It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent

Lgbt-Gay-Flag-Couple-Men-Pride-Rainbow
(Image: It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent)

It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent
Thursday, October 24, 2019 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) They say that everything is bigger in Texas, and this apparently includes court decisions that completely obliterate parental rights and force innocent children to undergo LGBTQ sex changes.

This is what happened just a few days ago in Dallas after a jury decided to separate a seven-year-old boy from his biological father, and place the child into the sole custody of his non-biological “mother” who admittedly wants to forcibly “transition” the boy into a “girl” using puberty blockers and cross-sex hormone drugs.

As previously reported, Dr. Anne Georgulas of Dr. Anne Pediatrics in Coppell, a suburb of Dallas, has never been content with the fact that neither of the twin boys she received from her former husband’s sperm and an unidentified egg donor were born as girls. Thus, Georgulas has been on a quest ever since to “transform” James into a “girl” in order to suit her own selfish desires.

The boys’ biological father, Jeffrey Younger, a religious man, has been fighting tooth and nail to stop Georgulas from destroying his son’s life with endocrine-disrupting pharmaceuticals – and based on the merits of the case, including the fact that it’s taking place in traditionally conservative Texas, we were of the persuasion that Jeffrey would probably win in the end. But much to our shock, that isn’t what happened.

According to reports, a jury sided with Georgulas by ruling that she, and she alone, will be allowed Sole Managing Conservatorship over both James, who will soon be renamed “Luna,” and his twin brother. Jeffrey, in other words, will no longer have any custody over his own children, which has been handed over to a woman who’s not their real mother, and who thus can’t be considered to have their best interests at heart.

Why do today’s “progressive” women hate men and masculinity so much that they’re eager to biologically destroy the lives of innocent little boys?

It’s important to emphasize once again that Georgulas has no biological connection to either James or his twin. They were created from their father Jeffrey’s sperm, which was combined with the eggs of an unidentified donor before being incubated through in-vitro fertilization. Georgulas played absolutely no role in their existence, in other words, and yet is being favored in this case, presumably because she is a woman.

This is the new state of identity politics in America, after all. If you’re a man, nothing you say or do has any value whatsoever – even if you’re fighting on behalf of your own children against your crazy ex-wife who more than likely suffers from Munchausen syndrome by proxy. But if you’re a female, then the world is handed to you on a silver platter, no questions asked – the lives and livelihoods of little boys everywhere be damned.

Naturally, the judge in Jeffrey’s case, Kim Cooks, is also a woman. And just like Georgulas, Cooks has no biological relation to James or his twin brother, and more than likely doesn’t care about their well-being as males. Our guess is that she, too, fully supports “transitioning” little boys into little “girls” to suit the LGBTQ agenda, which if you’ve been paying attention is rapidly becoming the LGBTQP agenda, with the P standing for pedophilia.

“This is the ultimate form of child abuse and societal destruction,” pointed out one Breitbart News commenter about the situation, emphasizing the fact that James “acts like a boy when he is with the father,” as indicated by earlier media reports.

“How the mother has avoided being committed to a facility is a mystery to me,” this same commenter further added. “In this case, the state has decided that a mentally ill parent and child abuse is not only okay but is preferred. Now, when this kid goes through puberty and commits suicide, will the media cover it? Don’t hold your breath.”

For more related news, be sure to check out Gender.news.

Sources for this article include:

Breitbart.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Advertisements

Massachusetts churches sue over transgender bathroom bill

The U.S. Supreme Court, file. REUTERS Gary Cameron
10/12/16 REUTERS 00:22:49
REUTERS
Copyright (c) 2016 Thomson Reuters
October 12, 2016

Massachusetts churches sue over transgender bathroom bill

Curtis Skinner
(Reuters) – Four Massachusetts churches on Tuesday filed a lawsuit asking to be exempted from a state law that requires public places to allow transgender people to use bathrooms in line with their gender identity.
Access to public bathrooms has become a flashpoint in the battle over transgender rights in the United States, after North Carolina earlier this year enacted a measure mandating that bathrooms and locker rooms be restricted according to a person’s biological gender.
The Horizon Christian Fellowship, the Swansea Abundant Life Assembly of God, the House of Destiny Ministries and the Faith Christian Fellowship of Haverhill filed the federal civil rights lawsuit in Massachusetts, arguing the law violates their constitutional rights to freedom of religious expression and free speech.
“The Churches’ policies and practices regarding access to their changing rooms and restrooms flow logically and directly from their religious beliefs concerning God’s design for biological sex,” the lawsuit said.
The law did not provide exemptions for religious organizations, with the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office saying on its website that “houses of worship” are public places.
The lawsuit is seeking an injunction from the law for religious organizations and attorneys fees.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey and the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination were named as defendants in the case. Neither could be reached for comment on Tuesday night.
Jillian Fennimore, a spokeswoman for Healey’s office, told the MassLive news website the office would not comment on the lawsuit as they are still reviewing it.
Fennimore added however, “We are pleased that we finally have a law in place that protects transgender people from discrimination in public places. This law is about civil rights and is critical for people who were without full protection and equality under the law for too long.”
The lawsuit makes Massachusetts the latest battleground for transgender rights.
A U.S. judge in August blocked an Obama administration policy that public schools should allow transgender students to use the bathrooms of their choice, granting a nationwide injunction sought by 13 dissenting states.
Meanwhile, lawmakers elsewhere have moved to expand protections for transgender people. Late last month California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill opening single-stall public restrooms to anyone, regardless of gender. The state already bars discrimination against transgender people, including in public bathrooms.
—- Index References —-
Company: CITY OF HAVERHILL MASSACHUSETTS
News Subject: (Civil Rights Law (1CI34); Gay & Lesbian Issues (1GA65); Intellectual Freedoms & Civil Liberties (1IN08); Legal (1LE33); Social Issues (1SO05))
Region: (Americas (1AM92); Massachusetts (1MA15); North America (1NO39); U.S. New England Region (1NE37); USA (1US73))
Language: EN
Other Indexing: (Destiny Ministries; Jillian Fennimore; Lucy NicholsonA; Jerry Brown; Lucy Nicholson; Maura Healey)
Keywords: (MCC:a); (N2:US); (N2:AMERS); (N2:NAMER); (N2:USA); (MCCL:OVR)
Word Count: 433
Massachusetts churches sue over transgender bathroom bill