H/T Concealed Nation. How many lives were saved by this concealed carrier by taking the action he did? DUNCAN, OKLAHOMA — A shooting incident occurred in a Walmart parking lot this morning where a man and woman were shot and killed as they sat inside a vehicle. Immediately after, it is reported that an armed […]
Category: Judicial Corruption
biden’s ukraine mess & real reason for impeaching trump…shut him up! That won’t do it. — Arlin Report
Marianne Schmidt wrote:Here is a summary for those of you who care to know the REAL reason why the House of Representatives are calling for impeachment of President Trump. Hunter Biden is former Vice-President Joe Biden’s son. He is 45 years old with a long history of drug abuse. Hunter Biden was kicked out of […]
REPORT: After Dems Hide Impeachment Proceedings From Republicans And The Public, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) Is Using Intimidation Against Witnesses To Attain Desired Testimony — Evans News Report — Arlin Report
By: Brian Evans New reports have become available that indicate that Rep. Adam Schiff, who is the most adamant and virulent Trump-hater in Congress, who has vowed to remove President Trump at any cost, and regardless of evidence! Now, as the Democrats hold unprecedented closed-door impeachment proceedings, which are the first-ever to be held behind […] […]
They Live, We Sleep: Beware The Growing Evil In Our Midst By: Tyler Durden
They Live, We Sleep: Beware The Growing Evil In Our Midst
by Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/30/2019 – 00:05
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/they-live-we-sleep-beware-growing-evil-our-midst
Authored by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,
“You see them on the street. You watch them on TV. You might even vote for one this fall. You think they’re people just like you. You’re wrong. Dead wrong.”
- They Live
We’re living in two worlds, you and I.
There’s the world we see (or are made to see) and then there’s the one we sense (and occasionally catch a glimpse of), the latter of which is a far cry from the propaganda-driven reality manufactured by the government and its corporate sponsors, including the media.
Indeed, what most Americans perceive as life in America—privileged, progressive and free—is a far cry from reality, where economic inequality is growing, real agendas and real power are buried beneath layers of Orwellian doublespeak and corporate obfuscation, and “freedom,” such that it is, is meted out in small, legalistic doses by militarized police armed to the teeth.
All is not as it seems.
This is the premise of John Carpenter’s film They Live, which was released more than 30 years ago, and remains unnervingly, chillingly appropriate for our modern age.
Best known for his horror film Halloween, which assumes that there is a form of evil so dark that it can’t be killed, Carpenter’s larger body of work is infused with a strong anti-authoritarian, anti-establishment, laconic bent that speaks to the filmmaker’s concerns about the unraveling of our society, particularly our government.
Time and again, Carpenter portrays the government working against its own citizens, a populace out of touch with reality, technology run amok, and a future more horrific than any horror film.
In Escape from New York, Carpenter presents fascism as the future of America.
In The Thing, a remake of the 1951 sci-fi classic of the same name, Carpenter presupposes that increasingly we are all becoming dehumanized.
In Christine, the film adaptation of Stephen King’s novel about a demon-possessed car, technology exhibits a will and consciousness of its own and goes on a murderous rampage.
In In the Mouth of Madness, Carpenter notes that evil grows when people lose “the ability to know the difference between reality and fantasy.”
And then there is Carpenter’s They Live, in which two migrant workers discover that the world is not as it seems. In fact, the population is actually being controlled and exploited by aliens working in partnership with an oligarchic elite. All the while, the populace—blissfully unaware of the real agenda at work in their lives—has been lulled into complacency, indoctrinated into compliance, bombarded with media distractions, and hypnotized by subliminal messages beamed out of television and various electronic devices, billboards and the like.
It is only when homeless drifter John Nada (played to the hilt by the late Roddy Piper) discovers a pair of doctored sunglasses—Hoffman lenses—that Nada sees what lies beneath the elite’s fabricated reality: control and bondage.
When viewed through the lens of truth, the elite, who appear human until stripped of their disguises, are shown to be monsters who have enslaved the citizenry in order to prey on them.
Likewise, billboards blare out hidden, authoritative messages: a bikini-clad woman in one ad is actually ordering viewers to “MARRY AND REPRODUCE.” Magazine racks scream “CONSUME” and “OBEY.” A wad of dollar bills in a vendor’s hand proclaims, “THIS IS YOUR GOD.”
When viewed through Nada’s Hoffman lenses, some of the other hidden messages being drummed into the people’s subconscious include: NO INDEPENDENT THOUGHT, CONFORM, SUBMIT, STAY ASLEEP, BUY, WATCH TV, NO IMAGINATION, and DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY.
This indoctrination campaign engineered by the elite in They Live is painfully familiar to anyone who has studied the decline of American culture.
A citizenry that does not think for themselves, obeys without question, is submissive, does not challenge authority, does not think outside the box, and is content to sit back and be entertained is a citizenry that can be easily controlled.
In this way, the subtle message of They Live provides an apt analogy of our own distorted vision of life in the American police state, what philosopher Slavoj Žižek refers to as dictatorship in democracy, “the invisible order which sustains your apparent freedom.”
We’re being fed a series of carefully contrived fictions that bear no resemblance to reality.
The powers-that-be want us to feel threatened by forces beyond our control (terrorists, shooters, bombers).
They want us afraid and dependent on the government and its militarized armies for our safety and well-being.
They want us distrustful of each other, divided by our prejudices, and at each other’s throats.
Most of all, they want us to continue to march in lockstep with their dictates.
Tune out the government’s attempts to distract, divert and befuddle us and tune into what’s really going on in this country, and you’ll run headlong into an unmistakable, unpalatable truth: the moneyed elite who rule us view us as expendable resources to be used, abused and discarded.
In fact, a study conducted by Princeton and Northwestern University concluded that the U.S. government does not represent the majority of American citizens. Instead, the study found that the government is ruled by the rich and powerful, or the so-called “economic elite.” Moreover, the researchers concluded that policies enacted by this governmental elite nearly always favor special interests and lobbying groups.
In other words, we are being ruled by an oligarchy disguised as a democracy, and arguably on our way towards fascism—a form of government where private corporate interests rule, money calls the shots, and the people are seen as mere subjects to be controlled.
Not only do you have to be rich—or beholden to the rich—to get elected these days, but getting elected is also a surefire way to get rich. As CBS News reports, “Once in office, members of Congress enjoy access to connections and information they can use to increase their wealth, in ways that are unparalleled in the private sector. And once politicians leave office, their connections allow them to profit even further.”
In denouncing this blatant corruption of America’s political system, former president Jimmy Carter blasted the process of getting elected—to the White House, governor’s mansion, Congress or state legislatures—as “unlimited political bribery… a subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors, who want and expect, and sometimes get, favors for themselves after the election is over.”
Rest assured that when and if fascism finally takes hold in America, the basic forms of government will remain: Fascism will appear to be friendly. The legislators will be in session. There will be elections, and the news media will continue to cover the entertainment and political trivia. Consent of the governed, however, will no longer apply. Actual control will have finally passed to the oligarchic elite controlling the government behind the scenes.
Sound familiar?
Clearly, we are now ruled by an oligarchic elite of governmental and corporate interests.
We have moved into “corporatism” (favored by Benito Mussolini), which is a halfway point on the road to full-blown fascism.
Corporatism is where the few moneyed interests—not elected by the citizenry—rule over the many. In this way, it is not a democracy or a republican form of government, which is what the American government was established to be. It is a top-down form of government and one which has a terrifying history typified by the developments that occurred in totalitarian regimes of the past: police states where everyone is watched and spied on, rounded up for minor infractions by government agents, placed under police control, and placed in detention (a.k.a. concentration) camps.
For the final hammer of fascism to fall, it will require the most crucial ingredient: the majority of the people will have to agree that it’s not only expedient but necessary.
But why would a people agree to such an oppressive regime?
The answer is the same in every age: fear.
Fear makes people stupid.
Fear is the method most often used by politicians to increase the power of government. And, as most social commentators recognize, an atmosphere of fear permeates modern America: fear of terrorism, fear of the police, fear of our neighbors and so on.
The propaganda of fear has been used quite effectively by those who want to gain control, and it is working on the American populace.
Despite the fact that we are 17,600 times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack; 11,000 times more likely to die from an airplane accident than from a terrorist plot involving an airplane; 1,048 times more likely to die from a car accident than a terrorist attack, and 8 times more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a terrorist , we have handed over control of our lives to government officials who treat us as a means to an end—the source of money and power.
As the Bearded Man in They Live warns, “They are dismantling the sleeping middle class. More and more people are becoming poor. We are their cattle. We are being bred for slavery.”
In this regard, we’re not so different from the oppressed citizens in They Live.
From the moment we are born until we die, we are indoctrinated into believing that those who rule us do it for our own good. The truth is far different.
Despite the truth staring us in the face, we have allowed ourselves to become fearful, controlled, pacified zombies.
We live in a perpetual state of denial, insulated from the painful reality of the American police state by wall-to-wall entertainment news and screen devices.
Most everyone keeps their heads down these days while staring zombie-like into an electronic screen, even when they’re crossing the street. Families sit in restaurants with their heads down, separated by their screen devices and unaware of what’s going on around them. Young people especially seem dominated by the devices they hold in their hands, oblivious to the fact that they can simply push a button, turn the thing off and walk away.
Indeed, there is no larger group activity than that connected with those who watch screens—that is, television, lap tops, personal computers, cell phones and so on. In fact, a Nielsen study reports that American screen viewing is at an all-time high. For example, the average American watches approximately 151 hours of television per month.
The question, of course, is what effect does such screen consumption have on one’s mind?
Psychologically it is similar to drug addiction. Researchers found that “almost immediately after turning on the TV, subjects reported feeling more relaxed, and because this occurs so quickly and the tension returns so rapidly after the TV is turned off, people are conditioned to associate TV viewing with a lack of tension.” Research also shows that regardless of the programming, viewers’ brain waves slow down, thus transforming them into a more passive, nonresistant state.
Historically, television has been used by those in authority to quiet discontent and pacify disruptive people. “Faced with severe overcrowding and limited budgets for rehabilitation and counseling, more and more prison officials are using TV to keep inmates quiet,” according to Newsweek.
Given that the majority of what Americans watch on television is provided through channels controlled by six mega corporations, what we watch is now controlled by a corporate elite and, if that elite needs to foster a particular viewpoint or pacify its viewers, it can do so on a large scale.
If we’re watching, we’re not doing.
The powers-that-be understand this. As television journalist Edward R. Murrow warned in a 1958 speech:
We are currently wealthy, fat, comfortable and complacent. We have currently a built-in allergy to unpleasant or disturbing information. Our mass media reflect this. But unless we get up off our fat surpluses and recognize that television in the main is being used to distract, delude, amuse, and insulate us, then television and those who finance it, those who look at it, and those who work at it, may see a totally different picture too late.
