A man in our neighborhood, who is disabled and elderly, showed us his Electricity Billing, here is what it shows:
Customer Name: MAN Account Number: 72 years old Current Electric Service – Residential Next Scheduled Read Date: On or after Mar 20, 2023 Meter Reading: 2986544 Reading Type: Tot kWh Current – 78510; Previous: 76740
Usage: 1,770 Jan 19 – Feb 17 Billing Period: Jan 19, 2023 – Feb 17, 2023 Rate Rider: Senior Citizens Discount Basic Service Charge: $ 13.35 Merger Transition Credit: 0.00 Senior Citizen Discount: -24.00 Senior Citizen Fuel Discount: -6.00 Energy Charge: 650 KWH x 0.058366: 37.94 Energy Charge: 350 KWH x 0.050062: 17.52 Energy Charge: 770 KWH x 0.049143: 37.84 Fuel Charge: 1770 KWH x 0.028241: 49.99 Economy Sales Credit 0.0000000: 0.00 Demand Side Management: 1.89 Rate Case Adjustment: 4.91 Environmental Compliance Cost: 19.09 Nuclear Construction Cost Recovery: 4.87 Municipal Franchise Fee: 1.86 Sales Tax: 12.73 Total Current Electric Service $ 171.99
Notice, the actual energy used is only: $143.29, and that by itself is ridiculous.
They are taxing us on something that we got no use from, but were charged.
If they had taxed us only on the energy we bought, it would have been a little over $10 for taxes.
Basic Service Charge $13.35. That means that even if you use no energy at all, and just have an account with them, you pay that amount of money. But if you use energy, you still pay this amount on top of all the other crazy charges they stick on.
Further, Environmental Complaint Cost of $19.09? The energy company does not pay for it’s environmental crimes, we pay for it. How can an energy company learn not to violate the environmental laws, when it is their customers, not the energy companies, that are punished for that? If it went to the investors (stock holders), you know that they would learn a lesson, but no, they put it off onto the customers. Thanks GA Public Commission people who regulate what GA Power can charge to us. Maybe it should go to the Commission paying the $19.09, maybe then they would learn that it is not the customers that should be paying the violations fees.
Geez, wouldn’t everyone like to stick someone else with the payments for their own penalties?
WTF is a Municipal Franchise Fee?
WTF is a Rate Case Adjustment fee?
WTF is Demand Side Management Fee?
Why do people that will never get any energy from the nuclear reactors, pay for construction of nuclear reactors that were supposed to be completed and running by 2016?* The new reactors still are not producing energy.
Why are we charged with fuel charges for electricity, when they have smart meters and use no fuel to come read the meter? We all need to get rid of the smart meters anyway.
So the Senior Discount for this elderly, disabled man, is about the same amount of the pretend charges tacked onto everyone’s bill each month. Notice the fuel charge of $49.99, the senior discount gives $6.00 off there, + $24.00 off on top of that; for a 72 year old disabled man, with no other income.
US gov’t data reveals shocking miscarriage, still birth rates after COVID jab compared to flu vaccine
‘The pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, [and] maybe [in the history of] humanity,’ Dr. James Thorp told Tucker Carlson.
(LifeSiteNews) – A preprint study examining government data has found that, in comparison to the influenza vaccine, the COVID-19 gene-based inoculations produce a 57-fold increase in miscarriages, a 38-fold increase in still birth rates, and a 1200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities.
Dr. James Thorp, a board-certified Obstetrician/Gynecologist, appeared on the Tucker Carlson Show on Thursday to discuss the paper he coauthored and expects will soon be “the lead featured article in a major peer-reviewed medical journal.”
The expert in maternal fetal medicine, who has almost 44 years of experience, lamented the results, telling Carlson that “the pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, maybe humanity.”
“We have never, ever broken the sacrosanct golden rule of pregnancy, never, ever,” he told the Fox News host, explaining that it is a medical “golden rule to never allow unknown substances to ever be used in pregnancy.”
Using data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) VAERS system, Thorp explained that he and his colleagues “compared the COVID-19 vaccine adverse events over 18 months with those of the influenza vaccine over 282 months.”
Recognizing the “danger threshold” used by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the CDC of a “two-fold or greater” increase indicating “abnormal” outcomes, the physician reported, “We found a 1200-fold increase in severe menstrual abnormalities, a 57-fold increase in miscarriage, [and] a 38-fold increase in fetal death or stillbirth rates. We found 15 other major pregnancy complications, all far exceeding the CDC and the FDA values of safety.”
According to the study’s abstract, these additional complications include “fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformation, fetal cystic hygroma, fetal cardiac disorders, fetal arrhythmias, [and] fetal cardiac arrest.”
Furthermore, “I can produce more than 30 other completely independent sources globally that corroborate exactly our findings,” Thorp said. “And if that is not bad enough, this includes Pfizer’s own internal data.”
In an essay Thorp wrote last November unpacking the findings of his team—which includes Dr. Peter McCullough—he lists “34 Independent Sources Collaborating VAERS C19 Vax Injury” including the UK government, UK Yellow card, EMA EudraVigillance, World Health Organization VigiAccess, and the World Council for Health.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES US Canada Catholic
As early as December 1, 2020, a former vice president and chief scientist for Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, along with a German colleague, filed a petition with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) calling for an immediate halt to all testing of the COVID-19 “vaccines” due to significant safety concerns including “infertility of indefinite duration [which] could result in vaccinated women.”
By April 2021, LifeSiteNews covered how thousands of women around the world were already reporting disrupted menstrual cycles after receiving injections of COVID-19 “vaccines,” (i.e. biowarfare agents). Such reports continued into August and September of that year despite the headwinds of Big Tech information suppression.
Around the same time, at least one study also emerged confirming the dreadful results of Yeadon’s unheeded warning in 2020, along with the surfacing of another study obtained from the Japanese medicines agency. This revealed how the “vaccine” substances concentrate in the ovaries, presenting the potential for all sorts of long term complications.
In January 2022, whistleblower physicians from the U.S. Department of Defense revealed a 279% increase in miscarriages among military families, a 471% increase in female infertility, and a 156% increase in birth defects.
Unpacking some of her team’s findings among a trove of Pfizer documents released due to a court order, feminist author Naomi Wolf explained last May that while women had been “assured that the vaccines were safe and effective,” this was based on faulty science. And furthermore, “reproduction itself is targeted” by these mRNA injections, causing a large-scale “baby die-off” amounting to “genocide.”
Boycott United Airlines until they permanently drop their unlawful Covid jab mandate
Show Petition Text
4514 have signed the petition.
Let’s get to 5000!
Add your signature:Country…USACanadaAaland IslandsAfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D’IvoireCroatiaCubaCuracaoCyprusCzech RepublicDemocratic Republic of the CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacauMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorth KoreaNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinePanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarRepublic of KosovoReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthelemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint MartinSaint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint MaartenSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan Mayen IslandsSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVatican CityVenezuelaVietnamVirgin Islands (British)Virgin Islands (U.S.)Wallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabweNot Collected
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues. Sign this Petition
›New Studies Deliver Harsh Verdicts on Mask Mandates, Vaccine Mandates for U.S. Cities
Two new studies on the effectiveness of mask mandates and city-level COVID-19 vaccine mandates concluded the policies failed to achieve their promised objectives. The study on vaccine mandates found the mandates caused economic harm.
Researchers found city-level vaccine mandates to have, at most, a negligible effect on vaccination rates, while conversely having a negative effect on cities’ economies.
Commenting on the study, California attorney Rita Barnett told The Defender:
“Shutting people out of society or denying them employment for refusing to take a medical treatment they do not want, need or trust violates all fundamental ethical principles — and local businesses and leaders who went along with these measures may suffer the consequences for many years to come.”
In the case of mask mandates, researchers who conducted a meta-analysis found they had no significant impact on curtailing the spread of COVID-19 — regardless of the type of mask studied.
Sujata Gibson, a lawyer and lead counsel on multiple lawsuits brought by New York City workers impacted by COVID-19 mandates said the study “shows conclusively that municipal COVID-19 vaccine mandates were a bust.”
Gibson, who said the findings should “come as no surprise,” added:
“They did absolutely nothing to reduce death or disease and failed to even meaningfully increase vaccine uptake. The reality is that back in the fall of 2021, when these mandates were imposed, the science already clearly showed that they were irrational.
