US gov’t data reveals shocking miscarriage, still birth rates after COVID jab compared to flu vaccine
‘The pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, [and] maybe [in the history of] humanity,’ Dr. James Thorp told Tucker Carlson.
(LifeSiteNews) – A preprint study examining government data has found that, in comparison to the influenza vaccine, the COVID-19 gene-based inoculations produce a 57-fold increase in miscarriages, a 38-fold increase in still birth rates, and a 1200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities.
Dr. James Thorp, a board-certified Obstetrician/Gynecologist, appeared on the Tucker Carlson Show on Thursday to discuss the paper he coauthored and expects will soon be “the lead featured article in a major peer-reviewed medical journal.”
The expert in maternal fetal medicine, who has almost 44 years of experience, lamented the results, telling Carlson that “the pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, maybe humanity.”
“We have never, ever broken the sacrosanct golden rule of pregnancy, never, ever,” he told the Fox News host, explaining that it is a medical “golden rule to never allow unknown substances to ever be used in pregnancy.”
BREAKING:
New research reveals 57 fold increase in miscarriages & 38 fold increase in still births & foetal deaths after covid mRNA jabs
‘The greatest violation of medical ethics & humanity ever’ says leading obstetrician.
Using data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) VAERS system, Thorp explained that he and his colleagues “compared the COVID-19 vaccine adverse events over 18 months with those of the influenza vaccine over 282 months.”
Recognizing the “danger threshold” used by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the CDC of a “two-fold or greater” increase indicating “abnormal” outcomes, the physician reported, “We found a 1200-fold increase in severe menstrual abnormalities, a 57-fold increase in miscarriage, [and] a 38-fold increase in fetal death or stillbirth rates. We found 15 other major pregnancy complications, all far exceeding the CDC and the FDA values of safety.”
According to the study’s abstract, these additional complications include “fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformation, fetal cystic hygroma, fetal cardiac disorders, fetal arrhythmias, [and] fetal cardiac arrest.”
Furthermore, “I can produce more than 30 other completely independent sources globally that corroborate exactly our findings,” Thorp said. “And if that is not bad enough, this includes Pfizer’s own internal data.”
In an essay Thorp wrote last November unpacking the findings of his team—which includes Dr. Peter McCullough—he lists “34 Independent Sources Collaborating VAERS C19 Vax Injury” including the UK government, UK Yellow card, EMA EudraVigillance, World Health Organization VigiAccess, and the World Council for Health.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES US Canada Catholic
As early as December 1, 2020, a former vice president and chief scientist for Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, along with a German colleague, filed a petition with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) calling for an immediate halt to all testing of the COVID-19 “vaccines” due to significant safety concerns including “infertility of indefinite duration [which] could result in vaccinated women.”
By April 2021, LifeSiteNews covered how thousands of women around the world were already reporting disrupted menstrual cycles after receiving injections of COVID-19 “vaccines,” (i.e. biowarfare agents). Such reports continued into August and September of that year despite the headwinds of Big Tech information suppression.
Around the same time, at least one study also emerged confirming the dreadful results of Yeadon’s unheeded warning in 2020, along with the surfacing of another study obtained from the Japanese medicines agency. This revealed how the “vaccine” substances concentrate in the ovaries, presenting the potential for all sorts of long term complications.
In January 2022, whistleblower physicians from the U.S. Department of Defense revealed a 279% increase in miscarriages among military families, a 471% increase in female infertility, and a 156% increase in birth defects.
Unpacking some of her team’s findings among a trove of Pfizer documents released due to a court order, feminist author Naomi Wolf explained last May that while women had been “assured that the vaccines were safe and effective,” this was based on faulty science. And furthermore, “reproduction itself is targeted” by these mRNA injections, causing a large-scale “baby die-off” amounting to “genocide.”
Boycott United Airlines until they permanently drop their unlawful Covid jab mandate
Show Petition Text
4514 have signed the petition.
Let’s get to 5000!
Add your signature:Country…USACanadaAaland IslandsAfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D’IvoireCroatiaCubaCuracaoCyprusCzech RepublicDemocratic Republic of the CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacauMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorth KoreaNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinePanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarRepublic of KosovoReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthelemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint MartinSaint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint MaartenSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan Mayen IslandsSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVatican CityVenezuelaVietnamVirgin Islands (British)Virgin Islands (U.S.)Wallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabweNot Collected
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues. Sign this Petition
›New Studies Deliver Harsh Verdicts on Mask Mandates, Vaccine Mandates for U.S. Cities
Two new studies on the effectiveness of mask mandates and city-level COVID-19 vaccine mandates concluded the policies failed to achieve their promised objectives. The study on vaccine mandates found the mandates caused economic harm.
Researchers found city-level vaccine mandates to have, at most, a negligible effect on vaccination rates, while conversely having a negative effect on cities’ economies.
Commenting on the study, California attorney Rita Barnett told The Defender:
“Shutting people out of society or denying them employment for refusing to take a medical treatment they do not want, need or trust violates all fundamental ethical principles — and local businesses and leaders who went along with these measures may suffer the consequences for many years to come.”
In the case of mask mandates, researchers who conducted a meta-analysis found they had no significant impact on curtailing the spread of COVID-19 — regardless of the type of mask studied.
Sujata Gibson, a lawyer and lead counsel on multiple lawsuits brought by New York City workers impacted by COVID-19 mandates said the study “shows conclusively that municipal COVID-19 vaccine mandates were a bust.”
Gibson, who said the findings should “come as no surprise,” added:
“They did absolutely nothing to reduce death or disease and failed to even meaningfully increase vaccine uptake. The reality is that back in the fall of 2021, when these mandates were imposed, the science already clearly showed that they were irrational.
“We have to ask — since it wasn’t science, what was really driving the municipal mandates? And we have to hold decision-makers and governments accountable for destroying untold thousands of lives for no rational reason.”
Vaccine mandates: little-to-no uptick in vaccinations, big uptick in economic harm
The researchers examined mandates in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, New Orleans, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington, D.C.
The paper states:
“City vaccine mandates were arguably among the most restrictive and polarizing regulations ever enacted in the United States. Millions of people were prevented from entering restaurants, bars, gyms, theaters, sports arenas, and other public indoor areas without proof of COVID-19 vaccination.”
According to WTOP News, the paper made “no judgments on whether someone should or should not get a vaccine, raises no questions about a vaccine’s effectiveness, and doesn’t try to argue whether someone should get one or not.”
Vitor Melo, a Ph.D. candidate in economics at Clemson University and one of the paper’s authors, told WTOP News, “Their [the mandates] intended outcomes were to raise vaccination rates, for people to get more vaccines; and consequently, the expectation was that COVID cases and deaths would go down.”
But according to the paper, “Indoor vaccine mandates had no significant impact on COVID-19 vaccine uptake, cases, or deaths across all nine cities that implemented the policy.”
Compared with cities that did not enact vaccine mandates, “There’s not much to show for it” on the part of the cities that did enforce mandates, Melo added. “COVID cases were not affected, COVID deaths were not affected, and really, there’s no evidence that people got more vaccinated because of these mandates.”
According to the paper:
“Previous research has shown that similar country-level mandates increased vaccine uptake substantially. However, city-level mandates are easier to evade than country-level mandates because it is generally easier to travel to a neighboring city that does not have a mandate than to cross national borders.”
As a result, the city mandates did not succeed in getting “people who were skeptical or resistant of the vaccine to do something they didn’t want to do,” Melo said. “I guess if you make life difficult enough for people, they’re more likely to do what you want them to do. But in the United States, at the city level, what they did, did not seem to work.”
The researchers said their “results overwhelmingly support the conclusion that the city-level indoor vaccine mandates in the United States had a statistically negligible effect on vaccine uptake, cases, and deaths, and they were likely less effective when compared to country-level and province-level mandates.”
For instance, the researchers noted that New York City fired 1,430 municipal workers for not complying with its vaccine mandate. They also referenced a study finding that 90% of the city’s restaurants reported experiencing “customer-related challenges” and 75% reported having “staff-related challenges.”
“Those are just a small fraction of the disruptions caused by the mandates,” the researchers said.
Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus and senior research scientist in epidemiology (chronic diseases) at the Yale School of Public Health, told The Defender he found the analysis “interesting,” adding:
“I wondered whether a summary analysis of all of the nine cities taken together might show something different, but my meta-analysis … did not show a benefit. … I can’t speak to the technical methods in this analysis because they are not used in the types of epidemiologic studies that I do, but they seem reasonable.”
Dr. Meryl Nass, a member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, said she found it “hard to believe that requiring people to vaccinate to undertake indoor activities like going to work did not increase vaccination rates.”
Nass added:
“I think these now-defunct mandates should have given us a taste of what life would be like in a totalitarian society. It should help us identify the pillars of a totalitarian society that are currently being built around us — such as the loss of freedom of speech.”
“I am not surprised by the results of this study. We said from the beginning that masking, social distancing and getting the COVID shots would not stop COVID, nor would any of the mandates prevent the deaths that we are now seeing in much larger numbers in the fully COVID-vaccinated population. We continue to be proven right as the ‘experts’ study the real effects of these COVID mandates.
“Many people who questioned the mandates and refused the unproven COVID shots suffered the loss of their jobs, their businesses, their friends, and worse, their homes and more. The unvaccinated have been hunted down like animals. This is something we never thought we would ever see in America. We must work together to ensure this never happens again.”
‘No evidence’ masks make any difference, ‘full stop’
A meta-analysis published last month by Oxford University senior associate tutor in epidemiology Dr. Tom Jefferson and 11 other researchers called into question the efficacy of masks in reducing the spread of COVID-19.
The researchers said they “wanted to find out whether physical measures stop or slow the spread of respiratory viruses, from well-controlled studies in which one intervention is compared to another, known as randomised controlled trials.”
They sought out studies “that looked at physical measures to stop people acquiring a respiratory virus infection,” and “were interested in how many people in the studies caught a respiratory virus infection, and whether the physical measures had any unwanted effects.”
The researchers identified “78 relevant studies” conducted “in low-, middle-, and high-income countries” during various pandemic, epidemic and non-health emergency periods. They included government and pharmaceutical studies, encompassing 610,872 people, including healthcare workers and the general population.
The researchers assessed the effects of different types of masks, including medical or surgical masks and N95/P2 respirators.
For medical or surgical masks, the researchers found they “may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness/COVID-like illness.”
Similarly, for N95/P2 respirators, they found the masks “probably [made] little to no difference in how many people have confirmed flu … and may make little to no difference in how many people catch a flu-like illness … or respiratory illness.”
“There is just no evidence that they” — masks — “make any difference.”
But, wait, hold on. What about N-95 masks, as opposed to lower-quality surgical or cloth masks?
“The pooled results of RCTs [randomized controlled trials] did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks.”
“There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection.”
In an interview with Maryane Demasi, Ph.D., an investigative medical reporter, Jefferson said, “There is just no evidence that [masks] make any difference, full stop.”
Remarking on the findings of the citywide vaccine mandate and mask studies, Barnett said she hopes they “will begin to persuade those who so easily supported widespread, illegal discrimination to resist these kinds of unproven interventions going forward and bring us out of these darkly coercive times.”
Stephens, in an op-ed for the Times, said, “No study — or study of studies — is ever perfect. Science is never absolutely settled,” but that “when it comes to the population-level benefits of masking, the verdict is in: Mask mandates were a bust.”
He added:
“Those skeptics who were furiously mocked as cranks and occasionally censored as ‘misinformers’ for opposing mandates were right. The mainstream experts and pundits who supported mandates were wrong. In a better world, it would behoove the latter group to acknowledge their error, along with its considerable physical, psychological, pedagogical and political costs.
“But whatever the reason, mask mandates were a fool’s errand from the start. They may have created a false sense of safety — and thus permission to resume semi-normal life. They did almost nothing to advance safety itself. The Cochrane report ought to be the final nail in this particular coffin.”
Risch told The Defender:
“The whole idea that mask-wearing would provide infection source control for what is an aerosolized respiratory virus was itself based only on plausibility, not empirical evidence.
“Mask mandates have been unwarranted and numerous studies of mandates show this. Mask-wearing has also been useless in the COVID pandemic, and lots of studies show this too. But these are not the same things.”
Fox News reported that the New York Times op-ed elicited a flurry of reactions from notable commentators on Twitter, on both sides of the “mask debate.”
While it’s nice to see the NY Times finally admit masks are worthless, it’s false to say the mandates “did nothing.” They harmed kids, eroded public trust, and psychologically damaged millions of people to the point where they’re still afraid to breathe in public. pic.twitter.com/k57e2cG1Km
Author David Zweig, who has contributed to the release of the “Twitter files,” said:
“The remarkable thing here is that the only way the most prestigious data review on community masks — which found no clear evidence of benefit — made it into the paper of record was in an opinion piece. The NYT Science desk did not deem it newsworthy.”
Mark Crispin Miller, Ph.D., professor of media studies at New York University, also remarked on the Times’ running the Cochrane study as an op-ed, telling The Defender:
“I, of course, was struck by the Times’ op-ed. I noticed that it was published as an op-ed, and I was also struck by the article’s complete failure to hold the Times itself accountable.
“Whereas the Times was, as I can attest from having studied it, fanatically committed to promoting the official line, [they] did not merely emphasize how important it was for everybody to wear masks. What they did was much subtler than that: they highlighted stories of ‘anti-maskers’ resorting to violence, usually in retail outlets.
“So that if you were a regular reader of the paper, you would have the distinct impression that ‘anti-maskers’ were the ones who were out there resorting to outright violence.”
Miller said the “true function” of mask mandates “was never to keep people from getting infected or from transmitting the virus,” but instead, “to habituate people to a certain kind of compliance.”
‘Vindication’ for those who questioned mask mandates
The Cochrane study may vindicate Swedish public health officials who eschewed lockdowns and mask mandates throughout the pandemic.
In 2020, Swedish state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell said, “We see no point in wearing a face mask in Sweden, not even on public transport,” adding there were “at least three heavyweight reports … which all state that the scientific evidence is weak.”
As reported by The Defender in April 2022, Sweden recorded fewer COVID-19-related deaths per million people than the U.S. — and 53 other countries.
“Face masks were not recommended for the general public [in Sweden] during the first wave, and only in certain situations later in the pandemic … Although Sweden was hit hard by the first wave, its total excess deaths during the first two years of the pandemic were actually among the lowestin Europe.”