This brings me back to They Live, in which the real zombies are not the aliens calling the shots but the populace who are content to remain controlled.
When all is said and done, the world of They Live is not so different from our own. As one of the characters points out, “The poor and the underclass are growing. Racial justice and human rights are nonexistent. They have created a repressive society and we are their unwitting accomplices. Their intention to rule rests with the annihilation of consciousness. We have been lulled into a trance. They have made us indifferent to ourselves, to others. We are focused only on our own gain.”
We, too, are focused only on our own pleasures, prejudices and gains. Our poor and underclasses are also growing. Racial injustice is growing. Human rights is nearly nonexistent. We too have been lulled into a trance, indifferent to others.
Oblivious to what lies ahead, we’ve been manipulated into believing that if we continue to consume, obey, and have faith, things will work out. But that’s never been true of emerging regimes. And by the time we feel the hammer coming down upon us, it will be too late.
So where does that leave us?
The characters who populate Carpenter’s films provide some insight.
Underneath their machismo, they still believe in the ideals of liberty and equal opportunity. Their beliefs place them in constant opposition with the law and the establishment, but they are nonetheless freedom fighters.
When, for example, John Nada destroys the alien hyno-transmitter in They Live, he restores hope by delivering America a wake-up call for freedom.
That’s the key right there: we need to wake up.
Stop allowing yourselves to be easily distracted by pointless political spectacles and pay attention to what’s really going on in the country.
The real battle for control of this nation is not being waged between Republicans and Democrats in the ballot box.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the real battle for control of this nation is taking place on roadsides, in police cars, on witness stands, over phone lines, in government offices, in corporate offices, in public school hallways and classrooms, in parks and city council meetings, and in towns and cities across this country.
The real battle between freedom and tyranny is taking place right in front of our eyes, if we would only open them.
All the trappings of the American police state are now in plain sight.
Wake up, America.
If they live (the tyrants, the oppressors, the invaders, the overlords), it is only because “we the people” sleep.
ForbiddenKnowledge TV’s Gropefest
“Targeted”: Insider Narrative Shows Flynn “Entrapment” Was Same As “Frame” what happened to General Michael Flynn how he was tricked and set-up by Obama administration officials in an entrapment scheme that was the “tip of the spear” against President Trump. by Georgette
(Everything about the pressure used against him and the interview itself scream miscarriage of justice. )
“Targeted”: Insider Narrative Shows Flynn “Entrapment” Was Same As “Frame”
The insider narrative explains what happened to General Michael Flynn in detail, and how he was tricked and set-up by Obama administration officials in an entrapment scheme that was the “tip of the spear” against President Trump.
by Georgette
“Targeted”: Insider Narrative Shows Flynn “Entrapment” Was Same As “Frame”
Everything about the pressure used against him and the interview itself scream miscarriage of justice.
General Michael Flynn has gotten a raw deal, many people argue. He pled guilty for ‘lying’ to the FBI, during an interview that was “tantamount” to a frame up, according to an insider narrative that was just filed in federal court.
Mueller’s prosecutors threatened to go after Flynn’s son and his business partner in order to get the cooperation for a ‘guilty’ plea, knowing full well that the case against him was feeble and based on entrapment.
The Washington Times reported on Sidney Powell’s outlining of the events, prior to the sentencing hearing that is scheduled for December:
Sidney Powell wrote this story in a letter to Attorney General William P. Barr in June as she was taking over as defense counsel for the former White House national security adviser.
She immediately accused the government of withholding exculpatory evidence that would show prosecutors violated U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order. Her motions essentially have been attacks on special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russia election trespassing, though Flynn was convicted of lying to FBI agents on another matter.
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Brandon L. Van Grack responded this month with an attack on Ms. Powell’s tactics. He said the government owns no such exculpatory, or “Brady,” material and accused her of advocating “conspiracy theories.”
The drama is set to play out at a hearing next month and sentencing in December. Meantime, Ms. Powell won the judge’s permission to reply to Mr. Van Grack with an extended brief that has been filed but not redacted for public viewing.
In his reply, Mr. Van Grack, a veteran of the Mueller team and thus a Powell target, chose to include an attachment: the June 6 Powell letter to Mr. Barr.
In it, she asked Mr. Barr for an internal case review leading to dismissal. She made seven specific requests, such as removing Mr. Van Grack, who remains in place four months later.
Mr. Mueller’s final report said he failed to establish an election conspiracy between the Kremlin and Trump campaign.
“We believe there will be ample justification for the [Justice] Department to follow the precedent of the Ted Stevens case and move to dismiss the prosecution of General Flynn in the interest of justice,” Ms. Powell said.
Judge Sullivan in 2009 threw out the conviction of the former senator from Alaska after discovering the Justice Department had withheld evidence favorable to his defense.
In her letter labeled “confidential,” Ms. Powell made some frank comments about Judge Sullivan, referring to the court hearing that led to a delay in sentencing.
“At the hearing, however, Judge Sullivan launched a tirade, effectively accusing Flynn of working for a foreign power while he was in the White House and committing treason,” Ms. Powell wrote. “Judge Sullivan made clear he intends to send him to prison. Judge Sullivan was completely wrong on the facts of the case, and his rant seems to have come straight from MSNBC comments of the previous night. After a short break in the court proceedings, the Judge returned to the bench and made something of a retraction of his most egregious choice of words. However, severe damage was done. The press ran wild with the treason suggestion unabated for an hour.”
Ms. Powell tried to make the case that the Obama administration targeted Flynn for his running criticisms on the fight against the Islamic State group, the Iran nuclear deal and Hillary Clinton’s handling of Benghazi as secretary of state.
“As more evidence has come to light, it is increasingly apparent that General Flynn was targeted and taken out of the Trump administration for concocted and political purposes,” she said. “We believe there is specific evidence of that fact. He was the tip of the spear aimed at President Trump.”
Flynn’s downfall was abrupt. He conducted several telephone calls with the Russian ambassador during the transition. He urged Russia not to overreact to Obama-imposed sanctions, a response to Moscow’s election interference.
Obama Justice Department officials, briefed on the intercepted calls, began talking up the idea that Flynn violated the never-prosecuted Logan Act of 1799, which forbids private citizens from meddling in foreign affairs.
By the time President Trump took office, the FBI had been investigating his aides for six months to see whether they colluded with the Kremlin. Agent Peter Strzok, who led the probe and expressed a deep dislike of Mr. Trump, went to the White House to interview Flynn. Flynn denied discussing sanctions, setting up his guilty plea to lying.
He pledged to cooperate with the Mueller team. He provided no evidence of a conspiracy despite rampant news media speculation that he had proof against Mr. Trump.
Flynn’s call was leaked to The Washington Post, triggering what would become a battle cry among conservatives: Obama-Clinton loyalists inside a “deep state” were sabotaging the new administration.
Former FBI Director James B. Comey later bragged in public about how he was able to send two agents to the White House without going through the counsel’s office.
“The FBI interview was worse than ‘entrapment,’” Ms. Powell told Mr. Barr. “He was led to believe he was having a casual conversation with friends about a training exercise from a day or two before, when in truth, it was a set-up-tantamount to a ‘frame.’”
Ms. Powell described Flynn’s early back-and-forth in 2017 with the Mueller team.
“The General was forced to sell his home two years ago to fund his legal defense and still needs a legal defense fund,” she said of the 33-year Army officer, who rose to the pinnacle of his military specialty as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
With Flynn under pressure, Mr. Strzok’s biased Trump texts to FBI counsel Lisa Page were about to emerge. Ms. Powell suggested that the Justice Department leaked the news only after it secured Flynn’s guilty plea in December 2017.
“Suddenly, SCO was making extreme threats and placing enormous pressure on General Flynn to enter a guilty plea,” she said. “Sometime after Mueller was notified by the IG of the extremely biased Strzok-Page text messages, Mueller went to [then-Deputy Attorney General Rod] Rosenstein to get authority to target Michael Flynn, Jr. Flynn, Jr., who had a 4-month-old baby, was required to produce his phones and computers. Suddenly, General Flynn was threatened with the public arrest, search of his home, the indictment of his son.”
She said Mr. Van Grack and other Mueller prosecutors “sought every means to put the utmost pressure on him to compel a guilty plea to the point of using threats against his son and manipulated the press to hide the truth in the process.”
Mr. Van Grack told Judge Sullivan this month that none of Ms. Powell’s “Brady” requests had anything to do with Flynn’s lying to FBI agents.
“The defendant predicates much of his request on conspiracy theories, demanding that the government engage in a fishing expedition for documents that could offer support for those theories,” he said. “Irrespective of whether such documents exist, a fact that the government does not concede here, the defendant fails to establish that such information is relevant — let alone favorable and material — in this criminal case.”
Ms. Powell told the judge she wants a letter the British Embassy supposedly delivered to the Obama White House questioning the veracity of Christopher Steele. Mr. Steele is the former British intelligence officer who wrote the now-discredited anti-Trump dossier.
Mr. Van Grack responded: “Not relevant. The government is not aware of information that Christopher Steele provided that is relevant to the defendant’s false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (‘FBI‘) on January 24, 2017, or to his punishment.”
To another Brady request, he said: “Already provided. The government has already provided any information that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing.”
Flynn has fulfilled his cooperation agreement with the Mueller team.
In the end, his case didn’t touch on Russian election interference and he did not implicate any Trump person or the president. He lied in his Jan. 24, 2017, FBI White House interview. He made false statements on his Foreign Agent Registration Act form with the Justice Department concerning work for the government of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The prosecution has recommended no jail time.
Flynn’s onetime partner Bijan Kian was convicted on lobbying charges by a jury in July in Alexandria, Virginia. But U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga took the unusual step last month of overturning the verdict, citing insufficient evidence.
It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent
(Image: It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent)
It’s now child abuse in America to try to save your child from being chemically castrated by a “woke” parent
Thursday, October 24, 2019 by: Ethan Huff
(Natural News) They say that everything is bigger in Texas, and this apparently includes court decisions that completely obliterate parental rights and force innocent children to undergo LGBTQ sex changes.
This is what happened just a few days ago in Dallas after a jury decided to separate a seven-year-old boy from his biological father, and place the child into the sole custody of his non-biological “mother” who admittedly wants to forcibly “transition” the boy into a “girl” using puberty blockers and cross-sex hormone drugs.
As previously reported, Dr. Anne Georgulas of Dr. Anne Pediatrics in Coppell, a suburb of Dallas, has never been content with the fact that neither of the twin boys she received from her former husband’s sperm and an unidentified egg donor were born as girls. Thus, Georgulas has been on a quest ever since to “transform” James into a “girl” in order to suit her own selfish desires.