“We have to ask — since it wasn’t science, what was really driving the municipal mandates? And we have to hold decision-makers and governments accountable for destroying untold thousands of lives for no rational reason.”
Vaccine mandates: little-to-no uptick in vaccinations, big uptick in economic harm
The researchers examined mandates in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, New Orleans, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington, D.C.
The paper states:
“City vaccine mandates were arguably among the most restrictive and polarizing regulations ever enacted in the United States. Millions of people were prevented from entering restaurants, bars, gyms, theaters, sports arenas, and other public indoor areas without proof of COVID-19 vaccination.”
According to WTOP News, the paper made “no judgments on whether someone should or should not get a vaccine, raises no questions about a vaccine’s effectiveness, and doesn’t try to argue whether someone should get one or not.”
Vitor Melo, a Ph.D. candidate in economics at Clemson University and one of the paper’s authors, told WTOP News, “Their [the mandates] intended outcomes were to raise vaccination rates, for people to get more vaccines; and consequently, the expectation was that COVID cases and deaths would go down.”
But according to the paper, “Indoor vaccine mandates had no significant impact on COVID-19 vaccine uptake, cases, or deaths across all nine cities that implemented the policy.”
Compared with cities that did not enact vaccine mandates, “There’s not much to show for it” on the part of the cities that did enforce mandates, Melo added. “COVID cases were not affected, COVID deaths were not affected, and really, there’s no evidence that people got more vaccinated because of these mandates.”
According to the paper:
“Previous research has shown that similar country-level mandates increased vaccine uptake substantially. However, city-level mandates are easier to evade than country-level mandates because it is generally easier to travel to a neighboring city that does not have a mandate than to cross national borders.”
As a result, the city mandates did not succeed in getting “people who were skeptical or resistant of the vaccine to do something they didn’t want to do,” Melo said. “I guess if you make life difficult enough for people, they’re more likely to do what you want them to do. But in the United States, at the city level, what they did, did not seem to work.”
The researchers said their “results overwhelmingly support the conclusion that the city-level indoor vaccine mandates in the United States had a statistically negligible effect on vaccine uptake, cases, and deaths, and they were likely less effective when compared to country-level and province-level mandates.”
For instance, the researchers noted that New York City fired 1,430 municipal workers for not complying with its vaccine mandate. They also referenced a study finding that 90% of the city’s restaurants reported experiencing “customer-related challenges” and 75% reported having “staff-related challenges.”
“Those are just a small fraction of the disruptions caused by the mandates,” the researchers said.
Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus and senior research scientist in epidemiology (chronic diseases) at the Yale School of Public Health, told The Defender he found the analysis “interesting,” adding:
“I wondered whether a summary analysis of all of the nine cities taken together might show something different, but my meta-analysis … did not show a benefit. … I can’t speak to the technical methods in this analysis because they are not used in the types of epidemiologic studies that I do, but they seem reasonable.”
Dr. Meryl Nass, a member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, said she found it “hard to believe that requiring people to vaccinate to undertake indoor activities like going to work did not increase vaccination rates.”
“I think these now-defunct mandates should have given us a taste of what life would be like in a totalitarian society. It should help us identify the pillars of a totalitarian society that are currently being built around us — such as the loss of freedom of speech.”
“I am not surprised by the results of this study. We said from the beginning that masking, social distancing and getting the COVID shots would not stop COVID, nor would any of the mandates prevent the deaths that we are now seeing in much larger numbers in the fully COVID-vaccinated population. We continue to be proven right as the ‘experts’ study the real effects of these COVID mandates.
“Many people who questioned the mandates and refused the unproven COVID shots suffered the loss of their jobs, their businesses, their friends, and worse, their homes and more. The unvaccinated have been hunted down like animals. This is something we never thought we would ever see in America. We must work together to ensure this never happens again.”
‘No evidence’ masks make any difference, ‘full stop’
A meta-analysis published last month by Oxford University senior associate tutor in epidemiology Dr. Tom Jefferson and 11 other researchers called into question the efficacy of masks in reducing the spread of COVID-19.
The researchers said they “wanted to find out whether physical measures stop or slow the spread of respiratory viruses, from well-controlled studies in which one intervention is compared to another, known as randomised controlled trials.”
They sought out studies “that looked at physical measures to stop people acquiring a respiratory virus infection,” and “were interested in how many people in the studies caught a respiratory virus infection, and whether the physical measures had any unwanted effects.”
The researchers identified “78 relevant studies” conducted “in low-, middle-, and high-income countries” during various pandemic, epidemic and non-health emergency periods. They included government and pharmaceutical studies, encompassing 610,872 people, including healthcare workers and the general population.
The researchers assessed the effects of different types of masks, including medical or surgical masks and N95/P2 respirators.
For medical or surgical masks, the researchers found they “may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness/COVID-like illness.”
Similarly, for N95/P2 respirators, they found the masks “probably [made] little to no difference in how many people have confirmed flu … and may make little to no difference in how many people catch a flu-like illness … or respiratory illness.”
The researchers concluded:
“The pooled results of RCTs [randomized controlled trials] did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks.”
“There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection.”
Remarking on the findings of the citywide vaccine mandate and mask studies, Barnett said she hopes they “will begin to persuade those who so easily supported widespread, illegal discrimination to resist these kinds of unproven interventions going forward and bring us out of these darkly coercive times.”
Stephens, in an op-ed for the Times, said, “No study — or study of studies — is ever perfect. Science is never absolutely settled,” but that “when it comes to the population-level benefits of masking, the verdict is in: Mask mandates were a bust.”
“Those skeptics who were furiously mocked as cranks and occasionally censored as ‘misinformers’ for opposing mandates were right. The mainstream experts and pundits who supported mandates were wrong. In a better world, it would behoove the latter group to acknowledge their error, along with its considerable physical, psychological, pedagogical and political costs.
“But whatever the reason, mask mandates were a fool’s errand from the start. They may have created a false sense of safety — and thus permission to resume semi-normal life. They did almost nothing to advance safety itself. The Cochrane report ought to be the final nail in this particular coffin.”
Risch told The Defender:
“The whole idea that mask-wearing would provide infection source control for what is an aerosolized respiratory virus was itself based only on plausibility, not empirical evidence.
“Mask mandates have been unwarranted and numerous studies of mandates show this. Mask-wearing has also been useless in the COVID pandemic, and lots of studies show this too. But these are not the same things.”
Fox News reported that the New York Times op-ed elicited a flurry of reactions from notable commentators on Twitter, on both sides of the “mask debate.”
Author David Zweig, who has contributed to the release of the “Twitter files,” said:
“The remarkable thing here is that the only way the most prestigious data review on community masks — which found no clear evidence of benefit — made it into the paper of record was in an opinion piece. The NYT Science desk did not deem it newsworthy.”
Mark Crispin Miller, Ph.D., professor of media studies at New York University, also remarked on the Times’ running the Cochrane study as an op-ed, telling The Defender:
“I, of course, was struck by the Times’ op-ed. I noticed that it was published as an op-ed, and I was also struck by the article’s complete failure to hold the Times itself accountable.
“Whereas the Times was, as I can attest from having studied it, fanatically committed to promoting the official line, [they] did not merely emphasize how important it was for everybody to wear masks. What they did was much subtler than that: they highlighted stories of ‘anti-maskers’ resorting to violence, usually in retail outlets.
“So that if you were a regular reader of the paper, you would have the distinct impression that ‘anti-maskers’ were the ones who were out there resorting to outright violence.”
Miller said the “true function” of mask mandates “was never to keep people from getting infected or from transmitting the virus,” but instead, “to habituate people to a certain kind of compliance.”
‘Vindication’ for those who questioned mask mandates
The Cochrane study may vindicate Swedish public health officials who eschewed lockdowns and mask mandates throughout the pandemic.
In 2020, Swedish state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell said, “We see no point in wearing a face mask in Sweden, not even on public transport,” adding there were “at least three heavyweight reports … which all state that the scientific evidence is weak.”
As reported by The Defender in April 2022, Sweden recorded fewer COVID-19-related deaths per million people than the U.S. — and 53 other countries.
