“Targeted”: Insider Narrative Shows Flynn “Entrapment” Was Same As “Frame” what happened to General Michael Flynn how he was tricked and set-up by Obama administration officials in an entrapment scheme that was the “tip of the spear” against President Trump. by Georgette

30020745053-a7df97d691-c-780x392
(Everything about the pressure used against him and the interview itself scream miscarriage of justice. )

“Targeted”: Insider Narrative Shows Flynn “Entrapment” Was Same As “Frame”
The insider narrative explains what happened to General Michael Flynn in detail, and how he was tricked and set-up by Obama administration officials in an entrapment scheme that was the “tip of the spear” against President Trump.
by Georgette

“Targeted”: Insider Narrative Shows Flynn “Entrapment” Was Same As “Frame”

Everything about the pressure used against him and the interview itself scream miscarriage of justice.

General Michael Flynn has gotten a raw deal, many people argue. He pled guilty for ‘lying’ to the FBI, during an interview that was “tantamount” to a frame up, according to an insider narrative that was just filed in federal court.

Mueller’s prosecutors threatened to go after Flynn’s son and his business partner in order to get the cooperation for a ‘guilty’ plea, knowing full well that the case against him was feeble and based on entrapment.

The Washington Times reported on Sidney Powell’s outlining of the events, prior to the sentencing hearing that is scheduled for December:

Sidney Powell wrote this story in a letter to Attorney General William P. Barr in June as she was taking over as defense counsel for the former White House national security adviser.

She immediately accused the government of withholding exculpatory evidence that would show prosecutors violated U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order. Her motions essentially have been attacks on special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russia election trespassing, though Flynn was convicted of lying to FBI agents on another matter.

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Brandon L. Van Grack responded this month with an attack on Ms. Powell’s tactics. He said the government owns no such exculpatory, or “Brady,” material and accused her of advocating “conspiracy theories.”

The drama is set to play out at a hearing next month and sentencing in December. Meantime, Ms. Powell won the judge’s permission to reply to Mr. Van Grack with an extended brief that has been filed but not redacted for public viewing.

In his reply, Mr. Van Grack, a veteran of the Mueller team and thus a Powell target, chose to include an attachment: the June 6 Powell letter to Mr. Barr.

In it, she asked Mr. Barr for an internal case review leading to dismissal. She made seven specific requests, such as removing Mr. Van Grack, who remains in place four months later.

Mr. Mueller’s final report said he failed to establish an election conspiracy between the Kremlin and Trump campaign.

“We believe there will be ample justification for the [Justice] Department to follow the precedent of the Ted Stevens case and move to dismiss the prosecution of General Flynn in the interest of justice,” Ms. Powell said.

Judge Sullivan in 2009 threw out the conviction of the former senator from Alaska after discovering the Justice Department had withheld evidence favorable to his defense.

In her letter labeled “confidential,” Ms. Powell made some frank comments about Judge Sullivan, referring to the court hearing that led to a delay in sentencing.

“At the hearing, however, Judge Sullivan launched a tirade, effectively accusing Flynn of working for a foreign power while he was in the White House and committing treason,” Ms. Powell wrote. “Judge Sullivan made clear he intends to send him to prison. Judge Sullivan was completely wrong on the facts of the case, and his rant seems to have come straight from MSNBC comments of the previous night. After a short break in the court proceedings, the Judge returned to the bench and made something of a retraction of his most egregious choice of words. However, severe damage was done. The press ran wild with the treason suggestion unabated for an hour.”

Ms. Powell tried to make the case that the Obama administration targeted Flynn for his running criticisms on the fight against the Islamic State group, the Iran nuclear deal and Hillary Clinton’s handling of Benghazi as secretary of state.

“As more evidence has come to light, it is increasingly apparent that General Flynn was targeted and taken out of the Trump administration for concocted and political purposes,” she said. “We believe there is specific evidence of that fact. He was the tip of the spear aimed at President Trump.”

Flynn’s downfall was abrupt. He conducted several telephone calls with the Russian ambassador during the transition. He urged Russia not to overreact to Obama-imposed sanctions, a response to Moscow’s election interference.

Obama Justice Department officials, briefed on the intercepted calls, began talking up the idea that Flynn violated the never-prosecuted Logan Act of 1799, which forbids private citizens from meddling in foreign affairs.