The boys’ biological father, Jeffrey Younger, a religious man, has been fighting tooth and nail to stop Georgulas from destroying his son’s life with endocrine-disrupting pharmaceuticals – and based on the merits of the case, including the fact that it’s taking place in traditionally conservative Texas, we were of the persuasion that Jeffrey would probably win in the end. But much to our shock, that isn’t what happened.
According to reports, a jury sided with Georgulas by ruling that she, and she alone, will be allowed Sole Managing Conservatorship over both James, who will soon be renamed “Luna,” and his twin brother. Jeffrey, in other words, will no longer have any custody over his own children, which has been handed over to a woman who’s not their real mother, and who thus can’t be considered to have their best interests at heart.
Why do today’s “progressive” women hate men and masculinity so much that they’re eager to biologically destroy the lives of innocent little boys?
It’s important to emphasize once again that Georgulas has no biological connection to either James or his twin. They were created from their father Jeffrey’s sperm, which was combined with the eggs of an unidentified donor before being incubated through in-vitro fertilization. Georgulas played absolutely no role in their existence, in other words, and yet is being favored in this case, presumably because she is a woman.
This is the new state of identity politics in America, after all. If you’re a man, nothing you say or do has any value whatsoever – even if you’re fighting on behalf of your own children against your crazy ex-wife who more than likely suffers from Munchausen syndrome by proxy. But if you’re a female, then the world is handed to you on a silver platter, no questions asked – the lives and livelihoods of little boys everywhere be damned.
Naturally, the judge in Jeffrey’s case, Kim Cooks, is also a woman. And just like Georgulas, Cooks has no biological relation to James or his twin brother, and more than likely doesn’t care about their well-being as males. Our guess is that she, too, fully supports “transitioning” little boys into little “girls” to suit the LGBTQ agenda, which if you’ve been paying attention is rapidly becoming the LGBTQP agenda, with the P standing for pedophilia.
“This is the ultimate form of child abuse and societal destruction,” pointed out one Breitbart News commenter about the situation, emphasizing the fact that James “acts like a boy when he is with the father,” as indicated by earlier media reports.
“How the mother has avoided being committed to a facility is a mystery to me,” this same commenter further added. “In this case, the state has decided that a mentally ill parent and child abuse is not only okay but is preferred. Now, when this kid goes through puberty and commits suicide, will the media cover it? Don’t hold your breath.”
For more related news, be sure to check out Gender.news.
Sources for this article include:
Breitbart.com
NaturalNews.com
NaturalNews.com
NaturalNews.com
Obama Executed by Firing Squad at GTMO! Field McConnell Saturday, October 12, 2019 19:52
Obama Executed by Firing Squad at GTMO! Field McConnell
Saturday, October 12, 2019 19:52
Shocking information has come in from Field McConnel.
Retired USAF Lt. Col Field McConnell says it’s been reported to him that Barack Obama was executed on September 29, 2019 by firing squad at GTMO. This information starts at about the 17:00 minute mark but the entire interview is very good so you’ll want to listen to all of it. McConnell went to the same high school as the illegal President Barak Obama in Hawaii! He said Obama’s death occurred on the same day that General Dunsford got to GTMO to oversee the military tribunals.
McConnel states the two big issues are 9/11 and pedophilia. He says anybody who has trafficked children is going to be executed as well as anybody aware of the 9/11 treason and didn’t report it as required. 9/11 was done by elements within our own government. By law, anybody having direct knowledge of treason is compelled to report it to one state Governor or one chief judge or justice of any one state. So anybody who was aware of the false flag 9/11 operation and who didn’t report it is guilty of treason.
He also states there is going to be a big celebration and announcements on the 10th of November which is the birthday of the US Marines founded in 1775 on this date. Lots covered here including one interesting tidbit he says about the US justice system. He says Trump is going to make all lawyers part of the BAR association repledge themselves to the United States since all BAR members currently work for the Queen of England!
I have no idea if some or any of this information is true! I’m not saying it is true, I’m simply reporting what Field McConnell says in this interview. McConnel does have a lot of intel sources it seems but there is so much disinformation being thrown around by spooks, there’s no way to tell if this is true until Obama surfaces again. Many people are reporting he’s been missing for a while now. Either Field McConnell has a lot of good intel here which will be proven correct very shortly or he or his sources are intentionally putting out “happy talk” to make patriots relax! If the later is the case, then I’ll very disappointed in him and his sources. He seems sincere that he at least is being told this information so we’ll just have to see what happens.
If Obama was executed for treason (which he should have been if we had a justice system and a real country) then we can only hope Obama repented for all his evil such as supporting the killing of God’s babies and accepted Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior before he was dispatched. Jesus is the only hope any of us have. You deny him, he denies you to the father!
Please monitor Field McConnel’s youtube channel and Twitter for more developments on this story.
Field McConnel’s Able Danger Livestream Youtube Channel
Image result for image of Field McConnell
‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home, By: Matt Agorist October 10, 2019
(Image credit: CBS 2 Chicago screen capture)
Cops in Chicago are raiding innocent families and terrorizing them — by mistake — and are going through great lengths to cover it up.
chicago
‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home
‘They Put Rifles to My Children’s Heads’ Cops Terrorize Family in Raid on Wrong Home
Matt Agorist October 10, 2019
Chicago, IL — Because of their gross negligence and incompetence, the city of Chicago is facing a slew of lawsuits for raiding the homes of innocent people — allegedly by mistake. TFTP has reported on several of these lawsuits in which cops raided a four-year-old’s birthday party and held other children at gunpoint. One of these families has even been raided — mistakenly — three times. One family’s recent mistaken raid, however, is exposing a blue wall of silence and showing how far the Chicago police department is willing to go to cover up their crimes.
Over the past few years, the residents of Chicago have been subject to a militarized police state occupation. Innocent family after innocent family each waking up in the middle of the night as heavily armed storm troopers throw flash bangs into their homes, haul them outside in the cold, point guns at their heads, and even handcuff small children. These families are being terrorized in their own homes, many of them left with PTSD, and no one is being held accountable—because the state is the one behind the terror.
And because they are the state, they are refusing to hold themselves accountable and going through great lengths to keep their terror campaign secret.
Some of the latest victims in this state-sponsored police terror campaign are Domonique Wilson and her children. Wilson’s raid has just exposed a troubling problem within the department as well.
Wilson’s home was raided in March by a SWAT team who was acting on the wrong information. Her tiny children had guns pointed at their heads and were placed in handcuffs. They were marched outside like slaves and forced to stand in the freezing wet rain for hours.
“They made me stand up straight and my hands just behind my back, and they had them tight,” said Wilson’s 8-year-old son, Royal Smart.
Wilson said police used excessive force on her children who were clearly afraid for their lives.
“I was worried about my sister most, because she’s only 6 years old,” Royal said. “My legs were shaking.”
After they were wrongly raided and terrorized by police, Wilson said she went to the department to get the body camera footage which she says shows how terribly the cops treated her family. But police refused to turn it over.
CBS 2 News also went to the Chicago police department with a Freedom of Information Act request to get the body camera video, but they refused to honor it.
“What do you believe that body camera footage will show when it comes to your 8-year-old son?” CBS 2’s Dave Savini asked Wilson.
“It’s going to show them placing my 8-year-old son in handcuffs; how scared he was – traumatized.”
“Do you think they’re hiding something?” he asked.
“Yes. They’re hiding that they put rifles to me and my children’s heads,” said Wilson.
When CBS 2 asked police Supt. Eddie Johnson if the department was tracking wrong raids and knew how many times officers got it wrong, he told them that they do track it and they have those numbers. But that was a lie.
As CBS 2 reports:
But it turns out that Johnson and his staff do not have that information. After nearly a year of repeatedly asking for numbers, Chicago Police have admitted to CBS 2 they don’t even keep track of all the times police raid the wrong homes.
Meanwhile, Supt. Eddie Johnson has also refused more than a dozen requests for a one-on-one interview.
His chief communications officer, Anthony Guglielmi, said the superintendent does not have the time, and CBS 2’s ratings are not high enough, for him to do an interview on this topic.
Thus, he refuses to talk about our yearlong investigation and all those impacted by bad traumatizing raid – a refusal while new wrong raids cases keep rolling in.
https://cbsloc.al/2AKgchP?anvt=8
Al Hofeld Jr., whose law office represents multiple families who’ve been wrongfully raided by incompetent Chicago police, held a press conference in July to address this very serious problem.
“There is a silent epidemic of trauma being perpetrated upon the children and families of the South and West sides of our city by Chicago police barreling into the wrong homes, holding guns on children, handcuffing children … ,” Hofeld said.
“Chicago police officers behave as if our children of color and their trauma is collateral damage in Chicago,” said Holfield.
And he’s right. As TFTP reported earlier this year, when Samari Broswell, 7, was celebrating her younger brother, TJ Broswell’s 4th birthday earlier this year, she never expected to see 17 heavily armed cops come smashing through her door. However, thanks to a severe case of police incompetence, that is exactly what happened.
Now, just like Wilson’s family, this family is left traumatized while people who claim to ‘protect’ them instead ignore them and continue the same practice. In the Broswell’s case, police claim video from officer-worn body cameras showing the horrifying raid simply went “missing.”
But that is not all.
Also, just last August, two little boys who used to look up to police were traumatized and their view of police tarnished after a SWAT team burst into their home at night and held the entire family at gunpoint, including the children. The family was innocent and just like the above cases, the raid was on the wrong home.
Those two children now suffer from PTSD and have to attend counseling.
It’s not just children either, Chicago cops have raided the wrong homes of elderly women too.
Elizabeth Harrison, 82, used to tell kids to “respect the law.” Then on March 17, 2016, a gang of Chicago cops raided her home, busting down the door and holding her at gunpoint. Because of this trauma, Harrison had to be rushed to the hospital.
The great-grandmother said police must have had the wrong house, but they insisted it was the correct address based on their “intelligence.” No one believed her when she said she was a widow and lived alone. Harrison was made to sit in a chair, overwhelmed with anxiety, while they searched her home for non-existent drugs. The stress was so overwhelming, Harrison was hospitalized.
Despite this history of dangerous terrorism from raiding wrong homes, it appears Chicago cops aren’t trying to get any better at their jobs and remain entirely unapologetic.
Corrupt kids: A generational stench seeps from the swamp | WND — Truth2Freedom’s Blog
A popular 1930s radio program began with a distinctive voice asking, “Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men.” The answer then followed with an ominous laugh. Referencing the program’s crime-fighting vigilante, the answer came, “The Shadow knows.” For almost two decades, audiences gathered around their radios to listen to The Shadow’s latest […]
via Corrupt kids: A generational stench seeps from the swamp | WND — Truth2Freedom’s Blog
The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Isabelle Z.
(Image: The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws)
The uprising begins: Ex-cop testifies before Congress, says “will not comply” with gun confiscation laws
Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Isabelle Z.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-ex-cop-testifies-will-not-comply-gun-confiscation.html
(Natural News) A former police officer expressed the sentiment of many Americans when she testified before Congress recently that she won’t comply with gun confiscation laws.