“Face masks were not recommended for the general public [in Sweden] during the first wave, and only in certain situations later in the pandemic … Although Sweden was hit hard by the first wave, its total excess deaths during the first two years of the pandemic were actually among the lowestin Europe.”
The investigation did identify some shortcomings in the country’s response, but said that, at most, masks should have been “recommended.” Soon after the report was released, a Feb. 25, 2022 Boston Herald op-ed stated that Sweden “got it right.”
Nevertheless, Vox described the Cochrane study as “scientifically irresponsible,” and placed blame on any problems identified with mask wearing on the government, which it said “bears some responsibility for poor communication about masks.”
Jefferson, in his interview with Demasi, disputed this, stating it was “not a very good study, because it was not a study about whether masks worked, it was a study about increasing compliance for wearing a mask.”
Risch also took issue with the Bangladeshi study, telling The Defender that Vox chose to “cherry pick” evidence from it and that “even if valid [it] shows only a small benefit of masking” and ignores contrary studies.
In his interview, Jefferson opined on why mask mandates were imposed when studies showed they were ineffective for respiratory viruses:
“Governments completely failed to do the right thing and demand better evidence [and] had bad advisors from the very beginning … They were convinced by non-randomised studies, flawed observational studies … A lot of it had to do with appearing as if they were ‘doing something.’”
Miller, in a Sept. 4, 2020 paper, outlined the rapid transformation in mask-related advice, noting that Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization, between March and April 2020, quickly pivoted from not recommending to recommending masks.
According to Fox News, “Those recommendations likely played a large part in 39 U.S. states eventually enacting mask mandates.”
Jefferson said his team had conducted a review on mask efficacy in early 2020, “but Cochrane held it up for 7 months,” a period he described as “crucial,” because “during that time, it was when policy about masks was being formed.” According to his studies, “the evidence didn’t really change from 2020 to 2023,” he said.
Miller, who taught a class on propaganda at New York University, was targeted in September 2020 for asking his students to review studies from both sides of the “mask debate.” This resulted in an “expedited review” against him by the university. He was cleared in 2021.
Miller told The Defender he found “a certain grim amusement in finding the New York Times, at this late date, coming around to the scientific facts that I was punished for even mentioning in a university class.”
There is information that the vaccinated spread the spike protein to other human beings. I wonder if it can be spread to pets.?.
I haven’t heard of that happening, but would we ever hear about it?
I have heard about animals getting all kinds of cancers, thyroid problems, all kinds of ailments since COVID came to town.
But are there more of these ailments since the vaccine? I don’t know. I do know that on facebook, people are posting about different ailments inflicting their pets. A lot of pets are dying, some from old age, some from contracting cancer.
We know that the vaccines causes more incidents of cancer, than before people were vaccinated. But is it effecting our pets too? Fauci fixed it so that COVID can more easily be spread from animals to humans, through his research into the blood-brain barrier. But can it likewise spread more easily from humans to animals?
My female Alaskan Malamute, came from a breeder that had a brain malfunction after getting vaccinated. She had never had any problems, got the jab, and was brain damaged. Her prognosis was not good. She had a terrible time communicating, and I never found out what happened to her. She disappeared to me.
I am curious, every time my female Mal doesn’t seem to feel very well, or coughs, I wonder. Did the spike protein from the jab go into my female? She was the pick of the litter, and well loved. Was she effected from the jab? I don’t know, I guess only time will tell… We adore her, she is wonderful.
But, compared to the male we got, from someone who had not been vaccinated, the female seems frail and almost sickly for less than two years old. She seems like she aged beyond her years. She is more like a 10 year old animal. Our male just turned a year old. He eats good, is totally playful all the time, and very outgoing.
Of course, I will have her vet checked. I just wonder though… Of course, I would not expect a vet to say hell yes, the vaccine is effecting this animal, even if he knew it to be true. Yall let me know what you think.
The Norfolk Southern railroad’s own actions worsened a train wreck that ignited a toxic chain of disastrous events for the people of East Palestine, Ohio, according to employees and a lawsuit against the railroad.
Employees say the size of the train — 151 cars, 9,300 feet long, 18,000 tons – was a factor in the accident, according to a report from CBS that did not name the employees interviewed.
Employees also said the train had experienced trouble before the derailment. They said the train, which started its journey in Madison, Illinois, had broken down at least once before the Ohio accident, according to CBS.
The train was simply too long, an employee said.
“We shouldn’t be running trains that are 150 car lengths long. There should be some limitations to the weight and the length of the trains. In this case, had the train not been 18,000 tons, it’s very likely the effects of the derailment would have been mitigated,” one employee told CBS.
“The workers are exhausted, times for car inspections have been drastically cut, and there are no regulations on the size of these trains,” an employee said.
Norfolk Southern issued a statement saying, “the weight distribution of this train was uniform throughout” and included a mid-train engine “which helps manage the dynamic forces of the train.”
Jared Cassity, the national legislative director for one union representing Norfolk Southern workers, cast suspicion on the company’s procedures.
“There’s a good chance the car that derailed had not been properly inspected for some time,” Cassity said, according to CBS, claiming that company instructions allow inspections to last less than a minute.
“You combine that with the added length and tonnage, plus the fact that it had all this hazardous material, and this was predictable. If nothing changes, it will happen again,” he said.
The National Transportation Safety Board said last week it “identified and examined the rail car that initiated the derailment,” and that surveillance video “showed what appears to be a wheel bearing in the final stage of overheat failure moments before the derailment.”
Norfolk Southern is facing a class-action suit in connection with the derailment that said the derailment and toxic cloud that eventually enshrouded East Palestine, Ohio, “would never have occurred if not for failure on top of failure by Norfolk Southern.”
“Train 32N should never have been operated in such a reckless manner that its wheel bearings would fail and cause derailment of a train carrying highly toxic and combustible substances. Even after derailment, the integrity of cars containing highly toxic and combustible substances should not have breached, and emergency pressure relief valves should have functioned as designed,” the suit states.
“Nevertheless, Norfolk Southern layered on yet more failures once it found its derailed train at imminent risk of catastrophic detonation. Norfolk Southern blew holes in its vinyl chloride cars and dumped 1,109,400 pounds of cancer causing Vinyl Chloride directly into the environment,” the suit states.
The suit sought to put the incident into perspective.
“Norfolk Southern discharged more cancer-causing Vinyl Chloride into the environment in the course of a week than all industrial emitters combined did in the course of a year,” the suit said, noting that setting vinyl chloride on fire creates deadly phosgene gas that has been banned ever since its use as a chemical weapon in World War I.
“Norfolk Southern ignited a 1 million pound plus chemical burn pit that burned for days and covered Plaintiffs and Class Members in a large plume of thick black smoke. A mushroom cloud resulted from the blaze, dispersing toxic chemicals for miles and across State lines into Pennsylvania,” the suit said.
The suit said the railroad subjected “surrounding communities to chemical warfare agents” and “instead of cleaning up its mess, Plaintiffs and Class Members have been exposed to toxic and noxious chemicals.”
News Analysis The Biden administration is preparing to sign up the United States to a “legally binding” accord with the World Health Organization (WHO) that would give this Geneva-based UN subsidiary the authority to dictate America’s policies during a pandemic. Despite widespread criticism of the WHO’s response to the COVID pandemic, U.S. Health and Human […]
Posted originally on the CTH on February 17, 2023 | Sundance The announcement by President Trump with his intent to visit East Palestine next Wednesday, followed moments later by a reversal announcement from FEMA stating they will now offer support to East Palestine, do not seem coincidental. The Biden administration, including the EPA, FEMA and Transporation Secretary, […]
In addition to this – it was a brown/black revolution by Pelosi to change the face of the public especially on TV. For weeks all ads were nothing but black and brown people.
BUSTED! Ray Epps Admitts “I Also Orchestrated” January 6th Attack [VIDEO] (Image) By Staff Writer
January 2, 2023
If Americans only hear the progressive left’s side of the story, January 6, 2021, was a violent attempt to overthrow the U.S. government. Many might assume that version of the chaos on Capitol Hill to be accurate if they only see or consider that one-sided explanation.