The investigation did identify some shortcomings in the country’s response, but said that, at most, masks should have been “recommended.” Soon after the report was released, a Feb. 25, 2022 Boston Herald op-ed stated that Sweden “got it right.”
Nevertheless, Vox described the Cochrane study as “scientifically irresponsible,” and placed blame on any problems identified with mask wearing on the government, which it said “bears some responsibility for poor communication about masks.”
Jefferson, in his interview with Demasi, disputed this, stating it was “not a very good study, because it was not a study about whether masks worked, it was a study about increasing compliance for wearing a mask.”
Risch also took issue with the Bangladeshi study, telling The Defender that Vox chose to “cherry pick” evidence from it and that “even if valid [it] shows only a small benefit of masking” and ignores contrary studies.
In his interview, Jefferson opined on why mask mandates were imposed when studies showed they were ineffective for respiratory viruses:
“Governments completely failed to do the right thing and demand better evidence [and] had bad advisors from the very beginning … They were convinced by non-randomised studies, flawed observational studies … A lot of it had to do with appearing as if they were ‘doing something.’”
Miller, in a Sept. 4, 2020 paper, outlined the rapid transformation in mask-related advice, noting that Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization, between March and April 2020, quickly pivoted from not recommending to recommending masks.
According to Fox News, “Those recommendations likely played a large part in 39 U.S. states eventually enacting mask mandates.”
Jefferson said his team had conducted a review on mask efficacy in early 2020, “but Cochrane held it up for 7 months,” a period he described as “crucial,” because “during that time, it was when policy about masks was being formed.” According to his studies, “the evidence didn’t really change from 2020 to 2023,” he said.
Miller, who taught a class on propaganda at New York University, was targeted in September 2020 for asking his students to review studies from both sides of the “mask debate.” This resulted in an “expedited review” against him by the university. He was cleared in 2021.
Miller told The Defender he found “a certain grim amusement in finding the New York Times, at this late date, coming around to the scientific facts that I was punished for even mentioning in a university class.”
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and part of the rotation of hosts for CHD.TV’s “Good Morning CHD.”
In this first video you can see Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg admit that the covid vaccines modify the human DNA. You will also hear form Dr. Carrie Madej how this is part of the transhumanist agenda to create a new breed of people, Human 2.0 When you scroll down, you will learn how genetically edited people become property of the patent holder of the technology used to edit their genome…
Download this video for free, and upload it anywhere you want. Post it on social media, your own blog, etc.
When your DNA is modified, you are property of the patent holder
Dr. Chinda Brandolino explains that according to a Supreme Court ruling from 2013 a person whose DNA has been modified, is patented and in fact has become the property of the patent holder of that DNA modification technology. Furthermore, they are no longer legally human, but are considered trans-human meaning that existing human rights do not apply to them.
In a court case in 2013 the Supreme Court of United States (see document below) ruled that human DNA cannot be patented because it is ‘a product of nature’. But at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that if a human genome were changed by mRNA vaccines (which are currently being used), then the genome can be patented.
This means that all people who have received the vaccine are now technically ‘patented’ and something that is patented is ‘property’ and will fall under the definition of ‘trans-human’. Those people who are legally identified as ‘trans-humans’ do not have access to Human Rights or any rights granted by the State. This is because they are not classified as 100% organic or human. Therefore, technically anyone who has this vaccine could no longer have access to Human Rights.
The following video explains how patent holders of gene editing technology claim ownership of people whose DNA is modified with their technology. This could be used to enforce compliance in future tyrannical mandates.
The agenda of the elites to legally own humanity
During a historic Grand Jury proceeding in February 2022, expert eye-witnesses testified about the official agenda of the elites to genetically modify and copyright humanity, so they would no longer belong to the Creator, but become their legal property. One of these witnesses is Alex Thomson, a former officer of Britain’s Signal Intelligence Agency, GCHQ, the partner agency to NSA (National Security Agency, USA). He was desk officer for the former Soviet Union and a transcriber of intercepted material. Thomson was part of GCHQ’s cross disciplinary team for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats: CBRN.
As an intelligence officer, Alex learned about the British strategy for world domination.
Alex Thompson was raised in the boarding schools and universities of the British elites, where he learned firsthand how they believe they have the right to enslave the rest of humanity, which they consider to be their ‘livestock’. In their views, they own the population – body, mind and soul.
Alex Thomson: “It is explicitly the view, certainly in the 1990’s when I was at a senior British boarding school – this term was used by the grandsons of City of London seniors who used the word ‘livestock’ to describe the British population. They are considered cattle and do not deserve a place in the world, other than under the direction of the British elite.”
If we understand how the financial elites view humanity, it is no surprise that they want to lift their ideological ownership of the people to an actual legal level, where they can claim literal ownership as a result of genetic editing.
Alex Thomson further explains:
They regard the real wealth as human minds and health, and the ability to alter and copyright the human being into a new model that would behave as expected.
Attorney Ana Garner: You mention copyrighting the human mind, copyrighting even the genetics. Do you feel that there is a link between the current so-called vaccines – the shots from Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, AstraZeneca – and this goal of copyrighting the humans?
Alex Thomson:I very strongly believe that. I’ve seen time and again that where there is hype and where there is a pseudo theological belief among the elite in Britain and America that you can achieve a certain aim by pulling a certain trick – such as by editing a gene and stamping a copyright on the human body – that is enough motivation in and of itself to fuel a serious attempt to go that way.
The very heart of it is the idea that genetic editing will allow the copyrighting of the number of souls and bodies in humanity that are affected, so that they’re no longer under the Creator.
Who are the families that make up the elites? What are their names? What is their agenda for humanity? How can we stop them? Learn more in the report below…
The majority of people are not even aware that a new world war may erupt soon, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has stated. The risk of a global catastrophe was highlighted this week by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.
The UN head said in a speech to the General Assembly on Monday that he feared that humanity was marching toward a “wider war” with its “eyes wide open” and urged preserving peace.
“Could we please not do WWIII,” pleaded conservative political commentator Luke Rudkowski, reacting to the speech. Musk responded: “Most are oblivious to the danger.”
The Twitter and SpaceX CEO previously warned against “relentless escalation” of the conflict in Ukraine, stating that it was dangerous for the country itself and the world.
Musk won praise for supplying SpaceX Starlink satellite internet systems to the Ukrainian government, with some experts assessing that they were a game-changer in the fight against Russia.
But he also suggested that Kiev would have to make concessions to Moscow in order to achieve peace, a notion that prompted some Ukrainian officials to harshly criticize and even insult the businessman.
Mikhail Podoliak, an aide to Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, claimed last week that Musk was using his control of Twitter to reduce the reach of Ukrainian official accounts and help “Russian propaganda.”
“Maybe a regulator is needed to explain competition rules to the owner?” Podoliak mused. The Ukrainian official offered no evidence to support his claims or explanation of how his regulatory threat could be carried out.
The world is under attack! Multibillionaire criminals are setting up a New World Order that will impose worldwide tyranny. Sign up and learn how to defend yourself.
Since the beginning of time, power hungry madmen have attempted to seize control over the entire world. Egyptian pharaohs, Asian emperors, European warlords, Roman emperors, Russian tsars, and British kings waged relentless wars, trying to gain absolute power over the rest of humanity. One world empire succeeded the other: the Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Roman, Chinese, Spanish, British empires all had one goal: conquer the nations, and if possible… rule the entire world.
The age old desire for world domination is one of the most basic realities in the history of humanity.
Many people in our time, however, have been led to believe that the dark desire to rule the world has somehow miraculously disappeared. Nothing could be further from the truth. This diabolical lust is more alive and dangerous today, than ever before. New technologies and the all-encompassing mind control by the omnipresent news media is creating unprecedented opportunities to enslave the entire human race, without most people even realizing it.
In the past, invading other nations was hard: iron clashed against iron, and every blast was answered with an even louder blast. Today the game has changed. In order to conquer the world, there is no longer a need for swords and spears, or guns and rockets.
All the invaders need to do is tell the world that a terrible danger is threatening them, and most people will immediately surrender all their rights and freedoms in order to be “safe”.
After World War II, the psychopath Nazi criminals were prosecuted during the historic Nuremberg trials. Judges were puzzled by the fact that Hitler had been able to get the support from the majority of the German people for his insane and inhumane mass murdering of millions of innocent people. Hitler’s right hand, Hermann Goring, explained how they did it:
“It’s easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and… they will follow their leader. This works in every nation.”
Basically Goring said: just make the people afraid, and they will do whatever you want, in order to feel safe again.
Oh, Thou Great and Mighty Lord of the News
The tool to make the entire world terrified of some “terrible danger” is the news media. With news media you can control exactly what the public thinks. A synonym for news media is mind control. It’s essentially the same.
The news controls the minds of the people.
Most people brainlessly believe anything they hear on the news. Let the news tell the masses that a dangerous virus threatens them, and they will throw themselves at your feet, willing to do anything you demand, to keep them “safe”. Even as far as driving around in their car, all by themselves, wearing a dirty, bacteria-infested cloth over their mouth that keeps pure air out, and toxic air in. They even bring you their babies and beg you to please inject them with an experimental, untested, gene-altering cocktail of various undisclosed toxins.
People will literally do anything, no matter how devastating it is to the well-being of themselves, their loved ones, and their fellow citizens, as long as it goes along with the hypnotizing mantra “this will keep you safe”.
Because of this, it has become a piece of cake for criminal rulers to submit the masses to their fingertips. This is especially true since they have full control over all mainstream media. They acquired it for this very reason: to have the ability to invade the mind of mankind and mold it exactly according to their agenda.
What is the supreme level of brainwashing?
Although the lust for world domination has been the common theme throughout history, in our day, the mind control has reached such a supreme level that many don’t even believe there is a plan to rule the world.
“Hahaha, that’s a conspiracy theory”, they echo loudly, brainlessly repeating what the “Lord of the News” has told them.
Those who know history are stunned by such a display of stupidity, yet it is the perception of the majority of the public. Try to explain how powerful people with unlimited financial resources are planning to dominate the world, and many will give you a blank stare… as if you just claimed the moon is one giant ball of vanilla ice cream.
The supreme level of brainwashing is when an entire population calls human history a “conspiracy theory”.
Who are the present-day pharaohs, who lust for world domination?
We know that our world has suffered under the cruel oppression of merciless pharaohs and emperors in the past. But who are the present-day tyrants desiring to gain complete control over the world? In other words, who are the “pharaohs” of our time? There are two answers to this question: a simple version, and a more complex one.
The easy answer is that, on the surface, the leading entity aiming at world domination is the World Economic Forum.
The WEF controls the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and many other globalist organizations. It gathers thousands of billionaires and millionaires under its wings, and uses refined methods of mind control and manipulation to convince them to go along with their agenda. Through sophisticated mechanism of election fraud, they position world leaders in politics, and with their vast financial resources they are able to determine the direction of health care, business, governments, finance, etc.
The World Economic Forum has literally positioned itself as the big bully over all of humanity.
Their official agenda for world domination is called the Great Reset, Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Build Back Better, and so on. Although no one has elected or even asked for the WEF, they have positioned themselves as the god of this world, ruling over governments worldwide, and telling all of humanity what to do.
The WEF invites the world’s most influential people – ranging from kings and presidents, to bankers and CEO’s of the largest corporations – to their yearly meetings in Davos. During these conferences they discuss the future of our world, and strategize how they can steer humanity in the desired direction. All outside of any form of democracy. The voice of humanity doesn’t count for them.
The untouchable rulers of the world
As I said, the WEF is the easy answer, as they are the visible entity on the worldwide theatre stage for the ignorant public. The World Economic Forum is however not an independent entity. It is in turn controlled by concealed financial entities, whose greatest power is obscurity. By concealing themselves and operating solely from the shadows, they are able to manipulate everything that happens on the visible stage of the world theatre. Their astronomical financial resources allow them to spread their tentacles of influence into every aspect of society. They are also referred to as “the cabal“.
The headquarters of these oligarchs are in so called “sovereign states” like the City of London (sovereign area in the heart of Greater London), the District of Columbia (sovereign area in Washington DC), and Vatican City State (sovereign area in Rome).
Another example of such a sovereign state is the Bank of International Settlements which oversees more than fifty central banks (central banks control the commercial banks, used by the public). They are one of the most powerful financial entities in the world, pulling many strings of world domination behind the scenes.
To show how criminal these sovereign states are, we will look at the 1987 Headquarters Agreement which was negotiated with the Swiss Federal Council, to formalize the special position of the Bank of International Settlements. These are a few noteworthy articles from this treaty:
✔︎ Full inviolability for all buildings of the BIS, and the land beneath and around them, indifferent to who owns them.
✔︎ Full immunity from criminal and civil prosecution and proceedings for the bank as such.
✔︎ No payment of taxes on transactions and salaries of personnel.
✔︎ No disclosure to governments regarding the activities of the BIS.
✔︎ Not subject to any jurisdiction.
The same inviolability and immunity is granted to the other sovereign states, like the City of London, Vatican City State, and District of Columbia.
These independent “states within a state” are above the laws of the land in which they are situated. They pay no taxes, answer to no government, and are literally untouchable.
The vast majority of humanity – even most political leaders – have no clue that these sovereign states even exist, let alone rule the world. All we know and see are the public personalities – like politicians and businessmen – who are mere puppets of these concealed puppet masters. Their strength is complete obscurity. By remaining hidden from the view of humanity, they are able to operate unchecked, without being held accountable by the people.
The World Economic Forum, United Nations, World Bank, World Health Organization, and all other big globalist entities are set up by these hidden rulers. The public never sees or hears them, yet they determine what happens in the world.
Many in-depth books and web articles have been written about these entities. One great resource you can download for free is shown below.
Top experts from the British Intelligence Service, British Navy, US Marine Corps, World Health Organization, United Nations, the CDC, etc. have testified before 11 lawyers and a judge about the official plan for world domination by financial elites, who operate from within sovereign “states within the state”.
These expert testimonies are summarized in the Grand Jury Evidence, which you can download for free.
The World Economic Forum cloaks itself with the white garments of shining statements like “improving the state of the world” and “global goals for sustainable development”. Making the world a better place is of course praiseworthy… what is less applaudable is the fact that the WEF was clearly involved in planning and orchestrating the pandemic, in order to manipulate humanity into accepting their Great Reset (see the documentary THE PLAN).
THE PLAN shows how the World Economic Forum and other globalist entities have planned multiple pandemics, with the purpose of implementing worldwide tyranny.