Dianna Muller, who won the ladies title in the 2015 NRA World Shooting Championship, is a 22-year veteran of the Tulsa Police Department. Speaking before the House Judiciary Committee recently, she stated that she would not be participating in an assault weapons ban should one be put in place.
She told the committee: “Please don’t legislate the 150 million people just like me into being criminals.”
She also spoke out on the ban on the bump stocks that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like automatic ones, saying she was forced to decide between complying with the ban or becoming a felon. Should she face a similar question about assault weapons, she said in no uncertain terms that she would not comply.
As a law enforcement officer during the previous assault weapon ban from 1994 to 2004, she said she did not see any impact on safety from the measure, adding that it wouldn’t have been allowed to sunset if it had been effective.
Muller is also the founder of the gun advocacy group The DC Project. Appearing on Fox & Friends shortly after her testimony, she warned that the Second Amendment is at stake and said that gun owners should “get involved and engaged.”
She said that many people in law enforcement agree with her stance and that those in favor of such a ban are throwing around terms such as “weapons of war” simply to stir up emotions.
Muller and other people at the hearing also raised questions about the practicality of such a ban. They said that the differences between the AR-15 and weapons like it, and a standard semi-automatic hunting rifle are merely cosmetic.
Another witness, Heritage Foundation Senior Legal Policy Analyst Amy Swearer, disputed the notion that law-abiding citizens don’t need weapons like AR-15s. She pointed out that her mother, who is a gun novice, struggled to fire a handgun at the range but was far more accurate when she tried an AR-15. Its greater stability makes it easy to handle and fire accurately in tense situations, but it can also be argued that simply brandishing one is often enough to deter would-be criminals from doing harm.
A question of self-defense
Many people who have obtained these weapons legally have done so for self-defense purposes, and several recent cases illustrate how valuable they can be in a life-or-death situation.
For example, a college student was able to scare off two armed burglars simply by holding up an unloaded AR-15 in 2013. That same year, a 15-year-old boy saved his own life and that of his 12-year-old sister when he fended off a pair of home invaders using his father’s AR-15.
When an Illinois man with an AR-15 intervened as a neighbor was attacking a pregnant woman with a knife in Oswego, Illinois, last year, the “intimidation factor” of the rifle was cited as the reason the attacker ultimately dropped his knife.
Muller likely spoke for a lot of gun owners when she said she didn’t plan to comply with laws that amount to gun confiscation, and such a move could well spark an uprising. Most owners of AR-15s and similar weapons hope they never have to use them on another person, but the peace of mind of knowing they can defend themselves and their families from those who want to harm them is something many people are willing to protect at all costs.
Sources for this article include:
TheTruthAboutGuns.com
FoxNews.com
DailySignal.com
Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Ethan Huff
(Image: Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along)
Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along
Sunday, October 06, 2019 by: Ethan Huff
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-woman-at-aoc-townhall-demands-everyone-eat-the-babies.html
(Natural News) During a recent town hall event in Corona, New York, her home district, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) responded to questions about her infamous Green New Deal, including from one woman who told AOC that we now need to “eat the babies” in order to save the planet from climate change.
Contending that AOC’s Green New Deal doesn’t go far in enough in addressing global warming, the woman stood up and began ranting about how “we only have a few months left,” and that AOC’s next campaign slogan should be, “We have to start eating babies!”
The woman then proceeded to remove her jacket, revealing a t-shirt that stated on the front of it, “Save the Planet. Eat the Children.”
“We don’t have enough time,” the irate woman continued to tell AOC, who nodded affirmatively in response. “Even if we would bomb Russia, we still have too many people, too much pollution, so we have to get rid of the babies. Just stopping having babies is not enough, we need to eat the babies.”
For more related news, be sure to check out Libtards.news.
Tucker Carlson mocks AOC’s stupidity in failing to denounce the suggestion that we all need to eat human babies to save the planet
AOC’s eventual response to the woman was that, “luckily, we have more than a few months.” AOC continued on to suggest that there are many “positive” solutions to the climate crisis that she hopes to tackle while in office.
The woman’s rantings were quickly picked up by the media, including by Tucker Carlson from Fox News. Carlson broadcast a clip of the incident during a segment of his show, laughing at the sheer lunacy of what the woman was suggesting.
Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: Lab-verified Nascent Iodine solution is a dietary supplement that provides your body with supplemental iodine to help protect your thyroid during radiation exposure. Nuclear accidents such as Fukushima (or nuclear war) can expose your body to radioactive iodine-131, a dangerous radioisotope. Pre-loading your system with stable iodine occupies the iodine receptor sites on your organs, causing your body to naturally expel radioactive iodine you may have been exposed to through air, food, water or milk products. This defensive strategy is recommended by nearly all health authorities, worldwide, including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Discover more at this link.
“Is that real?” Carlson asked with a chuckle. “We don’t know. Was it a swiftian parody? Was it clever trolling of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? Maybe it was. Maybe that’s just someone who believes the rhetoric of the Left.”
Even if it was a joke, what’s not was AOC’s lack of an appropriate response to the woman. Rather than decry her suggestion that we all start eating infant flesh to stop global warming, AOC appeared to be in agreement with it when she gently nodded her head in the affirmative.
“Either way, what didn’t you hear?” Carlson also asked about this anomaly. “That was the most interesting part. If someone said to you, ‘we need to eat the babies,’ wouldn’t your first response be, ‘what?! No, of course not! Eat the babies?!’ That’s the one thing that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez didn’t say. Huh, pretty revealing!”
blob:https://www.brighteon.com/2a966f79-71dc-4a73-af47-bf712e4e8bed
AOC’s Green New Deal would seem to imply that some people need to be killed off to solve “overpopulation”
Perhaps the reason why AOC didn’t have a more appropriate response to the woman from her district who suggested that we all “eat the babies” is the fact that AOC’s Green New Deal does contain provisions that, in order to come about, would require a massive reduction in the world’s population.
Because entitlement spending would go through the roof under AOC’s plan, millions of people would end up suffering in order to accommodate it, leading to what Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore once described as “the end of civilization” as we currently know it.
“The Green New Deal will be the end of civilization if 85% of the world’s and 85% of the US coal, oil and natural gas were phased out over the next few years, like the next ten years,” Carlson stated during an earlier segment of his show about AOC’s plan.
“We do not have anything to replace them with … Half of the population will die in a very short period of time. And as I also pointed out, there wouldn’t be a tree left on this planet … because that would be all there was to heat and cook.”
Sources for this article include:
TheGatewayPundit.com
NaturalNews.com
Once, Twice, or Thrice, It Was Not Enough for Japan to continue poisoning us ever since Fukashima triple melt down in 2011. Fukushima: Storage tanks are full, radioactive waste to be dumped straight into the ocean; Tuesday, October 01, 2019 by: Tracey Watson
Fukushima: Storage tanks are full, radioactive waste to be dumped straight into the ocean; Tuesday, October 01, 2019 by: Tracey Watson
(Natural News) Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was commissioned back in 1971 and was one of the world’s largest power stations until double natural disasters in March 2011 caused the second worst nuclear accident in history.
The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), has tried everything to contain the resulting buildup of contaminated groundwater, but recent reports indicate that they have effectively lost the war.
The go-to solution has been to store 1 million tons of the toxic water in 1,000 tanks at the site, but the company has now warned that it will have run out of tank storage by mid-2022. The proposed solution? After going to such great lengths to contain the water because of its toxicity, Tepco is now insisting that it can safely be diluted by being drained into the sea.
What triggered the Fukushima nuclear disaster?
As explained by Encyclopedia Britannica, first the Fukushima area was battered by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake. Then, two days later, a massive, 50-foot tsunami made landfall, damaging the power plant’s backup generators. The three reactors operating at the time were successfully shut down, but the loss of power caused by the generator failure meant the reactors’ cooling systems failed within days. The resulting high temperatures caused the fuel rods to overheat and start to melt, releasing radiation in the process.
Workers pumped cool seawater and boric acid into the units to try to cool them, but it was later discovered that some of the melted material had caused large holes at the bottom of the vessels, partially exposing nuclear material.
Natural News previously reported:
Even though the nuclear disaster in Fukushima took place over seven years ago, radioactive waste has continued to build up as ground water flows through the destroyed reactor buildings and becomes contaminated. This creates a staggering 160 tons of contaminated water each day.
While the purification devices used by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) do remove most of the radioactive materials, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen known as tritium cannot be removed, and tritium-contaminated water continues to cause big problems.
Why the government claims dumping the water in the ocean is a good idea
Officials from both Tepco and the Japanese government now insist that since tritium exists in nature, dumping this water in the ocean is a perfectly safe solution to the problem.
“The only option will be to drain it into the sea and dilute it,” Yoshiaki Harada, a Japanese politician, told a news briefing held in Tokyo recently. “The whole of the government will discuss this, but I would like to offer my simple opinion.”
According to the Guardian, recent studies have found that it would take around 17 years to get contamination levels low enough to meet the plant’s safety standards.
Local fishermen have expressed anger at the idea of toxic water being dumped into the ocean, and South Korea has voiced concerns about the potential impact on the reputation of its own fishing industry.
Meanwhile, there is evidence that Fukushima radiation is already causing harm to animals and marine life as far away as the west coast of the United States:
*Many different types of animals have been found with open wounds and fur loss;
*Large numbers of sea lions have inexplicably died;
*Populations of sockeye salmon are at an all-time low in both Canada and Alaska;
*Fish have been found along the coastline bleeding from the gills, eyes and bellies, for no apparent reason;
*Scientists have detected unusually high levels of cesium-137 in plankton in the Pacific;
*Bluefin tuna have been found to be contaminated with radiation; and
*Scientists in Canada have discovered extremely high levels of nuclear radiation in samples taken from a variety of fish.
Imagine the dire consequences if Tepco starts actively dumping contaminated water directly into the ocean!
Related: Learn more about this threat to the environment at Environ.news.
Sources include:
CounterPunch.org
TheGuardian.com
NaturalNews.com
NaturalNews.com
Chaos Continues In Hong Kong; Undercover Cops Pull Guns Amid ‘Aggressive Clearance Operation’
(Photo via Alejandro Alvarez)
Chaos Continues In Hong Kong; Undercover Cops Pull Guns Amid ‘Aggressive Clearance Operation’
by Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/29/2019 – 15:30
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/chaos-continues-hong-kong-undercover-cops-pull-guns-amid-aggressive-clearance
Violence continued in Hong Kong as anti-government demonstrations entered their 17th week. The police response was described by the Washington Post as “among the most aggressive” since the movement began over a now-withdrawn extradition bill which would have allowed China to forcibly move suspects to the mainland for face trial in communist courts.
