Coming to America 2 actress and host of ABC’s Supermarket Sweep Leslie Jones reacted to the conviction of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin in a video message to her 1.4 million Twitter followers, saying “Now let’s get the rest of them motherfuckers.”
“Guilty. Guilty. Guilty,” said Jones in a video she posted to Twitter, likely in reference to the three charges in the death of George Floyd, which the jury found Chauvin guilty of on Tuesday.
“Now let’s get the rest of them motherfuckers,” Jones added, in apparent reference to other police officers involved in unfortunate or tragic incidents.
Last summer, after the death of George Floyd, Jones suggested that protesters “vote” in an effort to “burn down this fucking Constitution,” rather than burn down buildings.
“I love that you guys are protesting and see how quick you did it. But I’m gonna tell you, to get the fuck what you really want, we’re going to have to change the fucking system,” she said. “And to change the system, we have to fucking vote.”
“You want to burn down buildings? Burn down this fucking Constitution,” Jones added. “That’s how we really show them.”
Now, nearly a year later, Jones appears to be pleased with the “system” she has previously expressed doesn’t work, as she celebrates the jury’s verdict, and suggests the system should be used to “get the rest of them motherfuckers.”
In 2017, Jones slammed President Donald Trump, stating, “I want to be in love — I want to do that, but it’s 2017, and we got a pig in office. The world is about to end” during a politically charged stand-up comedy set.
In 2018, Jones faced fire from the Baltimore City Fraternal Order of Police which criticized Saturday Night Live for lampooning the city’s police officers. The sketch, entitled “Traffic Stop, saw Jones and other cast members dressed as police who flirt with and sexually harass a male driver.
Gavin Newsom, the tyrannical dictator over California, is about to lose his title of “governor.” Before he is removed from power, he is trying all he can to threaten freedom in the state and to force certain races of people to vaccinate. Newsom says the people of California will not be able to go back to normal until 2 million Latinos are fully vaccinated according to the current CDC guidelines.
As part of the state’s “equitable” distribution of covid-19 vaccinations, California public health officials have allocated 40 percent of the state’s vaccine lot to the Latino communities in Central Valley and in pockets of Los Angeles. Gavin Newsom is threatening to hold down the livelihoods of people throughout the state, in a desperate attempt to divide people by race and pressure Latinos to take the vaccines.
Gavin Newsom racially profiles Latinos, forcing them to vaccinate in high numbers in order for people to have their freedoms back
Instead of seeking repentance for his tyrannical actions over the past year, Gavin Newsom is trying to shift the blame for his perpetual lockdowns by shaming people who don’t get the experimental vaccines. The first group that Newsom seeks to shame and racially profile are the Latinos, who live mostly in low-income areas, where infection data is high and where healthcare systems are failing.
Newsom refuses to take accountability for his perpetual lockdown policies, which have needlessly upended countless lives. The only way out for Newsom and these corrupt public health figures is to use the lockdowns once more to deprive people of their rights and segregate certain races and demographics, coercing them to give up their bodily autonomy.
State Health and Human Services Director, Dr. Mark Ghaly, said the state won’t reopen until the shots are in the arms. If Latinos do not submit themselves in higher numbers, then California will stay locked down. “As we achieve higher levels of vaccine in the hardest hit communities, we feel more confident that more and more activities across the state can occur,” he said in a recent press briefing. This is what the lockdowns were for. They weren’t a benign 14-day break, to “slow the spread.” They weren’t put in place to prevent peak capacity of hospitals. The lockdowns are to abuse people in every facet of life, until they submit their bodies en masse to the pharmaceutical companies. (Related: Biden orders TROOPS to administer coronavirus vaccines in California as military is repurposed for genocide.)
Using threats and coercion, California targets specific races and neighborhoods, giving rise to a Fourth Reich
The “equitable” distribution plan is not based on compassion, informed consent, or any medical ethic whatsoever. The “equitable” distribution plan is a way to target specific demographics and races, to put pressure on them to comply. Vaccination is no longer respected as an individual choice, with comprehensive, informed consent. Vaccination is being rolled out in stages, lumping people in herds, so they are more likely to be pressured by their peers and coerced to comply. By hinging the state’s freedom on one race’s compliance to the vaccines, a Fourth Reich is officially born.