By the time President Trump took office, the FBI had been investigating his aides for six months to see whether they colluded with the Kremlin. Agent Peter Strzok, who led the probe and expressed a deep dislike of Mr. Trump, went to the White House to interview Flynn. Flynn denied discussing sanctions, setting up his guilty plea to lying.

He pledged to cooperate with the Mueller team. He provided no evidence of a conspiracy despite rampant news media speculation that he had proof against Mr. Trump.

Flynn’s call was leaked to The Washington Post, triggering what would become a battle cry among conservatives: Obama-Clinton loyalists inside a “deep state” were sabotaging the new administration.

Former FBI Director James B. Comey later bragged in public about how he was able to send two agents to the White House without going through the counsel’s office.

“The FBI interview was worse than ‘entrapment,’” Ms. Powell told Mr. Barr. “He was led to believe he was having a casual conversation with friends about a training exercise from a day or two before, when in truth, it was a set-up-tantamount to a ‘frame.’”

Ms. Powell described Flynn’s early back-and-forth in 2017 with the Mueller team.

“The General was forced to sell his home two years ago to fund his legal defense and still needs a legal defense fund,” she said of the 33-year Army officer, who rose to the pinnacle of his military specialty as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.

With Flynn under pressure, Mr. Strzok’s biased Trump texts to FBI counsel Lisa Page were about to emerge. Ms. Powell suggested that the Justice Department leaked the news only after it secured Flynn’s guilty plea in December 2017.

“Suddenly, SCO was making extreme threats and placing enormous pressure on General Flynn to enter a guilty plea,” she said. “Sometime after Mueller was notified by the IG of the extremely biased Strzok-Page text messages, Mueller went to [then-Deputy Attorney General Rod] Rosenstein to get authority to target Michael Flynn, Jr. Flynn, Jr., who had a 4-month-old baby, was required to produce his phones and computers. Suddenly, General Flynn was threatened with the public arrest, search of his home, the indictment of his son.”

She said Mr. Van Grack and other Mueller prosecutors “sought every means to put the utmost pressure on him to compel a guilty plea to the point of using threats against his son and manipulated the press to hide the truth in the process.”

Mr. Van Grack told Judge Sullivan this month that none of Ms. Powell’s “Brady” requests had anything to do with Flynn’s lying to FBI agents.

“The defendant predicates much of his request on conspiracy theories, demanding that the government engage in a fishing expedition for documents that could offer support for those theories,” he said. “Irrespective of whether such documents exist, a fact that the government does not concede here, the defendant fails to establish that such information is relevant — let alone favorable and material — in this criminal case.”

Ms. Powell told the judge she wants a letter the British Embassy supposedly delivered to the Obama White House questioning the veracity of Christopher Steele. Mr. Steele is the former British intelligence officer who wrote the now-discredited anti-Trump dossier.

Mr. Van Grack responded: “Not relevant. The government is not aware of information that Christopher Steele provided that is relevant to the defendant’s false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (‘FBI‘) on January 24, 2017, or to his punishment.”

To another Brady request, he said: “Already provided. The government has already provided any information that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing.”

Flynn has fulfilled his cooperation agreement with the Mueller team.

In the end, his case didn’t touch on Russian election interference and he did not implicate any Trump person or the president. He lied in his Jan. 24, 2017, FBI White House interview. He made false statements on his Foreign Agent Registration Act form with the Justice Department concerning work for the government of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The prosecution has recommended no jail time.

Flynn’s onetime partner Bijan Kian was convicted on lobbying charges by a jury in July in Alexandria, Virginia. But U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga took the unusual step last month of overturning the verdict, citing insufficient evidence.

It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent

Lgbt-Gay-Flag-Couple-Men-Pride-Rainbow
(Image: It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent)

It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent
Thursday, October 24, 2019 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) They say that everything is bigger in Texas, and this apparently includes court decisions that completely obliterate parental rights and force innocent children to undergo LGBTQ sex changes.

This is what happened just a few days ago in Dallas after a jury decided to separate a seven-year-old boy from his biological father, and place the child into the sole custody of his non-biological “mother” who admittedly wants to forcibly “transition” the boy into a “girl” using puberty blockers and cross-sex hormone drugs.

As previously reported, Dr. Anne Georgulas of Dr. Anne Pediatrics in Coppell, a suburb of Dallas, has never been content with the fact that neither of the twin boys she received from her former husband’s sperm and an unidentified egg donor were born as girls. Thus, Georgulas has been on a quest ever since to “transform” James into a “girl” in order to suit her own selfish desires.