Protesters destroyed signs and flags raised in advance of the 70th anniversary celebrations of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, some of which were burned. According to WaPo, “At times, riot police appeared outnumbered. Shoppers at a luxury mall in central Hong Kong looked on as police and protesters engaged in a pitched battle. Protesters crouched, created a phalanx of umbrellas and tossed bricks and bottles toward the officers. Police fired round after round of tear gas.”
The protesters inched forward as rubber bullets shredded their umbrellas. When it appeared the police might be outflanked, officers made a hasty retreat. Protesters seized the moment, rushing toward officers piling into police vans.
Demonstrators, cheered by onlookers and fellow marchers, hit the vans with poles and bottles as the vehicles sped away. The road was littered with glass and spent tear-gas canisters clinked across the asphalt as the protesters continued their march.
At nightfall in the nearby neighborhood of Wan Chai, residents left their homes and workplaces to jeer at police and pelt their vehicles with bricks and bottles. -Washington Post
At one point, an undercover cop who was exposed pulled a gun on protesters.
Several people were seriously injured, including an Indonesian journalist based in Hong Kong who was hit in the eye by a projectile while live-streaming the event for her publication.
...
Street battles broke between protesters and police who struggled to keep the demonstrators at bay with rubber bullets and tear gas.
Residents and tourists were caught in the crossfire, clutching their faces and running in fear in several areas, including the neon-lit luxury shopping district of Causeway Bay. -Washington Post
In addition to tear gas, authorities deployed water cannons again – spraying protesters with blue die containing an irritant.
Hong Kong police officer sprays reporter
At approximately 5pm, riot police launched an aggressive clearance operation against protesters along Harcourt Road – a frequent location for clashes.
Police pushed young demonstrators to the asphalt road and dragged them away, leaving pools of blood. Hong Kong’s hospital authority said 13 people were admitted to hospitals by 7:30 p.m., including one in serious condition. -Washington Post
Riot police officers fire tear gas to disperse anti-government protesters after a march in Hong Kong. (Athit Perawongmetha/Reuters)
Arrested protesters were lined up against a wall outside a government building before being frisked and taken away.
After one clash, police regrouped and then charged protesters. “Go, go, go,” a commanding officer shouted as dozens of tactical and riot officers sprinted down the street. Officers tackled demonstrators, pinning them to the ground and blocking journalists’ cameras as they made arrests. -Washington Post
Some Red Flags About ‘Red Flag’ Laws
Some Red Flags About ‘Red Flag’ Laws
Beth Alcazar – 09/24/2019
A terrible tragedy occurred in my home state of Alabama last month. As reported by the local news, a father and his son were involved in an argument that led to the 70-year-old father shooting his 45-year-old son in the chest in what he claims was self-defense.
Soon afterward, the Alabama chapter of Moms Demand Action shared the news — along with a comment — on social media. They posted:
’Investigators said James Adams and his son, Alfred Dewayne Adams, were involved in an argument Sunday night. They further stated they believe James told Alfred he was going to bed. Alfred then walked into the bedroom and James shot him in the chest. Some of the neighbors and some other family members can tell us about stuff that was happening through [sic] the years.’ This life could have been spared by utilizing a red flag law.
Some Questions
“This life could have been spared by utilizing a red flag law?” That’s quite a statement. And I wanted to post a few questions to Moms Demand Action. First of all, I wanted to ask: If the father truly used a weapon in self-defense, would a “red flag” law have disarmed him … and then spared the life of his violent son? Would the father be dead, then, in this particular situation? Beyond that, do “red flag” laws cover all weapons in the home? What if the suspect had decided to use a knife? Or what about prescription drugs or poisons? Does it cover a person’s bare hands and/or body? Could we confiscate those weapons, as well, whenever we feel there’s “some stuff that was happening through the years?”
Some Examples
And what about the terrible case in which a son killed his father and wounded his mother with a knife? Two months ago, in Arizona, the Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office reported that when the older couple returned home, “they noticed their 33-year-old son had consumed a large amount of beer. The parents argued with him over their drinking concern. He threw his phone at them and then went into the kitchen and grabbed two large knives. When he tried to stab his mother, his father intervened and attempted to restrain him while he was still in the kitchen. The son began attacking his dad. As the struggle moved from the kitchen into the living room, the son was able to stab his dad in the chest. The father collapsed to the floor.”
Or there’s this recent horror story from Illinois: A man in a Chicago suburb was arrested by local police after killing his own mother by stabbing her repeatedly with a samurai sword in the chest. Park Ridge Police had removed the murderer’s firearms two times, with the last time being in July 2019. So the suspect didn’t have a gun … but he still had evil intent. And he used whatever weapon he could find.
There’s also the atrocity from Nevada a few weeks ago in which a 36-year-old man bludgeoned a woman to death with a sledgehammer in what Las Vegas police said was a random attack at a laundromat.
I could go on. But I won’t. Perhaps you see the point.
Some Red Flags
Beyond the fear of just anyone pointing out someone else with a gun for no good reason or people wrongly having their firearms taken from them because of mistaken identity or possibly just being in the wrong place at the wrong time, there are so many red flags about “red flag” laws. Undoubtedly, we’d love to be able to stop crimes and keep bad people from harming or killing others. But this is not the movie Minority Report, in which police can employ some sort of psychic technology to arrest and convict murderers before they commit their crimes. Ultimately, we have to ask: Will “red flag” laws actually target violent people … or just people with guns? Because as the above examples (and countless others) show, the problem isn’t the firearms.
About Beth Alcazar
Author of Women’s Handgun & Self-Defense Fundamentals, associate editor of Concealed Carry Magazine and creator of the Pacifiers & Peacemakers column, Beth Alcazar has enjoyed nearly two decades of teaching and working in the firearms industry. She holds degrees in language arts, education and communication management and uses her experience and enthusiasm to share safe and responsible firearms ownership and usage with others. Beth is certified through the NRA as a Training Counselor, Chief Range Safety Officer and Certified Instructor for multiple disciplines. She is also a Certified Instructor through SIG Sauer Academy, ALICE Institute, DRAW School, TWAW and I.C.E. Training and is a USCCA Certified Instructor and Senior Training Counselor.
How many times have we heard about someone running over a bunch of people too. Even the car or truck can be a deadly weapon. If someone is dead set that they are going to kill, for whatever reason, they will find the tool to kill others with!
These gun grabbers want any possible way to take our protection from us. And these same gun grabbers are socialists/communists.
Impeachment can go more ways than one. These politicians that want to do away with the Second Amendment, work for us. When they were sworn in, they swore to honor and uphold the Constitution. Trying to do away with any of the Amendments to the Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights, is not honoring and upholding the Constitution. Violating one’s Oath of Office is usually grounds for them to be removed.
I say let’s remove their asses!
(Please note, I usually don’t comment on my own posts).
Watch the Documentary Movie “VAXXED” – THE Anti-Vaccine Documentary http://vaxxedthemovie.com/
Within hours, Twitter took down Briscoe Cain’s post, which O’Rourke’s campaign labeled a “death threat”. “It violates our rules for threats of violence,” a company spokesperson said late Thursday night.
Texas Lawmaker’s Warning To Beto Deemed Threat
Posted at 2:00 pm on September 13, 2019 by Tom Knighton
Guns are a big thing in Texas. When Beto O’Rourke was running for the Senate, he had to walk a tight line. He still needed to appeal to his out-of-state donors who generally abhor guns, but he still needed to win votes in the Lone Star State. It’s not an easy way to go and, as we now know, O’Rourke wasn’t successful in his bid. Did he fail to walk that line well enough? It’s hard to say, though I suspect that might have played a role.
Now that he’s running for president, though, he doesn’t need to worry too much about the opinions of Texans. That’s why he’s been on a full-court press against so-called “assault weapons” ever since El Paso.
Last night, Beto once again made his intentions clear by saying “Hell yeah,” he was going to come for our AR-15s.
He then repeated that message on Twitter, which prompted a response.
A Republican state lawmaker from Texas has caused outcry for tweeting “My AR is ready for you Robert Francis” after Democratic presidential candidate Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke pledged to ban and confiscate AR-15 military-style rifles.
Within hours, Twitter took down Briscoe Cain’s post, which O’Rourke’s campaign labeled a “death threat”. “It violates our rules for threats of violence,” a company spokesperson said late Thursday night.
This is a death threat, Representative. Clearly, you shouldn’t own an AR-15—and neither should anyone else. pic.twitter.com/jsiZmwjMDs
— Beto O’Rourke (@BetoORourke) September 13, 2019
Earlier, Cain, a 34-year-old “conservative Republican” lawyer who represents a district outside of Houston, Texas, had mocked Twitter users who called his comment a threat of violence. “You’re an idiot,” he told one commenter. When O’Rourke called the tweet a death threat, and said it proved that neither Cain nor anyone else should own an AR-15, Cain responded, “You’re a child, Robert Francis.”
Here’s the thing, though. It wasn’t really a threat.
It was a warning.
O’Rourke continues to labor under this delusion that AR-15 owners will play nicely with him if he were to somehow win and get his way on the issue. He actually thinks we’ll comply. He’s convinced we will.
And when he’s warned that we won’t, he does this.
“Oh, you’re threatening me!”
Actual footage of Beto O’Rouke upon reading Cain’s tweet:
It’s like him claiming that Meghan McCain was giving people permission to commit violence.
Briscoe Cain is just the latest person to warn him of just what will transpire if the government decides to take people’s guns. We’re not playing around with him. We’re giving him fair warning.
The problem is, Beto is just too freaking stupid to grasp what we’re telling him.
If there’s a saving grace to this, it’s that Beto will never be president. He wouldn’t have qualified for last night’s debate if the DNC was using a less biased method to determine which polls mattered and which didn’t. That means everything he’s slinging around is bluster and little more.
Oh, don’t get me wrong, he means it. He just won’t get the chance to implement any of it.
Should that change, though, he needs to understand that when people start dying, he doesn’t get to pretend he didn’t know this would happen. He’s been warned. They’ve all been warned what will happen if they decide Beto’s idea is a good one and decide to implement it.
Cain is just the latest to do so.
”CYANIDE BOMBS” USED TO KILL WILD ANIMALS ARE BANNED IN WYOMING… by Todd Wilkinson
Graphic is from The Revelator
”CYANIDE BOMBS” USED TO KILL WILD ANIMALS ARE BANNED IN WYOMING…
POSTED ON AUGUST 21, 2019 3:54 PM BY RACHEL TILSETH
”Cyanide Bombs” used to kill wild animals are banned in Wyoming…
In an article published By Mountain Journal “Ultra-lethal ‘Cyanide Bombs’ Used To Kill Public Wildlife Banned For Now In Wyoming” August 20, 2019
UNDER PRESSURE, EPA ALSO REVERSES COURSE NATIONALLY, REVOKES APPROVAL FOR DEADLY M-44S TO KILL PREDATORS THAT MIGHT EAT LIVESTOCK ON PUBLIC LAND
by Todd Wilkinson
Most Americans are probably unfamiliar with the federal government’s taxpayer-subsidized killing campaign carried out every year against public wildlife on public lands, most of them located in the West.