According to Democrats, a horde of radicalized, right-wing militants were urged to show up in Washington, D.C., and attempt to overthrow a duly elected government. President Trump was accused of having orchestrated an insurrection. They say it was all…
In this first video you can see Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg admit that the covid vaccines modify the human DNA. You will also hear form Dr. Carrie Madej how this is part of the transhumanist agenda to create a new breed of people, Human 2.0 When you scroll down, you will learn how genetically edited people become property of the patent holder of the technology used to edit their genome…
Download this video for free, and upload it anywhere you want. Post it on social media, your own blog, etc.
When your DNA is modified, you are property of the patent holder
Dr. Chinda Brandolino explains that according to a Supreme Court ruling from 2013 a person whose DNA has been modified, is patented and in fact has become the property of the patent holder of that DNA modification technology. Furthermore, they are no longer legally human, but are considered trans-human meaning that existing human rights do not apply to them.
In a court case in 2013 the Supreme Court of United States (see document below) ruled that human DNA cannot be patented because it is ‘a product of nature’. But at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that if a human genome were changed by mRNA vaccines (which are currently being used), then the genome can be patented.
This means that all people who have received the vaccine are now technically ‘patented’ and something that is patented is ‘property’ and will fall under the definition of ‘trans-human’. Those people who are legally identified as ‘trans-humans’ do not have access to Human Rights or any rights granted by the State. This is because they are not classified as 100% organic or human. Therefore, technically anyone who has this vaccine could no longer have access to Human Rights.
The following video explains how patent holders of gene editing technology claim ownership of people whose DNA is modified with their technology. This could be used to enforce compliance in future tyrannical mandates.
The agenda of the elites to legally own humanity
During a historic Grand Jury proceeding in February 2022, expert eye-witnesses testified about the official agenda of the elites to genetically modify and copyright humanity, so they would no longer belong to the Creator, but become their legal property. One of these witnesses is Alex Thomson, a former officer of Britain’s Signal Intelligence Agency, GCHQ, the partner agency to NSA (National Security Agency, USA). He was desk officer for the former Soviet Union and a transcriber of intercepted material. Thomson was part of GCHQ’s cross disciplinary team for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats: CBRN.
As an intelligence officer, Alex learned about the British strategy for world domination.
Alex Thompson was raised in the boarding schools and universities of the British elites, where he learned firsthand how they believe they have the right to enslave the rest of humanity, which they consider to be their ‘livestock’. In their views, they own the population – body, mind and soul.
Alex Thomson: “It is explicitly the view, certainly in the 1990’s when I was at a senior British boarding school – this term was used by the grandsons of City of London seniors who used the word ‘livestock’ to describe the British population. They are considered cattle and do not deserve a place in the world, other than under the direction of the British elite.”
If we understand how the financial elites view humanity, it is no surprise that they want to lift their ideological ownership of the people to an actual legal level, where they can claim literal ownership as a result of genetic editing.
Alex Thomson further explains:
They regard the real wealth as human minds and health, and the ability to alter and copyright the human being into a new model that would behave as expected.
Attorney Ana Garner: You mention copyrighting the human mind, copyrighting even the genetics. Do you feel that there is a link between the current so-called vaccines – the shots from Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, AstraZeneca – and this goal of copyrighting the humans?
Alex Thomson:I very strongly believe that. I’ve seen time and again that where there is hype and where there is a pseudo theological belief among the elite in Britain and America that you can achieve a certain aim by pulling a certain trick – such as by editing a gene and stamping a copyright on the human body – that is enough motivation in and of itself to fuel a serious attempt to go that way.
The very heart of it is the idea that genetic editing will allow the copyrighting of the number of souls and bodies in humanity that are affected, so that they’re no longer under the Creator.
Who are the families that make up the elites? What are their names? What is their agenda for humanity? How can we stop them? Learn more in the report below…
The majority of people are not even aware that a new world war may erupt soon, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has stated. The risk of a global catastrophe was highlighted this week by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.
The UN head said in a speech to the General Assembly on Monday that he feared that humanity was marching toward a “wider war” with its “eyes wide open” and urged preserving peace.
“Could we please not do WWIII,” pleaded conservative political commentator Luke Rudkowski, reacting to the speech. Musk responded: “Most are oblivious to the danger.”
The Twitter and SpaceX CEO previously warned against “relentless escalation” of the conflict in Ukraine, stating that it was dangerous for the country itself and the world.
Musk won praise for supplying SpaceX Starlink satellite internet systems to the Ukrainian government, with some experts assessing that they were a game-changer in the fight against Russia.
But he also suggested that Kiev would have to make concessions to Moscow in order to achieve peace, a notion that prompted some Ukrainian officials to harshly criticize and even insult the businessman.
Mikhail Podoliak, an aide to Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, claimed last week that Musk was using his control of Twitter to reduce the reach of Ukrainian official accounts and help “Russian propaganda.”
“Maybe a regulator is needed to explain competition rules to the owner?” Podoliak mused. The Ukrainian official offered no evidence to support his claims or explanation of how his regulatory threat could be carried out.
The United States has already sent over $27 billion in military equipment and supplies to Ukraine. This includes everything from small arms and ammunition to artillery and armored vehicles. The protracted nature of this conflict has exposed one of the main strategic perils facing America’s military – the country’s weapons and ammunition inventories are falling to such low levels that defense companies are not equipped to replenish them rapidly.
“As the war in Ukraine illustrates, a war between major powers is likely to be a protracted, industrial-style conflict that needs a robust defense industry able to produce enough munitions and other weapons systems for a protracted war if deterrence fails,” wrote Seth Jones, senior vice president and director of the CSIS’s international security program.
“Given the lead time for industrial production, it would likely be too late for the defense industry to ramp up production if a war were to occur without major changes,” added Jones. “The bottom line is the defense industrial base, in my judgment, is not prepared for the security environment that now exists.”
Jones further noted that the American defense industry is now operating in a manner “better suited to a peacetime environment.”
Crucial American munitions would be drained within a week
The CSIS ran a war games simulation, which found that the U.S. would likely run out of essential munitions to defend Taiwan from attacks coming from the Taiwan Strait in less than a week.
“How do you effectively deter if you don’t have sufficient stockpiles of the kinds of munitions you’re going to need for a China-Taiwan Strait kind of scenario?” asked Jones.
These essential armaments include weapons that the U.S. is currently sending to Ukraine, including Javelin anti-tank weapons, Stinger anti-aircraft weapons, counter-artillery radar systems and 155-millimeter artillery shells, stocks of all of which are considered low by the CSIS study.
One of the most important munitions that can help prevent a Chinese seizure of Taiwan is long-range precision missiles, including those launched by American submarines. In a conflict over Taiwan, U.S. strategy dictates preventing Chinese naval assets from being able to land troops on the island. This requires the use of Long Range Anti-Ship Missiles (LRASMs), which are produced by Lockheed Martin.
The defense company will take at least two years to ramp up the production of LRASMs. If a conflict with China over Taiwan breaks out within that time, American supplies would be drained in a week.
In a war against a major power like China, the U.S. would also need to rely heavily on Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles, which are air-launched cruise missiles. Current inventories of these missiles would be emptied in just over a week if the U.S. expended hundreds of them each day.
Several other essential munitions that the U.S. does not have enough of include Tomahawk missiles, Joint Air-to-Ground Missiles and ship-based munitions like the Standard Missile 6. The CSIS report noted that it would take more than 20 months to produce these munitions, calling into question America’s ability to remain stocked during a war.
“The history of industrial mobilization suggests that it will take years for the defense industrial base to produce and deliver sufficient quantities of critical weapons systems and munitions and recapitalize stocks that have been used up,” noted the study.
Saturday, Jan. 28th, dark secrets of the United Nations will be revealed
The United Nations is currently rolling out Agenda 2030 worldwide, which is set to become the greatest transformation of all time. It involves all nations and all peoples, and will transform every aspect of human society: finance, agriculture, food, travel, business, sexuality, education, etc.
A radical and complete overhaul of how humanity lives on the earth
We’ve already had a taste of it over the past two years: extreme police brutality against peaceful protesters, lethal misinformation by news media and governments, suppression of millions of doctors and scientists, banishment of all cures for covid, forced vaccinations with experimental substances, far-reaching censorship of anyone who speaks out, etc.