The boys’ biological father, Jeffrey Younger, a religious man, has been fighting tooth and nail to stop Georgulas from destroying his son’s life with endocrine-disrupting pharmaceuticals – and based on the merits of the case, including the fact that it’s taking place in traditionally conservative Texas, we were of the persuasion that Jeffrey would probably win in the end. But much to our shock, that isn’t what happened.

According to reports, a jury sided with Georgulas by ruling that she, and she alone, will be allowed Sole Managing Conservatorship over both James, who will soon be renamed “Luna,” and his twin brother. Jeffrey, in other words, will no longer have any custody over his own children, which has been handed over to a woman who’s not their real mother, and who thus can’t be considered to have their best interests at heart.

Why do today’s “progressive” women hate men and masculinity so much that they’re eager to biologically destroy the lives of innocent little boys?

It’s important to emphasize once again that Georgulas has no biological connection to either James or his twin. They were created from their father Jeffrey’s sperm, which was combined with the eggs of an unidentified donor before being incubated through in-vitro fertilization. Georgulas played absolutely no role in their existence, in other words, and yet is being favored in this case, presumably because she is a woman.

This is the new state of identity politics in America, after all. If you’re a man, nothing you say or do has any value whatsoever – even if you’re fighting on behalf of your own children against your crazy ex-wife who more than likely suffers from Munchausen syndrome by proxy. But if you’re a female, then the world is handed to you on a silver platter, no questions asked – the lives and livelihoods of little boys everywhere be damned.

Naturally, the judge in Jeffrey’s case, Kim Cooks, is also a woman. And just like Georgulas, Cooks has no biological relation to James or his twin brother, and more than likely doesn’t care about their well-being as males. Our guess is that she, too, fully supports “transitioning” little boys into little “girls” to suit the LGBTQ agenda, which if you’ve been paying attention is rapidly becoming the LGBTQP agenda, with the P standing for pedophilia.

“This is the ultimate form of child abuse and societal destruction,” pointed out one Breitbart News commenter about the situation, emphasizing the fact that James “acts like a boy when he is with the father,” as indicated by earlier media reports.

“How the mother has avoided being committed to a facility is a mystery to me,” this same commenter further added. “In this case, the state has decided that a mentally ill parent and child abuse is not only okay but is preferred. Now, when this kid goes through puberty and commits suicide, will the media cover it? Don’t hold your breath.”

For more related news, be sure to check out Gender.news.

Sources for this article include:

Breitbart.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Obama Executed by Firing Squad at GTMO! Field McConnell Saturday, October 12, 2019 19:52

image

Obama Executed by Firing Squad at GTMO! Field McConnell
Saturday, October 12, 2019 19:52

Shocking information has come in from Field McConnel.

Retired USAF Lt. Col Field McConnell says it’s been reported to him that Barack Obama was executed on September 29, 2019 by firing squad at GTMO. This information starts at about the 17:00 minute mark but the entire interview is very good so you’ll want to listen to all of it. McConnell went to the same high school as the illegal President Barak Obama in Hawaii! He said Obama’s death occurred on the same day that General Dunsford got to GTMO to oversee the military tribunals.

McConnel states the two big issues are 9/11 and pedophilia. He says anybody who has trafficked children is going to be executed as well as anybody aware of the 9/11 treason and didn’t report it as required. 9/11 was done by elements within our own government. By law, anybody having direct knowledge of treason is compelled to report it to one state Governor or one chief judge or justice of any one state. So anybody who was aware of the false flag 9/11 operation and who didn’t report it is guilty of treason.

He also states there is going to be a big celebration and announcements on the 10th of November which is the birthday of the US Marines founded in 1775 on this date. Lots covered here including one interesting tidbit he says about the US justice system. He says Trump is going to make all lawyers part of the BAR association repledge themselves to the United States since all BAR members currently work for the Queen of England!

I have no idea if some or any of this information is true! I’m not saying it is true, I’m simply reporting what Field McConnell says in this interview. McConnel does have a lot of intel sources it seems but there is so much disinformation being thrown around by spooks, there’s no way to tell if this is true until Obama surfaces again. Many people are reporting he’s been missing for a while now. Either Field McConnell has a lot of good intel here which will be proven correct very shortly or he or his sources are intentionally putting out “happy talk” to make patriots relax! If the later is the case, then I’ll very disappointed in him and his sources. He seems sincere that he at least is being told this information so we’ll just have to see what happens.