Their intentions for our world might not be as admirable as they appear on first sight. Let’s have a closer look at some of their “Global Goals For Sustainable Development” – for example, the goals “Global Governance” and “Internet Governance”. These speak for themselves: the WEF wants to establish full control over the entire world. And they wish to be the ones who determine what information is allowed online.
Below is the WEF wheel, which shows how the COVID-19 pandemic is being used to transform every aspect of human life on earth. Their goal is to gain full control over business, health, information, etc.
The WEF goals for making a better world include installing a system of total control. And they wish to be the ones who determine what information is allowed online.
Zero poverty, or global welfare
Other sustainability goals sound like a dream: “No Poverty”, for example. Interestingly, however, the owners and members of the WEF all have one thing in common:
They are astronomically rich, mainly because they have been robbing humanity for decades.
As an example, they go into different nations of the world and steal all their natural resources through destructive mining. They keep all the profits for themselves, while the native populations are forced into slave labor, mining the treasures of their own land for the enrichment of these foreign intruders.
Similarly, they acquire every industry in the world, transferring all wealth to a handful of their own mega corporations, while destroying millions of people whose small businesses cannot compete with these monstrous giants.
And what about the financial system, that is designed to keep the people in perpetual financial crisis? Billions of people are forced to pay taxes, that supposedly serve to support their nation. In reality the vast majority of tax money disappears in the pockets of financial entities, who themselves don’t pay one dime of tax.
It’s by abusing humanity for their own enrichment, that they have gathered their astronomical wealth in the first place. And now they claim to have the noble goal of ending poverty?
Their true objective becomes clear when we look at how they plan to end poverty: install a universal income for all of humanity. The practical result of this will be, that every person on earth will become entirely dependent on these overlords.
We see this in full swing in The Netherlands, where basically overnight the tyrants have raised the energy prices 5-fold to 20-fold!
As a result millions will be plunged into poverty, no longer able to pay their outrageous energy bills. Suddenly the government comes with a solution: we will take care of you, just rely entirely on us.
This is always their strategy:
1) first create a problem, 2) then offer a solution, which means tyranny
The World Economic Forum has been informing the world about their ultimate goal: the population will own nothing: no voice, no privacy, no freedom and no possessions… and they will be “happy”.
This situation is promoted as a wonderful “utopia” in an article written by the WEF for Forbes.com.
The article describes how a citizen of the New World Order of the WEF expresses her happiness about this new way of living. She exclaims how wonderful it is to own nothing, and what a dream the world has become, as everybody is locked up in Smart Cities.
WHAT IS A SMART CITY?
DESCRIPTION BY WIKIPEDIA:
“A smart city is a technologically modern urban area that uses different types of electronic methods and sensors to collect specific data.
This includes data collected from citizens, devices, buildings and assets that is processed and analyzed to monitor and manage traffic and transportation systems, power plants, utilities, water supply networks, waste, criminal investigations, information systems, schools, libraries, hospitals, and other community services.“
A Smart City is a high tech environment where citizens are surveilled 24/7, by omnipresent data harvesting technologies, that will record every aspect of their life. Every conversation, purchase, physical activity, location, emotion, and even every dream will be recorded.
The author of the aforementioned article written by the World Economic Forum, describes life in a Smart City it as follows:
“Once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. Nowhere I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me. All in all, it is a good life.”
The WEF wants to move the majority of the world population into Smart Cities, where every breath, heartbeat, hormonal activity, human interaction (think sexuality), feeling, thought and even the most intimate, personal of all: our dreams, will be recorded.
Participation in society will depend on your vaccination status: only those people who are up to date with their umpteenth booster injection, will have access to banking services, shopping, gathering, social activities, transportation, health care, etc. Vaccine status will be connected to the digital ID, and social credit score. Surveillance technologies will be able to detect from a distance who has received the latest injection.
5G will insert thoughts and emotions
The president of Chile explained that 5G will be used to not only monitor our thoughts and feelings, but it will also inject thought and feelings into everyone. Listen to this president in the following video:
Forcing you to eat fake food
Another “sustainability goal” of the WEF is “Zero Hunger”. While it sounds beautiful, in reality it means destroying the grass-fed beef industry and replacing wholesome natural meat with genetically modified (= unhealthy) plant protein and lab grown “meat” created by the elites.
Bill Gates works closely with the WEF, and he is buying up all farmland in America, while constructing factories where synthetic meat will be grown.
Meanwhile, more than a hundred of the largest food production and distribution plants in America have all burned to the ground in the past few years. In 2022, more than fifteen of the leading food companies saw their headquarters go up in flames – all during the same week!
We can of course tell ourselves that this is a meaningless coincidence. Well… all major food plants in the USA burn down, right when the WEF talks about ending the current food supply and making all of humanity dependent on their new synthetic foods. Indeed – nothing to see here, folks.
Just like when they launch a bioweapon on humanity, suppress all the cures for the “pandemic” disease, and then “save the world” by injecting everybody with toxic, experimental, DNA-altering substances, with undisclosed ingredients.
In The Netherlands, the government is demanding all farmers to kill much of their livestock. The government threatens to seize the land of farmers that refuse to destroy their animals.
Why would any government demand such outrageous insanity? As traditional farming is strategically eliminated, the population becomes totally dependent on the artificial foods created by the financial elites.
New “food factories” are being built to replace traditional farming. Instead of growing crops in natural soil, where the produce becomes rich in nutrients thanks to the sun, they want to grow it in factories without a trace of sunlight. Everything must become totally artificial.
In Australia, growing your own food is being demonized, supposedly for “biosecurity” reasons, and in the UK, the government is claiming that gardening increases heart disease. People are even told they should wear a face mask while working in their garden.
“Zero hunger” is all about making the entire world population dependent on artificial, GMO food provided by the rulers.
WEF is similar to ancient rulers
In short, the WEF is the pinnacle of hypocrisy, hiding the most nefarious agenda that has ever threatened humanity under the white coating of magic-trick words like “sustainability”. They establish world dominance, and enslave humanity, while claiming to “improve the state of the world”. That’s exactly what the Roman Empire claimed:
“We share our higher civilization with you, by forcing all of you to submit to us. We steal all your rights, freedoms, and possessions, and make you slaves that pay high taxes to us. This is the best thing that ever happened to humanity!”
The WEF is in no way different than the ancient rulers. They may use different words, but the plan is the same.
The insane plans of the World Economic Forum
Just how dangerous are the plans of the World Economic Forum that is aiming to establish world dominance? Here is a short list of some of their goals, that are openly discussed on their own official websites, and in their videos, books and conferences. Any online research will reveal countless sources for all of this.
VACCINE BASED SOCIETY Make ongoing vaccinations the condition for partaking in society, with vaccine passports and digital ID’s. Banking, internet, working, shopping, gathering, etc., will only be available to people who are up to date with the latest booster injection.
SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE Base society on a social credit score: citizens who behave perfectly are rewarded. Those that step out of line are punished. Practical example: posting something on social media that criticizes the government will lower your score.
CONSTANT FEAR Make masks, screens, and social distancing permanent. Populations must remain in a perpetual state of fear to justify a vaccination-based world.
Please note that every existing virus is patented, meaning that all these diseases are man-made.
END OF FREE SPEECH Redefine free speech as ”hate speech”. Train humanity to despise everyone diverting from the prescribed narrative. Label all information that is not in line with the official storyline as “disinformation”.
INTERNET GOVERNANCE Govern the internet, so only the prescribed narrative will be available to the world. Delete all the millions of posts and websites that criticize, question, and disprove the official stories.
ISOLATE HUMANITY Limit human interaction by telling everyone to work, shop and school from behind their screens. Isolate humanity behind their devices where they are bombarded 24/7 by the propaganda of the rulers.
NO WEALTH Install a universal income and don’t allow anyone to gather wealth. Being rich is a privilege for the elites. The peasants must be kept poor and dependent on the ruling class.
WEATHER WARFARE Use weather warfare technology to cause droughts, floods, earthquakes, wildfires, hurricanes, etc. Blame it on climate change, which is then used as the excuse to further lock down, rob, and control the population.
NO OWNERSHIP Seize all private property from all the citizens of the world. Everything must be rented from the elites: homes, cars, equipment, tools, even clothes. Nobody may own anything. The goal is total dependency on the rulers.
ELECTRIC CARS Make everyone dependent on controllable – and trackable – electric cars. Electric cars are perfect for enforcing lockdowns. Broadcast a signal that disables all vehicles, and the world will not be going anywhere.
LIMIT TRAVEL People using vehicles with combustion engines will be limited in their movements, as they will have a maximum allowed CO2 “footprint”.
BLOCKING THE SUN The WEF is preparing to launch a raft the size of Brazil into the sky, to block the sun from illuminating the earth. Casting a perpetual shadow over the earth is needed, they say, to combat “climate change”.
NO SMALL BUSINESSES Decrease the number of small businesses through pandemic and climate lockdowns, and transfer all wealth to mega corporations, which are not required to cease operations.
NO HUMAN RIGHTS Remove all personal rights and freedoms from humanity under the guise of “we are in this together” and “the greater good”. Create hostility towards people standing up for rights and freedoms, by labeling them “selfish”.
CONTROLLED FINANCES Install a one-world digital currency that will be controlled by those in power. Banking services will only be available to people who have the required vaccination status and social credit score.
SEXUAL CONFUSION End the natural family by pushing the LGTBQA+ agenda. Make unnatural sexual relationships the norm, and project healthy families as “weird”. This is needed to reduce the world population.
NO WILDERNESS Close off all wilderness areas, so humanity no longer has access to wild, unspoiled nature.
PRISON CITIES Lock everybody up in Smart Cities, where their every breath is monitored. Nobody can leave the city without required vaccination status or social credit score.
VIRTUAL REALITY Replace reality with virtual illusions in the MetaVerse. Promote the virtual realm as being “better” than enjoying reality.
TOTAL SURVEILLANCE Fill the world with billions of surveillance cameras, drones, drone bugs, and satellites that will monitor every move of every soul on earth 24/7. All in the name of “public safety”.
EVERYONE A CYBORG End original humanity and make everyone a cyborg that can be monitored and controlled from the cloud by artificial intelligence.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Replace the majority of jobs with artificial intelligence. Doctors, lawyers, drivers, teachers, ministers, etc. can all easily be replaced by A.I. Naturally the A.I. will be programmed and controlled by the rulers.
5G MIND CONTROL Position millions of 5G towers (in the future 6G, 7G, etc.) to insert thoughts and feelings into the population. Make 5G the central nervous system of every society.
ARTIFICIAL FOOD Replace healthy grass-fed beef with synthetic meat created in factories. Grow genetically modified plant protein and large numbers of engineered bugs to feed the people.
FOOD DEPENDENCY Discourage and eventually forbid people to grow their own food, so they depend entirely on the supply from the elites.
NO ELDERLY Introduce early euthanasia when people are no longer producing money. Encourage all elderly to commit suicide to make room for the next generation, so they will not become a “burden to the global economy”.
All these examples are just the tip of the iceberg of the inhumane plans of the World Economic Forum. Their books, websites and conferences reveal much more, along the same lines.
A New World Order of total insanity
Running in the woods by yourself with a mask on, swimming in the wide-open ocean with a mask on, putting a mask on when entering the restaurant – then taking if off at the table, driving in a car all by yourself with a mask on… these are a few of the completely insane behaviors of the New World Order being pushed by the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, the United Nations and other globalist entities.
It is exactly the same as the inhumane communist terrorism that tortures the Chinese people. We all know how those who divert from the propaganda of the Chinese government simply “disappear”. Millions of Chinese people have been killed by their own government over the past decades.
In China, intelligent questioning is a crime. This is now also happening worldwide.
To ensure perfect behavior, everyone is constantly tracked by millions of surveillance cameras using facial recognition. Millions of tiny drones fly through the cities, monitoring every step of the Chinese people.
Smartphones continually record every heartbeat, breath, conversation, and activity of every person.
In other nations around the world, we see the same level of 24/7 super- surveillance being implemented during the pandemics. All this tyranny is disguised under the excuse of “for your safety”. Nobody is allowed to think or to question any of it. The world population is being trained to unquestioningly go along with even the most derailed ideas.
The next generation is being prepared for blind compliance, by teaching kids in schools to never ask questions, never criticize, and simply follow the rules.
This is plainly visible in the large numbers of little children – who are at no risk for covid whatsoever – riding their bicycles with masks on and playing in the park with masks, while keeping a “safe” distance from their friends. They are being programmed to be mindless, fearful servants of a controlling system that rejects all who use their brain as it was intended.
Intelligence must be destroyed
The complete eradication of every semblance of common sense is apparent when you observe that in airports, travelers are required to maintain 6 feet of distance at all times, after which they are all stacked right next to each other for hours on end in a small, confined space.
It is also witnessed in restaurants, where people carefully keep on their mask when entering, but once seated at the table, their mask goes off. When they walk to the toilet, they fearfully put their mask back on; then once they sit back down, it comes off again.
Indeed, every intelligent person knows that viruses are afraid of restaurant tables.
Lone individuals driving around in their cars with masks on, or joggers running all alone in the wide-open fresh air while wearing masks, further illustrates how these policies are turning humans into the dumbest creatures ever to roam the face of the earth.
Every and all intelligence must be destroyed.
People sporting on the beach without a mask, swimming in the ocean without a mask, or camping out in the wilderness have been violently arrested in Spain, Germany, England, the Netherlands and many other nations. Even people walking in their own backyard without a mask have been violently beaten by police.
The world population is trained to brainlessly follow even the most insane orders, and those who refuse are aggressively punished. Complete insanity and the total loss of a sound mind is the new normal in the New World Order of the World Economic Forum and their psychopathic allies.
Meanwhile politicians are seen without masks during their social gatherings, but once a television camera is pointed at them, the masks are up. Because, as we all know, viruses are activated by television cameras.
The good side of all of this indescribable madness, is that it is going way too far, and is therefore causing hundreds of millions of people to wake up and begin to understand what is going on in our world. This offers hope for the future, as for centuries, the masses have been clueless about the evil powers ruling their countries behind the scenes. Now at last humanity is starting to see how raving mad the rulers are, and how insanely wicked their agenda is.
It’s time for the greatest awakening of all time…
What can we do to stop this insanity?
be courageous
Don’t be silent to protect yourself. Seeing a man rape a child and standing by, doing nothing, is blatant complicity. You have refused to stop it, which is the same as allowing it to happen. That goes for every form of crime. When we stand by and do nothing, we are part of the criminal act.
This is the time to stand up and do something.
