names and mainstream media organizations you already know without me having to tell you.
Our Lord, of course, knows all about what’s going on—and is why He gave you guidance to follow in this matter—“A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed.”—and makes my heartfelt prayer for all of you that you’ll follow to see how gloriously true these words really are!
With God,
Sister Ciara
Dublin, Ireland
26 September 2019
Our needs today are dire indeed, but, if every one of you reading this gave just $20.00 today, our budget for the entire year would be met! So, before you click away, ask yourself this simple question….if your knowing the truth about what is happening now, and what will be happening in the future isn’t worth 5 US pennies a day what is?
Election Evidence Was Removed And Hidden From Public Google is interfering with this blog. They have placed this outside my October blogs. Now they have switched this to a draft and blocking it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/10/14/fraudits-are-flopping/ Yes, the Democrats sure were on election night 2020. They were mighty busy – especially during the hours of one to […]
I know it isn’t fair to jump straight to conspiracy-like conclusions about these quarantine camps. Maybe your motives are not sinister at all. Maybe this really is about ‘health and safety’ and ‘stopping the spread’.
Yet, there are several red flags that must be addressed.
Firstly, the name. If you don’t want us to think that you are constructing an Orwellian reality, please don’t call it a ‘Centre for National Resilience’. Maybe this isn’t quite at the ‘Ministry of Love’ level, but let’s just say if I was ever unlucky enough to be a ‘guest’ in these facilities, I would studiously avoid Cabin 101.
Secondly, the staffing. Prison officers are great and all, but really? It isn’t exactly reassuring to be told in a recent community briefing Zoom that this is because they bring ‘a really strong understanding of command and control and also what a rule means and how a rule should be applied. Also, after the recent show of brute force by police in Melbourne, finding out that ‘VicPol provides the support around the security elements for all of our operations and will continue to do so’, is just a tad concerning.
Finally, you realise that the world is laughing at us, don’t you? There are the constant memes describing Australia as ‘the world’s largest prison camp’, a New York Times inside scoop describing people being confined in these camps ‘like animals in a zoo’, and a viral tweet from James Melville showing drone and news footage with the caption: ‘Meanwhile in Australia. Quarantine camps. They are so far down the rabbit hole now.’
I’m trying hard not to don a tin-foil hat, but it’s getting just a little difficult now. I guess as long as you don’t promise to be our ‘single source of truth’, we’ll be okay?
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]
reposted here pursuant to Fair Use doctrine
We need you more than ever. Please share this! It turns out that most people don’t know the facts, and I can’t blame them. Where are you supposed to find this kind of information when anything and everything that’s not in alignment with the current narrative is canceled or censored? You know your social environment is not safe anymore when you can’t ask questions and are punished for simply having a different opinion. That’s why we’ve made it possible for you to get full access to this revealing information, but we can’t spread the word fast enough. We can’t do this without YOU. Giving this information to your friends and family will be a game-changer for them as much as it is for you. That’s why we set up a 
3 Points – (3 People) Unlocks access to Dr. Malone Speaks Out 
5 Points – (5 People) Gives you Who Decides Your Child is Next? 
10 Points – (10 People) Get access to critical study results with To V@cc!nate or Not to V@cc!nate: 1200 Studies. 
15 Points – (15 People) And last, but not least, the complete guide to C0VlD: Essential Guide to C0VlD 
Each eGuide gives you the information you need to make informed decisions based on facts, not fear. Read them, share them, and be informed! ______________________ If you happen to purchase anything Revealed Films recommends, in this or any of our communications, it’s likely we will receive some kind of affiliate compensation. Still, we only recommend stuff that we truly believe in and share with our friends and family. If you ever have an issue with anything we recommend please let us know. We want to make sure we are always serving you at the highest level. FTC DISCLOSURE: Any health claims shared by viewers, students, friends, subscribers, or clients are understood to be true and accurate, but are not verified in any way. Any products, programs, or personal recommendations made in this or any email communication from Revealed Films for 3rd parties will likely result in some form of compensation from said 3rd party. Always do your own due diligence and use your own judgment when making buying decisions and investments. Always consult a physician before making any health-related decisions. For more information click 
The BlackRobed Mafia 