In California, lockdowns are broken down into “reopening tiers” as state officials promise freedom in stages. These reopening tiers dictate business operations and school re-openings. Californians are being spoon-fed their freedom, as long as a certain percentage of the population complies with vaccinations. This color-based tier plan is now putting people of color in its cross-hairs, forcing them to comply in order for Californians to get some of their freedom back.
This level of coercion is racist, illegal and in violation of basic medical ethics and the Nuremberg treaty. With this level of coercion in place, state officials believe they will get 1.6 million people to comply with a first round of shots in the next two weeks. Officials do not consider this amount of vaccination sufficient to green-light “reopening tiers” across the state. Public health officials demand that the state will not get some of its freedoms back until 4 million doses of vaccine are received in the arms of Latinos in the targeted neighborhoods.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said calling illegal immigration a “surge” is part of a racist narrative in an Instagram Live AMA Tuesday.
Democrat “squad” member, Ocasio-Cortez, responded to a question regarding her seeming avoidance of the ongoing border crisis now that former President Trump has left office. On an Instagram Live “Ask Me Anything” session with her followers, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez paused to condemn labeling the crisis a “surge.”
When a viewer asked Ocasio-Cortez why was no longer “addressing the border crisis and the kids in cages like you used to,” she paused for a moment. “It’s not a border crisis. It’s an Imperialism crisis, it’s a climate crisis, it’s a trade crisis. And also it’s a carceral crisis,” she said.
“But people don’t want to have that conversation,” AOC continued. “They want to say, ‘But what about the surge?’” Then she called for a “gut check,” saying “Stop. Anyone who’s using the term ‘surge’ around you, consciously, is trying to invoke a militaristic frame.”
“And that’s a problem, because this is not a surge. These are children and they are not insurgents and we are not being invaded,” she continued. She called the idea and its language part of “a white supremacist philosophy,” criticizing “the idea that if another is coming in the population that this is an invasion of who we are.”
Marine veteran and Townhall.com senior writer Julio Rosas disagreed. “I’ve been using the term “surge” because there’s a higher than usual amount of people illegally crossing into the U.S.,” Rosas tweeted Tuesday night. And unlike AOC, Rosas said he had “seen it with my own eyes on a nightly basis for the past week.”
“Yes, there are kids here, often by themselves. It’s emotionally taxing to see that night after night because God only knows what they’ve been through,” Rosas continued. “Funny how AOC raced down to TX for the winter storm but she can’t be bothered to come down now to see what’s happening.”
You really don’t think that this event in the Suez canal was an ACCIDENT… do you?
They say that it won’t be long before the rest of the world realizes the economic impact from this debacle… but, is it REALLY a debacle or is it just another globalist-planned crisis like the Covid scam to further fuck with society and bring it to a grinding halt at their feet? It’s the latter, folks, you can bet the farm on it.
These megalomaniacal bastards know no restraints, their plans for world government have been in the works for thousands of years, a multi-generational scheme to control it ALL. Up to now, their movements have been relatively slow, but, things are heating up fast. They know the time is ripe for the take-over, society has never been more compliant than it is, today. People will believe anything and put up with anything rather…
About three weeks ago the Demo-Bolsheviks announced that they were starting a new attack on the Second Amendment with a push for more gun-control laws that would further disarm law-abiding citizens (the only ones who would obey such laws). Then there were two widely-publicized mass shootings in Atlanta and Boulder (unlike the not-so-publicized daily mass shootings in Chicago, Baltimore, Atlanta, and other heavily “gun-controlled” Demo-Bolshevik-run cities).
Obviously, the way to reduce or eliminate mass shootings is to get the Demo-Bolsheviks to stop threatening to destroy the Second Amendment once and for all. It seems like every time they make an announcement like this, sure enough, there is then a mass shooting that (they think) bolsters their case.
The Wisconsin state legislature has passed a resolution authorizing an official investigation into the 2020 election in the badger state. The resolution allows for evidence gathering and subpoena power for witness depositions.
Via Associated Press – MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Republican-controlled Wisconsin Assembly passed a resolution Tuesday to authorize an investigation into the 2020 presidential election that President Joe Biden narrowly won in the state.