INFORM THE PUBLIC
The key to the success of these criminal operations is the ignorance of the public. Once the people become aware of what is really going on, they resist, and the plans of the corrupt leaders fail. Therefore, our main focus must be to use all possible means to inform the people around us.
distribute flyers
I have designed flyers, posters, banners and memes that you can use in your community to point people to StopWorldControl.com. Since we don’t own the mainstream media, we have to inform people by handing out flyers, distributing brochures door to door, and putting up posters in public spaces. We need to place ads in local newspapers, rent billboards, and pay for radio commercials, all of which point people to StopWorldControl.com or any other website you want people to visit.
Below you see an example of an informative flyer that you can download for free, print as often as you like, and distribute in your community.
Inform the people in your community that are unknowingly the minions of the criminal entities by unquestioningly executing their insane orders. We must open their eyes. Send short letters, inviting them to watch key documentaries and interviews. MONOPOLY is one of the best productions of all time to open people’s eyes. Also send them the Grand Jury Evidence and Vaccine Death Report.
We need to wake up the following people: local government officials, law enforcement officers, school directors and teachers, hospital staff, local media, judges, pastors, lawyers, etc. Many of them are bribed to support the criminal schemes, but some are not, and once their eyes are opened, they can become powerful forces of truth.
GET INVOLVED
Get involved in local politics, industries, school boards, public meetings, local media, etc. Let your voice be heard in your community. Show official documents, talk about the real plans of the elites, explain how the World Economic Forum is an undemocratic organization that is controlling the entire world, point out how the World Health Organization is set up to be a one world government through their pandemic treaty.
Share truth to cause people to start thinking. Don’t expect immediate results, but begin with dropping a few truth bombs that can activate the critical thought process of good people.
RESIST
Do not comply with the mandates that forbid human interaction and force you to inject yourself and your loved ones with DNA-altering toxins. Don’t play their game – resist. They can never arrest the whole population. If enough of us don’t go along, there is nothing they can do. No government can arrest millions of people!
BE INDEPENDENT
Step away from being dependent on their services and start creating alternative solutions. This goes for shopping, health care, media, finances, etc.
CONNECT
Connectwith like-minded people, so you can learn from them and help one another. Make sure, however, to never allow anyone to control you. We are here to help others, not to lord over one another. Build healthy communities – not little cults.
prepare
Preparefor coming crises, like food shortages, power blackouts, cyber pandemics, natural disasters and financial collapse. Inform yourself about how to prepare for times of crisis. Prepare mentally and practically. Create backups for food, water, energy and medicines.
know the law
Educate yourself about the laws of the land. These criminals are violating every imaginable law. They are lawlessness embodied. They trample every constitution, international agreement, medical code – they don’t care about anything. If you get to know the laws of your land, you can resist their tyranny and point out how they are committing acts of terrorism, murder, abuse, treason, and so on.
pray
Praywith passion and authority. Pray for justice to be done on the earth, and deliverance to come to humanity. Use your spiritual authority as a child of the Most High to rebuke and destroy demonic strongholds. When we say “NO!” to these evil powers, they are rendered powerless. Bind the spiritual enemies of humanity, and release creation from their grip.
support
Supportthose who fight for the future of our world. Stop World Control, for example, is not funded by criminal billionaires like all the corrupt governments, health agencies, and news media. We depend on the goodness of the people to continue our work.
Together we can end this nightmare and build a better world. The future is bright, if we all do our part.
FIGHT FOR FREEDOM
There has been an aggressive attack on our work, in an effort to completely silence us. We lost almost everything. Please consider making a donation, so we can recover from the attacks and keep spreading lifesaving truth to the world.
The article states: DeKalb County will host a large-scale COVID-19 vaccination event this weekend, offering $100 prepaid debit cards to anyone who gets their first shot or a booster.
Officials said clear bookbags filled with school supplies will also be distributed at the event, which is scheduled for Saturday morning in the parking lot outside the Mall at Stonecrest. UniverSoul Circus performers will provide entertainment.
In the current article it states: “DeKalb officials said 62% of county residents have been vaccinated, but only 32% have then received a booster.” The article goes on to state: “Those interested are encouraged to pre-register at dekalbcountyga.gov/getvaxxed to minimize their wait time. Vaccines are free but attendees are asked to bring a photo ID, insurance information, and existing CDC vaccinations cards, if available”.
For a govt., DeKalb County sure is taking a lot upon themselves by ignoring these important facts. So they know more than the CDC and the President that they elected? What would the purpose be in continuing to bribe people to take these gene therapy shots, while lying to the citizens and telling them that it is a vaccine? And why push an alleged vaccine, when there is no longer a plannedemic?
It is all kind of scary to me. They make sure that there are people out here, that are suffering from the inflation that the govt tries to pretend don’t exist, and bribe people to get deadly shots by giving them $100 gift cards, and school supplies. I am surprised that people still send their kids to public schools, or that they are not home schooling after seeing the bullshit they are teaching kids, and watching grade school teachers on Tik Tok laugh about the fact that they get away with teaching boys that they want to be girls, and teaching girls that they want to be boys, and puberty blocking, and teaching kids that they want genitalia mutilation. WTF?
Then the “systemic racism” that the County claims exists. The only systemic racism I have seen is against whites. DeKalb County has been majority black for quite some time. All one has to do, is go to DeKalb County courthouse and see who is treated less favorably, to see the whites in this county are being discriminated against, not the blacks. So when the county personnel are crying about systemic racism, it really confuses a person.
All lives matter. I am part Native American, which peoples throughout history in this country, have been treated worse than the blacks were treated, and I hold no animosity toward any people, no matter their color. But apparently, when Obama became president, he got out his shit stirring stick and stirred up some shit.
The only way the globalists can succeed in their quest, is to have the people divided and hating one another. Together the American people are strong and firm, we could prevent the taking over of the world. But the years of dumbing Americans down, has taken it’s toll, just like the feminizing of American men has taken it’s toll. Too many Americans would not know the truth, if it came up and sat on them. They are way too used to being controlled. We are doomed.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]
While committing economic suicide, this report details, these deranged socialist Western colonial ideologues have also been flooding billions-of-dollars of weapons and ammunition into Ukraine to keep the conflict ongoing—are Western colonial weapons and ammunition the Sputnik Arabic News Servicehas shockingly tracked going into Ukraine then are being sold all around the world on the dark net—a beyond shocking fact confirmed by leftist American network CBS News, who, in their released CBS Reports documentary “Arming Ukraine”, explores why much of the billions-of-dollars of military aid that the United States is sending to Ukraine doesn’t make it to the front lines, and horrifyingly reveals: “Only 30% of it reaches its final destination”.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]
Lake Mead, Lake Powell, Lake Shasta, Lake Oroville and countless other Western US reservoirs are all drying up by the day. When the water runs out, chaos will commence at blinding speed. While relentless record heat bakes much of the US and the world, freak flash summer snowstorms are increasing, the one that just occurred in the Northeastern US is a case in point. Now that California is completely dried out with dying and dead forests everywhere, a “rare lightning barrage of 66,000 strikes” just struck the state. Just a coincidence? Has climate engineering yet again set the stage for a year of unprecedented wildfires? As the walls close in, the controllers are now playing every “divide and conquer” card they have in order to keep the public’s eyes off of the wider horizon till the moment of impact. How soon till we hit the wall at full velocity? The latest installment of Global Alert News is below.
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
25KVIEWS
(Natural News) America First Legal (AFL) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to investigate unconstitutional acts between the federal government and the Big Tech social media platforms. AFL obtained 256 pages of communication between the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Google, Facebook and Twitter. These pages document egregious violations of the US Constitution and provide evidence that the Federal Government violated the Nuremberg Code.
AFL President Stephen Miller issued a statement:
These explosive smoking-gun documents, obtained as a result of America First Legal’s litigation against the Biden Administration, conclusively demonstrate that Big Tech has unlawfully colluded with the federal government to silence, censor, and suppress Americans’ free speech and violate their First Amendment rights. Government is expressly prohibited from censoring competing or dissenting viewpoints or from silencing its political opponents whether it does so directly or whether it uses an outside corporation to achieve its draconian, totalitarian ends. AFL will not rest in the fight against illegal collusion between Big Tech and Big Government to trample on your voices and the Bill of Rights.
CDC conspired with Big Tech to censor Americans and destroy the informed consent principle
In July 2021, former White House press secretary Jen Psaki revealed that the Biden administration was “regularly making sure” to identify public health “disinformation” while working with social media networks to have it removed. “And we work to engage with them [Big Tech] to better understand the enforcement of social media platform policies,” Psaki proclaimed in July of last year. The Biden regime went public with their censorship goals, targeting twelve sources of information that they claimed were “the dirty disinformation dozen.” The Biden regime subsequently called on Big Tech to completely remove these individuals from all social media platforms.
According to the latest document release, officials with the CDC and the Biden administration colluded with content moderation teams at Google, Twitter and Facebook to block US citizens from receiving the most basic level of informed consent about the emergency use covid-19 “vaccines.” The US government not only violated the free speech clause of the US Constitution, but they also conspired to withhold relevant medical information in the informed consent process, violating basic medical ethics on a grand scale.
US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Amendment 1:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
“This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision…”
Biden regime, CDC used Big Tech to force destructive, deadly experiments onto global population
The CDC documents detail regular communications between the federal government and the three biggest social media platforms. These included regular “be on the lookout” meetings to identify information that conflicted with the CDC’s VAX-all agenda. Federal officials provided “examples” of posts that should be flagged and posts that should be censored entirely.
On top of all the censorship, Facebook elevated government and pharmaceutical propaganda by gifting the CDC $15 million-worth of ad credits. These ad credits were used to promote social distancing, travel restrictions and vaccine uptake while hiding relevant information on the covid-19 vaccines. The CDC also established a list of “verifiable information sources” with Facebook to protect social media posts released by the State Department of Health.
At Twitter, employees arranged regular chats with CDC officials and warned Facebook officials that their algorithms were not doing a good enough job at eliminating “vaccine misinformation.” Twitter officials reached out to the CDC and asked for help to identify “misinformation” that should be censored off the platform. CDC officials sent Twitter officials an official chart detailing the tweets that they wanted to target as “misinformation.” The CDC targeted and eliminated specific information on vaccine injury, vaccine shedding, miscarriage risk, menstrual cycle disruption, and information on genetic alterations caused by the vaccine.
At Google, CDC officials went as far as editing Google’s code for its Knowledgebase. These edits were focused on promoting isolation, mask and vaccine use. CDC officials told Google to use the SEARCH engine itself to promote the CDC’s vaccine page. The CDC also utilized Google’s “signal boost” to promote similar propaganda coming from the World Health Organization and to promote “comprehensive global training on tracking, analyzing and addressing misinformation.”
CDC officials did not want to get caught colluding with social media. In the emails, CDC officials instructed Twitter employees not to share their directives. “Please do not share outside your trust and safety teams,” the CDC officials wrote. The CDC has tried to bury important information about the COVID “vaccines” – information that is essential to the informed consent process. As AFL brings these crimes up in court, it’s time for each and every individual involved in this deceitful, unconstitutional process to be held accountable and brought forth to stand trial.
As to what has caused the “state of collapse” the under socialist siege Americans are experiencing, this report details, it began in February-1941, which was when American publishing oligarch Henry Luce, who founded Time, Life, Fortune, and Sports Illustrated magazines, and is called “the most influential private citizen in the America of his day”, released his historic manifesto “The American Century”, wherein he laid out a vision for American global domination arguing that the result of the United States immature refusal to accept the mantle of world leadership after the British Empire had begun to deteriorate in the wake of World War I was foolishness.
In these waning days of the American Century, Washington’s foreign policy establishment—the think tanks that define the limits of the possible—has splintered into two warring camps.
Defending the status quo are the liberal internationalists, who insist that the United States should retain its position of global armed primacy.
Against them stand the restrainers, who urge a fundamental rethinking of the U.S. approach to foreign policy, away from militarism and toward peaceful forms of international engagement.
The outcome of this debate will determine whether the United States remains committed to an atavistic foreign policy ill-suited to the twenty-first century, or whether the nation will take seriously the disasters of the past decades, abandon the hubris that has caused so much suffering worldwide, and, finally, embrace a grand strategy of restraint.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine—which was at least partially impelled by NATO expansion into Eastern Europe—is a clear example of the way in which behavior meant to deter war might very well incite it.
Yet these basic facts are difficult for liberal internationalists to admit. For them, the American Century can only be restored by facing China head-on.
Restrainers, by contrast, understand that the American Century is over. They maintain that the expansive use of the U.S. military has benefited neither the United States nor the world, and that charting a positive course in the twenty-first century requires taking a root and branch approach to the principles that have guided U.S. foreign policy since World War II.
Restrainers want to reduce the U.S. presence abroad, shrink the defense budget, restore Congress’s constitutional authority to declare war, and ensure that ordinary Americans actually have a say in what their country does abroad.
The origins of restraint can be traced to George Washington’s farewell address of September 1796, in which the president warned against “entangling our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice.”
Twenty-five years later, on July 4, 1821, the secretary of state, John Quincy Adams, likewise insisted that a defining characteristic of the United States was that it had “abstained from interference in the concerns of others. . . . She goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.”
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
After hearing the witness statements to the German Corona Investigative Committee by former vice president of Pfizer dr Mike Yeadon who has been a scientist for 36 years, lawyers with Reiner Füllmich draw the same conclusion: The injections normally called Corona vaccines are designed to experiment on the human race and to find out what dosage of a yet unknown toxin is needed in order to kill people. The mortality rate linked to the vaccines, according to Yeadon, is traceable in terms of lot numbers of the different batches, as some batches appear to be more lethal than others. When taking a look at the evidence available, the main goal with the injections all over the world is global depopulation, according to the lawyers involved. Dr Füllmich told Perspektiv that the lawyers preparing an international law suit were no longer in doubt: Poisoning and mass murder through so called Corona vaccines is intentionally being perpetrated on the peoples of the world.
Citizen Journalist Ulf Bittner from EU/EES Healthcare blog and Sverige Granskas stated in the interview that the situation with traceable lot numbers and injuries and death related to lot numbers is similar in the different health care regions of Sweden. Bittner is in contact with a vaccine coordinator who has provided documents to keep track of how many people have been injured and lost their lives related to the different batches of the so-called vaccines.
01:00 Different numbers on the barcodes on the bottom of the vaccine doses are placebo which has been given to politicians according to a Slovenian chief nurse. Is it the same in other countries?
1:54 Mike Yeadon and the LOT numbers of some shots of the brands Moderna, Johnson& Johnson and Pfizer/Biontech are related to much higher mortality than for the other manufacturers.