In several countries, we saw an initial trial run for a divided society, in which unvaccinated people were denied basic rights such as travel, shopping, and even banking. Part of Agenda 2030 is to only allow people into society who constantly accept new injections into their bodies. Scientists and doctors who resisted this tyranny were fired, threatened, silenced, defamed, arrested, incarcerated in psychiatric centers, and some were suddenly found dead.
Other Agenda 2030 developments include the destruction of the current food supply, replacing grass fed beef with genetically engineered insects. And under the guise of “equality”, transgenderism is being aggressively imposed, with millions of children worldwide being psychologically manipulated to have their biological sex surgically altered, often without parental consent.
These are just a few examples of the madness currently at work on a global level, as part of Agenda 2030. The magic phrase to fool everyone into going along with this insanity is “sustainable development” that will supposedly “save” the earth.
The ultimate goal of Agenda 2030 is to set up a one world government with unelected leaders. The United Nations is at the heart of this world government, along with the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum. Above them are financial interest groups who operate in total concealment from the public eye, so that no one can ever hold them accountable for their crimes against humanity.
DARK SECRETS OF THE U.N.
Given the deep seriousness of what is going on, there is a critical need to make the UN’s criminal agenda known to our fellow human beings around the world. Therefore, Stop World Control, in collaboration with the International Crimes Investigative Committee, is organizing an online exposé this Saturday, Jan. 28th, 2023. A senior official who has worked at the top level within the UN for two decades will reveal the organization’s dark secrets. This exposé will happen on StopWorldControl.com.
We cordially invite you to attend and hope you will help make this important event known. It will give a powerful boost to the global movement that is fighting for freedom and a better world. The event will be multilingual: English, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese and Dutch.
Visit StopWorldControl.com next saturday!
Invite your friends!
We ask everyone reading this to please invite your friends, relatives, colleagues and neighbors to this online event. Share this page and spread the flyer.
We can change the course of history. We can make history. We can build a better world.
Download this flyer, email it to all your contacts, post it on all your social media pages and groups. Email it to a local printer, have color prints made and hand them out in your community.
The following key insights will unlock the door of confusion to a brighter world of understanding, and hope
Trump was asked to run for president by high level military intelligence services, who are fighting against world tyranny. Trumps background in the inner circles of the cabal, and his decision to not go along with their evil plans, gave him insider knowledge needed to take them down.
He was informed that the pandemic was coming, and learned that the plan was to have two full years of ongoing lockdowns.
This would wipe out the economies of the world, and pave the way for a Great Reset, resulting in permanent worldwide tyranny. The agenda was to suppress all treatments for the pandemic disease, because the world had to stay in lockdown for two years. After those two years a vaccine would be released.
The pandemic agenda
✔︎ Release the pandemic
✔︎ Suppress all treatments
✔︎ Two years of lockdowns
✔︎ Devastate the nations
✔︎ Wipe out the middle class
✔︎ Impoverish all people
✔︎ Transfer all resources to the cabal
✔︎ Make humanity dependent on them
✔︎ Release vaccines after two years of lockdowns
✔︎ Be praised as the “saviors” of the world
✔︎ Establish permanent worldwide tyranny
Trump and his allies were aware of this agenda, yet had no way of stopping it. The cabal had prepared their plan for decades, and had everything in place: government agencies, health organizations, news media, mind controlled population, every little detail…
The heart of the agenda are the two years of lockdowns to destroy the world. This had to be prevented by all means. There was only one way to end the lockdowns: a vaccine. 150 years of non stop mind control of humanity had convinced virtually every single soul on earth that a vaccine is the one thing that protects them from illness.
Mankind demanded a vaccine. They would not accept anything else.
Trump could not change the minds of billions of brainwashed people. Saying publicly that vaccines are bad, would destroy his credibility, and he would waste all chances of saving America and the world. So Trump gave orders to work on vaccines, prior to the pandemic. His plan was to cut the lockdowns short by releasing the vaccine way ahead of the cabal timeline. This would accomplish two objectives:
1) Save America and the world from destruction
2) Forcing the cabal to rush their agenda, which causes critical errors, while they expose themselves
It was the only option. Nothing could prevent the vaccines. Mankind demanded it. They would be released anyway. All Trump could do, was pull them forward, to thwart the plans of the cabal. Meanwhile he fiercely opposed vaccine mandates, defended personal choice, and supported his allies who warned humanity about the dangers of the injections.
Trump promoted treatments for months on end
A central element of the cabal strategy was to hide all treatments. The WHO ordered all governments, news media, and social media to censor, and ban information about treatments. Humanity was not allowed to have hope. Everyone had to be kept in total despair, locked down for two years, waiting for a vaccine.
Trump smashed this plan, by shouting from the rooftops there are treatments. He posted 26 tweets (!) about hydroxychloroquine, and promoted doctors who use it.
This is a list of the 26 (!) tweets in which Trump tried to tell humanity they don’t need a vaccine, because there are safe and very effective drugs.
Trump also made personal videos in which he told the world about powerful therapeutics. He repeatedly told the world not to fear, and not to let C0VID control their lives.
Essentially Trump removed the need for a vaccine by saying there are cures. Who needs a rushed vaccine if there are proven drugs? He promoted these drugs for many months. The significance of this evades most of us. The cabal insisted there are no cures, and governments worldwide banned every treatment. Trump severely disrupted their plan by touting cures, as loud as he could, for months on end.
Eventually, however, he had to do the inevitable: save America and the world from complete destruction, by pulling the vaccine more than a year forward.
Again: the vaccines were not his idea. It was THEIR plan. He simply released them 1,5 years sooner, to end the lockdowns, which saved the world.
The genocide is not his fault. The adverse events are not his fault. This would have happened anyway, and far worse, on top of the total wipe out of America and the nations, followed by a tyrannical Great Reset.
Keys to open our minds
✔︎ The vaccines would have come anyway
✔︎ Trump had no way of preventing them
✔︎ Humanity demanded a vaccine to end lockdowns
✔︎ Trump pulled the agenda more than a year forward
✔︎ By doing so, he saved the world from destruction
✔︎ He constantly promoted cures, which eliminate the need for a vaccine
✔︎ He constantly opposed the mandates
✔︎ He said nobody has to be afraid of C0VID
✔︎ He supports his allies who warn about the vaccines
Recently Trump announced to outlaw censorship, which means: those who warn humanity about the vaccines, will no longer be silenced. If he was on the side of the cabal, he wouldn’t do that, as a main message of patriots today, is: stay away from the vaccines!
Imagine what will happen once all medical doctors worldwide are able again to warn humanity about vaccines? That will be thanks to Trump.
May this insight help you understand that Trump is not evil. He has been fighting an impossible war. Let’s learn to dig deeper, look beyond the surface, and gain an accurate understanding. Don’t listen to negative voices.
Look at this list of what Trump has been doing…
✔︎ Expose media corruption
✔︎ Expose government corruption
✔︎ Expose Big Pharma corruption
✔︎ Expose Big Tech corruption
✔︎ Expose FBI corruption
✔︎ Expose CIA corruption
✔︎ Expose DOJ corruption
✔︎ Expose DHS corruption
✔︎ Expose IRS corruption
✔︎ Expose election corruption
✔︎ Expose judiciary corruption
✔︎ Expose Supreme Court corruption
✔︎ Expose RINO corruption
✔︎ Expose the Deep State
✔︎ Expose the Cabal
✔︎ Expose child trafficking
✔︎ Expose the transgender agenda
✔︎ Expose border invasion
✔︎ Expose WHO crimes against humanity
✔︎ Expose WEF domination agenda
✔︎ Expose climate change hoax
✔︎ Expose New World Order
✔︎ Expose the “destroy America” agenda
Trump has been doing nothing but expose evil. Not only did he expose all of it, but he is personally confronting it. That’s why he is constantly under attack.
This is an incomplete list of the unrelenting attacks on Trump:
✔︎ Russian collusion hoax
✔︎ Two impeachment attempts
✔︎ Mass media slandering campaigns
✔︎ Facebook and Twitter accounts deleted
✔︎ Mass election fraud
✔︎ January 6 trap
✔︎ Kanye West set up
✔︎ Tax return investigation
✔︎ Constant public discrediting
✔︎ Controlled opposition accusations
✔︎ Republican Party betrayal
During conferences of the World Economic Forum, the think tank of the cabal, Trump was repeatedly named as the greatest threat to their plan. George Soros called Trump their nr. 1 enemy.