Most are probably unaware that their hard-earned money, paid in taxes to Uncle Sam, helps to operate a federal agency known as Wildlife Services, a branch of the US Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
One of Wildlife Service’s primary missions is functioning essentially as a protective hit squad for privately-owned cattle and sheep producers allowed to graze their animals on public land grass at rates that haven’t risen much in over half a century.
While most citizens are outraged when they learn what Wildlife Services does, they are incredulous even more when they discover that one of the weapons Wildlife Services and its state affiliates have used to wipe landscapes free of predators is ultra-lethal sodium cyanide “bombs” known as “M-44s.” They possess enough poison that can kill a human or pet if they accidentally come in contact with them.
In fact, a teenage boy from Pocatello, Idaho nearly died a few winters ago after he and his pet dog wandered into an M-44 placed by a Wildlife Services trapper near their suburban home. The dog bumbled into the M-44, a dose of cyanide exploded in his face and then died, foaming at the mouth, in the boys’ arms, leaving 14-year-old Canyon Mansfield understandably traumatized. (Read this piece that appeared in National Geographic.). Continue reading full story by clicking here.
Rachel Tilseth
WOLVESDOUGLASCO
Rachel Tilseth is a freelance writer, fine artist, filmmaker and environmentalist. Tilseth has been a Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Volunteer Winter Wolf Tracker since the year 2000. Tilseth worked with the Wisconsin Wolf Recovery Program as a volunteer since 1998, and as a result learned about the lives of wild gray wolves. Tilseth worked to draw attention to the plight of Gray wolves during the three years Wisconsin held wolf hunts. As an environmentalist Tilseth has organized events, film screenings and a film festival. Tilseth is the Producer and Director of Inside the Heart of Wolf Advocacy: The Yellowstone Story currently in production. Rachel Tilseth received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Art Education in 1992 from UW-Stout, graduating with cum laude honors.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2019 AT 12:43 PM
Reblogged this on Wolves of Douglas County Wisconsin Films and commented:
Most Americans are probably unfamiliar with the federal government’s taxpayer-subsidized killing campaign carried out every year against public wildlife on public lands, most of them located in the West.
Most are probably unaware that their hard-earned money, paid in taxes to Uncle Sam, helps to operate a federal agency known as Wildlife Services, a branch of the US Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
One of Wildlife Service’s primary missions is functioning essentially as a protective hit squad for privately-owned cattle and sheep producers allowed to graze their animals on public land grass at rates that haven’t risen much in over half a century.
SHARE THIS:
TwitterFacebookLinkedInTumblrPinterestEmailWhatsApp
POSTED IN GRAY WOLF NEWS & ACTIONS | TAGGED CYANIDE BOMBS, KILLING WILDLIFE, LETHAL CONTROL, USF&WS, WILDLIFE SERVICES, WYOMING
ONE THOUGHT ON “”CYANIDE BOMBS” USED TO KILL WILD ANIMALS ARE BANNED IN WYOMING…”
5G was tested in Russia on humans & animals with disturbing results: what you are not being told – Dr Barrie Trower & Mark Steele discuss — The Most Revolutionary Act
Originally posted on Rangitikei Environmental Health Watch: “The USSR experimented on humans and animals with 5G in 1977, 1972 and 1997. A proper military experiment. The humans suffered metabolic problems, ie everything started to fall apart, blood problems, immune system dysfunction, severe medical and neurological problems. With animals, since they were able to dissect them,…
The Nuclear Option: Meteorologists, the Professional Fake Forecasters
The Nuclear Option: Meteorologists, the Professional Fake Forecasters
nuclear-option
CHARLES HURT7 Sep 2019
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/07/the-nuclear-option-meteorologists-the-professional-fake-forecasters/
President Trump defeated establishment Republicans and destroyed the Democrats. He has slain swamp kings along the banks of the Potomac. He stood up to Chinese President Xi Jinping, stiffed the mullahs of Iran and walked away from North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un. And he utterly humiliated the Great Political Pundits of 2016.
Now come the meteorologists.
Sheathed in their nerdy white lab coats and pocket protectors, armed with their little TV weather screen clickers, they are ready for battle against the Great Orange Force of Nature.
“Trump clings to idea Alabama faced big threat from Dorian,” blares The Associated Press headline about the first major hurricane of the Atlantic season.
The meteorologists declared it a Category 5 on Sept. 1. It was a Category 5 — until it wasn’t.
Meteorologists are in the business of getting predictions wrong. Why else does anyone watch the weather news — except for the hilarity of watching them get it wrong day after day after day? They predict sunshine, grab your umbrella.
Meteorologists are so deeply wedded to fake weather predictions that they make the Great Political Pundits of 2016 look like an army of Nostradamuses.
Just when you think it can’t get any more ridiculous, the world of fake news collides with the world of fake weather forecasts. Who could have seen that coming? Certainly not the meteorologists or political pundits.
Mr. Trump’s great crime here was, as usual, a tweet.
“In addition to Florida — South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated. Looking like one of the largest hurricanes ever. Already category 5. BE CAREFUL! GOD BLESS EVERYONE!”
Every shred of information included in the president’s tweet came directly from — that’s right — meteorologists. The very same meteorologists who then turned viciously against Mr. Trump as soon as their own predictions, as usual, turned into total fantasy.
One fake forecaster complained about Mr. Trump’s tweet in an email to the AP. “Alabama was never in the five-day cone except for a tiny sliver of the southeast corner of the state at one point.”
Seriously? This is the idiot’s complaint?
In other words, Alabama was never in the five-day cone except when it was. And how is it that somehow the “tiny sliver of the southeast corner” of Alabama is suddenly no longer “Alabama”?
No wonder these people dedicate so much of their lives to giving the American people fake weather forecasts.
Another weather faker complained that since Mr. Trump has such a massive Twitter following — far larger than even the largest fake weather “forecaster” — he needs to stick with only the latest fake forecasts.
“If he’s going to be a provider of up-to-date information, he needs to be up to date,” the fake forecaster sniveled.
In other words, leave the fake forecasting to the professional fake forecasters and only pass along the very latest fake forecast that all the professional fake forecasters currently agree upon.
Thank God for Donald J. Trump.
• Contact Charles Hurt at churt@washingtontimes.com or on Twitter @charleshurt.
Universal Background Checks Won’t Stop Criminals Getting Guns
In this Jan. 19, 2016 file photo, handguns are displayed at the Smith & Wesson booth at the Shooting, Hunting and Outdoor Trade Show in Las Vegas. Backers of an expanded gun background check ballot measure approved by Nevada voters in 2016 are arguing that the Nevada governor and attorney …AP Photo/John Locher, File
NRA: Universal Background Checks Won’t Stop Criminals Getting Guns
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/05/nra-universal-background-checks-wont-stop-criminals-getting-guns/
AWR HAWKINS5 Sep 2019
The NRA is warning universal background checks will not keep criminals from getting guns to use against innocents.
This warning comes as politicians as divergent as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) argue in favor of taking action against private gun sales. Patrick specifically argued that the NRA ought to get behind the effort to close the private sale “loophole.”
But the NRA notes that universal background checks are riddled with problems, not the least of which is that they will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns.
The NRA tweeted:
NRA
✔
@NRA
So-called “universal” background checks won’t stop criminals from obtaining guns, would criminalize private transfers and loans between friends and family, and is completely unenforceable. Criminals don’t follow the law.
A BIG NO FROM US! https://twitter.com/NBCDFW/status/1168969378660007936 …
NBC DFW
✔
@NBCDFW
Do you support universal background checks for all firearm purchases?
3,054
2:46 PM – Sep 4, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
1,473 people are talking about this
Down Range with AWR Hawkins. Sign up today!
Enter your email address
SIGN UP
The NRA also notes universal background checks make it difficult for guns to be transferred between friends and family. Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) made this same point earlier in the week by citing a Houston woman who was able to save herself from alleged robbers by pulling her handgun and shooting the suspect. He noted, “With universal background checks, I wouldn’t be able to let my friends borrow my handgun when they travel alone like this. We would make felons out of people just for defending themselves.”
California has had universal background checks since the early 1990s, yet criminals in that state continue to be armed.
On December 9, 2018, Breitbart News reported California’s firearm homicides witnessed an 18 percent rise in firearm homicides from 2014 to 2016. How is this possible with universal background checks in place, unless such checks do not actually prevent criminals from getting and/or possessing guns?
AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.
VIOLATIONS OF OATHS OF OFFICE GROUNDS FOR IMPEACHMENT OF CONGRESSMEN
Contrary to the below article, this idiot news person should study our constitution, and what it means, and what it means to swear an Oath to Office.
Congress’s Oath:
https://www.thoughtco.com/oaths-of-office-for-federal-officials-3368324
The current oath was enacted in 1884. It reads:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
US Senate Oath of Office:
https://www.cop.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Oath_Office.htm
Oath of Office
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Oath of Office
https://www.thoughtco.com/oaths-of-office-for-federal-officials-3368324
Each Supreme Court Justice takes the following oath:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
The Oaths don’t say “only when we feel like it”, or “except for what we disagree with”.
These entities working for We the People, must be removed from office for violating their oaths of office.
WASHINGTON — If President Donald Trump is serious about strengthening gun laws in the wake of two mass shootings, he should demand that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell put a House-passed bill strengthening background checks up for a vote, congressional Democrats said Monday. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said the Senate GOP leader is blocking gun safety reforms that more than 90% of Americans support. He tweeted that McConnell, R-Ky., should “gavel the Senate into emergency session to take immediate […]
via Democrats: Pres. Trump should demand Senate vote on gun bill — FOX6Now.com
AMERICA, LOVE IT, LEAVE IT, DEFEND IT, or DESTROY IT… By Roybeaird’s Blog
AMERICA, LOVE IT, LEAVE IT, DEFEND IT, or DESTROY IT…
Jul 26
by roybeaird
AMERICA, LOVE IT, LEAVE IT, DEFEND IT, or DESTROY IT…
Those seem to be our choices in today’s politics. We either love America, hate America, want to stay, want to leave, are willing to defend or want to ‘fundamentally transform’ which is liberal leftist speak for destroy. Which is it for you? Some will take immediate offense and say, “Well, I’m standing on principles and Trump is the biggest problem in America.” Others will say, “We have the right to differ in our opinions.” I agree with the last statement but not the first.
I believe that today’s political climate makes our choice binary on one hand and necessitates the effort to purge the ranks of both major political parties on the other. That’s how I see it and you can agree, disagree, or be indifferent, your choice. The antics and rhetoric of today’s politicians make me want to regurgitate and find a quiet place to get away from it all. Sadly, that is not an option, due to the seriousness of this battle and what is at stake.