3:52 The producers of the so-called vaccines are experimenting with the correct dosages to kill people according to Dr Füllmich. This according to the Corona Investigative Committee, constitute compelling evidence for punitive damages and attempted mass murder. They are intentionally killing people.
08:30 Lawyers from India have filed complaints for premeditative murder.
09:55 Mike Yeadon as a witness for the coming legal action against the perpetrators.
10:44 Everyone who critizises the wrongdoings of the governments of the world is being called a ‘right wing extremist’. This has also happened to the internationally renowned scientist Mike Yeadon.
13:05 CDC withdrew the recommendation for the PCR-tests diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 from 31/12-2021. PCR- tests are the foundation of the pandemic. Why is Anthony Fauci now doing a 180-degree turn?
17:25 At least a million dollars per person will be claimed in punitive damages if the lawsuit is successful.
18:33 Previously only ten percent of all adverse effects were reported. In the situation the world is right now, the team estimated that in fact only one percent of all adverse effects were being reported.
19:25 CEO of Life insurance company from Indiana USA with 100 billions of dollars in assets said: ”Over the span of this past year there has been an excess mortality of 40 percent”. This is believed to be due to the injections.
21:05 What substance in the vials makes them so lethal? Is it Graphene Oxide/graphene hydroxide?
22:37 Any vaccin is a poison, it is the dosage which makes the difference. This is not a vaccine, as a vaccine provides immunity, while these products demand incessant injections. Either a vaccine works or it does not.
24:40 This is not gene therapy either, since a gene therapy means exchanging a broken gene with a fixed one. This is more like experimenting on people, and trying to kill us.
25.15 The doses are not tested by governments, while governments will be keeping the contracts hidden from the public for at least 55 years. How is this affecting the possibility of getting people punished? Dr Füllmich goes through all the lies paving the way for the tyrannical situation the world is now in.
28:25 The vaccines are neither safe nor effective. The producers are experimenting on lethal doses of poison. Everyone now taking part in intentional malicious infliction of harm will be punished.
30:05 How sure are legal experts about the conclusion that Mike Yeadon has drawn from this, that it is all about depopulation and intentionally killing people through injections? If close to 50 lawyers are of the same opinion, it is regarded as “irrefutable proof”.
32:08 Batches of injections in Sweden can be traced by an application.
32:45 Füllmich is in cooperation with people working within the secret service of Germany who do not wish to take the injections.
34:15 Dr Lee Merritt on combat pilots in the USA refusing to get the shots. According to Dr Füllmich, Dr Merrit explained: ”They understood that if they were forced to [get vaccinated] they were going to get killed.”
35:15 Information is being collected on batches in Sweden from every region, the Swedish health authorities (Folkhälsomyndigheten) and medical board (Läkemedelsverket). Every batch is traceable through an application. There is economic reward for the Swedish regions which manage to get more people injected. One of the expert lawyers involved in the upcoming court hearings is a specialist on Nuremberg Trials.
38:45 How will the trials be performed, and through what legal structure? A common design, the same structure as for the Nuremberg trials.
39:40 Free choice should reign for members of the European Union. Consumers of health care have consumer rights. Fraud means misleading the people and consumers of health care.
42:00 The so called vaccines are an adulterated product put on to the market. According to Mike Yeadon there is a law in the US that will make everyone liable for the harms created by the adulterated product. Toxins are being put into the vials other than the known lipids etc, which the people who took the vaccines never consented to.
43:40 The importance of decentralization of power and national independence rather than global organizations such as the European Union telling the people what to do. Disconnecting from the banking system, NGO:s and creating independent and strong agricultural supply chains, energy supply chains etc.
46:15 When are the trials going to take place? How will the indicements happen and how will the trials be held? One of the goals is to inform people and expose the wrongdoings by involving the alternative media so that the mainstream media won’t be able to ignore the trials. The crew is working on a new system of law in the USA, Africa and Germany.
50:48 Dr Füllmich believes the world is close to a tipping point and the whole narrative will fall apart very very soon, maybe in a couple of weeks or months.
54:13 Robert Malone, Robert F Kennedy and Mike Yeadon and others involved in exposing the agenda are in contact with each other, and a tour is planned with these whistleblowers in the USA in March
Biden Mocks Chevron Rebuke, Says “Didn’t Know They’d Get Their Feelings Hurt That Quickly”
by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Jun 22, 2022 – 04:23 AM
Reposted Under the Fair Use Doctrine
Update: During a press conference at THe White House thia afternoon, President Biden was asked how he felt about the Chervon CEO’s response to his letter. His response sums a lot of things up about this administration’s approach.
The Reporter asked:
“The Chevron CEO… said that your administration has largely criticized the oil and gas industry and …would need to take a change in approach in order to make progress in reducing energy prices.”
To which Biden snapped back in quiet mode:
“He’s mildly sensitive…” before adding that “I didn’t know they’d get their feelings hurt that quickly.”
Then reverting back to his talking points he addressed the fact that its not his fault that ‘Big Oil’ won’t help cut prices, claiming that:
“We ought to be able to work something out whereby we can increase refining capacity and still not give up on transitioning to renewable energy.”
Once again completely missing the point that is holding back refiners from the massive investments required. given government’s long-term goals.
So we’re back at square one…
Reporter: “The Chevron CEO… said that your administration has largely criticized the oil and gas industry and …would need to take a change in approach in order to make progress in reducing energy prices.”
Biden: “I didn’t know they’d get their feelings hurt that quickly.”
Reporter: “The Chevron CEO… said that your administration has largely criticized the oil and gas industry and …would need to take a change in approach in order to make progress in reducing energy prices.”
Chevron CEO Mike Wirth sent an open letter to President Biden on Tuesday that probably started out closer to “go fuck yourself” than the final, still-snarky note seeking cooperation on ways to lower prices at the pump.
“At every level of the system, the policy of our government is to reduce demand, and so it’s very hard in a business where investments have a payout period of a decade or more. And the stated policy of the government for a long time has been to reduce demand for your products,” Wirth noted very frankly.
Then last week President Biden fired off an angry letter to oil companies accusing them of being greedy, and demanding that they help ease the “Putin price hike” or face consequences.
“At a time of war, refinery profit margins well above normal being passed directly onto American families are not acceptable,” wrote Biden.
The next day, Chevron hit back – claiming that the Biden administration’s policies since January 2021 ave sent a message that it aims to “impose obstacles to our industry delivering energy resources the world needs.”
Meanwhile, the American Petroleum Institute wrote the Biden administration last week recommending several measures, including lifting development restrictions on federal lands and waters, authorizing critical energy infrastructure projects, speed up the permitting process, and other items.
Fast forward to today’s letter to Biden from Chevron CEO Mike Wirth, which suggests that “Addressing this situation requires thoughtful action and a willingness to work together, not political rhetoric,” adding “your Administration has largely sought to criticize, and at times vilify, our industry.“
Wirth makes clear that “Chevron shares your concerns over the higher prices that Americans are experiencing,” noting that the company is “increasing capital expenditures to $18 billion in 2022 – over 50% higher than last year.“
Chevron still got a few blows in, writing “Chevron will engage in this week’s meeting with Secretary Granholm. I encourage you to also send your senior advisors to this meeting, so they too can engage in a robust conversation.“
Oh, and this is, well, quite something:
“Chevron will engage in this week’s meeting with Secretary Granholm. I encourage you to also send your senior advisors to this meeting, so they too can engage in a robust conversation.”
“Chevron will engage in this week’s meeting with Secretary Granholm. I encourage you to also send your senior advisors to this meeting, so they too can engage in a robust conversation.” — Javier Blas (@JavierBlas) June 21, 2022
The letter then outlines what the Biden administration can do to help solve the problem:
You have called on our industry to increase energy production. We agree. Let’s work together. The U.S. energy sector needs cooperation and support from your Administration for our country to return to a path toward greater energy security, economic prosperity, and environmental protection.
We need clarity and consistency on policy matters ranging from leases and permits on federal lands, to the ability to permit and build critical infrastructure, to the proper role of regulation that considers both costs and benefits. Many of these elements are described in our industry’s recently released 10-point plan. Most importantly, we need an honest dialogue on how to best balance energy, economic, and environmental objectives – one that recognizes our industry is a vital sector of the U.S. economy and is essential to our national security.
We can only meet these challenges by working together.
We can’t wait to say what the administration – which recently said it wouldn’t budge on easing pressure on the oil industry – will say in response.
The Administration needs to face it, Biden ain’t no Trump. Trump has couth, intelligence, and can carry on a conversation without anyone’s permission on talking points. Trump has charisma, charm, and people like to be around him
Biden on the other hand, is in a stupor, unless someone brings kids around, then he perks up all bubbly, yea, he still talks stupid, but he is awake. The only thing that wakes Biden up is, kids. Thank God I don’t have to hear his thoughts. After seeing how he was looking at his own kid, when she was probably 8-10 years old, with lust in his eyes, what a sick fucker.
Oh well, enough of my own thoughts on the matter…. You get the picture.
Vice President Kamala Harris has been “honestly useless” at controlling the US border with Mexico, Republican Representative Mayra Flores (Texas) told Fox News earlier this week. In a recent special election, Flores flipped a seat comfortably won by her Democratic predecessor just two years ago.
Flores defeated Democratic candidate Dan Sanchez in a special election last week, picking up 51% of the vote in a district won by outgoing Democratic Rep. Filemon Vela by 13 points in 2020. Flores’ district, which sits in the Rio Grande Valley bordering Mexico, is 85% Hispanic, has been represented by Vela since 2012, and voted for Democrats in the last three presidential elections.
Flores’ victory is being interpreted by some analysts as a sign that voters are unhappy with the Democratic Party’s border policies, and Flores herself singled out Harris for criticism on Thursday.
“She’s honestly useless,” Flores said. “I don’t know why she’s in that position. She hasn’t been here in south Texas to see what their policies are creating, the mess that they’re creating in our country, and that their policies are hurting real people.”
Harris was tapped by US President Joe Biden in 2021 to address a brewing crisis on the US-Mexico border. After Biden ended former President Donald Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy and reinstated the Obama-era policy of ‘Catch and Release’, the number of migrants interdicted along the US’ southern border nearly tripled during the president’s first six months in office. Enormous shanty towns of migrants sprung up along crossing points, as Republicans accused Biden of ignoring the problem.
Harris visited the border region once while serving as Biden’s ‘border czar’, and the last migration-related event held by the vice president took place in January, when she met with Honduran President Xiomara Castro to discuss the “root causes of migration.” Meanwhile, illegal border crossings reached a record 239,416 last month – not counting those who evaded detection – and this year’s illegal entries are on track to pass last year’s total of 1.7 million within the coming weeks.
Flores, who was born in Mexico and immigrated to the US as a child, made border security front and center of her campaign. Her television ads touted her marriage to a Border Patrol agent and accused Democrats in Washington of putting the Rio Grande Valley “under attack.” As Flores is currently finishing out Vela’s term, she will have to fight for her seat again in November, in a redrawn district map that is believed to favor her Democrat opponent, Vincente Gonzalez Jr.
Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger recently shared his opinion of the Ukraine crisis and Russia’s ongoing special military operation in that country. At the latest World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, he suggested that it was time for Kiev to think about a diplomatic settlement of the conflict, even if that means territorial concessions.
Henry Kissinger, a geopolitics colossus who turned 99 on 27 May, has claimed that the US is “infinitely” more divided today than at the time of the Vietnam War (1955-1975).
The former US Secretary of State to presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, whose book, Leadership, is set to come out on July 5, offered his opinion of the present state of US internal politics, the Ukraine crisis and US the stand-off with China in an exclusive interview for The Sunday Times.
‘Unremitting Hostility of the Opposition’
The patriarch of international politics deplored the partisan antipathy that has surged in the US over the past several decades. The American National Election Studies surveys and polls have increasingly shown that Democrats and Republicans view members of the other party more as enemies than simply as political opponents.
According to Kissinger, in the early Seventies, there was “still a possibility of bipartisanship” in the US, before the “hostility” firmly took root.
“The national interest was a meaningful term, it was not in itself a subject of debate. That has ended. Every administration now faces the unremitting hostility of the opposition and in a way that is built on different premises … The unstated but very real debate in America right now is about whether the basic values of America have been valid,” underscored Kissinger, a Republican since the Fifties.
The “values” in question refer to the sacrosanct status of the American Constitution and the “primacy of individual liberty and equality before the law”, the publication explained.
Kissinger deplored the stance espoused at present by the “progressive left,” which, according to him, argues that “unless these basic values are overturned, and the principles of [their] execution altered, we have no moral right even to carry out our own domestic policy, much less our foreign policy”.
Kissinger warned that this is “not a common view yet, but it is sufficiently virulent to drive everything else in its direction and to prevent unifying policies … [It] is [a view held] by a large group of the intellectual community, probably dominating all universities and many media.”
Kissinger offered a dire warning of what such “unbridgeable divisions” are fraught with.
“Either the society collapses and is no longer capable of carrying out its missions under either leadership, or it transcends them …”
The veteran foreign policy scholar agreed that sometimes an “external shock” or an “external enemy” was resorted to to bridge this “divide”.
At this point Kissinger broached the subject of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, where Russia launched a special military operation to demilitarise and de-Nazify the country on 24 February after the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics (DPR and LPR) appealed for help in defending themselves against shelling from Ukrainian forces.
Kissinger recently sparked controversy by his brief virtual speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos on 23 May. Movement toward peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine needs to begin within the next two months or so, he said, before the conflict escalates to a point where tensions are much harder to overcome.
Kissinger, known for his efforts to ease tensions between the US and the Soviet Union, emphasised Russia’s importance to Europe and, in his Davos address, urged western countries not to get swept up “in the mood of the moment”, as he advocated that the West pressure Kiev into accepting negotiations even if that means territorial concessions.
The seasoned US scholar, renowned for his wise statements on geopolitics, faced a backlash for his calls for negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.
Kissinger, who played an integral role in developing the relationship between the US and the People’s Republic of China during the Nixon administration, found himself blacklisted by Ukraine’s notorious website Mirotvorets (Peacemaker) for “participation in Russia’s special information operation against Ukraine”. He was also charged with “propaganda, blackmail and encroachment on the territorial integrity of Ukraine”.
As western countries seek to isolate Russia with a sweeping sanctions policy while funnelling weapons into Ukraine and eyeing NATO expansion, Henry Kissinger predicted in The Sunday Times interview that “big issues are going to take place in the relations of the Middle East and Asia to Europe and America.”