The resolution, opposed by Democrats, is needed to give the committee authorization if it decides to issue subpoenas to compel testimony and gather documents, said Rep. Joe Sanfelippo. He is vice-chairman of the Assembly elections and campaign committee that would conduct the probe.
The resolution authorizing the investigation passed on a 58-35 party line vote, with all Republicans in support and all Democrats against. It passed after Republicans last month ordered an audit of the election results. (read more)
U.S. Health Officials Accuse AstraZeneca of Misrepresenting Efficacy Data
An independent trial review board says AstraZeenca may have included outdated information about its clinical trial results in a press release.ByMegan Redshaw
In a “highly unusual” statement Tuesday, a U.S. health agency said AstraZeneca may have included “outdated information” in its clinical trial results, which may have led to the vaccine maker providing the public with an incomplete view of its efficacy data.
The statement by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) came less than a day after the pharmaceutical company said its vaccine was 79% effective against COVID and 100% effective against severe or critical disease and hospitalization.
“We urge the company to work with the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) to review the efficacy data and ensure the most accurate, up-to-date efficacy data be made public as quickly as possible,” the NIAID said.
AstraZeneca immediately responded saying the numbers published Monday were based on a “pre-specified interim analysis with a data cut-off” of Feb. 17. The company promised to “immediately engage with the DSMB to share their primary analysis with the most up-to-date efficacy data” and to issue the results of the primary analysis within 48 hours.
The DSMB is an independent expert group that sees trial data before the pharmaceutical companies, the doctors running the trials or even the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), according to CNN. It has the authority to advise a company of positive interim findings or to halt a trial over safety concerns, which is what happened to AstraZeneca last September after a study participant developed neurological symptoms.
In an interview with Good Morning America, NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci explained the sequence of events. Fauci said that the DSMB and AstraZeneca reviewed the trial data together before the vaccine maker issued its press release. But when AstraZeneca issued its press release, the DSMB “got concerned and wrote a rather harsh note to them and with a copy to me saying that in fact the data that was in the press release were somewhat outdated and might in fact be misleading a bit and wanted them to straighten it out.”
That’s when NIAID issued its statement advising AstraZeneca that it “better get back with the DSMB to make sure that the correct data gets put into a press release,” Fauci said. Fauci said that DSMB picking up this discrepancy is really “a safeguard.”
In a statement to the Science Media Centre in the UK, Stephen Evans, professor of pharmacoepidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said that members of the DSMB sometimes disagree with investigators over vaccine trial results, but usually in private. “So this is unprecedented in my opinion,” Evans said.
As analysts scrambled to interpret the statement, one scientist claimed the U.S. government stopped just short of accusing AstraZeneca of manipulating its trial data.
According to The New York Times, companies sponsoring drug or vaccine trials typically wait for the monitoring board to review analyses and conclude that the study has yielded an answer before they announce trial results.
In recent days, the monitoring board’s analysis of the AstraZeneca trial was delayed several times because the board asked for revised reports from those handling trial data on behalf of the company. The monitoring board ultimately conveyed the results of the study to AstraZeneca in a meeting over the weekend, leading to the company’s press release Monday morning.
Dr. Eric Topol, a clinical trials expert at Scripps Research in San Diego, said it was “highly irregular” to see such a public display of friction between a monitoring board and a study sponsor. “I’ve never seen anything like this,” he told the Times after the institute’s statement was released. “It’s so, so troubling.”
According to Zero Hedge, the AstraZeneca vaccine — which is a linchpin of the World Health Organization’s effort to vaccinate poorer countries via its Bill Gates-approved COVAX initiative — once again finds itself mired in controversy. Notably, in its most recent data, AstraZeneca neglected to include key information, such as the number of trial participants who developed “severe COVID.” AstraZeneca President Ruud Dobber, during an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, said the number was “5,” shortly after the data were released.
“The way they handled their data early on, AstraZeneca basically shot themselves in the foot,” Julian Tang, a virologist at the University of Leicester, said even before the latest issue arose.
AstraZeneca has received criticism over its studies since the first data released in the UK, which purported to show the vaccine was 70% effective, yet failed to account for a manufacturing mistake and didn’t include enough participants over 65 to determine efficacy among older patients, reported ZeroHedge.