The message of the dark realm, has been from the beginning: “Hate Trump! Hate Trump! Hate Trump!” When you insist on hating Trump, you are doing the very thing the dark realm has been shouting to humanity for years. Don’t side with evil, please.
May we all learn accurate discernment, and choose the side of truth.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]
Just like we aren’t supposed to question any of the other nakedly self-serving policies.
Who, for example, is surprised to learn there is a large and active Ukraine lobby in Washington? That has paid off handsomely, with our government now handing over $130 million daily to Kyiv with little to no oversight.
And of course, most maddeningly, any critically thinking American who even dares to question the US government’s obviously dangerous and counterproductive policies, bought and paid for by literal foreign agents, are themselves accused of being in the pay of Moscow, Beijing, or Tehran.
Never mind that all the evidence points in the opposite direction.
Again, the American people aren’t expected to think at all, only to stay in line and keep the money flowing.
This is the sad state of foreign policy in America, and it happens right out in the open.”
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
Enjoy it, it may be the last one ever see. You can’t celebrate freedom and independence when you no longer have either. We are no longer the home of the Free and Brave, Our forefathers have rolled over in their graves already.
Divide and conquer we are being, wake the fuck up before it is too late. It may already be.
In their goals of disarming us, they have allowed or arranged for several mass shootings for this holiday. Stay away from large public gatherings, and be with loved ones.
May God have mercy on our souls, which they are also trying to take from us. We must join together despite our differences, just like we always have in times of turmoil and suffering. Together, we have a chance of surviving the coming devastation, divided, we will not survive it.
Love to all, you are all my brothers and sisters. Stay safe!!!
After hearing the witness statements to the German Corona Investigative Committee by former vice president of Pfizer dr Mike Yeadon who has been a scientist for 36 years, lawyers with Reiner Füllmich draw the same conclusion: The injections normally called Corona vaccines are designed to experiment on the human race and to find out what dosage of a yet unknown toxin is needed in order to kill people. The mortality rate linked to the vaccines, according to Yeadon, is traceable in terms of lot numbers of the different batches, as some batches appear to be more lethal than others. When taking a look at the evidence available, the main goal with the injections all over the world is global depopulation, according to the lawyers involved. Dr Füllmich told Perspektiv that the lawyers preparing an international law suit were no longer in doubt: Poisoning and mass murder through so called Corona vaccines is intentionally being perpetrated on the peoples of the world.
Citizen Journalist Ulf Bittner from EU/EES Healthcare blog and Sverige Granskas stated in the interview that the situation with traceable lot numbers and injuries and death related to lot numbers is similar in the different health care regions of Sweden. Bittner is in contact with a vaccine coordinator who has provided documents to keep track of how many people have been injured and lost their lives related to the different batches of the so-called vaccines.
01:00 Different numbers on the barcodes on the bottom of the vaccine doses are placebo which has been given to politicians according to a Slovenian chief nurse. Is it the same in other countries?
1:54 Mike Yeadon and the LOT numbers of some shots of the brands Moderna, Johnson& Johnson and Pfizer/Biontech are related to much higher mortality than for the other manufacturers.
3:52 The producers of the so-called vaccines are experimenting with the correct dosages to kill people according to Dr Füllmich. This according to the Corona Investigative Committee, constitute compelling evidence for punitive damages and attempted mass murder. They are intentionally killing people.
08:30 Lawyers from India have filed complaints for premeditative murder.
09:55 Mike Yeadon as a witness for the coming legal action against the perpetrators.
10:44 Everyone who critizises the wrongdoings of the governments of the world is being called a ‘right wing extremist’. This has also happened to the internationally renowned scientist Mike Yeadon.
13:05 CDC withdrew the recommendation for the PCR-tests diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 from 31/12-2021. PCR- tests are the foundation of the pandemic. Why is Anthony Fauci now doing a 180-degree turn?
17:25 At least a million dollars per person will be claimed in punitive damages if the lawsuit is successful.
18:33 Previously only ten percent of all adverse effects were reported. In the situation the world is right now, the team estimated that in fact only one percent of all adverse effects were being reported.
19:25 CEO of Life insurance company from Indiana USA with 100 billions of dollars in assets said: ”Over the span of this past year there has been an excess mortality of 40 percent”. This is believed to be due to the injections.
21:05 What substance in the vials makes them so lethal? Is it Graphene Oxide/graphene hydroxide?
22:37 Any vaccin is a poison, it is the dosage which makes the difference. This is not a vaccine, as a vaccine provides immunity, while these products demand incessant injections. Either a vaccine works or it does not.
24:40 This is not gene therapy either, since a gene therapy means exchanging a broken gene with a fixed one. This is more like experimenting on people, and trying to kill us.
25.15 The doses are not tested by governments, while governments will be keeping the contracts hidden from the public for at least 55 years. How is this affecting the possibility of getting people punished? Dr Füllmich goes through all the lies paving the way for the tyrannical situation the world is now in.
28:25 The vaccines are neither safe nor effective. The producers are experimenting on lethal doses of poison. Everyone now taking part in intentional malicious infliction of harm will be punished.
30:05 How sure are legal experts about the conclusion that Mike Yeadon has drawn from this, that it is all about depopulation and intentionally killing people through injections? If close to 50 lawyers are of the same opinion, it is regarded as “irrefutable proof”.
32:08 Batches of injections in Sweden can be traced by an application.
32:45 Füllmich is in cooperation with people working within the secret service of Germany who do not wish to take the injections.
34:15 Dr Lee Merritt on combat pilots in the USA refusing to get the shots. According to Dr Füllmich, Dr Merrit explained: ”They understood that if they were forced to [get vaccinated] they were going to get killed.”
35:15 Information is being collected on batches in Sweden from every region, the Swedish health authorities (Folkhälsomyndigheten) and medical board (Läkemedelsverket). Every batch is traceable through an application. There is economic reward for the Swedish regions which manage to get more people injected. One of the expert lawyers involved in the upcoming court hearings is a specialist on Nuremberg Trials.
38:45 How will the trials be performed, and through what legal structure? A common design, the same structure as for the Nuremberg trials.
39:40 Free choice should reign for members of the European Union. Consumers of health care have consumer rights. Fraud means misleading the people and consumers of health care.
42:00 The so called vaccines are an adulterated product put on to the market. According to Mike Yeadon there is a law in the US that will make everyone liable for the harms created by the adulterated product. Toxins are being put into the vials other than the known lipids etc, which the people who took the vaccines never consented to.
43:40 The importance of decentralization of power and national independence rather than global organizations such as the European Union telling the people what to do. Disconnecting from the banking system, NGO:s and creating independent and strong agricultural supply chains, energy supply chains etc.
46:15 When are the trials going to take place? How will the indicements happen and how will the trials be held? One of the goals is to inform people and expose the wrongdoings by involving the alternative media so that the mainstream media won’t be able to ignore the trials. The crew is working on a new system of law in the USA, Africa and Germany.
50:48 Dr Füllmich believes the world is close to a tipping point and the whole narrative will fall apart very very soon, maybe in a couple of weeks or months.
54:13 Robert Malone, Robert F Kennedy and Mike Yeadon and others involved in exposing the agenda are in contact with each other, and a tour is planned with these whistleblowers in the USA in March
The House Armed Services Committee gave initial approval Wednesday afternoon to a $37 billion increase to the Fiscal Year 2023 Pentagon budget request that would add funding for additional ships, aircraft, missile and air defense systems, ammunition and munitions technology improvements, among other things.
If the amendment, introduced by Reps. Elaine Luria (D-VA) and Jared Golden (D-ME), passes through the various legislative hoops – including a full committee vote on a final draft likely later tonight or early tomorrow – and is signed into law, the new Defense Department budget would raise from $773 billion to $810 billion. That would be the biggest Defense Department budget in history.
We’ve listed some of the highlights of the additional budget requests.
The measure calls for $178 million for safety and modernization upgrades to the military’s ammunition industrial base, $400 million for munitions technology development and more than $73 million to purchase 5.56 mm, 7.62 mm and 50 caliber ammunition.
Ukraine Security Assistance
The measure would add $550 million for Ukraine security assistance, as well as costs for advance planning to support presence on the Eastern front.