Against the backdrop of squabbling over Finland and Sweden’s NATO membership bid with Turkey, Russia has continuously reiterated that further expansion of the NATO bloc will not bring greater security to Europe.
Kissinger, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973, claimed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an “institution whose components don’t necessarily have compatible views. They came together on Ukraine because that was reminiscent of [older] threats and they did very well, and I support what they did. The question will now be how to end that war. At its end a place has to be found for Ukraine and a place has to be found for Russia – if we don’t want Russia to become an outpost of China in Europe.”
Obligation to Avert ‘Catastrophic Collision’
On the issue of China, Kissinger believed that Beijing and Washington were “facing each other as the ultimate contestants”, who are “governed by incompatible domestic systems”.
“And this is occurring when technology means that a war would set back civilisation, if not destroy it,” said Kissinger, agreeing that the two superpowers “have a minimum common obligation to prevent [a catastrophic collision] from happening”.
Kissinger concluded by acknowledging his profound concerns about the lack of a dialogue between superpowers, as “other countries will want to exploit this rivalry”.
“So we’re heading into a very difficult period,” Kissinger foretold.
Paris, like official Berlin, and Rome, which has joined these two co-founders of the European Union, are less and less willing to listen to what they are being told from Kiev (and almost no longer pay attention to the tone of what was said, bordering on bizarre abuse), and to the fact that what Washington is trying to convince them of.
Neither France, nor Germany, nor Italy in any way wants to mess with the Russians when they meet them on the battlefield.
Despite all attempts to erase the memory of the power of Russian weapons and the Russian military spirit, the spinal cord of a united Europe still remembers perfectly what outcome awaits those who come to Russia with a sword.
The “Horsemen of the Apocalypse” are only unlocking the gates of the stable where their horses are. Western Europe, hearing, of course, this creaking of the castle, cannot help but understand that it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to turn these horses around later.
Being aware of what this could threaten, even the European military-industrial complex and the European military are trying to stop the apocalypse by any means: either as the Dassault family or by various “leaks”.
But Europe, which ordered the fight, regardless of whether it wants it or not, at the moment when the order is received, will not be able to return everything “back”. Even if the outcome, that is, the European loss, as well as the European break, in theory, is already a foregone conclusion.
As to why a beyond shocking 16% of Americans polled would like to see President Putin as their leader, this report continues, becomes self explanatory when noticing that as these under socialist siege peoples are being economically destroyed by the hour, their suffering was ignored yesterday by Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden, who, instead of addressing the needs of his citizens, engaged in a teenage mean girl spat with the world’s richest man Elon Musk telling him to have “lots of luck in his trip to the Moon”.
The West ought to pay compensation to those who have suffered from its actions.
I would recommend to the collective West this one thing. If you want to condemn aggression — start with yourselves. Set an example by condemning your own military adventures, illegal economic restrictions, deadly colonial and neo-colonial wars, genocide, and robbery of indigenous peoples.
Start paying off compensations to states and nations that suffered from you. Such a step would indeed bring us closer to having a more just world order that would have no place for anyone’s self-proclaimed exceptionalism.
When NATO was attacking Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, international law was perceived only as an annoying impediment.
In futile attempts to justify their aggression against sovereign states, the collective West had to come up with exotic concepts, such as ‘humanitarian intervention’, ‘war on terror‘ and ‘preventive strikes’. The outcome is always the same: lots of casualties, and no one held accountable.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
When America socialists can’t even tell what a woman is and start claiming that bees are fish, one would think people would start to notice something is really wrong!
(Natural News) The Biden regime’s intent to destroy the powerhouse economy that President Donald Trump built in just four short years actually began when the leftist deep state pushed him to agree to recommend lockdowns and business closures during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the year the same people were plotting to steal his reelection.
And now that the process is in full swing, the regime is set to finish the job.
During Biden’s first year in office, the Democrat-majority Congress passed one major spending bill after another, flooding the country with newly printed trillions at a time when there was a worsening supply chain crisis and ongoing shutdowns. The result was out-of-control inflation as more money in the system competed for fewer goods and services, a perfect recipe for spiking inflation.
Ostensibly to ‘control’ inflation, the Federal Reserve has begun hiking interest rates which is expected to slow down spending to allow the supply chain to catch up with the money supply. But at the same time, the rate hikes come as used cars have risen in price by 35 percent while prices for existing homes have also shot skyward as they did in the years before the 2007 Great Recession.
The resulting crash left millions of Americans with overpriced homes that lost a third of their value, leading to massive foreclosures and an economy literally on the brink of collapse — and it’s all happening again.
In March 2022, foreclosures surged 181% to [the] highest levels since March 2020, with Chicago, New York, LA and Houston leading the pack.
Some eight months after a nationwide moratorium on foreclosures expired, foreclosure filings soared to the highest level since the pandemic began.
Last month, 33,333 properties across the U.S. faced foreclosure, a 181 percent jump from March 2021 and 29 percent pop from February, according to a report by foreclosure tracker Attom. The first quarter saw 78,271 properties with a foreclosure filing, a 39 percent increase from the previous quarter and 132 percent from last year.
In March 2020, barely a month into the COVID pandemic shutdown, nearly 47,000 homes were held in foreclosure filings according to Rick Sharga, the executive vice president of market intelligence for the firm ATTOM.
And in fact, March was the 11th consecutive month where foreclosure activity posted a rise year-over-year.
“Not only did foreclosure activity hit a peak, the time it took properties to foreclose ticked down 3 percent from the previous quarter. Properties foreclosed on in the first quarter were in the process for an average of 917 days, down from 941 in the previous period and 930 in the first quarter of 2021,” Strange Sounds added.
Not surprisingly, California was the state where the highest number of foreclosure starts for the first three months of this year — 5,378 — thanks to the insanely overpriced housing market there. But Florida and Texas were second and third, respectively, with 4,707 and 4,649.
Among the country’s major metropolitan areas, Chicago saw the largest increase in new foreclosure filings during the first quarter of this year with 3,101. New York City followed with 2.580 starts after a statewide foreclosure moratorium expired in January.
Despite the rise in activity, Sharga believes that economic growth in the country will continue. However, he added, the U.S. isn’t likely to see pre-pandemic levels “until the end of the year at the earliest, unless the economy takes a significant turn for the worse.”
And that’s really the plan: The Biden regime and the leftist deep state running it will be fine, economically, as their investments and assets will be protected from their own economy-destroying policies. The rest of the country, however, is in for a massive contraction like that seen just a short 15 years ago.
The power of language is magical to behold. Through the mere pronouncement of words, people can be persuaded to do what they would never have thought to do, left to their own devices. The playbook with the most success in this regard is that of war. When people are “informed” that they and their families are in mortal danger, they can and often will acquiesce to any and all policies which government authorities claim to be necessary in order to protect them.
Young people can be coaxed into killing complete strangers who never did anything personally to them. Citizens can be brainwashed to believe that suitably labeled persons can and indeed must be denied any and all human rights. When the stakes are claimed to be life and death, even apparently intelligent people can be goaded to accept that the mere possession of a divergent opinion is evil, and the expression of dissent a crime. The use of military weapons to execute obviously innocent, entirely innocuous civilians, including children, suddenly becomes permissible, so long as the victims have been labeled collateral damage. All any of this takes is to identify “the enemy” as evil.
In centuries past, “the laws of war” were said to require the humane treatment of enemy soldiers. They were diagnosed as suffering from “invincible ignorance,” misled and mistaken about the dispute said to necessitate recourse to war, but still acknowledged as persons capable of being courageous combatants who found themselves through historical fortuity on the wrong side. An enemy soldier was to be provided with the opportunity to lay down his weapon and surrender in order to save his own life. Disarmed or incapacitated soldiers were not to be executed by their captors, for they had already been neutralized and posed no more danger than unarmed civilians. Prisoners of war were to be treated as human beings, and when they were tortured or summarily executed, this constituted a war crime. Such “laws of war,” which form the basis of international agreements, including the Geneva Conventions, have needless to say often been flouted, but, in theory, they were to be upheld by civilized people.
After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, political leaders and government officials proclaimed that “everything changed.” The Bush administration legal team deployed linguistic innovation to issue in an entirely new era of warfare, wherein the “laws of war” would still be said to obtain, but they would be inapplicable to entire classes of human beings. Jihadist soldiers for radical Islamist causes were labeled unlawful enemy combatants, whose “unlawful” status was said to imply that they were protected by neither international norms such as the Geneva Conventions nor the laws of civil society.
Under this pretext, terrorist suspects were tortured while held captive at prisons in Guantánamo Bay, Abu Ghraib and Baghram, in addition to many black sites around the world. Ever keen to cover their tracks, the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) also flatly denied that they ever tortured anyone, by redefining as enhanced interrogation techniques the abusive practices inflicted on hundreds, if not thousands, of men in an effort to extract from them actionable intelligence. And just in case any of this “logic” was called into question by pesky human rights advocates, Bush administration officials also derided the Geneva Conventions as “quaint.”
Imminent vs. Immediate in the Global War on Terror
The “peace candidate” Barack Obama was elected in 2008 on the promise to rein in the excesses of the Bush administration, including what Obama characterized as the “dumb” war on Iraq. The new president publicly denounced “enhanced interrogation techniques” as torture but then proceeded to take linguistic neologism to an entirely new level by not only redefining assassination as targeted killing but also labeling any suspect eliminated through the use of lethal drones as an Enemy Killed in Action (EKIA).
The slaughtered “soldiers” were assumed to be guilty of possible complicity in future possible crimes, a preposterous position never fully grasped by Obama’s devotees, who somehow failed to recognize that the specific implement used to kill does not distinguish various types of homicide from one another, morally speaking. The extrajudicial execution of individual human beings in civil society is illegal, but the Obama administration effectively maintained that the targeting of suspicious persons and their associates in lands far away was perfectly permissible, so long as the victims were killed by missiles launched from drones, thereby rendering them “acts of war.”
The entire drone program, whether within or far from areas of active hostilities (i.e., war zones), was portrayed by Obama and his administration as just another facet of “just war.” Blinded to the moral atrocity of this new lethal-centric approach to dealing with suspected enemies, whereby they would be executed rather than taken prisoner, Obama’s loyal supporters blithely embraced the propaganda according to which he was a smart warrior. After demonstrating his death creds to the satisfaction of hawks, by killing not only Osama bin Laden, but also U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki, suspected of complicity in factional terrorism, Obama was reelected for a second term in 2012, despite having summarily executed thousands of men—mostly brown-skinned, unnamed, and unarmed—located in their own civil societies, far from any U.S. citizen, and in clear violation of the Geneva Conventions.
The deft deployment of two simple words, immediate and imminent, played a key role in allowing Obama to get away with murder, even of U.S. citizens such as Anwar al-Awlaki and his sixteen-year-old son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. Guided by drone-killing czar John Brennan, Obama’s lawyers calmly explained in public addresses and official documents that suspects who posed imminent threats to the United States could be targeted by lethal drones because an imminent threat did not imply immediacy. In other words, they could be killed even when they were currently unarmed and living in their own civil society, surrounded by family members and friends, and even when the future crime of which they were vaguely suspected was merely hypothetical and therefore had no specific date.
When targets were “nominated” for execution, the administration operated under the assumption that they were guilty unless specific information was brought forth to demonstrate their innocence. The victims themselves obviously could not do this, initially, because they were not informed that they were being targeted and, later, because they were dead. Meanwhile, local residents and journalists on the ground who knew these people’s names and dared to assert that the victims were not terrorists were either denounced as propagandists or cast as misguided persons hoodwinked by the rhetoric of jihadists.
As the death toll mounted, outspoken critics in the vicinity of the missile strikes became progressively more terrified of being themselves eliminated for seeming to support terrorist groups. Their concerns were not unfounded, for they risked being affixed with the lethal label associate and added to hit lists for execution if they dared to question the drone warriors’ narrative. This oppressive climate needless to say served actively to suppress dissent from the U.S. government’s official story of what they had done, even among locals who witnessed the grisly scenes where entirely innocent community members were incinerated by missiles launched from drones.
Imminent vs. Immediate in the Opioid Crisis
Improbably enough, the very same two words, imminent and immediate, used by the Obama legal team to invert the presumption of innocence to a presumption of guilt in the case of terrorist suspects located abroad, proved to be deadly in an entirely different context during the twenty-first century as well.
The causes of the sudden and shocking increase in the number of narcotics addicts and overdose deaths all over the United States are manifold, but a tidal wave of diversion was made possible by drug-dealer doctors and the notorious “pain clinics” where they plied their trade. Manufacturers produced and pharmacies dispensed billions of pills as demand multiplied in tandem with the creation of more and more new addicts, who could no longer function without narcotics.
Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family are widely regarded as the prime movers of the opioid crisis, having undertaken a highly successful campaign to coax doctors into believing that their patented time-release prescription narcotic Oxycontin was nonaddictive and could be safely provided to patients even for moderate pain. This marketing feat was achieved by influencing key players at the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), who not only approved the medication but permitted it to be sold along with a package insert falsely suggesting that it was less prone to abuse than other narcotics.
In its quest to sell as many pills as possible, the pharmaceutical industry repeatedly pivoted to neologize in lethal ways over the two decades following the launch of Oxycontin in 1996. When it emerged that the pills sometimes wore off before the twelve-hour time release period, marketers and sales representatives claimed that those patients were suffering from breakthrough pain, the remedy for which was (surprise!) to double their dose. The narcotics marketers indulged in flat-out sophistry when they insisted that patients who appeared to be addicted to their painkillers were in fact suffering from pseudoaddiction, the remedy for which was (surprise!) even higher doses of their drugs. As farcical as these arguments may seem in retrospect, with the benefit of hindsight and in the light of the overdose epidemic now running rampant, many doctors appear to have been persuaded to believe that their patients’ miserable condition was not indicative of addiction but a manifestation of their ongoing and unbearable pain, the solution to which was to ply them with yet more powerful narcotics.
Pharma-coopted lawmakers were notified of the proliferating addiction problem early on but refused to stop the runaway train by demanding that the FDA cease playing along with Purdue’s insane pro-narcotics marketing campaign. Other companies needless to say contributed as well, through promulgating the “pain epidemic” propaganda so as to expand the market niche of such products, which had previously been reserved for terminally ill patients. Johnson & Johnson played a causal role in what became the opioid crisis by growing tons of poppies (in Tasmania) to meet the enormous increased industry need for raw opium, without which the billions of pills prescribed could not and would never have been produced.