If Obama was executed for treason (which he should have been if we had a justice system and a real country) then we can only hope Obama repented for all his evil such as supporting the killing of God’s babies and accepted Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior before he was dispatched. Jesus is the only hope any of us have. You deny him, he denies you to the father!

Please monitor Field McConnel’s youtube channel and Twitter for more developments on this story.

Field McConnel’s Able Danger Livestream Youtube Channel

chic-burlingame-and-field-mcconnell
Image result for image of Field McConnell

‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home, By: Matt Agorist October 10, 2019

chicago-raids-660x330
(Image credit: CBS 2 Chicago screen capture)

Cops in Chicago are raiding innocent families and terrorizing them — by mistake — and are going through great lengths to cover it up.
chicago

‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home

‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home
Matt Agorist October 10, 2019

Chicago, IL — Because of their gross negligence and incompetence, the city of Chicago is facing a slew of lawsuits for raiding the homes of innocent people — allegedly by mistake. TFTP has reported on several of these lawsuits in which cops raided a four-year-old’s birthday party and held other children at gunpoint. One of these families has even been raided — mistakenly — three times. One family’s recent mistaken raid, however, is exposing a blue wall of silence and showing how far the Chicago police department is willing to go to cover up their crimes.

Over the past few years, the residents of Chicago have been subject to a militarized police state occupation. Innocent family after innocent family each waking up in the middle of the night as heavily armed storm troopers throw flash bangs into their homes, haul them outside in the cold, point guns at their heads, and even handcuff small children. These families are being terrorized in their own homes, many of them left with PTSD, and no one is being held accountable—because the state is the one behind the terror.

And because they are the state, they are refusing to hold themselves accountable and going through great lengths to keep their terror campaign secret.

Some of the latest victims in this state-sponsored police terror campaign are Domonique Wilson and her children. Wilson’s raid has just exposed a troubling problem within the department as well.

Wilson’s home was raided in March by a SWAT team who was acting on the wrong information. Her tiny children had guns pointed at their heads and were placed in handcuffs. They were marched outside like slaves and forced to stand in the freezing wet rain for hours.

“They made me stand up straight and my hands just behind my back, and they had them tight,” said Wilson’s 8-year-old son, Royal Smart.

Wilson said police used excessive force on her children who were clearly afraid for their lives.

“I was worried about my sister most, because she’s only 6 years old,” Royal said. “My legs were shaking.”

After they were wrongly raided and terrorized by police, Wilson said she went to the department to get the body camera footage which she says shows how terribly the cops treated her family. But police refused to turn it over.

CBS 2 News also went to the Chicago police department with a Freedom of Information Act request to get the body camera video, but they refused to honor it.

“What do you believe that body camera footage will show when it comes to your 8-year-old son?” CBS 2’s Dave Savini asked Wilson.

“It’s going to show them placing my 8-year-old son in handcuffs; how scared he was – traumatized.”

“Do you think they’re hiding something?” he asked.

“Yes. They’re hiding that they put rifles to me and my children’s heads,” said Wilson.
When CBS 2 asked police Supt. Eddie Johnson if the department was tracking wrong raids and knew how many times officers got it wrong, he told them that they do track it and they have those numbers. But that was a lie.

As CBS 2 reports:

But it turns out that Johnson and his staff do not have that information. After nearly a year of repeatedly asking for numbers, Chicago Police have admitted to CBS 2 they don’t even keep track of all the times police raid the wrong homes.

Meanwhile, Supt. Eddie Johnson has also refused more than a dozen requests for a one-on-one interview.

His chief communications officer, Anthony Guglielmi, said the superintendent does not have the time, and CBS 2’s ratings are not high enough, for him to do an interview on this topic.

Thus, he refuses to talk about our yearlong investigation and all those impacted by bad traumatizing raid – a refusal while new wrong raids cases keep rolling in.

https://cbsloc.al/2AKgchP?anvt=8

Al Hofeld Jr., whose law office represents multiple families who’ve been wrongfully raided by incompetent Chicago police, held a press conference in July to address this very serious problem.

“There is a silent epidemic of trauma being perpetrated upon the children and families of the South and West sides of our city by Chicago police barreling into the wrong homes, holding guns on children, handcuffing children … ,” Hofeld said.

“Chicago police officers behave as if our children of color and their trauma is collateral damage in Chicago,” said Holfield.