The measure passed the committee by a 42-17 margin.
“We need only look to world events in Ukraine reports regarding China’s plans and actions in the South China Sea, or simply read the latest headlines about Iranian nuclear ambitions and North Korean missile tests and close ongoing terrorist threats in order to see why this funding is necessary to meet the security challenges of our time,” Golden said, in support of his amendment. “At the same time, the inflationary pressures that are impacting economies worldwide are hampering our military’s ability to purchase new equipment, invest in emerging technologies and to adequately pay and support our greatest national security asset – the men and women in uniform.”
Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-MO) lauded the measure because it increases the Army’s stock of 5.56 mm, 7.62 mm, and 50 caliber ammunition by 8.5 percent over the Presidential budget.
“This funding will help ensure we are meeting both the demands of our military and able to maintain a highly-skilled workforce as we prepare for the production of 6.8 mm ammunition for the Next Generation Squad Weapon.” You can read all about this new family of weapons here.
Hartzler said she was also happy that the measure includes $95 million in additional funding for urgently needed safety updates at the Lake City Army ammunition plant in Missouri.
The biggest complaints raised at the hearing about the measure centered on the LSC funding.
“I strongly object to restoring five of the LCSs when the President has asked for nine of them to be decommissioned,” said Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA). “We all know what lemon cars are. We have a fleet of lemon LCS ships. We have spent billions of dollars on this fleet when they have no capability to help us deal with our largest threat, which is China and Russia. The only winners have been the contractors on which the Navy relies for sustaining these ships.”
Though this measure would increase the Defense Department budget by nearly 5%, there is a long way to go before it becomes a reality.
First, it has to be passed out of the committee in the final draft of the Fiscal Year National Defense Authorization Act, a vote that will likely take place later today or early tomorrow morning. Then it would have to pass the full House of Representatives, survive a conference with the Senate, which is seeking an additional $45 billion for the Defense Department budget, and ultimately, be signed into law by President Joe Biden.
There will be a lot more debate about these issues and The War Zone will take deeper dives into some of the specific systems and capabilities at stake as the process grinds on.
Biden Mocks Chevron Rebuke, Says “Didn’t Know They’d Get Their Feelings Hurt That Quickly”
by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Jun 22, 2022 – 04:23 AM
Reposted Under the Fair Use Doctrine
Update: During a press conference at THe White House thia afternoon, President Biden was asked how he felt about the Chervon CEO’s response to his letter. His response sums a lot of things up about this administration’s approach.
The Reporter asked:
“The Chevron CEO… said that your administration has largely criticized the oil and gas industry and …would need to take a change in approach in order to make progress in reducing energy prices.”
To which Biden snapped back in quiet mode:
“He’s mildly sensitive…” before adding that “I didn’t know they’d get their feelings hurt that quickly.”
Then reverting back to his talking points he addressed the fact that its not his fault that ‘Big Oil’ won’t help cut prices, claiming that:
“We ought to be able to work something out whereby we can increase refining capacity and still not give up on transitioning to renewable energy.”
Once again completely missing the point that is holding back refiners from the massive investments required. given government’s long-term goals.
So we’re back at square one…
Reporter: “The Chevron CEO… said that your administration has largely criticized the oil and gas industry and …would need to take a change in approach in order to make progress in reducing energy prices.”
Biden: “I didn’t know they’d get their feelings hurt that quickly.”
Reporter: “The Chevron CEO… said that your administration has largely criticized the oil and gas industry and …would need to take a change in approach in order to make progress in reducing energy prices.”
Chevron CEO Mike Wirth sent an open letter to President Biden on Tuesday that probably started out closer to “go fuck yourself” than the final, still-snarky note seeking cooperation on ways to lower prices at the pump.
“At every level of the system, the policy of our government is to reduce demand, and so it’s very hard in a business where investments have a payout period of a decade or more. And the stated policy of the government for a long time has been to reduce demand for your products,” Wirth noted very frankly.
Then last week President Biden fired off an angry letter to oil companies accusing them of being greedy, and demanding that they help ease the “Putin price hike” or face consequences.
“At a time of war, refinery profit margins well above normal being passed directly onto American families are not acceptable,” wrote Biden.
The next day, Chevron hit back – claiming that the Biden administration’s policies since January 2021 ave sent a message that it aims to “impose obstacles to our industry delivering energy resources the world needs.”
Meanwhile, the American Petroleum Institute wrote the Biden administration last week recommending several measures, including lifting development restrictions on federal lands and waters, authorizing critical energy infrastructure projects, speed up the permitting process, and other items.
Fast forward to today’s letter to Biden from Chevron CEO Mike Wirth, which suggests that “Addressing this situation requires thoughtful action and a willingness to work together, not political rhetoric,” adding “your Administration has largely sought to criticize, and at times vilify, our industry.“
Wirth makes clear that “Chevron shares your concerns over the higher prices that Americans are experiencing,” noting that the company is “increasing capital expenditures to $18 billion in 2022 – over 50% higher than last year.“
Chevron still got a few blows in, writing “Chevron will engage in this week’s meeting with Secretary Granholm. I encourage you to also send your senior advisors to this meeting, so they too can engage in a robust conversation.“
Oh, and this is, well, quite something:
“Chevron will engage in this week’s meeting with Secretary Granholm. I encourage you to also send your senior advisors to this meeting, so they too can engage in a robust conversation.”
“Chevron will engage in this week’s meeting with Secretary Granholm. I encourage you to also send your senior advisors to this meeting, so they too can engage in a robust conversation.” — Javier Blas (@JavierBlas) June 21, 2022
The letter then outlines what the Biden administration can do to help solve the problem:
You have called on our industry to increase energy production. We agree. Let’s work together. The U.S. energy sector needs cooperation and support from your Administration for our country to return to a path toward greater energy security, economic prosperity, and environmental protection.
We need clarity and consistency on policy matters ranging from leases and permits on federal lands, to the ability to permit and build critical infrastructure, to the proper role of regulation that considers both costs and benefits. Many of these elements are described in our industry’s recently released 10-point plan. Most importantly, we need an honest dialogue on how to best balance energy, economic, and environmental objectives – one that recognizes our industry is a vital sector of the U.S. economy and is essential to our national security.
We can only meet these challenges by working together.
We can’t wait to say what the administration – which recently said it wouldn’t budge on easing pressure on the oil industry – will say in response.
The Administration needs to face it, Biden ain’t no Trump. Trump has couth, intelligence, and can carry on a conversation without anyone’s permission on talking points. Trump has charisma, charm, and people like to be around him
Biden on the other hand, is in a stupor, unless someone brings kids around, then he perks up all bubbly, yea, he still talks stupid, but he is awake. The only thing that wakes Biden up is, kids. Thank God I don’t have to hear his thoughts. After seeing how he was looking at his own kid, when she was probably 8-10 years old, with lust in his eyes, what a sick fucker.
Oh well, enough of my own thoughts on the matter…. You get the picture.
Image: ALLISON DINNER/AFP via Getty Images by Jason Koebler Vice News The City of Uvalde and its police department are working with a private law firm to prevent the release of nearly any record related to the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in which 19 children and two teachers died, according to a letter obtained […]
Vice President Kamala Harris has been “honestly useless” at controlling the US border with Mexico, Republican Representative Mayra Flores (Texas) told Fox News earlier this week. In a recent special election, Flores flipped a seat comfortably won by her Democratic predecessor just two years ago.
Flores defeated Democratic candidate Dan Sanchez in a special election last week, picking up 51% of the vote in a district won by outgoing Democratic Rep. Filemon Vela by 13 points in 2020. Flores’ district, which sits in the Rio Grande Valley bordering Mexico, is 85% Hispanic, has been represented by Vela since 2012, and voted for Democrats in the last three presidential elections.
Flores’ victory is being interpreted by some analysts as a sign that voters are unhappy with the Democratic Party’s border policies, and Flores herself singled out Harris for criticism on Thursday.
“She’s honestly useless,” Flores said. “I don’t know why she’s in that position. She hasn’t been here in south Texas to see what their policies are creating, the mess that they’re creating in our country, and that their policies are hurting real people.”