As the opioid crisis began to become recognized for what it was, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) sought to issue “Immediate Suspension Orders” (ISOs) against the three major drug wholesale distributors to pharmacies, Cardinal Health, McKesson, and Amerisource Bergen. Through issuing such orders, Joe Rannazzisi, the deputy director of the Office of Diversion Control, hoped to halt the ongoing mass shipments of opioids to retailers such as CVS in cases where the sheer volume of prescriptions could not be explained by ordinary medical practice and so was a clear indication that widespread diversion of narcotics was underway.
Rannazzisi ended up being hobbled by a team of corporate lawyers and lobbyists who managed to cobble together a new law in 2014 which, despite its beneficent-sounding name, “The Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act” (HR4709), served to protect, above all, drug manufacturers and distributors. The Act rewrote the law already on the books through redefining the imminent danger required to issue an ISO to mean “a substantial likelihood of an immediate threat.” One of the new Act’s enthusiastic promoters, Linden Barber (a former DEA officer and lawyer who had left his government position to represent the drug distributors), persuasively explained on the floor of Congress that “having a clear legal standard is always better.” The measure passed unanimously, without a roll call vote, for the simple reason that it sounded like a policy to which no decent person could object. But rather than stemming the tide of the opioid crisis, the Act severely hampered the DEA’s ability to issue ISOs, for it was prohibitively difficult for officials to meet the newly stipulated legal standard of imminence as requiring immediacy.
President Obama signed the Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2014 into law, and the marketing campaign used to promote the use of highly addictive time-release narcotics barreled ahead. The DEA’s sudden inability to call a halt to the shipment of tons of narcotics to retailers effectively guaranteed that the number of dependent persons would multiply, as potent prescription pills continued to be diverted for recreational uses and thereby create more addicts. But more addicts meant more overdoses, not only from the potent pills themselves, but also because the street supplies of heroin to which many users eventually turned were often cut with extremely dangerous fentanyl.
Unfazed by the death tolls, which had already soared to many thousands by 2014, the pharmaceutical giants insisted that the sorry situation of addicts was no argument against helping patients genuinely in pain, who would in fact be wronged if their access to narcotics were curbed. The addicts dropping like flies were painted as solely responsible for their plight, despite ample evidence that many of the overdose victims began as legitimate pain patients, who became aware of their dependency only upon reaching the bottom of their amber vials.
The Role of Obamacare in Propelling and Augmenting the Opioid Crisis
“Everything changed” in the twenty-first century, not only with the war on terror, the rebranding of torture, and the normalization of assassination, but also in the pharma-friendly approach to healthcare ushered in by President Barack Obama. By pushing through his signature legislation, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, which leftists were led to believe would create a system of socialized medicine (referred to by many as Obamacare), the president notoriously bowed to drug makers and the insurance industry, extending to those sectors the very form of crony corporate welfare already enjoyed by companies in the military industry.
Obama’s collaboration with pharmaceutical and insurance company executives in crafting the ACA allowed them to secure advantageous pricing arrangements to ensure the maximization of their profits, while at the same time massively increasing the sheer volume of sales. The pharmaceutical industry was greatly enriched through the provision of virtually limitless free psychiatric medications to low-income patients through government programs such as Medicaid and Medicare, and to veterans through the VA (Veterans Administration). Mental health-based disability claims soared, and the sales of SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), anti-anxiety, atypical anti-psychotic medications and other psychotropes, including narcotics, increased accordingly. The millions of new prescription medications dispensed to formerly uninsured Americans ended up being paid for by the middle class, who were mandated by law to sign up for Obamacare or else face a hefty tax penalty, should they decline to comply.
Despite what may have been Obama’s initial good intention, to make healthcare available to uninsured persons, Obamacare ultimately made medical treatment in the United States prohibitively expensive for many middle class families, whose copays, premiums and deductibles increased dramatically. The new mandatory healthcare program skyrocketed the salaries of health industry executives while pricing drugs and procedures out of reach for many persons who had previously been able to afford them. Millions of people in the United States have filed medical bankruptcy in recent years. In cases where prescription narcotics addicts became uninsured because they lost their jobs, they turned to the streets for their needed drugs, given the impossibility of paying out of pocket for extraordinarily expensive prescription pills.
Given the story of Obamacare, perhaps no one should be surprised that when the Obama administration finally took action to address the opioid epidemic, most of the allocated $1.1 billion was for the alternative medication of already existing addicts. The pharma-friendly approach prevailed once again, encouraging the sale of more and more drugs (such as Suboxone) to help addicts to wean themselves off their narcotics. Obama’s dilatory and pro-pill approach to the opioid crisis ultimately generated even more people who, in order to kick their narcotics habit, would need to avail themselves of further pharmaceutical means, effectively trading one drug for another. In other words, both the problem of opioid overprescription, facilitated through Obamacare by providing easy access to narcotics to formerly uninsured persons, and the measures implemented by the Obama administration in response to the overdose epidemic, served to increase pharmaceutical industry profits.
The Death Connection
Whether or not one wishes to connect any further dots in the cases of drone assassination and the opioid epidemic, it does seem worth pointing out that Obama’s own attorney general, Eric Holder (2009-2015), was a former legal counselor to Purdue Pharma, who in fact defended the company in a 2004 lawsuit alleging deceptive marketing of Oxycontin. This is noteworthy because it was none other than Eric Holder who, in an infamous White Paper and various public addresses, so adamantly defended the creative interpretation of imminence as not implying immediacy, the crucial linguistic maneuver used to defend and promote Obama’s drone killing spree.
The normalization of assassination achieved by the Obama administration expanded the domain of what was said to be legitimate state killing by inverting the burden of proof on suspects while simultaneously claiming (illogically enough) that “areas outside active hostilities” were in fact war zones. Together, all of these linguistic tricks generated a veritable killing machine, opening up vast new market niches and dramatically increasing the profit potential for companies in the shockingly lucrative business of state-inflicted homicide. Not only weapons manufacturers but also logistics and analytics companies were able to reap hefty profits through eliminating as many people pegged as “terrorist suspects” as possible.
The imminent vs. immediate dichotomy was inverted and redeployed, but in the opposite direction, by pharmaceutical company legal teams and collaborating lawmakers in 2014 to permit the promiscuous sale of narcotics to continue on despite the opioid overdose epidemic on display throughout the United States. The Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2014 ironically “ensured” only profits for drug companies, as millions of new addicts would be created during the second decade of the twenty-first century, accelerating and multiplying the domino effect of diversion and overdoses already ravaging communities all across the United States. It matters not that pharmaceutical company executives sought not to kill people but to sell pills. They aggressively pushed narcotics without regard for the likely future consequences of their drive for profit. Indeed, they persisted in pushing narcotics even as drug overdose deaths reached record levels.
Under Obama, more than two thousand suspects outside areas of active hostilities were premeditatedly and intentionally incinerated by missiles launched from drones. The tally of overdose deaths in the United States exceeded 100K for the single year ending in April 2021. The long-range effects of the normalization of assassination, however, are likely to be more deadly than the opioid crisis, given that many other governments have followed suit in acquiring lethal drones for their own use, having been persuaded by the precedent set by the U.S. government that this form of state-inflicted homicide is perfectly permissible. In contrast, the promiscuous opioid prescription practices of doctors in the United States has been curtailed and was not emulated in the UK or in Europe, although the pharmaceutical giants do appear to have continued their morally dubious marketing practices in other countries abroad, especially in less-developed lands.
As both the drone program and the opioid prescription debacle illustrate, when government agencies such as the Pentagon and the FDA have been captured by industry forces focused above all on maximizing profits, they will simply look the other way as the corpses pile up, denying responsibility for any and all “collateral damage.” This tendency of bureaucrats and corporate leaders to shirk responsibility for the negative consequences of their policies helps to explain the ease with which lawmakers are coopted by lobbyists from not only the military but also the pharmaceutical industry. The recent deployment of imminent and immediate by lethal legal “experts” serves to underscore why the censorship of language by government officials themselves is inherently dangerous, given that their policies in recent years have multiplied, not prevented, the deaths of human beings.
In a representative democracy, the lawmakers promote the interests of the voters who elected them. What kind of government sacrifices the lives of human beings in order to maximize the profits of corporate leaders?9,969
John Michael Crichton (23 October 1942 – 4 November 2008) was an American author and filmmaker. His books have sold over 200 million copies worldwide, and over a dozen have been adapted into films.
Sooner Or Later The Endless Spectacle Is Over. Then We Will Take Revenge; Mercilessly.”
“If you don’t know history, then you don’t know anything. You are a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree.”John Michael Crichton (23 October 1942 – 4 November 2008) was an American author and filmmaker. His books have sold over 200 million copies worldwide, and over a dozen have been adapted into films.
Standing opposed to the Western powers seeking to take command of the “Heartland” so they could control the world was Russian linguist and historian Nikolai Trubetzkoy (16 April 1890 – 25 June 1938), who founded the Eurasianism political movement in Russia that posits that Russian civilization does not belong in the “European” or “Asian”—and, in 1938, died from a heart attack attributed to Nazi persecution after he had published an article that was highly critical of Nazi German leader Adolph Hitler’s theories of Western “white master race” supremacy over all other peoples.
It is the space of Midnight. And there the final point of the Fall is reached. The moment at hand is one of a change of poles.
The West turns into the East. Putin and Trump are in two opposite corners of the planet.
In the 20th century, these two extremes were embodied by the most radical forms of Modernity – capitalism and communism.
Two apocalyptical monsters – Leviathan and Behemoth. Now they have turned into two eschatological promises: Putin’s Greater Russia and America liberating itself under Trump.
The 21st century has finally begun.
For over a century now, the Western powers trying to take command of the “Heartland” so they can control the world have left in their wake tens-of-millions of Russian lives—and Russia will never allow this happen, which means that if they are pressed too far, they will obliterate the West with their largest in the world nuclear arsenal, then rise from the ashes to start over again, which they’ve been planning to do for as long as this threat has hung over them.
What’s most critically important for each of you realize at this moment, and like I told you exactly a month ago, this a war about Christianity, not Ukraine—and when you know this fact, and as history has long proved, this war won’t end until one side is decisively defeated—which means that it won’t be over in days, weeks or months, but rather in years, if not decades.
As a direct participant in this war, and maybe soon an actual combatant as it draws ever nearer to your front door, the most critical decision you have to make right now is who you receive your information from—and whose choice you have are those who’ve continued to lie to you, or those like us who keep telling you the truth.
I don’t have to tell you about the ferocious attacks we’re now under because we keep telling you the truth, because you know this fact well—but I can honestly tell you that without your immediate support we’ll no longer be able to sustain against these attacks—and to keep from happening, all you have to do is open your generous hearts and intelligent minds and give today whatever you can so we can survive.
And, as always, I’ll leave you with the words I’ve left you with before, and are as true right now as they always will be: In the coming months, the dimensions of this looming war are going to shift in radical and unforeseen ways—which is why we believe it is your right to know the full truth about what is happening—a truth the demonic enemies of humanity and our God are doing everything in their power to suppress—which is why our Dear Lord ordered us to band together in such times as these to protect one another—a protection we urgently need at this very moment to keep the truth flowing to you—and in aiding us, our Dear Lord has promised you: “Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”
With God,
Sister Ciara
Dublin, Ireland
23 March 2022https://www.youtube.com/embed/9VnJ9l4xZ6Q
Our needs today are dire indeed, but, if every one of you reading this gave just $20.00 today, our budget for the entire year would be met! So, before you click away, ask yourself this simple question….if your knowing the truth about what is happening now, and what will be happening in the future isn’t worth 5 US pennies a day what is?
The Georgia Supreme Court has given new life to a lawsuit challenging DeKalb County commissioners’ vote giving themselves a hefty pay raise.
In an opinion published Friday, the state’s high court found that a DeKalb Superior Court judge erred in dismissing some of the claims that local gadfly Ed Williams made in his lawsuit over the controversial 2018 vote.
While the Supreme Court did not rule on the merit of any alleged violations themselves, it found that Williams should have been permitted to pursue civil penalties against individual commissioners for allegedly violating the state’s Open Meetings Act. It also found that Williams’ request for an injunction to stop DeKalb CEO Michael Thurmond from paying the new salaries was dismissed prematurely.
The case was sent back to DeKalb Superior Court Judge Gregory A. Adams to hash things out.
“I’m elated by the decision that the court made,” Williams said Monday. “I kind of expected that result, but it made me happy when it was actually rendered. It gave me some relief that two years of working on the case was not lost and wasted.”
County officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the Supreme Court’s findings.
The salary saga started in February 2018, when commissioners voted to give themselves a nearly 60% raise that increased their pay to $64,637 per year. The proposal was quickly introduced during a meeting without being listed on the agenda and without going through the commission’s normal committee review process.
Other commissioners said at the time that they deserved more compensation for the hours they devote to what are supposed to be part-time jobs.
The way the vote was handled outraged some DeKalb County residents, two of whom eventually filed complaints with the state Attorney General’s Office. Attorney General Chris Carr determined that the vote violated the state’s open meetings law, but declined to take action because the 90-day period to formally contest the vote had passed.
In August 2018, Williams filed a lawsuit alleging that the commission’s vote violated open meeting laws and that the salary ordinance was unconstitutional. Adams dismissed the suit but Williams appealed all the way to Georgia’s Supreme Court.
The opinion issued last week was a victory for Williams, but there’s still a long way to go.
While the Supreme Court ruled that individual commissioners don’t enjoy immunity from penalties under the Open Meetings Act, it will still be up to Judge Adams to determine if those violations occurred.
Adams also will determine if Williams has the legal standing to sue Thurmond, the DeKalb CEO. If Williams does have standing, Adams would then have to determine if Thurmond even has the power enact what Williams is seeking: a stoppage on payments of the commission’s higher salaries.
The timeline in which Adams will re-consider the case is murky. Courts across Georgia are closed for the foreseeable future due to concerns about the spread of coronavirus.
Williams said he’s confident he’ll get more good news, whenever a decision comes.
“The law is on my side,” he said. “The law has always been on my side.”
A new judge will be assigned to handle the lawsuit challenging DeKalb County commissioners’ controversial 2018 vote to give themselves a pay raise.
DeKalb Superior Court Judge Gregory A. Adams voluntarily recused himself from the case late last week, more than three months after the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling sending it back to the trial court.