And he’s right. As TFTP reported earlier this year, when Samari Broswell, 7, was celebrating her younger brother, TJ Broswell’s 4th birthday earlier this year, she never expected to see 17 heavily armed cops come smashing through her door. However, thanks to a severe case of police incompetence, that is exactly what happened.

Now, just like Wilson’s family, this family is left traumatized while people who claim to ‘protect’ them instead ignore them and continue the same practice. In the Broswell’s case, police claim video from officer-worn body cameras showing the horrifying raid simply went “missing.”

But that is not all.

Also, just last August, two little boys who used to look up to police were traumatized and their view of police tarnished after a SWAT team burst into their home at night and held the entire family at gunpoint, including the children. The family was innocent and just like the above cases, the raid was on the wrong home.

Those two children now suffer from PTSD and have to attend counseling.

It’s not just children either, Chicago cops have raided the wrong homes of elderly women too.

Elizabeth Harrison, 82, used to tell kids to “respect the law.” Then on March 17, 2016, a gang of Chicago cops raided her home, busting down the door and holding her at gunpoint. Because of this trauma, Harrison had to be rushed to the hospital.

The great-grandmother said police must have had the wrong house, but they insisted it was the correct address based on their “intelligence.” No one believed her when she said she was a widow and lived alone. Harrison was made to sit in a chair, overwhelmed with anxiety, while they searched her home for non-existent drugs. The stress was so overwhelming, Harrison was hospitalized.

Despite this history of dangerous terrorism from raiding wrong homes, it appears Chicago cops aren’t trying to get any better at their jobs and remain entirely unapologetic.

Corrupt kids: A generational stench seeps from the swamp | WND — Truth2Freedom’s Blog

A popular 1930s radio program began with a distinctive voice asking, “Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men.” The answer then followed with an ominous laugh. Referencing the program’s crime-fighting vigilante, the answer came, “The Shadow knows.” For almost two decades, audiences gathered around their radios to listen to The Shadow’s latest […]

via Corrupt kids: A generational stench seeps from the swamp | WND — Truth2Freedom’s Blog

The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Isabelle Z.

AR-15-Rifle-Magazines-1
(Image: The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws)

The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws
Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Isabelle Z.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-ex-cop-testifies-will-not-comply-gun-confiscation.html

(Natural News) A former police officer expressed the sentiment of many Americans when she testified before Congress recently that she won’t comply with gun confiscation laws.

Dianna Muller, who won the ladies title in the 2015 NRA World Shooting Championship, is a 22-year veteran of the Tulsa Police Department. Speaking before the House Judiciary Committee recently, she stated that she would not be participating in an assault weapons ban should one be put in place.

She told the committee: “Please don’t legislate the 150 million people just like me into being criminals.”

She also spoke out on the ban on the bump stocks that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like automatic ones, saying she was forced to decide between complying with the ban or becoming a felon. Should she face a similar question about assault weapons, she said in no uncertain terms that she would not comply.

As a law enforcement officer during the previous assault weapon ban from 1994 to 2004, she said she did not see any impact on safety from the measure, adding that it wouldn’t have been allowed to sunset if it had been effective.

Muller is also the founder of the gun advocacy group The DC Project. Appearing on Fox & Friends shortly after her testimony, she warned that the Second Amendment is at stake and said that gun owners should “get involved and engaged.”

She said that many people in law enforcement agree with her stance and that those in favor of such a ban are throwing around terms such as “weapons of war” simply to stir up emotions.

Muller and other people at the hearing also raised questions about the practicality of such a ban. They said that the differences between the AR-15 and weapons like it, and a standard semi-automatic hunting rifle are merely cosmetic.

Another witness, Heritage Foundation Senior Legal Policy Analyst Amy Swearer, disputed the notion that law-abiding citizens don’t need weapons like AR-15s. She pointed out that her mother, who is a gun novice, struggled to fire a handgun at the range but was far more accurate when she tried an AR-15. Its greater stability makes it easy to handle and fire accurately in tense situations, but it can also be argued that simply brandishing one is often enough to deter would-be criminals from doing harm.

A question of self-defense
Many people who have obtained these weapons legally have done so for self-defense purposes, and several recent cases illustrate how valuable they can be in a life-or-death situation.

For example, a college student was able to scare off two armed burglars simply by holding up an unloaded AR-15 in 2013. That same year, a 15-year-old boy saved his own life and that of his 12-year-old sister when he fended off a pair of home invaders using his father’s AR-15.