In war, you cannot just take a break and call ‘time-out’ expecting the enemy to honor your temporary respite and truce. No, you fight to the finish! In playing sports, I discovered that winners never quit and never take a play off, but give it their all 100% of the time. I have found in business that those who succeed do not put their efforts and plans on the shelf and take breaks, they continually, even in getaway time, they think and plan their next move. I have found in relationships, that you cannot just take a break and not put your heart into the development of the relationship, you are always alert and engaged.
In life and in spiritual matters, when we discover we are in a war for survival, we draw strength we did not know we had and a fight. I have served in combat in the military and in a firefight, you don’t take a break. There is no coexistence with evil and there is no compromise with those who want to destroy our Republic and transform it into something other than what it was designed to be and has been for over 240 years. America and our Freedom is a prize that must not be lost.
In the most recent antics of the Democrats in the never-ending, ‘Get Trump’ coup and investigations we saw, more clearly than ever, the charade for what it is. Trump was not inaccurate when he called this a ‘Witch Hunt.’ Robert Mueller demonstrated his lack of knowledge, apparent lack of involvement, and his complicity in the coup attempt. His almost incoherent displays, his lack of understanding what took place, his blankness on Fusion GPS, and his delays in ridding his team of those hand-picked Democrats who were exposed for their bias was troubling and revealing.
It was incredibly revealing when he responded to Representative Doug Collins of Georgia whether collusion and conspiracy were synonymous. He said, “No.” When challenged about that position contradicting his report, where he said they were largely synonymous he said, “Not when I read it.” What? I thought you wrote it, what do you mean when you read it? His apparent lack of knowledge about Fusion GPS was astounding. That was the group that Hillary Clinton’s team paid to produce the salacious and unverified Steel dossier, a key part of the entire premise for the investigation. He didn’t know who they were? Where have you been for two-years, Mr. Mueller?
The Democrats are, in my opinion, ‘beating a dead horse’ and a horse that had nothing to do with the Russian ‘so-called’ tampering in the 2016 elections. Was there tampering? Absolutely. Was it by the Russians? I do not know how much they tampered but the amount that the Obama administration, the DNC, and the Clinton’s engaged in was mountainous.
Who actually ran the investigation? I suspect it was Andrew Weismann. Mueller declared that his investigation did not exonerate the president and he could still be prosecuted when he leaves office. First, the investigator does not exonerate or convict anyone. That is not his job. Although that is what Comey attempted to do for Hillary. The Attorney General does not have the constitutional or legal power to exonerate anyone. Therefore, that statement by Mr. Mueller was designed as a missile launched to harm the president in public perception not rooted in good investigative or prosecutorial actions. It was political!
Representative Mike Turner of Ohio offered the line of the day when he said to Mr. Mueller, “You have no more power to declare him (Trump) exonerated than you have to declare him Anderson Cooper.” That caused me to double up in laughter. He continued with some pertinent thoughts, “The statement about exoneration is misleading and meaningless and colors this investigation. One word out of the entire portion of your report and it’s a meaningless word that has no legal meaning and it has colored your entire report.” Bravo, Representative Turner, Bravo!
When Representative Ted Lieu of California attempted to make the non-indictment an issue and insinuated that Mr. Mueller would have indicted had Trump not been president. Mueller seemed to concur. Then, Representative Debbie Lesko of Arizona exposed the inconsistency and hypocrisy of Muller’s consorting with Representative Lieu about his own report declaring “his office could not come to a conclusion one way or the other on obstruction of justice.” Attorney General Barr had exposed Mueller’s attempt to offer innuendo rather than investigative conclusions. Mueller tried to backtrack on his response to Mr. Lieu but that was too little too late.
Mueller either lied or had a tremendous lapse in memory about his interview for the FBI Director’s job and being turned down the day before his unfortunate appointment to the office of Special Counsel.
With the ‘so-called’ Squad, the Four-Horsewoman of the Apocalypse ranting about America the pot is being stirred. The POTUS hopefuls of the Left wanting to destroy our system of government and economics, the border issues, and more, we are in a fight for survival. Some accuse me of being a Trump cultist, a bot, an apologist for him, and a Trump worshipper. None of those are accurate but if that’s what you think, then that’s what you think.
I have never called Donald Trump a true Conservative. But in viewing our past presidents, back to Reagan, he has done more for conservative principles and the American people than anyone since Reagan.
He can be ruthless in deals and also compassionate with people. He is a New York City street fighter in his attitude and if pushed he pushes back. He is not the nation’s pastor or spiritual leader, but he has demonstrated a willingness to fight for us. More good has been done for America and the American people of all ethnicities in three years than in the 16 years of Obama and Clinton or the 8 of George W. Bush. I voted for Him in 2016 and, at this point, plan to do so again in 2020. Why? Because I love America and know the Democrats if allowed to win, will destroy that which we love.
God bless you and God bless America!
Pew: 91% Democrats see violence next in the war of words — Jim Campbell’s
Comment by Jim Campbell July 20th, 2019 Ordinarily I pay little attention to polls, this one reeks of their despondency. Logically, the results of Pew’s findings make sense. Left with no plan, fear of facts and a willing press as their accomplices taking it to the streets would be a rational thought for irrational people. […]
via Pew: 91% Democrats see violence next in the war of words — Jim Campbell’s
Copied From Trigger Reset.net: Maine: Somali Muslim “Refugees” Roam Streets Randomly Attacking Americans…
Maine: Somali Muslim “Refugees” Roam Streets Randomly Attacking Americans…
Maine: Somali Muslim “Refugees” Roam Streets Randomly Attacking Americans…
Going out on a limb here, but perhaps importing hordes of third-world people with an average IQ of 68 who adhere to a violent, murderous “religion” into a civilized, Christian nation was, shall we say…stupid.
Governments are supposed to PROTECT their citizens, not INFECT them.
LEWISTON -In the early evening on the first day of summer, a large group of Somali boys approached a woman on the corner of Ash and Pierce streets.
According to police reports, they intimidated the woman and slapped her in the back of the head before scattering into the downtown.
Five days later, shortly after midnight, a man was accosted by a group of Somali boys outside the Big Apple on Main Street. Police reports say several members of the group punched the man and took money from him. They then fled in a car.
Later that night, a woman in her late 60s was beaten by a group of Somali boys and relieved of cash while walking in Kennedy Park.
Five nights later, another man was jumped by a group of similar description. He resisted the gang and was beaten badly. He required surgery.
Throughout the summer, similar reports have come into the Police Department. Witnesses and investigators say swarms of Somali boys, some as young as 8, others in their late teens, overwhelm solitary victims through sheer numbers.
“It’s not gang activity in the traditional sense,” Deputy Chief James Minkowsky said. “We’re not seeing the colors or the monikers, but it’s still a gang mentality.”
Often, these gang members carry sticks and rocks with which to intimidate their victims. There are often four or five of them, sometimes as many as a dozen. Typically, they threaten or beat their victims until they give up the goods: money, bicycles, cell phones, prescription drugs, or other items of value.
Then they scatter.
“By the time the call gets to us, the group has dispersed,” Minkowsky said.
The attacks continued all summer; more than a dozen were reported to police. There were more in the fall and a series of them in recent weeks. In each attack, the victim is one who may have appeared weak to the group that descended on them.
“They single out a person who is walking alone. The victim is often intoxicated,” Minkowsky said. “Or he might be small. They look for someone who is not likely to fight back or present much of a challenge.”
On the first day of December, a man walking through Kennedy Park after leaving a Park Street club said he was attacked by four Somali males. The group came at him from behind, knocked him down and stole prescription drugs and $150 in cash. That man told police it was the second time he was attacked in such a fashion. The first time, he was able to escape.
On the last day of November, there were three such attacks reported in Lewiston: one in the area of Central Maine Medical Center, another on Bartlett Street, the third in Kennedy Park.
In another attack, a woman walking a dog in the park was set upon. The assailants, a group of Somali males, beat her dog with a stick. Police later tracked down one of the attackers. He was a 10-year-old boy.
In late summer, an off-duty civilian police employee was eating at a local restaurant. A local boy ran to the window, screaming for help. The police employee ran outside and found a group — roughly a half-dozen — of Somali boys. When confronted, they ran off.
Police say they are investigating the attacks on several fronts. They are using new technology and new techniques. A bigger break came in recent weeks when they were approached by a group that wants to help.
“Members of the Somali community came to us,” Minkowsky says. “They set up a meeting with us and came in to talk about it. They want to help us combat it.”
Police Chief Michael Bussiere pointed out that the attackers do not appear to involve large segments of the Somali population. It seems to be a select group that has organized to carry out the attacks.
Police say group robberies are almost unheard of in Lewiston. In the past, when multiple people have attacked a lone victim, two or three assailants were reported and the assault was typically prompted by intoxication or old rivalries.
Not so with the Somali attacks.
“We haven’t seen that it’s been fueled by alcohol or drugs,” Minkowsky said. He added that robbery appears to be a primary motivation among the Somali gangs. “But in some cases, they seem to do it for the thrill of it.”
Stephen Wessler, director of the Center for the Prevention of Hate Violence, said he was not aware of the Somali assaults in Lewiston. After hearing the nature of them, he said the attacks likely were not the type that involve his group. The motive appears to be robbery, rather than race.
While investigating the ambush-style attacks, police have little to compare them with, at least locally. A search of assaults dating back to spring revealed no incidents of a similar nature involving non-Somalis.
“This is unique,” Minkowsky said.
There have been a few arrests since the attacks began. Minkowsky said many of the suspects had dropped out of school. Their parents seemed to have no idea that their children had become part of a roving gang.
Seeing children as young as 8 running the streets with teens closing in on 20 is something police are not used to seeing. There is a lot about the attacks investigators have not seen before.
Via: SunJournal
Just a day at the park…with the happy Somalian “refugees”…
Editor’s note: YouTube took the original down for “dangerous content”…Because the TRUTH is dangerous, I suppose. If they remove it again, let me know and I’ll re-post it if possible.
Trigger Reset.net is COMMITTED to getting the truth out to Americans.
Thank you, Frank N. Blunt.