Adams’ recusal follows a motion brought by local activist Ed Williams, who filed the original lawsuit against several DeKalb commissioners and county CEO Michael Thurmond. Williams had requested Adams remove himself due to his previous rulings in the case and what Williams called the judge’s “long congenial relationship with some of the commissioners.”
Williams also raised questions about Adams’ appointment as chair of DeKalb’s charter review commission, a body tasked with evaluating the organization of the county’s government and how powers are delegated. Williams argued that the matters under examination by the review commission could include the very issue he raised in his lawsuit.
In his June 26 recusal latter, Adams did not specify a reason for removing himself from the case.
As of Wednesday, a new judge had not been assigned.
Williams filed his lawsuit without the aid of an attorney in August 2018, several months after DeKalb commissioners voted to give themselves a nearly 60% raise. The pay hike was quickly introduced during a meeting without being listed on the agenda and without going through the commission’s normal committee review process.
Williams’ suit argues that the commission’s vote violated open meeting laws and the salary ordinance was unconstitutional.
Adams dismissed the suit originally but Williams appealed all the way to the state’s Supreme Court, where law students at the University of Georgia’s appellate litigation clinic helped argue the case late last year.
The Supreme Court issued its opinion in March.
While the high court did not rule on the merit of any allegations themselves, it found that Williams should have been permitted to pursue civil penalties against individual commissioners for allegedly violating the state’s Open Meetings Act. It also found that Williams’ request for an injunction to stop CEO Thurmond from paying the increased salaries was dismissed prematurely.
(Natural News) This is the most important Daily News note that I have ever written. Read on and you will understand why I wrote this to go out with the LifeSite Daily News email to subscribers last night.
Monday was a wild, roller coaster day for Canadians and the Convoy 2022 movement that has attracted immense international attention and support. One nation after another has seen the rise of a trucker movement imitating the incredibly successful Canadian one. Each one verifies similar citizen disgust and desperation over covid mandates in their respective nations.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced end to vaccine passports mandate
The day started out with an astonishing press conference from COVID tyrant and Ontario premier Doug Ford. Ontario is Canada’s most populated and wealthy province. Ford announced a completely unexpected, supposed end to the province’s vaccine passports mandate. I use “supposed” because he is also going to allow businesses to continue to demand proof of vaccination if they so wish. That is a contradictory policy of giving with one hand while taking away with the other.
He also vaguely indicated that masks will stay in place until “a later date” and threatened Truckers with “serious consequences” for “lawless activity,” ignoring his own constantly failed, massively lawless COVID policies that have been catastrophic and resulted in thousands of otherwise preventable deaths and severe injuries that are ongoing.
Trudeau/federal government invocation of Emergency Measures Act
Then there was the carefully staged Justin Trudeau and various aids’ press conference, where for the first time in Canadian history the extreme Emergency Measures Act (EMA) was invoked. It gives this chronically lying prime minister frightening dictatorial powers to crush terrorists or similar threats to the nation.
Trudeau has never been known to be consistent on his beliefs and policies which back in 2020 would have strongly supported today’s truckers’ actions – even if they lasted a year. See the following excerpt from the New York Times editorial board noted in an illuminating Hot Air column today:
“Entertaining the use of force to disperse or contain legal protests is wrong. As Mr. Trudeau said in November 2020, in expressing his support of a yearlong protest by farmers in India that blocked major highways to New Delhi, “Canada will always be there to defend the right of peaceful protest.”’
The Hot Air author logically concludes, “Trudeau’s sudden grasp of emergency powers to shut down peaceful protest is not just a clear case of hypocrisy, but also a warning sign for authoritarianism.”
LifeSite’s Kennedy Hall writes that what Trudeau has actually done was to give himself new powers to “squash a freedom movement that is engaging in civil disobedience peacefully.” And that civil disobedience has been a sacred, traditional right in Canada.
Trudeau political clone Doug Ford also expressed complete support for the PM’s extreme reaction to the peaceful, patriotic protesters. They have been gaining support from millions of Canadians desperately seeking relief from the COVID mandates that have devastated Canada’s economy and society.
Ford seems to have a political death wish which the provincial Liberals will take full advantage of in the upcoming provincial election.
Tucker Carlson was quick to respond last night to Trudeau as having declared Canada to be a dictatorship, which, as he explains, is not an unreasonable charge.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has thankfully announced last night that Trudeau has gone too far. They added, “the federal government has not met the threshold necessary to invoke the Emergencies Act. This law creates a high and clear standard for good reason: the Act allows the government to bypass ordinary democratic processes. This standard has not been met.”
They are correct. There is no justifiable, honest reason for its invocation. This is major fraud involving massive exaggerations and lies about the truckers and supporters.
At an earlier truckers’ press conference, Canadian Senator Brian Peckford, the last remaining drafter of Canada’s Charter of Rights, and a great Canadian expressed dismay over the expected invocation of the EMA. Both Peckford and a trucker organizer stated that Convoy 2022 “will hold the line” and the protests will continue to try to free Canadians from the destructive mandates.
Canada’s federal police, the Mounties, have engaged in overnight, Mafia-like violent sabotage of three huge excavators on private property in a field near the Coutts, Alberta truckers’ blockade which they only “suspected” would be used in the blockade. They also claim to have arrested persons connected to the blockade who allegedly had a large number of guns and planned violence against the Mounties when they moved to dismantle the blockade.
At the truckers’ press conference a journalist asked a question about the arrests and guns. There was an immediate outcry from the truckers shouting “lies, lies, lies.” Almost everyone related to the truckers has long been expecting a false flag setup of this type by the Mounties in order to turn the public against them and to justify extreme actions.
The Conservative parliamentary motion to end the COVID restrictions was unfortunately defeated Monday 185 to 151, with only all the Conservatives supporting the motion.
Dr. Robert Malone warns Canadians to defend their nation from Globalists
This is the big one: Dr. Robert Malone posted an article on his blog supporting the Canadian truckers and warning that Canadians must defend their nation if they “wish to keep it, or the Globalists will take it from you.” The article is a MUST-READ for all Canadians and citizens of all other nations.
Malone explains what the catastrophic COVID policies are really all about – imposing the Great Reset on every nation in the world. That also explains the real purpose of Monday’s Canadian federal government press conference. In reality, it had NOTHING to do with “terrorists” or other serious threats to the security of Canada. Justin Trudeau is a protégé of Great Reset creator Klaus Schwab and has a number of times publicly expressed his support for the evil Great Reset scheme.
The truckers are very patriotic Canadians giving their whole heart and soul to defend Canada from those who are destroying it. Every truck and all those cheering them on in Ottawa and on every bridge and stop along the way to Ottawa from the different parts of Canada displayed a sea of Canadian flags.
During rallies, there has been frequent singing of the national anthem. In Ottawa, contrary to Liberal and media lies, truckers cleaned and protected the monuments in front of Parliament. They are no “terrorists” nor any threat to the nation among them compared to the threat that the federal and provincial governments have been with their two years of COVID tyranny and destruction.
Check out my February 11 article that now includes five moving, short videos revealing the true heart and soul of Convoy 2022 and the millions of Canadians supporting them. Forward that article and videos to others so they can use them to convince skeptics and critics of the truckers that they are actually very different from what they have been told every day by the bought and controlled media.
Convoy 2022 has become an unexpected, international, and very serious threat to Great Reset global plans as well as a convenient opportunity to exploit for the purpose of rapidly advancing Great Reset policies in Canada sooner than planned.
Deputy PM Freeland’s shocking financial control measures
The especially big give-away yesterday was the lengthy explanation by Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland of radical new financial policies announcing the government will seize truckers’ assets at will.
Watch Freeland to the left of Trudeau at the beginning of the video of the press conference yesterday when all of this was announced. She was obviously extremely anxious about what she was about to say and the government’s huge risk in trying to get away with its extreme measures.
I have never seen a Deputy PM so obviously near what seems to be a panic attack before speaking. She had every reason to be that anxious as Justin Trudeau also seemed to be very uncomfortable as he announced his unsupportable invoking of the Emergency Measures Act against a huge, popular movement of peaceful Canadian patriots.
She stated, “We are broadening the scope of Canada’s anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules so that they cover Crowd Funding Platforms and the payment service providers they use.” That is an unprecedented, revolutionary and frightening change to Canada’s financial system and protections for citizens.
There was much more, including authorizing banks to unilaterally suspend any account for any reason on the basis of suspicion alone, no court order required, with legal immunity.
She also announced the government is even planning to seize crypto-currency funds which the truckers have begun using to protect their money from tyrannical government measures. Freeland’s announcements were the most frightening of all the government actions to date.
What Freeland announced strongly appeared to be the next stage of later, full government control of everyone’s financial assets, not just the truckers, and a suspension of all financial privacy rights, with arbitrary and often changing bank and government conditions required of citizens to earn, move and use money.
Chrystia Freeland
That total control of personal finances is right out of the Great Reset book and all too similar to Communist China’s social credit system. This is even worse than if Trudeau sent in the army to remove the protesters. What Freeland and Trudeau have begun, unless there is an immediate, great uproar among all Canadians to stop this planned financial slavery, is a grave threat to every Canadian.
Trudeau, Freeland, and the others who spoke during the press conference indicated that these drastic new measures, other than the crowdfunding controls, were temporary and would last only for an unspecified period of time. Trudeau also stated that they are not intended to be applied to all Canadians.
More warnings about the duration and dangers of emergency measures
I need to remind everyone that Trudeau, Ford, and many others promised back in 2020 that they only needed “two weeks to flatten the curve.” How did that turn out? There has been an ongoing string of broken promises and policy reverses for the past two years on almost everything related to Covid. There is good reason to not believe any of the assurances given yesterday afternoon.
Watch the Trucker press conference this morning during which Ontario MPP Randy Hillier and the renowned Dr. Paul Alexander provide sobering responses to yesterday’s developments. Both are very blunt about what Canadians are now facing. There will surely be many more such warnings that Canada has now gone down a very dangerous, unnecessary path.
The entire Ottawa press conference was pure political theatre. It was carefully scripted to further unjustly demonize the Convoy 2022 and provoke Canadians to turn against each other. That is, nothing in it was honest and all Canadians and others watching were considered to be subjects for psychological conditioning to believe that the truckers are violent terrorists threatening national security and economic stability. That is preposterous and unconscionable!
Canadians were assured that the suspension of civil rights and severe actions were targeted only against anyone even suspected of supporting this patriotic movement. That would likely include even millions of Canadians. But it won’t stop there, I can guarantee you.
All Canadians, whether they support or oppose the truckers should be alarmed about this development. It portends the end of democracy in Canada. That would threaten every one of whatever views who are not among the globalist elites.
See the full, one-hour-long press conference here.It is important to endure watching and viewing it from the perspective that has been presented in this article.
I urge all LifeSite readers, no matter what country you are in, to pray for the continued success of Canada’s Convoy 2022 because what happens in Canada over the next few months will have an impact on the rest of the world.
RESIST and NEVER COMPLY with unjust laws and policies.
News out of Vermont paints a bleak picture of just how harmful the collective psychosis of COVID hysteria is, a phenomenon that seems isolated to heavily Democrat areas.
For years, fear-mongering from the government and national media has pushed people to detach themselves from reality when it comes to assessing risk profiles regarding the coronavirus. That’s now playing out in the form of completely asymptomatic individuals rushing to jam up emergency rooms in Vermont. Though, as we’ll see, this is hardly limited to the Green Mountain State.
My thoughts, everyone should read the article,,,
The article shows that there is mental illness within the population, and it is growing. I hope that the democrats and other fear mongering monsters are happy with themselves. I also hopes that it comes back to bite them in their big ugly asses. They will be proud of themselves. Not only are they killing millions of people with their jabs, but they are scaring them to death before they die.
Watch Queensland Senator Pauline Hanson I’m Not Putting That Shit in My Body Video
This entry was posted by aviator on December 13, 2021 at 6:13 pm
🇦🇺 Queensland Senator Pauline Hanson: “I Haven’t Had the Jab, I Don’t Intend to Have the Jab, I’m Not Putting That Shit in My Body.”👇 pic.twitter.com/LUE6hCEOXB
All for a disease that’s so terrible and deadly, people have to be tested to see if they even have it; and for a vaccine that’s so wonderful, people have to be threatened and coerced to take it. This appears to many people to be literal insanity.
Another government official comes out. she knows the potential fate so she wants to be on the right side. But after 2 years, don’t think so. Too late
Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
By Politics.co.uk staff Sajid Javid confirms booster jabs for all adults amid Omicron case rise The health secretary Sajid Javid has confirmed Covid booster jabs will be offered to all adults in the UK to help stem the emergence of the new Omicron variant. The health secretary also confirmed the JCVI had approved cutting the […]
I know it isn’t fair to jump straight to conspiracy-like conclusions about these quarantine camps. Maybe your motives are not sinister at all. Maybe this really is about ‘health and safety’ and ‘stopping the spread’.
Yet, there are several red flags that must be addressed.
Firstly, the name. If you don’t want us to think that you are constructing an Orwellian reality, please don’t call it a ‘Centre for National Resilience’. Maybe this isn’t quite at the ‘Ministry of Love’ level, but let’s just say if I was ever unlucky enough to be a ‘guest’ in these facilities, I would studiously avoid Cabin 101.
Secondly, the staffing. Prison officers are great and all, but really? It isn’t exactly reassuring to be told in a recent community briefing Zoom that this is because they bring ‘a really strong understanding of command and control and also what a rule means and how a rule should be applied. Also, after the recent show of brute force by police in Melbourne, finding out that ‘VicPol provides the support around the security elements for all of our operations and will continue to do so’, is just a tad concerning.
Finally, you realise that the world is laughing at us, don’t you? There are the constant memes describing Australia as ‘the world’s largest prison camp’, a New York Times inside scoop describing people being confined in these camps ‘like animals in a zoo’, and a viral tweet from James Melville showing drone and news footage with the caption: ‘Meanwhile in Australia. Quarantine camps. They are so far down the rabbit hole now.’
I’m trying hard not to don a tin-foil hat, but it’s getting just a little difficult now. I guess as long as you don’t promise to be our ‘single source of truth’, we’ll be okay?
Armstrong Economics Blog/Vaccine Re-Posted Oct 4, 2021 by Martin Armstrong COMMENT: Hi Marty,Here in Australia our last legal hope hinged on a case in the NSW Supreme court against mandatory vaccinations. I personally donated to this cause. They needed half a million they reckoned as the lawyer was going to cost $22K/day. I don’t know if you […]
Marina Demidiuk/Shutterstock
reposted here pursuant to Fair Use doctrine
The BlackRobed Mafia 