Harris was tapped by US President Joe Biden in 2021 to address a brewing crisis on the US-Mexico border. After Biden ended former President Donald Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy and reinstated the Obama-era policy of ‘Catch and Release’, the number of migrants interdicted along the US’ southern border nearly tripled during the president’s first six months in office. Enormous shanty towns of migrants sprung up along crossing points, as Republicans accused Biden of ignoring the problem.
Harris visited the border region once while serving as Biden’s ‘border czar’, and the last migration-related event held by the vice president took place in January, when she met with Honduran President Xiomara Castro to discuss the “root causes of migration.” Meanwhile, illegal border crossings reached a record 239,416 last month – not counting those who evaded detection – and this year’s illegal entries are on track to pass last year’s total of 1.7 million within the coming weeks.
Flores, who was born in Mexico and immigrated to the US as a child, made border security front and center of her campaign. Her television ads touted her marriage to a Border Patrol agent and accused Democrats in Washington of putting the Rio Grande Valley “under attack.” As Flores is currently finishing out Vela’s term, she will have to fight for her seat again in November, in a redrawn district map that is believed to favor her Democrat opponent, Vincente Gonzalez Jr.
Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger recently shared his opinion of the Ukraine crisis and Russia’s ongoing special military operation in that country. At the latest World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, he suggested that it was time for Kiev to think about a diplomatic settlement of the conflict, even if that means territorial concessions.
Henry Kissinger, a geopolitics colossus who turned 99 on 27 May, has claimed that the US is “infinitely” more divided today than at the time of the Vietnam War (1955-1975).
The former US Secretary of State to presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, whose book, Leadership, is set to come out on July 5, offered his opinion of the present state of US internal politics, the Ukraine crisis and US the stand-off with China in an exclusive interview for The Sunday Times.
‘Unremitting Hostility of the Opposition’
The patriarch of international politics deplored the partisan antipathy that has surged in the US over the past several decades. The American National Election Studies surveys and polls have increasingly shown that Democrats and Republicans view members of the other party more as enemies than simply as political opponents.
According to Kissinger, in the early Seventies, there was “still a possibility of bipartisanship” in the US, before the “hostility” firmly took root.
“The national interest was a meaningful term, it was not in itself a subject of debate. That has ended. Every administration now faces the unremitting hostility of the opposition and in a way that is built on different premises … The unstated but very real debate in America right now is about whether the basic values of America have been valid,” underscored Kissinger, a Republican since the Fifties.
The “values” in question refer to the sacrosanct status of the American Constitution and the “primacy of individual liberty and equality before the law”, the publication explained.
Kissinger deplored the stance espoused at present by the “progressive left,” which, according to him, argues that “unless these basic values are overturned, and the principles of [their] execution altered, we have no moral right even to carry out our own domestic policy, much less our foreign policy”.
Kissinger warned that this is “not a common view yet, but it is sufficiently virulent to drive everything else in its direction and to prevent unifying policies … [It] is [a view held] by a large group of the intellectual community, probably dominating all universities and many media.”
Kissinger offered a dire warning of what such “unbridgeable divisions” are fraught with.
“Either the society collapses and is no longer capable of carrying out its missions under either leadership, or it transcends them …”
The veteran foreign policy scholar agreed that sometimes an “external shock” or an “external enemy” was resorted to to bridge this “divide”.
At this point Kissinger broached the subject of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, where Russia launched a special military operation to demilitarise and de-Nazify the country on 24 February after the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics (DPR and LPR) appealed for help in defending themselves against shelling from Ukrainian forces.
Kissinger recently sparked controversy by his brief virtual speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos on 23 May. Movement toward peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine needs to begin within the next two months or so, he said, before the conflict escalates to a point where tensions are much harder to overcome.
Kissinger, known for his efforts to ease tensions between the US and the Soviet Union, emphasised Russia’s importance to Europe and, in his Davos address, urged western countries not to get swept up “in the mood of the moment”, as he advocated that the West pressure Kiev into accepting negotiations even if that means territorial concessions.
The seasoned US scholar, renowned for his wise statements on geopolitics, faced a backlash for his calls for negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.
Kissinger, who played an integral role in developing the relationship between the US and the People’s Republic of China during the Nixon administration, found himself blacklisted by Ukraine’s notorious website Mirotvorets (Peacemaker) for “participation in Russia’s special information operation against Ukraine”. He was also charged with “propaganda, blackmail and encroachment on the territorial integrity of Ukraine”.
As western countries seek to isolate Russia with a sweeping sanctions policy while funnelling weapons into Ukraine and eyeing NATO expansion, Henry Kissinger predicted in The Sunday Times interview that “big issues are going to take place in the relations of the Middle East and Asia to Europe and America.”
Against the backdrop of squabbling over Finland and Sweden’s NATO membership bid with Turkey, Russia has continuously reiterated that further expansion of the NATO bloc will not bring greater security to Europe.
Kissinger, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973, claimed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an “institution whose components don’t necessarily have compatible views. They came together on Ukraine because that was reminiscent of [older] threats and they did very well, and I support what they did. The question will now be how to end that war. At its end a place has to be found for Ukraine and a place has to be found for Russia – if we don’t want Russia to become an outpost of China in Europe.”
Obligation to Avert ‘Catastrophic Collision’
On the issue of China, Kissinger believed that Beijing and Washington were “facing each other as the ultimate contestants”, who are “governed by incompatible domestic systems”.
“And this is occurring when technology means that a war would set back civilisation, if not destroy it,” said Kissinger, agreeing that the two superpowers “have a minimum common obligation to prevent [a catastrophic collision] from happening”.
Earlier this yearKaren discussedthe secret nighttime flights that the Biden administration has arranged to bring illegal migrants from the border to other locations around the country, where they are then released into the wild. One spot seeing a lot of this traffic was the airport in Westchester, New York. Planeloads of migrants were arriving on an almost nightly basis. They were given boxes of welcome gifts and loaded onto buses to be dropped off in New York City or other communities around the state. No announcements of these arrivals were given to the communities where it was taking place.
Once the news went public, I foolishly thought that the practice might come to an end, or at least be made public so more oversight could be applied. Neither of…
Paris, like official Berlin, and Rome, which has joined these two co-founders of the European Union, are less and less willing to listen to what they are being told from Kiev (and almost no longer pay attention to the tone of what was said, bordering on bizarre abuse), and to the fact that what Washington is trying to convince them of.
Neither France, nor Germany, nor Italy in any way wants to mess with the Russians when they meet them on the battlefield.
Despite all attempts to erase the memory of the power of Russian weapons and the Russian military spirit, the spinal cord of a united Europe still remembers perfectly what outcome awaits those who come to Russia with a sword.
The “Horsemen of the Apocalypse” are only unlocking the gates of the stable where their horses are. Western Europe, hearing, of course, this creaking of the castle, cannot help but understand that it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to turn these horses around later.
Being aware of what this could threaten, even the European military-industrial complex and the European military are trying to stop the apocalypse by any means: either as the Dassault family or by various “leaks”.
But Europe, which ordered the fight, regardless of whether it wants it or not, at the moment when the order is received, will not be able to return everything “back”. Even if the outcome, that is, the European loss, as well as the European break, in theory, is already a foregone conclusion.
As to why a beyond shocking 16% of Americans polled would like to see President Putin as their leader, this report continues, becomes self explanatory when noticing that as these under socialist siege peoples are being economically destroyed by the hour, their suffering was ignored yesterday by Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden, who, instead of addressing the needs of his citizens, engaged in a teenage mean girl spat with the world’s richest man Elon Musk telling him to have “lots of luck in his trip to the Moon”.
The West ought to pay compensation to those who have suffered from its actions.
I would recommend to the collective West this one thing. If you want to condemn aggression — start with yourselves. Set an example by condemning your own military adventures, illegal economic restrictions, deadly colonial and neo-colonial wars, genocide, and robbery of indigenous peoples.
Start paying off compensations to states and nations that suffered from you. Such a step would indeed bring us closer to having a more just world order that would have no place for anyone’s self-proclaimed exceptionalism.
When NATO was attacking Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, international law was perceived only as an annoying impediment.
In futile attempts to justify their aggression against sovereign states, the collective West had to come up with exotic concepts, such as ‘humanitarian intervention’, ‘war on terror‘ and ‘preventive strikes’. The outcome is always the same: lots of casualties, and no one held accountable.