When an Illinois man with an AR-15 intervened as a neighbor was attacking a pregnant woman with a knife in Oswego, Illinois, last year, the “intimidation factor” of the rifle was cited as the reason the attacker ultimately dropped his knife.

Muller likely spoke for a lot of gun owners when she said she didn’t plan to comply with laws that amount to gun confiscation, and such a move could well spark an uprising. Most owners of AR-15s and similar weapons hope they never have to use them on another person, but the peace of mind of knowing they can defend themselves and their families from those who want to harm them is something many people are willing to protect at all costs.

Sources for this article include:

TheTruthAboutGuns.com

FoxNews.com

DailySignal.com

Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Ethan Huff

aoc-4
(Image: Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along)

Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along
Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Ethan Huff
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-woman-at-aoc-townhall-demands-everyone-eat-the-babies.html

(Natural News) During a recent town hall event in Corona, New York, her home district, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) responded to questions about her infamous Green New Deal, including from one woman who told AOC that we now need to “eat the babies” in order to save the planet from climate change.

Contending that AOC’s Green New Deal doesn’t go far in enough in addressing global warming, the woman stood up and began ranting about how “we only have a few months left,” and that AOC’s next campaign slogan should be, “We have to start eating babies!”

The woman then proceeded to remove her jacket, revealing a t-shirt that stated on the front of it, “Save the Planet. Eat the Children.”

“We don’t have enough time,” the irate woman continued to tell AOC, who nodded affirmatively in response. “Even if we would bomb Russia, we still have too many people, too much pollution, so we have to get rid of the babies. Just stopping having babies is not enough, we need to eat the babies.”

For more related news, be sure to check out Libtards.news.

Tucker Carlson mocks AOC’s stupidity in failing to denounce the suggestion that we all need to eat human babies to save the planet

AOC’s eventual response to the woman was that, “luckily, we have more than a few months.” AOC continued on to suggest that there are many “positive” solutions to the climate crisis that she hopes to tackle while in office.

The woman’s rantings were quickly picked up by the media, including by Tucker Carlson from Fox News. Carlson broadcast a clip of the incident during a segment of his show, laughing at the sheer lunacy of what the woman was suggesting.

Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: Lab-verified Nascent Iodine solution is a dietary supplement that provides your body with supplemental iodine to help protect your thyroid during radiation exposure. Nuclear accidents such as Fukushima (or nuclear war) can expose your body to radioactive iodine-131, a dangerous radioisotope. Pre-loading your system with stable iodine occupies the iodine receptor sites on your organs, causing your body to naturally expel radioactive iodine you may have been exposed to through air, food, water or milk products. This defensive strategy is recommended by nearly all health authorities, worldwide, including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Discover more at this link.

“Is that real?” Carlson asked with a chuckle. “We don’t know. Was it a swiftian parody? Was it clever trolling of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? Maybe it was. Maybe that’s just someone who believes the rhetoric of the Left.”

Even if it was a joke, what’s not was AOC’s lack of an appropriate response to the woman. Rather than decry her suggestion that we all start eating infant flesh to stop global warming, AOC appeared to be in agreement with it when she gently nodded her head in the affirmative.

“Either way, what didn’t you hear?” Carlson also asked about this anomaly. “That was the most interesting part. If someone said to you, ‘we need to eat the babies,’ wouldn’t your first response be, ‘what?! No, of course not! Eat the babies?!’ That’s the one thing that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez didn’t say. Huh, pretty revealing!”

blob:https://www.brighteon.com/2a966f79-71dc-4a73-af47-bf712e4e8bed

AOC’s Green New Deal would seem to imply that some people need to be killed off to solve “overpopulation”

Perhaps the reason why AOC didn’t have a more appropriate response to the woman from her district who suggested that we all “eat the babies” is the fact that AOC’s Green New Deal does contain provisions that, in order to come about, would require a massive reduction in the world’s population.

Because entitlement spending would go through the roof under AOC’s plan, millions of people would end up suffering in order to accommodate it, leading to what Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore once described as “the end of civilization” as we currently know it.

“The Green New Deal will be the end of civilization if 85% of the world’s and 85% of the US coal, oil and natural gas were phased out over the next few years, like the next ten years,” Carlson stated during an earlier segment of his show about AOC’s plan.

“We do not have anything to replace them with … Half of the population will die in a very short period of time. And as I also pointed out, there wouldn’t be a tree left on this planet … because that would be all there was to heat and cook.”

Sources for this article include:

TheGatewayPundit.com

NaturalNews.com