The Heart of Darkness: The Sexual Predators Within America’s Power Elite | The Most Important News — Truth2Freedom’s Blog
(By John W. Whitehead) As I documented in the in-depth piece I wrote earlier this year, child sex trafficking—the buying and selling of women, young girls and boys for sex, some as young as 9 years old—has become big business in America. It is the fastest growing business in organized crime and the second most-lucrative […]
Lt. Col. Allen West Says ‘Pelosi Just … Committed a High Crime and Misdemeanor’ — depolreablesunite
H/T Western Journal. While Lt. Colonel Allen West is correct nothing will happen to Pelosi for two reasons one Delusional DemocRats control the House and our two-tiered justice system looks the other way for Delusional Democrats and the rich. San Fran Nan is both rich and a Delusional DemocRat. President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed […]
via Lt. Col. Allen West Says ‘Pelosi Just … Committed a High Crime and Misdemeanor’ — depolreablesunite
KOMMONSENTSJANE – IT IS TIME FOR ILLEGALS TO WAKE UP. YOU ARE BREAKING THE U.S. LAWS. — kommonsentsjane
If you are living under those circumstances – you should be worried because you are breaking the laws of this country. No matter what country you are from – you should respect the laws of the U.S.. You are an uninvited guest who is BREAKING LAW AND WHAT MAKES YOU THINK IT IS OKAY. When […]
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Chief of Staff Saikat Chakrabarti wore a t-shirt bearing the face of Subhas Chandra Bose, a staunch collaborator of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime.
AOC’s Chief of Staff Wears Shirt Supporting Fascist Nazi Collaborator.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Chief of Staff Saikat Chakrabarti wore a t-shirt bearing the face of Subhas Chandra Bose, a staunch collaborator of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime.
AOC’s Chief of Staff Wears Shirt Supporting Fascist Nazi Collaborator.
By Ian Miles Cheong
July 9, 2019
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Chief of Staff has shown support for a controversial Indian leader known for his long-time collaboration with both Imperial Japan and Adolf Hitler.
Bose described his ideology as “a synthesis of what modern Europe calls socialism and fascism.”
Saikat Chakrabarti, who previously supported Bernie Sanders’ bid for the White House in 2016, entered public politics with a series of tweets slamming Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for belittling her freshman colleagues and losing to the Republicans.
Following his brief brush with fame, the AOC staffer has posed in a t-shirt printed with the likeness of early 20th century politician Subhas Chandra Bose.
As twice-elected leader of the Indian National Congress, Bose called for the violent overthrow of India’s British government, but was forced to resign following opposition from Mohandas Gandhi.
At the dawn of the Second World War, Bose established diplomatic ties with authoritarian regimes, including the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and Imperial Japan.
Bose was a fierce proponent of both Hitler’s national socialist ideology and Stalin’s version of communism. Bose described his ideology as “a synthesis of what modern Europe calls socialism and fascism.” During his exile from India, Bose penned laws that demanded a death sentence for anyone who defied his future rule. He intended to rule India for at least 20 years following its liberation from British rule.
Despite this, Bose continues to be a celebrated figure amongst Indian nationalists.
At the height of the war, Bose led the self-styled Indian National Army with heavy assistance from Imperial Japan.
He made use of slave labor made up of prisoners of war captured by the Japanese, and conscripted Indian POWs into the role of shock troops to support the Japanese invasion of Asia. His military campaigns against the British Commonwealth and Allied forces in the region were failures.
Chandra Bose meeting Hitler, 1942 (Wikimedia Commons)
Bose died in a plane crash in August 1945, just days before Japan’s unconditional surrender to the United States of America.
Despite his failures, he continues to be a celebrated figure among some Indian nationalists and members of the diaspora – among them Saikat Chakrabarti, who appears to idolize the controversial figure.
It is not known if Chakrabarti is aware of the full scope of Bose’s political leanings – or if he is simply wearing a shirt with Bose’s face on it the same way leftists celebrate the memory of Che Guevara by wearing t-shirts with his face on them.
Chakrabarti’s reverence for Chandra Bose is the perfect accompaniment to Ocasio-Cortez’s recent quoting of Argentina’s Eva Perón, whose sympathies for the Nazis are well documented.
Ian Miles Cheong is the managing editor of Human Events
Mueller Has Big Problem: 2016 Interview Could Provide Manafort Appeal This is very big and could get Manafort out of jail for good.
Mueller Has Big Problem: 2016 Interview Could Provide Manafort Appeal
This is very big and could get Manafort out of jail for good.
by Georgette
Mueller could be in huge trouble!
John Solomon is right in the thick of things in the Beltway… his latest revelation could spell big trouble for Robert Mueller’s congressional testimony because it could expose the orchestrated set-up of Donald Trump.
For the Hill, Solomon reported:
Sometimes it is the quiet, elusive ones who come back to haunt you. And for ex-special prosecutor Robert Mueller, one of those might be a Russian billionaire named Oleg Deripaska.
The oligarch who once controlled Russia’s largest aluminum empire has been an international man of intrigue in the now-completed and disproven Trump collusion investigation.
Deripaska was a disaffected former business client of Donald Trump’s fallen campaign chairman Paul Manafort. He also was a legal research client of Trump-hating, Clinton-aiding British spy Christopher Steele. In his spare time, he was an occasional friendly cooperator with the FBI and its fired deputy director, Andrew McCabe.
And, at the height of the Russia collusion hysteria, Deripaska was sanctioned by the Trump administration to financially punish Russian President Vladimir Putin for his meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
With the Russia case, in which he had so many connections, now completed, Deripaska is breaking his silence. And what he has to say could impact Mueller’s July 17 testimony before Congress.
In a wide-ranging interview with me, Deripaska confirmed a story told to me more than a year ago by law enforcement sources: He was indeed interviewed by FBI agents in September 2016 during the early Russia probe, and he told them he strongly doubted the bureau’s theory that the Trump campaign, through Manafort, was colluding with Moscow to hijack the 2016 election.
“I told them straightforward, ‘Look, I am not a friend with him [Manafort]. Apparently not, because I started a court case [against him] six or nine months before … . But since I’m Russian I would be very surprised that anyone from Russia would try to approach him for any reason, and wouldn’t come and ask me my opinion,’ ” he said, recounting exactly what he says he told the FBI agents that day.
“I told them straightforward, I just don’t believe that he would represent any Russian interest. And knowing what he’s doing on Ukraine for the last, what, seven or eight years.”
OK, so why should you care if a Russian denied Trump campaign collusion with Russia during the election?
First, Deripaska wasn’t just any Russian. He was closely aligned with Putin and had been helpful to the FBI as far back as 2009. So he had earned some trust with the agents.
Most importantly, Deripaska’s interview with the FBI reportedly was never provided by Team Mueller to Manafort’s lawyers, even though it was potential proof of innocence, according to Manafort defense lawyer Kevin Downing. Manafort, initially investigated for collusion, was convicted on tax and lobbying violations unrelated to the Russia case.
That omission opens a possible door for appeal for what is known as a Brady violation, for hiding exculpatory information from a defendant.
“Recent revelations by The Hill prove that the Office of Special Counsel’s (OSC) claim that they had a legitimate basis to include Paul Manafort in an investigation of potential collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and the Russian government is false,” Downing told me. “The failure to disclose this information to Manafort, the courts, or the public reaffirms that the OSC did not have a legitimate basis to investigate Manafort, and may prove that the OSC had no legitimate basis to investigate potential collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and the Russian government.”
Deripaska’s second relevance to Mueller’s congressional hearings has to do with a series of events that first gained him trust inside the FBI.
Deripaska confirmed a story I reported last year from FBI sources that he spent more than $20 million of his own money between 2009 and 2011 on a private rescue operation to free Robert Levinson, a retired FBI agent captured in Iran in 2007 while on a CIA mission.
Deripaska confirmed he paid for the operation at the request of the FBI, which was then under Mueller’s direction. And he added that McCabe, then a rising FBI supervisor who was a former colleague of Levinson and later became a key figure in the Russia collusion probe, was one of those who asked him to help.
“I was approached, you know, by someone that he is under a lot of scrutiny now — McCabe,” Deripaska said. “He also said that it was important enough for all of them [FBI officials]. And I kind of trusted them.”
Deripaska said his privately funded rescue team came very close to a deal with the Iranian captors to secure Levinson’s release but he was told by his FBI handlers that the deal ran into difficulties at Hillary Clinton’s State Department and was scuttled. “I heard that some Russian ‘hand,’ or whatever you call people who are expert on the Russians at the State Department, [said], ‘We just don’t want to owe anything to this guy,’ ” Deripaska told me, adding that he never expected any U.S. favors for his personal efforts to free Levinson.
Asked if he thought the former FBI agent is alive, some dozen years later, Deripaska answered: “I don’t think so.” He pointed out that if Levinson had been alive, he likely would have come home in 2016, after the Obama administration struck a nuclear deal with Iran.
Deripaska said he is continuing to investigate what really happened at State with Levinson, as he tries to fight the sanctions levied against him in 2018. His company, Rusal, has been removed from the sanctions list.
Deripaska’s tale has the potential to raise questions about a conflict of interest, since Mueller’s FBI first received a gift in the form of the privately funded rescue mission before Mueller, as special prosecutor, investigated Deripaska’s ties to key figures in the Russia case.
And Deripaska’s complicated tale goes on: His legal team in 2012 hired Steele, the former British MI6 agent, to do some research for a lawsuit involving a business rival that Deripaska was fighting in London: “It was a research project to support what was the case against me in London. But my understanding is that the lawyers trusted him for some reason, and he was for quite a time on retainer.”
Deripaska was unaware, though, that Steele also was working for the FBI on, among other things, a special program to recruit Russian oligarchs to provide intelligence on Putin and Russian organized crime.
He told me that Steele invited him to a September 2015 meeting with some Justice Department officials, under the guise that they might be able to help with the Russian’s long-running battle with State to get visas to visit the U.S. He said the offer to help with his visa problem was a “pretext” to recruit him.
“They actually never talk, you know, about the [visa] problem. They start talking about anything else. They ask, ‘Do you have anything? Give me names. Cases, whatever,’ ” Deripaska recalled.
He said he later was shocked to learn that Steele eventually went to work for the Clinton campaign through Fusion GPS, and the FBI, and spread allegations of the now-disproven Russia-Trump collusion.
Deripaska’s willingness to do an American interview at this moment undoubtedly has a motive. It’s likely rooted in an American charm offensive, as he sues not only to reverse the sanctions that Trump imposed on him but to challenge the State Department’s 15-year effort to keep him from getting normal visas.
He recently won a lawsuit and forced State to produce the so-called evidence it used to justify denying him a visa for years and imposing the sanctions. It was a thinly sourced file, he said, mostly of old newspaper articles with no real secret intelligence.
So I asked him about the most common allegation levied by his detractors at State — that, earlier in his life while consolidating power in the aluminum industry, he had ties to Russian mobsters and may have killed or encouraged killing critics.
He quickly responded, noting that the file released by the courts offered no such direct proof: “There is no evidence. What is there to dispute? Do you believe that I could kill someone 25 years ago and there will be no victims, no corpses, no names?”
Throughout the interview, it was clear Deripaska chose his words in English carefully. But there was one word he offered only twice — once in response to the Steele dossier’s allegations of Trump-Russia collusion, and the other time to respond to the allegations used to sanction him. “Balderdash,” he insisted.
Now it’s time for Team Mueller to answer the same questions.
The BlackRobed Mafia 