European governments like Germany and France responded by initially limiting the jab to patients under the age of 65. In the U.S., officials suspended AstraZeneca’s study in 30,000 Americans for an unusual six weeks last fall, as frustrated regulators sought details about neurological problems reported in Britain.
The latest controversy comes after 20 countries suspended use of AstraZeneca last week based on reports of rare blood clots, some resulting in death, in healthy people who received the vaccine. Although The European Medicines Agency (EMA) found the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID vaccine “may be associated with very rare cases of blood clots,” it deemed the vaccine “safe and effective” and encouraged countries to use it, The Defender reported.
Two independent research teams in Norway and Germany announced Friday they identified antibodies that provoke immune reactions leading to the type of blood clots experienced by some people who received AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine. Although many countries resumed their vaccination program with AstraZeneca’s vaccine after the EMA’s preliminary findings, some countries, including France, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland, have not lifted their restrictions on its use, according to The British Medical Journal.
And Federal employees get!!! Americans Will Get $1,400 Once from Dem COVID Relief Bill, Federal Workers Can Get $21,000 Of taxpayers money… “Under the bill as currently drafted, full-time federal employees can take up to 600 hours in paid leave until September 30, up to $35 an hour and $1,400 a week. That’s 15 weeks […]
Following today’s release of the latest Personal Income and Spending data, Wall Street was predictably focused on the changes in these two key series, which showed a surge in personal income (to be expected in the month when the $900BN December 2020 stimulus hit), coupled with a far more modest increase in personal spending.
But while the change in the headline data was notable, what was far more remarkable was data showing just how reliant on the US government the population has become.Recommended VideosGoogle Launches Stadia Gaming Platform
We are referring, of course, to Personal Current Transfer payments which are essentially government sourced income such as unemployment benefits, welfare checks, and so on. In January, this number was $5.781 trillion annualized, which was not only up by nearly $2 trillion from the $3.8 trillion in December it was also $2 trillion above the pre-Covid trend where transfer receipts were approximately $3.2 trillion.
This means that excluding the $2 trillion annualized surge in govt transfers, personal income excluding government handouts actually declined by $22.3BN from $15.696TN to $15.673TN, hardly a sign of a healthy, reflating economy.
Shown in longer-term context, one can see the creeping impact of government payments, shown in red below.
This, as noted earlier, was due to the latest round of government stimulus checks hitting personal accounts which in turn helped push the savings rate to a whopping 20.5% from 13.4% at the end of 2020.
Stated simply, what all this means is that the government remains responsible for over a quarter of all income, or 26.9 to be precise!
Imagine what that income chart will look like after Biden’s $1400 checks go out?
Putting that number in perspective, in the 1950s and 1960s, transfer payment were around 7%. This number rose in the low teens starting in the mid-1970s (right after the Nixon Shock ended Bretton-Woods and closed the gold window). The number then jumped again after the financial crisis, spiking to the high teens.
And now, the coronavirus has officially sent this number into the mid-20% range, after hitting a record high 31% in April.
And that’s how creeping banana republic socialism comes at you: first slowly, then fast.
So for all those who claim that the Fed is now (and has been for the past decade) subsidizing the 1%, that’s true, but with every passing month, the government is also funding the daily life of an ever greater portion of America’s poorest social segments.
Who ends up paying for both?
Why the middle class of course, where the dollar debasement on one side, and the insane debt accumulation on the other, mean that millions of Americans content to work 9-5, pay their taxes, and generally keep their mouth shut as others are burning everything down and tearing down statues, are now doomed.
The “good” news? As we reported last November, the US middle class won’t have to suffer this pain for much longer, because while the US has one one of the highest median incomes in the entire world, with only three countries boasting a higher income, it is who gets to collect this money that is the major problem, because as the chart also shows, with just a 50% share of the population in middle-income households, the US is now in the same category as such “banana republics” as Turkey, China and, drumroll, Russia.
What is just as stunning: according to the OECD, more than half of the countries in question have a more vibrant middle class than the US.
So the next time someone abuses the popular phrase “they hate us for our [fill in the blank]”, perhaps it’s time to counter that “they” may not “hate” us at all, but rather are making fun of what has slowly but surely become the world’s biggest banana republic?
And as we concluded last year, “it has not Russia, nor China, nor any other enemy, foreign or domestic, to blame… except for one: the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States.”